Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of graphene oxide on the mechanical, thermal and roughness of polyethersulphone

  • Published:
Bulletin of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Polyethersulphone (PES) is a prominent engineering plastic and its characteristics must be increased because of its promise functions in the aviation, vehicle industries and even sports fields. In this study, PES, and PES/graphene oxide (GO) composites are organized using extrusion blending methods. In this study, GO loading is suggested to increase PES composites’ mechanical characteristics, dimensional strength and cryogenic engineering applications. The dynamic mechanical analysis displays that the loss and storage modulus of composites successfully increase with the GO inclusion, suggesting that the GO loading causes a powerful interfacial contact among the PES structure. The optimum GO loading for developing overall composite mechanical efficiency is 0.5 wt%. It has been shown that GO inclusion improves the cryogenic mechanical characteristics. Besides, the cryogenic mechanical characteristics of PES and its composites at –70°C have been seen to be much superior to those at room temperature. The impact of GO loadings on the morphology and efficiency of the composites was studied by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fei L, Yu L, Cheng B Q, Hong M X, Yang H, Guo X S et al 2015 J. Polym. 59 155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Linlin D, Yuanming W, Yatao Z and Jindun L 2015 J. Appl. Surf. Sci. 355 436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sirus Z, Vahid V, Ali A Z, Masoud R, Zahra R and Mohsen K 2015 J. Water Process Eng. 7 280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fei L, Yang H, Cheng B Q, Hong M X and Shao Y F 2016 J. Compos. Part A 89 47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Efosa I, Yaolin F, Ramamoorthy M, Kimberly L J and Vernon M 2016 J. Compos. Sci. 514 518

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sabet M and Soleimani H 2020 J. Polym. Sci. Series A 61 922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Saeed E, Shahram M B, Hadi A, Mohammad P, Faranak A and Toraj M 2016 J. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. I09 647

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sen S D, Fei L, Hong M X, Yuan Q L, Ning H and Shao Y F 2016 J. Compos. Part B 99 407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Aditya S K, Lukka Y T, Arthanareeswaran G, Matsuura T and Ismail A F 2016 Chem. Eng. J. 286 528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Prince J A, Bhuvana S, Anbharasi V, Ayyanar N and Boodhoo K V K 2016 J. Water Res. 103 311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Safarpoura M, Vatanpour V and Khataee A 2016 J. Desalination 393 65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sabet M, Soleimani H and Hosseini S 2020 J. Polym. Bull. 77 459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fei L, Cheng B Q, Yang H, Hong M X and Shao Y F u 2017 J. Carbon 119 339

  14. Modi A, Verma S K and Bellare J 2017 J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 504 86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Modi A, Verma S K and Bellare J 2018 J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 514 750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Abdi G, Alizadeh A, Zinadini S and Moradi G 2018 J. Compos. Sci. 552 326

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sabet M, Soleimani H, Mohammadian E and Hosseini S 2020 J. Mater. Perform. Charact. 9 284

    Google Scholar 

  18. Karim A A, Leaper S, Alberto M, Vijayaraghavan A, Fan X, Holmes S M et al 2018 Chem. Eng. J. 334 789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bagheripour E, Moghadassia A R, Hosseini S M, Bruggen B V D and Parvizian F 2018 J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 62 311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu L, Yan F, Li M, Zhang M, Xiao L, Shang L et al 2018 J. Compos. Part A 114 418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Algamdi M S, Alsohaimi I H, Lawler J, Ali H M, Aldawsari A M and Hassan H M A 2019 J. Sep. Purif. Technol. 223 17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sabet M, Soleimani H, Mohammadian E and Hosseini S 2020 Iran. Polym. J. 29 1099

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang X, Feng M, Liu Y, Deng H and Lu J 2019 J. Compos. Sci. 577 41

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kong S, Lim M Y, Shin H, Baik J H and Lee J C 2020 J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 84 131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jafarian F, Bordbar A K, Razmjou A and Zare A 2020 J. Compos. Sci. 613 118435

  26. Sabet M, Soleimani H, Hosseini S and Mohammadian E 2021 J. High Perform. Polym. 33 165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Eduardo L S, Gonçalves J, Lemos H G, Venancio E C, Mierzwa J C, Souza J D S D et al 2020 Chem. Eng. J. 390 124612

  28. Ndlwana L, Motsa M M and Mamba B B 2020 Eur. Polym. J. 136 109889

  29. Vatanpour V, Khadem S S M, Dehqan A, Naqshabandi M A A, Ganjali M R, Hassani S S et al 2021 J. Chemosphere 263 127892

  30. Sun X, Liu X and Li F 2021 J. Appl. Surf. Sci. 551 149438

  31. Sabet M, Soleimani H, Mohammadian E and Hosseini S 2021 J. Plast. Rubber Compos. 50 61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Karimipour H, Shahbazi A and Vatanpour V 2021 J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9 104849

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maziyar Sabet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabet, M., Soleimani, H. Influence of graphene oxide on the mechanical, thermal and roughness of polyethersulphone. Bull Mater Sci 45, 42 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-021-02615-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-021-02615-y

Keywords

Navigation