Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk Factors Associated with Infections and Need for Permanent Cerebrospinal Fluid Diversion in Pediatric Intensive Care Patients with Externalized Ventricular Drains

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Externalized ventricular drains (EVDs) are commonly used in pediatric intensive care units (PICU) but few data are available regarding infection rates, infection risks, or factors associated with conversion to permanent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion.

Methods

Retrospective observational study of patients managed with EVDs admitted to a tertiary care PICU from January 2005 to December 2009.

Results

Three hundred eighty patients were identified. Neurologic diagnostic groups were externalization of existing shunt in 196 patients (52 %), brain tumor in 122 patients (32 %), intracranial hemorrhage in 23 patients (6 %), traumatic brain injury in 17 patients (5 %), meningitis in 9 patients (2 %), or other in 13 patients (3 %). Six percent of all patients (24/380) had new infections associated with EVD management for an infection rate of 8.6 per 1,000 catheter days. The median time to positive cultures was 7 days (interquartile range 4.75, 9) after EVD placement. Patients with EVD infections had significantly longer EVD duration 6 versus 11.5 days (p = 0.0001), and higher maximum EVD outputs 1.9 versus 1.5 mL/kg/h (p = 0.0017). Need for permanent CSF diversion was associated with higher maximum EVD drainage (1.3 vs. 1.6 mL/kg/h p < 0.0001), longer EVD duration (5 vs. 4 days, p < 0.005), and younger age (4.5 vs. 8 years, p < 0.02) but not intracranial hypertension (72 vs. 82 % of patients, p = 0.4).

Conclusions

In our large pediatric cohort, EVD infections were associated with longer EVD duration and higher maximum EVD output. Permanent CSF diversion was more likely in patients with higher maximum EVD drainage, longer EVD duration, and younger age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell MJ, Carpenter J, Au AK, et al. Development of a pediatric neurocritical care service. Neurocrit Care. 2009;10:4–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lozier AP, Sciacca RR, Romagnoli MF, Connolly ES Jr. Ventriculostomy-related infections: a critical review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:170–81 discussion 81–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ngo QN, Ranger A, Singh RN, Kornecki A, Seabrook JA, Fraser DD. External ventricular drains in pediatric patients. Pediatr Critical Care Med. 2009;10:346–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim JH, Desai NS, Ricci J, et al. Factors contributing to ventriculostomy infection. World Neurosurg. 2012;77:135–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bota DP, Lefranc F, Vilallobos HR, Brimioulle S, Vincent JL. Ventriculostomy-related infections in critically ill patients: a 6 years experience. J Neurosurg. 2005;103:468–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mayhall CG, Archer NH, Lamb VA, et al. Ventriculostomy-related infections. A prospective epidemiologic study. N Engl J Med. 1984;310:553–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Khalil BA, Sarsam Z, Buxton N. External ventricular drains: is there a time limit in children? Child’s Nerv Syst. 2005;21:355–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. LaRovere KL, Graham RJ, Tasker RC. Pediatric Critical Nervous System P. Pediatric neurocritical care: a neurology consultation model and implication for education and training. Pediatr Neurol. 2013;48:206–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Aucoin PJ, Kotilainen HR, Gantz NM, Davidson R, Kellogg P, Stone B. Intracranial pressure monitors. Epidemiologic study of risk factors and infections. Am J Med. 1986;80:369–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lyke KE, Obasanjo OO, Williams MA, O’Brien M, Chotani R, Perl TM. Ventriculitis complicating use of intraventricular catheters in adult neurosurgical patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:2028–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Poon WS, Ng S, Wai S. CSF antibiotic prophylaxis for neurosurgical patients with ventriculostomy: a randomised study. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1998;71:146–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Blomstedt GC. Results of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis in ventriculostomy and shunting procedures. A double-blind randomized trial. J Neurosurg. 1985;62:694–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wyler AR, Kelly WA. Use of antibiotics with external ventriculostomies. J Neurosurg. 1972;37:185–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wong GK, Poon WS, Lyon D, Wai S. Cefepime vs. Ampicillin/Sulbactam and Aztreonam as antibiotic prophylaxis in neurosurgical patients with external ventricular drain: result of a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2006;31:231–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sonabend AM, Korenfeld Y, Crisman C, Badjatia N, Mayer SA, Connolly ES Jr. Prevention of ventriculostomy-related infections with prophylactic antibiotics and antibiotic-coated external ventricular drains: a systematic review. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:996–1005.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Keong NC, Bulters DO, Richards HK, et al. The SILVER (Silver Impregnated Line Versus EVD Randomized trial): a double-blind, prospective, randomized, controlled trial of an intervention to reduce the rate of external ventricular drain infection. Neurosurgery. 2012;71:394–403 discussion-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Walker CT, Stone JJ, Jacobson M, Phillips V, Silberstein HJ. Indications for Pediatric External Ventricular Drain Placement and Risk Factors for Conversion to a Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2013;48(6):342–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bauer DF, McGwin G Jr., Melton SM, George RL, Markert JM. Risk factors for conversion to permanent ventricular shunt in patients receiving therapeutic ventriculostomy for traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:85–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller C, Tsivgoulis G, Nakaji P. Predictors of ventriculoperitoneal shunting after spontaneous intraparenchymal hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2008;8:235–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shore PM, Thomas NJ, Clark RS, et al. Continuous versus intermittent cerebrospinal fluid drainage after severe traumatic brain injury in children: effect on biochemical markers. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21:1113–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bell MJ, Adelson PD, Hutchison JS, et al. Differences in medical therapy goals for children with severe traumatic brain injury-an international study. Pediatr Critical Care Med. 2013;14:811–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported by NIH K23-NS075363 (AAT), K23-NS076550 (NSA), RO1-HD061963 (JWH), and K08-NS064051 (SHF).

Conflict of interest

Alexis A Topjian, Amber Stuart, Alyssa A. Pabalan, Ashleigh Clair, Todd J. Kilbaugh, Nicholas S. Abend, Robert A. Berg, Gregory G. Heuer, Phillip B. Storm Jr., Jimmy W. Huh, and Stuart H. Friess declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart H. Friess.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Topjian, A.A., Stuart, A., Pabalan, A.A. et al. Risk Factors Associated with Infections and Need for Permanent Cerebrospinal Fluid Diversion in Pediatric Intensive Care Patients with Externalized Ventricular Drains. Neurocrit Care 21, 294–299 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-013-9946-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-013-9946-7

Keywords

Navigation