Skip to main content
Log in

Surface conductivity of binary carbonate as a performance-governing parameter of an electrochemical CO2 gas sensor

  • Published:
Bulletin of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

In electrochemical CO2 gas sensor, the chemical potential of electrolyte changes on adsorption of CO2 molecules as the process involves catalytic electron transfer. In addition, it is the rate-determining step that decides sensor’s response. In this study, in-situ bulk AC, DC and surface electronic conductivities of CaCO3 + Li2CO3 binary solid electrolyte were investigated at different temperatures and CO2 gas partial pressures using complex impedance spectroscopy, Wagner’s DC polarization technique and four-probe method, respectively. For the four-probe conductivity measurements with crucial requirement of high temperatures and test gas variations, a customized sample holder was designed and fabricated having gold-plated equidistant, spring-loaded electrodes and localized heating system (maximum 593 K). The AC bulk conductivity was found to decrease with rise in CO2 gas concentration (from 0.1 to 100%) by about two orders and one order of magnitudes at lower and higher temperatures, respectively. Similarly, surface conductivity variation with temperature also showed Arrhenius behaviour for both the concentrations of CO2 viz. 0.04 and 10%, giving lower value of activation enthalpy for lower CO2 concentration. The surface conductivity change in the presence of different concentrations of CO2 gas is justified by comparing with AC bulk conductivity measurements at different CO2 partial pressures and DC conductivity along with sensing response. The mechanism is explained using activated charge transfer data. The range of Ea values on adsorption of CO2 gas was found to be in the electronic excitation window, suggesting involvement of a new parameter to be investigated for non-Nernstian response of EC sensors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chandra S 1981 Super ionic solids: principles and applications (Amsterdam, North-Holland: Elsevier Science Ltd.) ISBN-13: 978-0444860392

  2. Ambekar P, Randhawa J and Singh K 2014 Adv. Sci. Lett. 20 565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Janata J and Huber R J (eds) 1985 Solid state chemical sensors (Orlando: Academic Press Inc.) ISBN: 0-12-380210-5

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dietz J H 1982 Solid State Ion 6 175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Josowicz M and Janata J 1988 Solid State Ion 28 1625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Weppner W 1986 Proc. 2nd Int. meeting on chemical sensors Bordeaux, France p 59

  7. Singh K, Ambekar P and Bhoga S S 2002 in Solid state ionics: trends in new millennium B V R Chowdhari et al (eds) (Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.) p 469

  8. Haynes W M 2010-11 in CRC handbook of chemistry and physics David R Lide and William M Haynes (eds) (Taylor & Francis) p 91

  9. Smits F M 1958 Bell Syst. Tech. J. 37 711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Scherrer P 1918 Gottinger Nachrichten Gecell. 2 98

    Google Scholar 

  11. Barin I 1993 Thermochemical data of pure substances 2nd edn (Weinheim: VCH) vol 1 and 2

  12. Starecki F, Charpentier F, Doualan J-L, Quetel L, Michel K, Chahal R et al 2015 Sensor Actuat. B Chem. 207 518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiong Y, Xue Q, Ling C, Lu W, Ding D, Zhu L et al 2017 Sensor Actuat. B Chem. 241 725

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ersöz B, Schmitt K and Wöllenstein J 2020 Sensor Actuat. B Chem. 317 128201

  15. Huang X J, Aldous L, O’Mahony A M, Campo F J D and Compton R G 2010 Anal. Chem. 82 5238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rezk M Y, Sharma J and Gartia M R 2020 Nanomaterials 10 2251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nafe H, R Waser, S Hoffmann, D Bonnenberg and Ch. Hoffmann (eds) 1994 Electroceramics IV (Germany: University of Technology) (vol II) p 745

  18. Randhawa J B, Ambekar P, Singh K and Bhoga S S 2004 Ionics 10 45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hariharan K and Maier J 1995 J. Electrochem. Soc. 142 3469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. https://en.gassensor.com.cn/index.html

  21. https://www.vaisala.com/sites/default/files/documents/GMW80-Series-Datasheet-B211435EN.pdf

  22. https://www.electronicscomp.com/gas-sensor/mg811-air-carbon-dioxide-co2-sensor-module

  23. Hunter G W and Xu J C 2008 US Patent nos. 8,702,962 and 8,052,854, https://technology.nasa.gov/patent/LEW-TOPS-59

Download references

Acknowledgement

UGC Western Regional Office, Pune, is greatly acknowledged for financial support in carry out this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prashant Ambekar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ambekar, P., Randhawa, J. Surface conductivity of binary carbonate as a performance-governing parameter of an electrochemical CO2 gas sensor. Bull Mater Sci 44, 235 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-021-02526-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-021-02526-y

Keywords

Navigation