Skip to main content
Log in

Bed boundary identification from well log data using Walsh transform technique: A case study from NGHP Expedition-02 in the Krishna–Godavari basin, India

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Identification of thin stratigraphic beds is often dealt with using the scale of core data analysis. The downhole wireline log data also provide accurate information on the characteristics of lithological boundaries. In the present study, we have used a Walsh low pass filter and bed boundary detection algorithm to develop an automated bed boundary identification approach. Initially, we ran a Walsh low pass filter against the wireline log responses. Afterwards, a bed boundary detection algorithm has been applied to the Walsh low pass filtered version of the wireline log data. The Walsh domain filter creates a stepped version of the well log data having a constant step width over the entire low pass version of the log signal. As the Walsh function basically represents the binary waveforms, the Walsh low pass filtering can appropriately identify the thin lithological units within a complex succession of sedimentary strata. Further, the proposed approach is an efficient way of resolving and understanding subsurface inhomogeneity from wireline log data. The feasibility of the technique is successfully tested on the downhole wireline log data acquired from the Krishna–Godavari basin during the Expedition 02 of Indian National Gas Hydrate Program (MGHP).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aboosadi Z A, Rooeentan S and Adibifar M 2018 Estimation of subsurface petrophysical properties using different stochastic algorithms in nonlinear regression analysis of pressure transients; J. Appl. Geophys. 154 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali M, Paul S and Chatterjee R 2017 Cleat orientation from ground mapping and image log studies for in-situ stress analysis: Coal bed methane exploration in South Karanpura Coalfield, India; Energy Fuels 31(7) 6812–6824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auduson E A 2018 Petro-elastic modelling and characterization of solid-filled reservoirs: Comparative analysis on a Triassic North Sea reservoir; J. Appl. Geophys. 154 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bath M 1974 Spectral Analysis in Geophysics; Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp K G 1975 Walsh Function and Their Applications; Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee R, Datta Gupta S and Mandal P P 2017 Fracture and stress orientation from borehole image logs: A case study from Cambay Basin, India; J. Geol. Soc. India 89(5) 573–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury S, Chandrasekar E, Pandey K V and Prasad M 2007 Use of wavelet transform for geophysical well-log data analysis; In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Digital Signal, pp. 647–650. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdsp.2007.4288665.

  • Das B and Chatterjee R 2018 Well log data analysis for lithology and fluid identification in Krishna-Godavari Basin, India; Arab. J. Geosci. 11 231–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das B, Chatterjee R, Singha D K and Kumar R 2017 Post-stack seismic inversion and attribute analysis in shallow offshore of Krishna-Godavari Basin, India; J. Geol. Soc. India 90 32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewan J T 1983 Essentials of Modern open-Hole Log Interpretation; PennWell Publishing Company, Tulsa, OK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doveton J H 1986 Log Analysis of Subsurface Geology Concepts and Computer Methods; Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillot P, Brewer T, Pezard P and Yeh E 2007 Borehole imaging tools – Principles and applications; Scientific Drilling, 5. https://doi.org/10.2204/iodp.sd.5.07s1.2007.

  • Gogoi T and Chatterjee R 2018 Estimation of petrophysical parameters using seismic inversion and neural network modeling in Upper Assam Basin, India; Geosci. Front. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2018.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmuth H F 1968 Sequency filters based on Walsh functions; IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 10 293–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh B Z, Lewis C and Lin Z S 2005 Lithology identification of aquifers from geophysical well logs and fuzzy logic analysis: Shui-Lin Area, Taiwan; Comput. Geosci. 31 263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jianping Y, Hongpeng Y and Haiyun X 2011 Identifying fracture by time-frequency analysis of well logs; In: International Conference on Computational and Information Sciences (ICCIS), pp. 652–654.

  • Keating P 1992 Density mapping from gravity data using the Walsh transform; Geophysics 57 637–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoshbakht F, Rasaie M R and Shekarifard A 2017 Improving petrophysical interpretation of conventional log by determination of real bed boundaries; J. Sci. Islamic Repub. Iran 28(2) 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Yamada Y, Furutani A, Vishwanath K and Collett T and NGHP-02 Operation & Science Party 2016 India National Gas Hydrate Program R & D Expedition 02 Comprehensive Post Expedition Report.

  • Lanning E N and Johnson D M 1983 Automated identification of rock boundaries: An application of the Walsh transform to geophysical well-log analysis; Geophysics 48 197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maiti S and Tiwari R K 2005 Automatic detection of lithologic boundaries using the Walsh transform: A case study from the KTB borehole; Comput. Geosci. 31(8) 949–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maiti S and Tiwari R K 2012 Modeling of rock boundary using Walsh domain sequency filtering: An example from the German Continental Deep Drilling Program (KTB) borehole site; In: 9th Biennial International Conference & Exposition on Petroleum Geophysics, P-19, pp. 1–7.

  • Mukherjee B and Roy P N S 2016 Comparative study of unconventional tools in reservoir characterisation. Case study from Bhogpara, N–E, India; J. Geophys. 37(2) 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal C P 1991 A Walsh sequency filtration method for integrating the resistivity log and sounding data; Geophysics 56(8) 1259–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw R K and Agarwal B N P 1990 The application of Walsh transforms to interpret gravity anomalies due to some simple geometrically shaped causative sources: A feasibility study; Geophysics 55 843–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw R K, Agarwal B N P and Nandi B K 1998 Walsh spectra of gravity anomalies over some simple sources; J. Appl. Geophys. 40 179–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singha D K and Chatterjee R 2015 Geomechanical modeling using finite element method for prediction of in-situ stress in Krishna-Godavari basin, India; Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. 73 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singha D and Chatterjee R 2017 Rock physics modeling in sand reservoir through well log analysis, Krishna-Godavari basin, India; Geomech. Eng. 13(1) 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singha D K, Chatterjee R, Sen M K and Sain K 2014 Pore pressure prediction in gas-hydrate bearing sediments of Krishna-Godavari Basin in, India; Mar. Geol. 357 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu W and Grana D 2017 Integrated petrophysics and rock physics modeling for well log interpretation of elastic, electrical, and petrophysical properties; J. Appl. Geophys. 146 54–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the director, CSIR-National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad for permission (Ref. No: NGRI/Lib/2019/Pub-54), and place a record of gratitude to the Director, Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology to publish this work. We are grateful to the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas (Government of India), Oil India Limited (OIL), Gas Authority of India Limited (GAIL), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) and all other NGHP partner organisations for providing the opportunity to contribute to the NGHP-02 Expedition. The technical and science support from Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), United States Geological Survey (USGS), U.S. Department of Energy (US-DOE), the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Geotek Coring and Schlumberger is gratefully acknowledged. The author also acknowledges the anonymous reviewers for improving the manuscript. Bappa Mukherjee, gratefully acknowledges the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB/PDF/2017/001331), the Government of India, for sponsoring this work. The Ministry of Earth Sciences is acknowledged for extending support in pursuing the research on gas hydrates at CSIR-NGRI. This is contributed to the in-house project MLP-6402-28(KS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kalachand Sain.

Additional information

Communicated by N V Chalapathi Rao

Corresponding editor: N V Chalapathi Rao

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mukherjee, B., Sain, K. Bed boundary identification from well log data using Walsh transform technique: A case study from NGHP Expedition-02 in the Krishna–Godavari basin, India. J Earth Syst Sci 128, 214 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-019-1240-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-019-1240-4

Keywords

Navigation