Skip to main content
Log in

Production of Cellulolytic Enzymes by Fungi Acrophialophora nainiana and Ceratocystis paradoxa Using Different Carbon Sources

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although a number of filamentous fungi, such as Trichoderma and Aspergillus, are well known as producers of cellulases, xylanases, and accessory cellulolytic enzymes, the search for new strains and new enzymes has become a priority with the increase in diversity of biomass sources. Moreover, according to the type of pretreatment applied, biomass of the same type may require different enzyme blends to be efficiently hydrolyzed. This study evaluated cellulases, xylanases, and β-glucosidases produced by two fungi, the thermotolerant Acrophialophora nainiana and Ceratocystis paradoxa. Cells were grown in submerged culture on three carbon sources: lactose, wheat bran, or steam-pretreated sugarcane bagasse, a commonly used cattle feed in Brazil. Xylanase and endo-1-4-β-glucanase (CMCase) highest production were found in A. nainiana growing on lactose and reached levels of 2,200 and 2,016 IU/L, respectively. C. paradoxa showed highest activity for xylanase when grown on wheat bran and for β-glucosidase when grown on steam-treated bagasse, at levels of 12,728 and 1,068 IU/mL, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Azzam, A. M. (1989). Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part B, 24(4), 421–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bjerre, A. B., Olesen, A. B., & Fernqvist, T. (1996). Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 49, 568–577.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cadoche, L., & López, G. D. (1989). Biological Wastes, 30, 153–157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dale, B. E., Henk, L. L., & Shiang, M. (1984). Developments in Industrial Microbiology, 26, 223–233.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Duff, S. J. B., & Murray, W. D. (1996). Bioresource Technology, 55, 1–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reshamwala, S., Shawky, B. T., & Dale, B. E. (1995). Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 51/52, 43–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wright, J. D. (1998). Chemical Engineering Progress, 84(8), 62–74.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Medeiros, R. G., Soffner, M. L. A., Thomé, J. A., Cacais, A. O. G., Estelles, R. S., Salles, B. C., et al. (2000). Biotechnology Progress, 16, 522–524.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moutia, Y., & Saumtally, S. (1999). Technical report: Mauritius Sugar Industry Research Institute AMAS. Réduit: Food and Agricultural Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ghose, T. K. (1987). Pure and Applied Chemistry, 59(2), 257–268.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller, L. (1959). Analytical Chemistry, 31, 426–428.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Filho, E. X. F., Puls, J., & Coughlan, M. P. (1993). Journal of Industrial Microbiology, 11, 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cardoso, O. A. V., & Filho, E. X. F. (2003). FEMS Microbiology Letters, 223(2), 309–314.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodrigo R. O. Barros.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barros, R.R.O., Oliveira, R.A., Gottschalk, L.M.F. et al. Production of Cellulolytic Enzymes by Fungi Acrophialophora nainiana and Ceratocystis paradoxa Using Different Carbon Sources. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 161, 448–454 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-009-8894-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-009-8894-3

Keywords

Navigation