Abstract
Purpose of Review
Accumulating data on the consumption of plant-based diets and their impact on blood pressure indicate a consensus that plant-based diets are linked to reduced blood pressure. The suggested mechanisms of action are manifold, and, in this systematic review, we provide a summary of the most recent findings on plant-based diets and their impact on blood pressure, along with an analysis of the molecules accountable for the observed effects.
Recent Findings
The overwhelming majority of intervention studies demonstrate that plant-based diets result in lower blood pressure readings when compared to diets that are based on animal products. The various mechanisms of action are being clarified.
Summary
The data discussed in this systematic review allow us to conclude that plant-based diets are associated with lower blood pressure and overall better health outcomes (namely, on the cardiovascular system) when compared to animal-based diets. The mechanisms of action are being actively investigated and involve many macro- and micronutrients plentiful in plants and the dishes prepared with them.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Data concerning the intake of plant-based diets and their effects on blood pressure keep accumulating, and there is consensus that plant-based diets are associated with lower blood pressure. The proposed mechanisms of action are manifold, and, in this systematic review, we summarize the latest data on plant-based diets and blood pressure, with insights on the molecules responsible for the described effects.
We first want to briefly highlight two of the major cross-sectional studies available on this topic. On the one hand, the Epic-Oxford study included more than ten thousand British subjects and showed that vegans presented the lowest levels of hypertension and blood pressure (BP), while meat-eating individuals presented the highest ones [1••]. Likewise, in arbitrarily selected subjects from the Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2) cohort (comprising almost one hundred thousand Adventists in North America), vegans and vegetarians presented lower BP levels than the individuals eating meat [2]. Noteworthy, in both studies, adjustment for body mass index (BMI) reduced the magnitude of these findings.
The impact of dietary patterns on BP has also been explored in numerous prospective cohort investigations. In the context of the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA), a dose-dependent relationship was found between plant food intake (whole grains, fruits, vegetables, etc.) and reduced incidence of raised BP [3]. In addition, in the combined analysis of the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) I and II and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS), an association was found between hypertension and the consumption of meat and seafood [4]. Similar findings were reported in other smaller prospective studies [5-8].
Methods
The search strategy — according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [9] — is shown in Fig. 1. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Literature search strategies used for each database and the syntax search terms are displayed in Supplementary Table 1. The search retrieved 8422 articles. After removing papers < 2020, duplicated records, reviews, non-human studies, etc., we review 39 papers, discussed in Table 1.
Evidence on the Effects of Particular Plant-Based Diets
Many types of dietary patterns exist in the arena of essentially plant-based diets, including vegetarian diets and their variants, the Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, the Mediterranean (Med) diet, the healthy Nordic diet, and many other high-fruit, vegetable, and whole grain diets.
Vegetarian Diets
Vegetarian diets usually do not include meat, poultry, or fish, although individual eating patterns do vary. Lacto-ovo-vegetarian diets are based on grains, vegetables, fruits, legumes, seeds, nuts, dairy products, and eggs, excluding meat, poultry, and fish. The lacto-vegetarian diet also excludes eggs besides meat, poultry, and fish. The vegan, or pure vegetarian diet not only excludes meat, poultry, or fish, but also dairy and additional animal products. A meta-analysis of 32 cross-sectional studies, including more than twenty-thousand individuals, indicated that a lower mean BP was related with the intake of vegetarian diets compared to omnivorous ones [10]. Accordingly, a recent meta-analysis, comprising a total of 187 participants from five controlled trials, showed a mean reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (−5.47 mmHg (95% CI, −7.60, −3.34); P < 0.00001) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (−2.49 mmHg (−4.17, −0.80; P = 0.004) in subjects using a lacto-ovo vegetarian diet compared with the consumption of comparator diets, with a high certainty of the results for SBP and a moderate one for DBP [11]. Furthermore, a meta-analysis, which included 856 subjects from 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), showed that vegetarian diets significantly reduced SBP (−2.66 mmHg (−3.76, −1.55), P < 0.001) and DBP (−1.69 mmHg (−2.97, − 0.41), P < 0.001) compared to omnivorous diets [12]. In the subgroup analysis, a vegan diet showed higher decrease in SBP (−3.12 mmHg; (−4.54, −1.70), P < 0.001) compared to a lacto-ovo-vegetarian diet (−1.75 mmHg, (−5.38, 1.88), P = 0.05). The vegan diet showed a similar trend in terms of DBP reduction (−1.92 mmHg (−3.18, −0.66), P < 0.001), while those in a lacto-ovo-vegetarian diet did not. Conversely, another meta-analysis, including 677 individuals from nine controlled trials, showed that the consumption of vegan diets was not significantly associated with a mean reduction in SBP (−1.30 mmHg (−3.90, 1.29); P = 0.33) and DBP (− 0.81 mmHg (−2.91, 1.28); P = 0.45) compared with the consumption of comparator diets, although the reliability of results was low [13]. Moreover, the authors acknowledge that the use of BP-lowering comparator diets probably underrated the BP-lowering capability of vegan diets. Indeed, when the usual diet of volunteers was used as the comparator, there was a statistically significant overall effect estimate, although reliability remained low.
DASH Diet
The DASH randomized trial was designed to evaluate the effects on BP of a fundamentally plant-based diet, which included plant foods, low-fat dairy, and limited amounts of lean meat [14]. During this eight-week trial, volunteers consumed one of the following diets: (1) a “standard” American diet (control), (2) the DASH diet, or (3) a fruits and vegetables diet. Compared to the fruits and vegetables diet, the DASH diet had a reduced fat content and consisted in more daily servings of fruits and grains and fewer meat servings. The DASH diet reduced BP when compared with the control diet, especially in African Americans, and in already hypertensive subjects [15, 16]. The potential impact on BP reduction caused by a plant-based diet was verified in the DASH-sodium trial, which showed that restraining sodium led to further effects on BP reduction in combination with the DASH diet [17] and that higher BP levels at baseline were associated with an enhanced reduction of BP [18]. A recent meta-analysis comprising a total of 1400 participants from 11 controlled trials showed that SBP (−5.53 mmHg (95% CI −7.95, − 3.12); P < 0.00001) and DBP (–3.78 mmHg (–5.51 to –2.04); P < 0.0001) levels were reduced upon consumption of DASH diets compared with the consumption of comparator diets, with a high degree of certainty of the results [13].
Mediterranean Diet
The Mediterranean (Med) diet entails a moderate intake of poultry, eggs, seafood, and dairy products and a low consumption of red and processed meats. In this sense, the Med diet can be considered to a large extent to be a plant-based diet, as it comprises a high consumption of plant-based foods such as fruits, vegetables, legumes, grains, nuts, and olive oil [19]. In a meta-analysis of observational studies, including prospective and cross-sectional (four and eight, respectively) studies, representing over 30,000 individuals and 6342 cases of metabolic syndrome (MetS), BP showed an inverse significant association with high adherence to the Med diet (RR = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.77–0.97) [20]. Several RCTs have estimated the effects of the Med diet on BP, and at least three meta-analyses showed consistent results. The first one, which included six trials, comprising more than 7000 people, found that adopting a Med diet pattern for at least 1 year reduced both SBP (− 1.44 mmHg) and DBP (− 0.70 mmHg) levels [21]. Another meta-analysis included three RCTs focused on different healthy dietary patterns and reported an association between the Med diet and a reduction on SBP (− 3.02 mm Hg) and DBP (− 1.99 mm Hg) [22]. Finally, a more recent meta-analysis, comprising a total of 5276 participants from eight controlled trials, showed that SBP (− 0.95 mmHg; 95% CI, − 1.70, − 0.20); P < 0.00001) and DBP (− 0.69 mmHg (− 1.44, 0.06); P = 0.07) levels were lessened upon consumption of a Med diet compared with the consumption of comparator diets, with a moderate certainty of the results [13].
Nordic Diet
Like the DASH and Med diets, the healthy Nordic diet is essentially a plant-based dietary pattern, consisting of whole grains, fruits, vegetables, legumes, rapeseed oil, fatty fish (e.g., salmon), shellfish, seaweed, low-fat meat (e.g., poultry), and dairy, along with restraining salt and sugar-sweetened products [23]. A recent meta-analysis, comprising a total of 420 participants from three controlled trials, showed that the consumption of a healthy Nordic diet led to a reduction in SBP (− 4.47 mmHg; 95% CI, − 7.14, − 1.81); P < 0.001) and DBP (− 2.32 mmHg (− 3.83, − 0.82); P = 0.002) levels compared with the consumption of comparator diets, with a moderate certainty of the results [13].
Other High-Fruit/-Vegetable/-Fiber Diets
Diets not fitting in the previous categories, but that could still be contained in the plant-based diet arena include the ones characterized by increased consumption of fruit and vegetables and high-fiber diets focused on increasing whole-grain and legume consumption. In a meta-analysis including 140 subjects from two RCTs, high-fruit/high-vegetable diets were linked with reduction in SBP (− 0.57 mmHg (− 7.45, 6.32); P = 0.87) and DBP (− 0.96 mmHg (− 3.08, 1.15); P = 0.37) compared with the consumption of comparator diets [13]. Similarly, consumption of high-fiber diets resulted in a decrease in SBP (− 0.65 mmHg (− 1.83, 0.53); P = 0.28) and DBP (− 1.02 mmHg (− 3.86, 1.82); P = 0.48) compared with the consumption of comparator diets (meta-analysis with 316 subjects from two RCTs) [13]. However, in both cases, the certainty of evidence was extremely low.
In line with the results described above, Dinu and colleagues published the first umbrella review focusing on the effects of different popular diets on cardiometabolic risk factors [24•]. Regarding plant-based diets and BP outcomes, the review included meta-analyses of RCTs assessing the DASH (n = 6), Mediterranean (n = 11), vegetarian (n = 9), and Nordic (n = 2) diets, among others. Overall, the findings of this review support that balanced dietary patterns, favoring vegetables, fruits, whole grains, and plant-based protein, and limit sugar, sodium, and red and processed meat, are beneficial in adverse cardiometabolic scenarios. Notably, DASH and, especially, Med diets showed the most consistent findings regarding a reduction in BP accompanied by improvements in other parameters, whereas for the Nordic and vegetarian dietary patterns, only weak evidence of a beneficial effect in BP levels was found. Nevertheless, the authors emphasize that around 80% of the meta-analyses included in the study suffered from low methodological quality and weak strength of evidence and included, for many diets, a reduced number of clinical trials. Furthermore, the authors acknowledge the limitations concerning the understanding, meaning, and applicability of findings in clinical practice. For instance, meta-analyses, in many cases, included RCTs performed on individuals in a variety of pathological settings and the extrapolation of results to the general population is not straightforward.
Evidence Coming from Recent RCTs
In the last 3 years, evidence generated from RCTs on the effect of plant-based diets has been plentiful. Limiting this list to trials where at least one arm included a recognizable plant-based diet as the main exposure of interest and where BP and/or hypertension were outcomes of interest returned 39 papers (Table 1). Most studies concern the exposure of overweight/obese subjects at (high) risk of cardiometabolic disease, e.g., metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), to diets based on the Mediterranean or DASH dietary patterns, although vegan and vegetarian diets, among others, were also investigated. Healthy/pathological context scenarios other than the above mentioned include rheumatoid arthritis and chronic kidney disease, etc. The main results of these studies regarding BP values and/or hypertension reinforce the conclusions of the above-mentioned umbrella review and several other meta-analyses. Sub-studies from the PREDIMED and PREDIMED-Plus trials confirm that a high adherence to the Med diet is associated with lower BP values (vide infra). Of note, non-treated participants following a Med diet showed less need for the use of antihypertensive drugs [25]. Indeed, Med diet adherence was associated with decreased need of escalating antihypertensive therapy in patients who were using two drugs at baseline and attenuated the association of antihypertensive drug use with the risk of cardiovascular events [25]. As for the PREDIMED-Plus trial, at baseline, a tendency was found towards a lower Med diet adherence for participants with the highest validated MetS severity score, which (among many other parameters showing unfavorable readings) were characterized by high BP levels [26]. On the other hand, also at baseline, adherence to eight a priori high-quality dietary scores did not show inverse associations with hypertension [27]. Longitudinal analysis showed that the reductions in SBP and DBP were enhanced with higher carbohydrate quality index (categorized in quintiles and based on four criteria: total dietary fiber intake, glycemic index, whole grain/total grain ratio, and solid carbohydrate/total carbohydrate ratio) [28]. Decreases in SBP were significantly associated with increased nut consumption [29], although results from a 2-month crossover RCT showed non-significant intra- and inter-group differences in SBP and DBP in MetS subjects who consumed a Med diet or a non-Med diet plus nuts (50 g/day) [30]. Some studies propose that, alongside a higher adherence to Med diet, other factors, such as physical activity, low sedentary time, or low depression risk, could contribute to enhance the positive effects seen on hypertension (among other CVD risk factors) [31, 32].
Apart from the PREDIMED trial, in the last 3 to 4 years, many RCTs on the effects of Med diets have been published in different physio-pathological contexts. Adherence to Mediterranean-based dietary patterns was associated with favorable effects on BP in apparently healthy individuals [33], overweight/obese at high risk of CVD [34-38], MetS [39], prediabetic [40], T1DM [41], T2DM [42], NAFLD [43, 44], heart or lung transplant recipients [11], obstructive sleep apnea [31], HIV [45], rheumatoid arthritis [46], and cancer patients [47], among others. However, in general, the differences observed were not significant between the intervention groups on the Med diet and other groups. In some cases, neither intra-group nor inter-group significant differences were found, as was the case of individuals without major CVD who consumed the Atlantic diet, for 6 months. This diet has several characteristics in common with the Med diet such as high consumption of vegetables, fruits, whole grains, beans, and olive oil as a key fat source. It is also characterized by high intake of fish and seafood, starch-based products, nuts, milk, and cheese. In professional female handball players who consumed a free diet, a Med diet, or a high antioxidant diet, for 12 weeks, there were no significant differences in BP over time or between groups [48, 49].
Regarding the effects of DASH-based diets on BP, a longitudinal analysis was conducted with one-year data of changes in the DASH diet score and its association with cardiometabolic risk factors in PREDIMED-Plus trial [50]. After adjusting for several potential confounders, higher DASH diet scores were significantly associated with lower SBP (− 0.57 mmHg) and DBP (− 0.15 mmHg). Furthermore, in a RCT with individuals with untreated high normal BP or stage 1 hypertension, Japanese cuisine-based DASH (J-DASH) diets, which are in accordance with the nutritional composition of the DASH diet (but have less total fat and saturated fatty acids), improved home measured BP and stabilized its variability compared to a group who consumed their usual diet [51]. An investigational diet mimicking the average East Asian diet, but retaining common characteristics of the Med and DASH diets, also produced positive effects on BP, in subjects with T2DM [52]. Finally, in CVD risk patients with MetS, a modified DASH diet with additional emphasis on plant-based and Med diets to optimize refeeding also led to a reduction in SBP after 3 months. According to the results of this study, volunteers who had a 5-day fasting prior to following the modified DASH diet showed a sustained reduction both in 24-h ambulatory SBP and mean arterial BP (MABP). Indeed, subjects undergoing fasting reduced their intake of antihypertensive medication in 43% of cases, whereas on DASH alone this happened in 17% of cases.
In the context of RCTs aimed at assessing the effects of vegan and/or vegetarian diets where BP values were evaluated a few studies are worth discussing. In a crossover RCTwith overweight individuals, SBP and DBP values decreased (−9.3 and −7.3 mmHg, respectively) in subjects on a Med diet compared with a vegan diet (−3.4 and − 4.1 mmHg, respectively) [53]. In contrast, 6 months of a vegetarian diet (very-low-protein diet) significantly lowered SBP and DBP more effectively than a Med diet or a Med diet supplemented with essential amino acids and ketoanalogs (Med diet + KA) [54]. In another study, subjects with cardiometabolic risk factors were instructed to consume ad libitum whole-food plant-based diets, consisting of vegetables, grains, legumes, and fruits and avoidance of animal products. Compared to the control group, who consumed an omnivorous diet, there was a tendency for more favorable effects in SBP and DBP [55]. In another study, a low-carbohydrate vegan diet, high in canola oil and plant proteins, was compared to a vegetarian therapeutic diet in type 2 diabetics [56]. There were no changes in BP medications and no treatment differences in BP. However, within treatment, significant reductions in SBP and DBP were seen on the low-carbohydrate vegan (−4.12 and −3.54 mmHg, respectively) and on the vegetarian diet (−5.91 and −4.13 mmHg, respectively). Still on vegetarian diets, a plant-based diet built on the USDA healthy vegetarian meal plan, with modifications to exclude eggs and dairy products, was compared with the same diet except for eggs being permitted (2 eggs/d for 6 weeks while preserving an isocaloric condition) in individuals at risk of T2DM. SBP, DBP, and MABP decreased from baseline in both groups (statistical significance was only found for plant-based diet + eggs), yet changes were not significantly different between groups [57]. On the other hand, a plant-based diet with either 2 eggs/d or the equivalent amount of egg substitute showed no effect in SBP and DBP in MetS subjects [58]. A study carried out in prediabetic subjects who consumed one of three isocaloric-restricted diets: (1) Med diet, (2) a traditional Jiangnan diet high in plants, or (3) a control diet low in plants, for 6 months, showed significant decreases from baseline in SBP and DBP for all diets but differences between groups were non-significant [40]. In a another RCT, rheumatoid arthritis patients completed a 7-day fast followed by an 11-week plant-based diet or a 12-week standard Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung (DGE) diet [59]. Neither dietary protocol lowered SBP, although there was a tendency to decrease DBP in the fasting + plant-based diet group. In another study, all 3 healthy eating patterns: (1) plant-based diet, (2) AHA diet, or (3) Med diet, were associated with similar statistically significant improvements in SBP and DBP, in children with BMI > 95% age/sex predicted [60].
In T2DM [61] and in normotensive women [62], increasing the amount of vegetable, fruit and whole grain dietary intake produced favorable effects in BP. On the other hand, BP did not improve in children, adolescents, and adults included in an intervention group instructed to eat more healthy food items, such as fruits and vegetables, legumes, fish, nuts and seeds, and olive oil, compared to the control group [63]. Furthermore, 12 weeks of consumption of a traditional Brazilian Diet (DieTBra), consisting of plenty of tropical fruits, rice and beans, raw and cooked vegetables and legumes, moderate consumption of dairy products, small portion of red meat, and predominant use of soy oil, did not produce a significant reduction in BP in severely obese individuals (BMI ≥ 35.0 kg/m2) [64].
Plant-Based Diet Components with Hypotensive Actions
Vitamin C
Fruits and vegetables are sources of vitamin C, whose effects on BP have been investigated both in clinical trials and in basic biochemistry experiments. Indeed, there is solid evidence from clinical studies that vitamin C treatment restores endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease or coronary risk factors [65-67]. Of note, there are at least two meta-analyses [68, 69] that conclude that provision of vitamin C (usually 500 mg/d) significantly reduce SBP and DBP and that this effect is more pronounced in hypertensive patients. Yet, it is unfortunate that the near totality of internists or cardiologists do not prescribe ascorbic acid as supplement.
In terms of mechanisms of action, there is clear biochemical evidence that ascorbic acid stimulates endothelium-derived nitric oxide (EDNO) synthesis [70, 71] and that it does so mainly by increasing the intracellular levels of tetrahydrobiopterin, i.e., the most important cofactor for eNOS activity [72, 70]. Even though ascorbic acid is an important antioxidant [73, 74], it does not affect GSH levels in human aortic endothelial cells (HAEC), and it does not increase the GSH/GSSG ratio. Therefore, based on the literature [72, 71], it is unlikely that ascorbic acid directly improves the intracellular redox environment and, consequently, EDNO synthesis. The most conceivable mechanism of action involves the maintenance or even increase of tetrahydrobiopterin levels by reducing dihydro- or trihydrobiopterin back to tetrahydrobiopterin [75], as also shown by basic experiments in which ascorbic acid was found to stimulate purified eNOS activity directly, despite limiting concentrations of tetrahydrobiopterin and without the contribution of GSH [72]. One caveat is that data obtained from in vitro experiments should be interpreted with caution, as culture media are devoid of vitamin C. Indeed, cultured cells are in scorbutic states [76] and exogenous vitamin C first replenishes their stores and then, eventually, exerts biological effects [77].
A critical issue is that of the optimal dose of vitamin C that augments BP. The only complete pharmacokinetic study carried out with vitamin C is that of Levine et al. [78••], who concluded that vitamin C daily doses above 400 mg have no evident value. Also, a review of over 200 articles on vitamin C and health concluded that a daily intake of 100 mg of vitamin C is associated with lower incidence of heart disease, stroke, and cancer [79]. It should be noted that these amounts (1) are consistent with those reported by Levine et al. to saturate cells [78••]; (2) are consistent with the maximal velocity of the vitamin C transporter [80]; and (3) are achievable through a balanced diet [81]. Indeed, it is worth underscoring that, despite some propaganda on mega-doses, ascorbic acid’s concentrations are tightly regulated in the body [82, 83]. One way to overcome such limitations is to administer vitamin C intravenously [84] in order to reach millimolar plasma concentrations. However, the scant clinical trials of intravenous ascorbic acid for cancer treatment yielded negative results [85] and much more well-performed research on a large number of patients is needed to clarify this issue. However, pertinent to this review, Bruno and colleagues demonstrated that acute vitamin C infusion (3 g i.v. in 5 min) significantly lowers BP in hypertensive patients, but not in normotensive subjects [86]. These data confirm those of Heitzer et al. [87], who reported anti-hypertensive effects vitamin C infusion is smokers (whose endothelial function is notoriously impaired). Hence, there might be room for future high-quality trials in hypertensive patients, even though it might be quite impractical to perform ascorbic acid infusions in an outpatient setting.
In summary, ascorbic acid may play a key role in the plant-based diet beneficial effect on BP. These effects are likely not mediated by redox modulation and involve maintenance of cofactors such as tetrahydrobiopterin [88]. Based on the literature, we advocate the use of vitamin C by clinicians and patients as adjunct therapy of hypertension.
Potassium
Potassium is the most abundant intracellular mineral, and its role in the regulation of BP is well established [89], even if there is no agreement among authors [90]. Unfortunately, the contribution of potassium to the healthful effects of a plant-based diets is often overlooked [91] in favor of, e.g., (poly)phenols (vide infra). However, many vegetables such as green leafy vegetables and some fruits such as bananas are rich in potassium [92], which might at least in part explain [93] why vegetarian diets are associated with significant reductions in BP compared with omnivorous diets [12]. Historically, humans have been consuming quantities of potassium that were much higher than the current ones [94]. Life expectancy was much shorter, but current potassium intakes are often much lower than the recommended levels [95].
The first clinical evidence of the effects of potassium on BP is likely that of WL Addison [96], and some researchers have been investigating the mechanisms of actions that underlie potassium’s BP-lowering activities [97, 93]. One proposed mechanism involves the stimulatory effects of potassium on the sodium–potassium ATPase, which hyperpolarizes cells [98], hence decreasing cytosolic calcium concentrations and leading to augmented vasomotion. Also, potassium has been suggested to directly stimulate EDNO synthesis [99] and increase natriuresis [99, 91, 97] by inhibiting renal sodium reabsorption.
Finally, we propose an indirect effect of high potassium intake, i.e., that high consumption via a plant-based diet largely replaces that of sodium, either as a natural component of meats (especially smoked and cured meats), some comfort foods, e.g., pizza and savory snacks, or added as part of salt to enhance flavor and taste [100].
(Poly)phenols
As mentioned, nitric oxide synthesis can be modulated by dietary factors [101]. Many constituents of plants and, hence, plant-based diets are non-nutritional compounds that play key roles in plant physiology and interactions with the environment [102, 103]. The most actively studied minor components are (poly)phenols, which have been long investigated for their supposed antioxidant activities. Indeed, there is negative correlation between (poly)phenols intake and blood pressure [104]. Even though research has disproven their direct antioxidant actions, their effects on various enzyme activities appear to be even more interesting in terms of health protection: research in this area should be and, indeed, is further extensively promoted [105].
Among the various biological activities of (poly)phenols, their actions on endothelial function have been researched by various groups. Our own group reported the vasomodulating activities of wild plant extracts rich in (poly)phenols (namely wild artichoke and thyme) in vitro [106] and in vivo [107]. Others studied the vasodilator effects of olive extracts, rich in oleuropein, hydroxytyrosol [108, 109], and hypotensive peptides [110, 111] and used as decoction in folk medicine [112, 113].
As mentioned, direct antioxidant, free radical-scavenging activities of (poly)phenols have been ruled out due to their poor bioavailability and reactivity [114•, 115]. However, in biochemical terms, plasma membrane-associated eNOS is considered to be more constitutively active and extremely sensitive to agonist-induced intracellular Ca+2 fluxes. In addition to post-translational regulatory mechanisms dictating eNOS function, redox changes in the endothelium do indeed modify both enzyme activity as well as EDNO production, in turn adversely affecting vasomotion [116]. As discussed for ascorbic acid, eNOS synthetic activity is dependent on maintaining tetrahydrobiopterin in a reduced state. When the tetrahydrobiopterin/biopterin ratio is high eNOS produces NO, however, when that redox ratio declines, the internal electron transport chain of eNOS becomes uncoupled, which actually generates superoxide anion rather than NO [117]. Thus, in a pro-oxidative milieu [115], eNOS may not only become a target of oxidant species, but also may exacerbate oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction, hence impairing vasomotion and leading to hypertension. In brief, even though (poly)phenols are not direct antioxidants, they contribute to maintain a proper endothelial redox status and contribute to the hypotensive actions of a fruit- and vegetable-rich diet.
In addition to epidemiological data (often related to the Mediterranean diet [118]) linking a plant-based diet with lower blood pressure [119], some human studies provided direct evidence of the (poly)phenol-induced increase in vasomotion. Three examples are worth mentioning. One is tea, whose intake (chronic or acute) increases flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in healthy subjects and hypertensive patients [120, 121]. The effects are highly likely due to catechin and its derivatives, given the juxtaposition of their plasma kinetics with FMD [122]. Another (poly)phenol-rich food that has been extensively studied is cocoa/chocolate [123, 124]; again, the most active component appears to be catechin, acting through mechanisms of actions that are only partly elucidated and likely fit with what we described above. Finally, recent research is addressing beetroot juice as functional food with remarkable hypotensive actions [125, 126]. In reason of its vasomodulating actions, beetroot juice is being used as a sport supplement [127] and attributed with ergogenic effects that need to be confirmed by human trials [127, 128].
In summary, (poly)phenols are a likely important contributor to the hypotensive actions of plant-based dietary regimens. Even though the extent and true nature of their biochemical actions has not been fully elucidated, it is very likely that a combination of indirect antioxidant activities (thereby maintaining eNOS function and avoiding its uncoupling), anti-inflammatory actions, direct eNOS hydroxylation, antagonism of L-type Ca2+ channels [129], etc. contributes to the augmented vasomotion associated with clinical trials and demonstrated by some human experiments.
Omega 3 Fatty Acids
Fatty acids of the omega 3 (or n-3) series, i.e., alfa-linolenic (18:3; ALA), eicosapentaenoic (20:5, EPA), and docosahexaenoic (22:6, DHA), are essential and must be derived from the diet [130]. Their cardiovascular effects have been the subject of much investigation [131] that — from a clinical point of view — led to mostly inconclusive results [132-135].
Among the potentially healthful actions of omega 3 fatty acids, modulation of endothelial function and, hence, of blood pressure has been proposed. The rationale behind the purported activities of omega 3 fatty acids on the endothelium and vasomotion is manifold. For example, omega 3 fatty acids are anti-inflammatory molecules [136] and inflammation greatly participates in the development of, e.g., arterial stiffness [117], impaired vasomotion [137], and hypertension [138]. Moreover, that are — paradoxically — anti- rather than pro-oxidant [139, 140], via molecular mechanisms that have been largely elucidated and include, e.g., inhibition of NADPH oxidase 4 (Nox 4), V sPLA2, and cyclooxygenases, as well as reduced superoxide production [140], thereby maintaining an adequate “peroxide tone” [141].
Human studies of the effects of omega 3 fatty acids on vascular tone and blood pressure yielded mixed results. For example, a recent publication by Bischoff-Ferrari et al. [142] reported that administration of 1 g/d of algal oil (330 mg of EPA and 660 mg DHA) had no significant effects in improving systolic and diastolic blood pressures of older adults. Yet, the uncertainty surrounding the hypotensive effects of omega 3 might depend on several factors such as the dose and the choice of patients. Accordingly, a recent dose–response metanalysis by Zhang et al. [143] reported a nonlinear dose–response relationship for systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The computed J-shaped curves implicate that dosages of EPA + DHA between 2 and 3 g/day (combined) were associated with the strongest effects. A slightly older metanalysis published by Guo and coworkers [144] concluded that provision of EPA and DHA leads to a significant reduction in systolic (EPA) and diastolic (DHA) blood pressure in subjects with dyslipidemia or with high C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations, i.e., at high risk of cardiovascular disease. Whether such effects are due to a direct action of EPA and DHA on the endothelium or to the reduction of CRP concentrations, i.e., anti-inflammatory effects (or a combination of both mechanisms), remains to be elucidated. In this respect, Mori et al. [145] showed that omega 3 fatty acids, in particular DHA rather than EPA, improved vasodilator responses to endogenous and exogenous NO donors and attenuated vasoconstrictor response to norepinephrine in the forearm microcirculation of humans. The mechanisms appeared to be predominantly endothelium independent, based on enhanced vasodilatory responses after the co-infusion of acetylcholine with L-NMMA and the infusion of nitroprusside, both of which are endothelium independent.
As regards ALA (the vegetal omega 3 fatty acid), there are — to the best of our knowledge — no large RCTs exploring its effects on blood pressure, even when given at high doses [146]. However, the use of flaxseed products results in significant reductions of diastolic and systolic blood pressures [147], which might be at least in part due to its high content of ALA. The same applies to a nutraceutical providing Perilla Frutescens powder [148] and to high walnut use by elderly subjects [149]. Mechanistically, it is worth reminding that ALA is converted into oxylipins [150] with biological activities in the vessel wall. In short, epidemiological evidence is strongly suggestive of the cardioprotective actions of ALA [151], which might include modulation of blood pressure [152]. Clinical trials are scant and not concordant, calling for further research on this medium-chain fatty acid.
To summarize, a plant-based diet provides polyunsaturated fatty acids that, when consumed in high proportions, likely exert cardioprotective effects. Whether and to what extent such effects are modulated by augmented vasomotion and BP control is still unclear and requires more research.
Omega 6 Fatty Acids
With some exceptions, e.g., foods elaborated with coconut and palm oils, plant-based diets provide a proportionally high amount of omega 6 fatty acids, largely found in seed oils such as safflower, sunflower, and corn oils and in seeds and nuts, e.g., walnuts, almonds, hemp seeds, or cashews [153].
As opposed to their omega 3 counterparts, omega 6 fatty acids, e.g., linoleic acid (LA), cannot be studied as drugs or supplements because their levels of consumption are much higher than those of omega 3. Therefore, most of the data we have on omega 6 and human health come from observational studies. Further, LA is the precursor of arachidonic acid and, consequently, of pro-inflammatory eicosanoids. Hence, the hypothesis was formulated that we should reduce omega 6 consumption to avoid increasing systemic, low-grade inflammation, i.e., one of the major etiological agents in degenerative diseases (vide infra) [154].
This hypothesis has been disproven [155], and some clinical studies of low-to-modest quality did evaluate the effects of PUFA-rich diets on BP. Due to aforementioned difficulties inherent to omega 6 research, such studies should be interpreted as a “replacement” of one class of fatty acids with another one.
Some observational studies did not find any significant effect of higher intakes of omega 6 fatty acids on systolic and diastolic pressures [156-159]. One example is the International Study of Macro-Micronutrients and Blood Pressure, which enrolled 4680 subjects and analyzed the proportion of dietary LA. The authors reported a non-significant, inverse association between LA use and BP (systolic and diastolic) [160]. Yet, a sub-analysis of the control group, i.e., people who were free from cardiovascular diseases or diabetes, did not follow a special diet, and did not take food supplements or medicines, found that BP was modestly yet significantly reduced (− 1.4/ − 0.9 mmHg for each 3.8% more calories from LA) [160]. Other studies [161], nonetheless, did not confirm those data and a metanalysis reported no important effects of omega 6 fatty acids on either systolic or diastolic BP [162].
To summarize, omega 6 fatty acids, namely LA, do not appear to have relevant and clinically-important effects on BP. Therefore, the cardioprotective activities of appropriate omega 6 intakes [163, 164] are likely due to their cholesterol-lowering actions rather than to their effects on BP.
Conclusions
The data discussed in this systematic review allow us to conclude that plant-based diets are associated with lower BP and overall better health outcomes (namely, on the cardiovascular system) when compared with animal-based diets. The mechanisms of action are being actively investigated and involve many micronutrients plentiful in plants and the dishes prepared with them. We also stress the need to look at human health as closely intertwined with planetary health, as it is necessary to consider the overall “environmental pressure” of food production. In general, animal-based diets have a greater impact than plant-based ones; for this reason, the latter should be promoted in a “one health” framework [165].
Data Availability
All data presented are contained within this manuscript.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
•• Appleby PN, Davey GK, Key TJ. Hypertension and blood pressure among meat eaters, fish eaters, vegetarians and vegans in EPIC-Oxford. Public health nutrition. 2002;5(5):645–54. https://doi.org/10.1079/phn2002332. Huge cohort study that started research on BP and diets.
Pettersen BJ, Anousheh R, Fan J, Jaceldo-Siegl K, Fraser GE. Vegetarian diets and blood pressure among white subjects: results from the Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2). Public Health Nutr. 2012;15(10):1909–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980011003454.
Steffen LM, Kroenke CH, Yu X, Pereira MA, Slattery ML, Van Horn L, et al. Associations of plant food, dairy product, and meat intakes with 15-y incidence of elevated blood pressure in young black and white adults: the coronary artery risk development in young adults (CARDIA) study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82(6):1169–77; quiz 363–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/82.6.1169.
Borgi L, Curhan GC, Willett WC, Hu FB, Satija A, Forman JP. Long-term intake of animal flesh and risk of developing hypertension in three prospective cohort studies. J Hypertens. 2015;33(11):2231–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0000000000000722.
Wang L, Manson JE, Buring JE, Sesso HD. Meat intake and the risk of hypertension in middle-aged and older women. J Hypertens. 2008;26(2):215–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f283dc.
Miura K, Greenland P, Stamler J, Liu K, Daviglus ML, Nakagawa H. Relation of vegetable, fruit, and meat intake to 7-year blood pressure change in middle-aged men: the Chicago Western Electric Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(6):572–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh085.
Golzarand M, Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Sadeghian-Sharif S, Azizi F. Dietary phytochemical index is inversely associated with the occurrence of hypertension in adults: a 3-year follow-up (the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study). Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015;69(3):392–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.233.
Chuang SY, Chiu TH, Lee CY, Liu TT, Tsao CK, Hsiung CA, et al. Vegetarian diet reduces the risk of hypertension independent of abdominal obesity and inflammation: a prospective study. J Hypertens. 2016;34(11):2164–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0000000000001068.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10:89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
Yokoyama Y, Nishimura K, Barnard ND, Takegami M, Watanabe M, Sekikawa A et al. Vegetarian diets and blood pressure: a meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2014;174(4):577–87. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14547.
Entwistle TR, Miura K, Keevil BG, Morris J, Yonan N, Pohl M, et al. Modifying dietary patterns in cardiothoracic transplant patients to reduce cardiovascular risk: The AMEND-IT Trial. Clinical transplantation. 2021;35(2):e14186. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.14186.
Lee KW, Loh HC, Ching SM, Devaraj NK, Hoo FK. Effects of vegetarian diets on blood pressure lowering: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Nutrients. 2020;12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12061604.
Gibbs J, Gaskin E, Ji C, Miller MA, Cappuccio FP. The effect of plant-based dietary patterns on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled intervention trials. J Hypertens. 2021;39(1):23–37. https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0000000000002604.
Karanja NM, Obarzanek E, Lin PH, McCullough ML, Phillips KM, Swain JF, et al. Descriptive characteristics of the dietary patterns used in the dietary approaches to stop hypertension trial. DASH Collaborative Research Group. J Am Diet Assoc. 1999;99(8 Suppl):S19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-8223(99)00412-5.
Appel LJ, Moore TJ, Obarzanek E, Vollmer WM, Svetkey LP, Sacks FM, et al. A clinical trial of the effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure. DASH Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(16):1117–24. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199704173361601.
Svetkey LP, Simons-Morton D, Vollmer WM, Appel LJ, Conlin PR, Ryan DH, et al. Effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure: subgroup analysis of the dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) randomized clinical trial. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(3):285–93. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.159.3.285.
Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, Appel LJ, Bray GA, Harsha D, et al. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) diet. DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(1):3–10. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200101043440101.
Juraschek SP, Miller ER 3rd, Weaver CM, Appel LJ. Effects of sodium reduction and the DASH diet in relation to baseline blood pressure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(23):2841–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.011.
Martínez-González MA, Salas-Salvadó J, Estruch R, Corella D, Fitó M, Ros E. Benefits of the Mediterranean diet: insights from the PREDIMED study. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;58(1):50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2015.04.003.
Godos J, Zappalà G, Bernardini S, Giambini I, Bes-Rastrollo M, Martinez-Gonzalez M. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet is inversely associated with metabolic syndrome occurrence: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2017;68(2):138–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2016.1221900.
Nissensohn M, Román-Viñas B, Sánchez-Villegas A, Piscopo S, Serra-Majem L. The effect of the Mediterranean diet on hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016;48(1):42-53.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2015.08.023.
Ndanuko RN, Tapsell LC, Charlton KE, Neale EP, Batterham MJ. Dietary patterns and blood pressure in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Adv Nutr. 2016;7(1):76–89. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.115.009753.
Adamsson V, Reumark A, Fredriksson IB, Hammarström E, Vessby B, Johansson G, et al. Effects of a healthy Nordic diet on cardiovascular risk factors in hypercholesterolaemic subjects: a randomized controlled trial (NORDIET). J Intern Med. 2011;269(2):150–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02290.x.
• Dinu M, Pagliai G, Angelino D, Rosi A, Dall'Asta M, Bresciani L, et al. Effects of popular diets on anthropometric and cardiometabolic parameters: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Adv Nutr. 2020;11(4):815–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmaa006. An umbrella review of the most pupular healthy diets and their cardiovascular effects.
Ribó-Coll M, Lassale C, Sacanella E, Ros E, Toledo E, Sorlí JV, et al. Mediterranean diet and antihypertensive drug use: a randomized controlled trial. J Hypertens. 2021;39(6):1230–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0000000000002765.
Gallardo-Alfaro L, Bibiloni MDM, Mascaró CM, Montemayor S, Ruiz-Canela M, Salas-Salvadó J, et al. Leisure-time physical activity, sedentary behaviour and diet quality are associated with metabolic syndrome severity: the PREDIMED-Plus study. Nutrients. 2020;12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12041013.
Alvarez-Alvarez I, Toledo E, Lecea O, Salas-Salvadó J, Corella D, Buil-Cosiales P, et al. Adherence to a priori dietary indexes and baseline prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in the PREDIMED-Plus randomised trial. Eur J Nutr. 2020;59(3):1219–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-019-01982-x.
Martínez-González MA, Fernandez-Lazaro CI, Toledo E, Díaz-López A, Corella D, Goday A, et al. Carbohydrate quality changes and concurrent changes in cardiovascular risk factors: a longitudinal analysis in the PREDIMED-Plus randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020;111(2):291–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqz298.
Julibert A, Del Mar BM, Gallardo-Alfaro L, Abbate M, Martínez-González M, Salas-Salvadó J, et al. Metabolic syndrome features and excess weight were inversely associated with nut consumption after 1-year follow-up in the PREDIMED-Plus study. J Nutr. 2020;150(12):3161–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxaa289.
Galié S, García-Gavilán J, Papandreou C, Camacho-Barcía L, Arcelin P, Palau-Galindo A, et al. Effects of Mediterranean diet on plasma metabolites and their relationship with insulin resistance and gut microbiota composition in a crossover randomized clinical trial. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(6):3798–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2021.04.028.
Georgoulis M, Yiannakouris N, Kechribari I, Lamprou K, Perraki E, Vagiakis E, et al. Cardiometabolic benefits of a weight-loss mediterranean diet/lifestyle intervention in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: the “MIMOSA” randomized clinical trial. Nutrients. 2020;12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12061570.
Gallardo-Alfaro L, Bibiloni MDM, Bouzas C, Mascaró CM, Martínez-González M, Salas-Salvadó J, et al. Physical activity and metabolic syndrome severity among older adults at cardiovascular risk: 1-year trends. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2021;31(10):2870–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2021.06.015.
Murphy KJ, Dyer KA, Hyde B, Davis CR, Bracci EL, Woodman RJ et al. Long-term adherence to a Mediterranean diet 1-year after completion of the MedLey study. Nutrients. 2022;14(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14153098.
McEvoy CT, Moore S, Erwin C, Kontogianni M, Wallace SM, Appleton KM, et al. Trial to Encourage Adoption and Maintenance of a MEditerranean Diet (TEAM-MED): a randomised pilot trial of a peer support intervention for dietary behaviour change in adults from a Northern European population at high CVD risk. Br J Nutr. 2022;128(7):1322–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114521003986.
Goldenshluger A, Constantini K, Goldstein N, Shelef I, Schwarzfuchs D, Zelicha H, et al. Effect of dietary strategies on respiratory quotient and its association with clinical parameters and organ fat loss: a randomized controlled trial. Nutrients. 2021;13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13072230.
Yokose C, McCormick N, Rai SK, Lu N, Curhan G, Schwarzfuchs D, et al. Effects of low-fat, mediterranean, or low-carbohydrate weight loss diets on serum urate and cardiometabolic risk factors: a secondary analysis of the dietary intervention randomized controlled trial (DIRECT). Diabetes Care. 2020;43(11):2812–20. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-1002.
Osorio-Conles Ó, Olbeyra R, Moizé V, Ibarzabal A, Giró O, Viaplana J, et al. Positive effects of a Mediterranean diet supplemented with almonds on female adipose tissue biology in severe obesity. Nutrients. 2022;14(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14132617.
Bersch-Ferreira AC, Hall WL, Santos RHN, Torreglosa CR, Sampaio G, Tereza da Silva J, et al. The effect of the a regional cardioprotective nutritional program on inflammatory biomarkers and metabolic risk factors in secondary prevention for cardiovascular disease, a randomised trial. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(6):3828–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2021.04.035.
Asoudeh F, Fallah M, Djafarian K, Shirzad N, Clark CCT, Esmaillzadeh A. The effect of Mediterranean diet on inflammatory biomarkers and components of metabolic syndrome in adolescent girls. J Endocrinol Invest. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-023-02027-1.
Luo Y, Wang J, Sun L, Gu W, Zong G, Song B, et al. Isocaloric-restricted Mediterranean diet and Chinese diets high or low in plants in adults with prediabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(8):2216–27. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgac303.
Dimosthenopoulos C, Liatis S, Kourpas E, Athanasopoulou E, Driva S, Makrilakis K, et al. The beneficial short-term effects of a high-protein/low-carbohydrate diet on glycaemic control assessed by continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021;23(8):1765–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14390.
Zahedi M, Akhlagh SA, Aboomardani M, Alipoor R, Hosseini SA, Shahmirzadi AR. Efficacy of mediterranean diet on blood biochemical factors in type II diabetic patients: a randomized controlled trial. Gazi Medical Journal. 2021;31(4A):714–8. https://doi.org/10.12996/GMJ.2020.166.
Montemayor S, Mascaró CM, Ugarriza L, Casares M, Llompart I, Abete I, et al. Adherence to Mediterranean diet and NAFLD in patients with metabolic syndrome: the FLIPAN study. Nutrients. 2022;14(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14153186.
Marin-Alejandre BA, Cantero I, Perez-Diaz-Del-Campo N, Monreal JI, Elorz M, Herrero JI, et al. Effects of two personalized dietary strategies during a 2-year intervention in subjects with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized trial. Liver international: official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver. 2021;41(7):1532–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.14818.
Stradling C, Thomas GN, Hemming K, Taylor S, Taheri S. Randomized parallel-group pilot trial (best foods for your heart) comparing the effects of a Mediterranean Portfolio diet with a low saturated fat diet on HIV dyslipidemia. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(3):860–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2020.08.038.
Hulander E, Bärebring L, Turesson Wadell A, Gjertsson I, Calder PC, Winkvist A, et al. Diet intervention improves cardiovascular profile in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the randomized controlled cross-over trial ADIRA. Nutr J. 2021;20(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-021-00663-y.
Oliverio A, Radice P, Colombo M, Paradiso A, Tommasi S, Daniele A, et al. The impact of Mediterranean dietary intervention on metabolic and hormonal parameters according to BRCA1/2 variant type. Frontiers in genetics. 2022;13:820878. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.820878.
Miralles-Amorós L, Asencio-Mas N, Martínez-Olcina M, Vicente-Martínez M, Frutos JMG, Peñaranda-Moraga M, et al. Study the effect of relative energy deficiency on physiological and physical variables in professional women athletes: a randomized controlled trial. Metabolites. 2023;13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13020168.
Calvo-Malvar M, Benítez-Estévez AJ, Sánchez-Castro J, Leis R, Gude F. Effects of a community-based behavioral intervention with a traditional Atlantic diet on cardiometabolic risk markers: a cluster randomized controlled trial (“the GALIAT study”). Nutrients. 2021;13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041211.
Glenn AJ, Hernández-Alonso P, Kendall CWC, Martínez-González M, Corella D, Fitó M, et al. Longitudinal changes in adherence to the portfolio and DASH dietary patterns and cardiometabolic risk factors in the PREDIMED-Plus study. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(5):2825–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2021.03.016.
Umemoto S, Onaka U, Kawano R, Kawamura A, Motoi S, Honda N, et al. Effects of a Japanese cuisine-based antihypertensive diet and fish oil on blood pressure and its variability in participants with untreated normal high blood pressure or stage I hypertension: a feasibility randomized controlled study. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2022;29(2):152–73. https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.57802.
Jin SM, Ahn J, Park J, Hur KY, Kim JH, Lee MK. East Asian diet-mimicking diet plan based on the Mediterranean diet and the dietary approaches to stop hypertension diet in adults with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of diabetes investigation. 2021;12(3):357–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13384.
Barnard ND, Alwarith J, Rembert E, Brandon L, Nguyen M, Goergen A, et al. A Mediterranean diet and low-fat vegan diet to improve body weight and cardiometabolic risk factors: a randomized, cross-over trial. Journal of the American Nutrition Association. 2022;41(2):127–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2020.1869625.
Rocchetti MT, Di Iorio BR, Vacca M, Cosola C, Marzocco S, di Bari I, et al. Ketoanalogs' Effects on intestinal microbiota modulation and uremic toxins serum levels in chronic kidney disease (Medika2 study). J Clin Med. 2021;10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040840.
Dressler J, Storz MA, Müller C, Kandil FI, Kessler CS, Michalsen A, et al. Does a plant-based diet stand out for its favorable composition for heart health? Dietary intake data from a randomized controlled trial. Nutrients. 2022;14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14214597.
Jenkins DJA, Jones PJH, Abdullah MMH, Lamarche B, Faulkner D, Patel D, et al. Low-carbohydrate vegan diets in diabetes for weight loss and sustainability: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqac203.
Njike VY, Treu JA, Kela GCM, Ayettey RG, Comerford BP, Siddiqui WT. Egg consumption in the context of plant-based diets and cardiometabolic risk factors in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes. J Nutr. 2021;151(12):3651–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxab283.
Thomas MS, Puglisi M, Malysheva O, Caudill MA, Sholola M, Cooperstone JL, et al. Eggs improve plasma biomarkers in patients with metabolic syndrome following a plant-based diet-a randomized crossover study. Nutrients. 2022;14(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14102138.
Hartmann AM, Dell’Oro M, Spoo M, Fischer JM, Steckhan N, Jeitler M, et al. To eat or not to eat-an exploratory randomized controlled trial on fasting and plant-based diet in rheumatoid arthritis (NutriFast-Study). Front Nutr. 2022;9:1030380. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.1030380.
Macknin M, Stegmeier N, Thomas A, Worley S, Li L, Hazen SL, et al. Three healthy eating patterns and cardiovascular disease risk markers in 9 to 18 year olds with body mass index >95%: a randomized trial. Clin Pediatr. 2021;60(11–12):474–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/00099228211044841.
Hashim SA, Mohd Yusof BN, Abu Saad H, Ismail S, Hamdy O, Mansour AA. Effectiveness of simplified diabetes nutrition education on glycemic control and other diabetes-related outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clinical nutrition ESPEN. 2021;45:141–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.07.024.
Van Horn L, Aragaki AK, Howard BV, Allison MA, Isasi CR, Manson JE, et al. Eating pattern response to a low-fat diet intervention and cardiovascular outcomes in normotensive women: the Women’s Health Initiative. Curr Dev Nutr. 2020;4(3):nzaa021. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa021.
Miguel-Berges ML, Jimeno-Martínez A, Larruy-García A, Moreno LA, Rodríguez G, Iguacel I. The effect of food vouchers and an educational intervention on promoting healthy eating in vulnerable families: a pilot study. Nutrients. 2022;14(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14234980.
Santos A, Rodrigues A, Rosa LPS, Noll M, Silveira EA. Traditional Brazilian diet and olive oil reduce cardiometabolic risk factors in severely obese individuals: a randomized trial. Nutrients. 2020;12(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12051413.
Levine GN, Frei B, Koulouris SN, Gerhard MD, Keaney JF Jr, Vita JA. Ascorbic acid reverses endothelial vasomotor dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1996;93(6):1107–13. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.93.6.1107.
Taddei S, Virdis A, Ghiadoni L, Magagna A, Salvetti A. Vitamin C improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation by restoring nitric oxide activity in essential hypertension. Circulation. 1998;97(22):2222–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.97.22.2222.
Gokce N, Keaney JF Jr, Frei B, Holbrook M, Olesiak M, Zachariah BJ, et al. Long-term ascorbic acid administration reverses endothelial vasomotor dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1999;99(25):3234–40. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.99.25.3234.
Juraschek SP, Guallar E, Appel LJ, Miller ER 3rd. Effects of vitamin C supplementation on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95(5):1079–88. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.111.027995.
Guan Y, Dai P, Wang H. Effects of vitamin C supplementation on essential hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(8):e19274. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019274.
Heller R, Munscher-Paulig F, Grabner R, Till U. L-Ascorbic acid potentiates nitric oxide synthesis in endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(12):8254–60. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.12.8254.
Visioli F, Smith A, Zhang W, Keaney JF Jr, Hagen T, Frei B. Lipoic acid and vitamin C potentiate nitric oxide synthesis in human aortic endothelial cells independently of cellular glutathione status. Redox Rep. 2002;7(4):223–7. https://doi.org/10.1179/135100002125000604.
Huang A, Vita JA, Venema RC, Keaney JF Jr. Ascorbic acid enhances endothelial nitric-oxide synthase activity by increasing intracellular tetrahydrobiopterin. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(23):17399–406. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M002248200.
Frei B, England L, Ames BN. Ascorbate is an outstanding antioxidant in human blood plasma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86(16):6377–81. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.16.6377.
Visioli F, Keaney JF, Halliwell B. Antioxidants and cardiovascular disease; panaceas or tonics for tired sheep? Cardiovasc Res. 2000;47(3):409. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-6363(00)00156-5.
Carr AC, Zhu BZ, Frei B. Potential antiatherogenic mechanisms of ascorbate (vitamin C) and alpha-tocopherol (vitamin E). Circ Res. 2000;87(5):349–54. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.87.5.349.
Smith AR, Visioli F, Hagen TM. Vitamin C matters: increased oxidative stress in cultured human aortic endothelial cells without supplemental ascorbic acid. FASEB J. 2002;16(9):1102–4. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.01-0825fje.
Halliwell B, Whiteman M. Measuring reactive species and oxidative damage in vivo and in cell culture: how should you do it and what do the results mean? Br J Pharmacol. 2004;142(2):231–55. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0705776.
•• Levine M, Conry-Cantilena C, Wang Y, Welch RW, Washko PW, Dhariwal KR et al. Vitamin C pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers: evidence for a recommended dietary allowance. Proc Natl Acad Sci. U S A. 1996;93(8):3704–9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.8.3704. The definitive human trial on vitamin C and its pharmacokinetics.
Carr AC, Frei B. Toward a new recommended dietary allowance for vitamin C based on antioxidant and health effects in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69(6):1086–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/69.6.1086.
Michels AJ, Hagen TM, Frei B. A new twist on an old vitamin: human polymorphisms in the gene encoding the sodium-dependent vitamin C transporter 1. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92(2):271–2. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2010.29979.
Morelli MB, Gambardella J, Castellanos V, Trimarco V, Santulli G. Vitamin C and cardiovascular disease: an update. Antioxidants (Basel). 2020;9(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9121227.
Padayatty SJ, Levine M. Vitamin C: the known and the unknown and Goldilocks. Oral Dis. 2016;22(6):463–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12446.
Visioli F, Reilly MM, Rimoldi M, Solari A, Pareyson D, for the C-T, et al. Vitamin C and Charcot-Marie-Tooth 1A: pharmacokinetic considerations. PharmaNutrition. 2013;1(1):10–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phanu.2012.10.001.
Chen P, Reed G, Jiang J, Wang Y, Sunega J, Dong R, et al. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of intravenous vitamin C: a classic pharmacokinetic study. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022;61(9):1237–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-022-01142-1.
Padayatty SJ, Sun AY, Chen Q, Espey MG, Drisko J, Levine M. Vitamin C: intravenous use by complementary and alternative medicine practitioners and adverse effects. PLoS One. 2010;5(7):e11414. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011414.
Bruno RM, Daghini E, Ghiadoni L, Sudano I, Rugani I, Varanini M, et al. Effect of acute administration of vitamin C on muscle sympathetic activity, cardiac sympathovagal balance, and baroreflex sensitivity in hypertensive patients. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;96(2):302–8. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.112.035022.
Heitzer T, Just H, Munzel T. Antioxidant vitamin C improves endothelial dysfunction in chronic smokers. Circulation. 1996;94(1):6–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.94.1.6.
d’Uscio LV, Milstien S, Richardson D, Smith L, Katusic ZS. Long-term vitamin C treatment increases vascular tetrahydrobiopterin levels and nitric oxide synthase activity. Circ Res. 2003;92(1):88–95. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.0000049166.33035.62.
Staruschenko A. Beneficial Effects of High Potassium: Contribution of Renal Basolateral K(+) Channels. Hypertension. 2018;71(6):1015–22. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.10267.
Dickinson HO, Nicolson DJ, Campbell F, Beyer FR, Mason J. Potassium supplementation for the management of primary hypertension in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006(3):CD004641. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004641.pub2.
Houston MC. The importance of potassium in managing hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2011;13(4):309–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-011-0197-8.
US Department of Agriculture. https://fdc.nal.usda.gov. Accessed 17 January 2023.
Joshi S, Ettinger L, Liebman SE. Plant-based diets and hypertension. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2020;14(4):397–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827619875411.
Palmer BF, Clegg DJ. Achieving the benefits of a high-potassium, paleolithic diet, without the toxicity. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(4):496–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.01.012.
Campbell S. Dietary reference intakes: water, potassium, sodium, chloride, and sulfate. Clin Nutr Insight. 2004;30:1–4.
Addison WL. The use of sodium chloride, potassium chloride, sodium bromide, and potassium bromide in cases of arterial hypertension which are amenable to potassium chloride. Can Med Assoc J. 1928;18(3):281–5.
Murillo-de-Ozores AR, Gamba G, Castaneda-Bueno M. Molecular mechanisms for the regulation of blood pressure by potassium. Curr Top Membr. 2019;83:285–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ctm.2019.01.004.
Haddy FJ, Vanhoutte PM, Feletou M. Role of potassium in regulating blood flow and blood pressure. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006;290(3):R546–52. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00491.2005.
Fujiwara N, Osanai T, Kamada T, Katoh T, Takahashi K, Okumura K. Study on the relationship between plasma nitrite and nitrate level and salt sensitivity in human hypertension: modulation of nitric oxide synthesis by salt intake. Circulation. 2000;101(8):856–61. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.8.856.
American Heart Association. Get the Scoop on Sodium and Salt. 2022. https://www.heart.org/en/healthy-living/healthy-eating/eat-smart/sodium/sodium-and-salt. Accessed 17 January 2023.
Wu G, Meininger CJ. Regulation of nitric oxide synthesis by dietary factors. Annu Rev Nutr. 2002;22:61–86. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.22.110901.145329.
Bacchetta L, Visioli F, Cappelli G, Caruso E, Martin G, Nemeth E, et al. A manifesto for the valorization of wild edible plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2016;191:180–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2016.05.061.
Visioli F. Science and claims of the arena of food bioactives: comparison of drugs, nutrients, supplements, and nutraceuticals. Food Funct. 2022;13(24):12470–4. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2fo02593k.
Medina-Remon A, Zamora-Ros R, Rotches-Ribalta M, Andres-Lacueva C, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Covas MI, et al. Total polyphenol excretion and blood pressure in subjects at high cardiovascular risk. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2011;21(5):323–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2009.10.019.
Visioli F, Bogani P, Grande S, Galli C. Mediterranean food and health: building human evidence. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2005;56(Suppl 1):37–49.
Grande S, Bogani P, de Saizieu A, Schueler G, Galli C, Visioli F. Vasomodulating potential of mediterranean wild plant extracts. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52(16):5021–6. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf049436e.
Rossoni G, Grande S, Galli C, Visioli F. Wild artichoke prevents the age-associated loss of vasomotor function. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53(26):10291–6. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf052499s.
Zarzuelo A, Duarte J, Jimenez J, Gonzalez M, Utrilla MP. Vasodilator effect of olive leaf. Planta Med. 1991;57(5):417–9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-960138.
Romero M, Toral M, Gomez-Guzman M, Jimenez R, Galindo P, Sanchez M, et al. Antihypertensive effects of oleuropein-enriched olive leaf extract in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Food Funct. 2016;7(1):584–93. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5fo01101a.
Alcaide-Hidalgo JM, Romero M, Duarte J, Lopez-Huertas E. Antihypertensive effects of virgin olive oil (unfiltered) low molecular weight peptides with ACE inhibitory activity in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Nutrients. 2020;12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12010271.
Alcaide-Hidalgo JM, Margalef M, Bravo FI, Muguerza B, Lopez-Huertas E. Virgin olive oil (unfiltered) extract contains peptides and possesses ACE inhibitory and antihypertensive activity. Clin Nutr. 2020;39(4):1242–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2019.05.016.
Lasserre B, Kaiser R, Pham Huu C, Ifansyah N, Gleye J, Moulis C. Effects on rats of aqueous extracts of plants used in folk medicine as antihypertensive agents. Naturwissenschaften. 1983;70(2):95–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00365512.
Razmpoosh E, Abdollahi S, Mousavirad M, Clark CCT, Soltani S. The effects of olive leaf extract on cardiovascular risk factors in the general adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022;14(1):151. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-022-00920-y.
• Lotito SB, Frei B. Consumption of flavonoid-rich foods and increased plasma antioxidant capacity in humans: cause, consequence, or epiphenomenon? Free Radic Biol Med. 2006;41(12):1727–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.04.033. This review questions the purported (and still believed) direct free radical-scevenging actions of (poly)phenols.
Ursini F, Maiorino M, Forman HJ. Redox homeostasis: the golden mean of healthy living. Redox Biol. 2016;8:205–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2016.01.010.
Smith AR, Visioli F, Frei B, Hagen TM. Age-related changes in endothelial nitric oxide synthase phosphorylation and nitric oxide dependent vasodilation: evidence for a novel mechanism involving sphingomyelinase and ceramide-activated phosphatase 2A. Aging Cell. 2006;5(5):391–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00232.x.
Smith AR, Visioli F, Hagen TM. Plasma membrane-associated endothelial nitric oxide synthase and activity in aging rat aortic vascular endothelia markedly decline with age. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2006;454(1):100–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2006.02.017.
Medina-Remon A, Tresserra-Rimbau A, Pons A, Tur JA, Martorell M, Ros E, et al. Effects of total dietary polyphenols on plasma nitric oxide and blood pressure in a high cardiovascular risk cohort. The PREDIMED randomized trial. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;25(1):60–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2014.09.001.
Gomez-Delgado F, Romero-Cabrera JL, Perez-Martinez P. Diet and vascular risk. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2022;37(4):343–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000000960.
Duffy SJ, Keaney JF Jr, Holbrook M, Gokce N, Swerdloff PL, Frei B, et al. Short- and long-term black tea consumption reverses endothelial dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2001;104(2):151–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.104.2.151.
Deka A, Vita JA. Tea and cardiovascular disease. Pharmacol Res. 2011;64(2):136–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2011.03.009.
Widlansky ME, Hamburg NM, Anter E, Holbrook M, Kahn DF, Elliott JG, et al. Acute EGCG supplementation reverses endothelial dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Nutr. 2007;26(2):95–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2007.10719590.
Grassi D, Necozione S, Lippi C, Croce G, Valeri L, Pasqualetti P, et al. Cocoa reduces blood pressure and insulin resistance and improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation in hypertensives. Hypertension. 2005;46(2):398–405. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000174990.46027.70.
Ludovici V, Barthelmes J, Nagele MP, Enseleit F, Ferri C, Flammer AJ, et al. Cocoa, blood pressure, and vascular function. Front Nutr. 2017;4:36. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2017.00036.
Borghi C, Tsioufis K, Agabiti-Rosei E, Burnier M, Cicero AFG, Clement D, et al. Nutraceuticals and blood pressure control: a European Society of Hypertension position document. J Hypertens. 2020;38(5):799–812. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000002353.
Mirmiran P, Houshialsadat Z, Gaeini Z, Bahadoran Z, Azizi F. Functional properties of beetroot (Beta vulgaris) in management of cardio-metabolic diseases. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2020;17:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-019-0421-0.
Olsson H, Al-Saadi J, Oehler D, Pergolizzi J, Jr., Magnusson P. Physiological effects of beetroot in athletes and patients. Cureus. 2019;11(12):e6355. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6355.
Lopez-Torres O, Rodriguez-Longobardo C, Capel-Escoriza R, Fernandez-Elias VE. Ergogenic aids to improve physical performance in female athletes: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2022;15(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15010081.
Scheffler A, Rauwald HW, Kampa B, Mann U, Mohr FW, Dhein S. Olea europaea leaf extract exerts L-type Ca(2+) channel antagonistic effects. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008;120(2):233–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2008.08.018.
Visioli F, Poli A. Fatty acids and cardiovascular risk. evidence, lack of evidence, and diligence. Nutrients. 2020;12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12123782.
Harris WS, Calder PC, Mozaffarian D, Serhan CN. Bang and Dyerberg’s omega-3 discovery turns fifty. Nature Food. 2021;2:303–5.
Aung T, Halsey J, Kromhout D, Gerstein HC, Marchioli R, Tavazzi L, et al. Associations of omega-3 fatty acid supplement use with cardiovascular disease risks: meta-analysis of 10 trials involving 77 917 individuals. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3(3):225–34. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2017.5205.
Tadic M, Sala C, Grassi G, Mancia G, Taddei S, Rottbauer W, et al. Omega-3 fatty acids and coronary artery disease: more questions than answers. J Clin Med. 2021;10(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112495.
Visioli F, Agostoni C. Omega 3 fatty acids and health: the little we know after all these years. Nutrients. 2022;14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14020239.
Sherratt SCR, Libby P, Budoff MJ, Bhatt DL, Mason RP. Role of omega-3 fatty acids in cardiovascular disease: the debate continues. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2023;25(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-022-01075-x.
Calder PC, Deckelbaum RJ. Editorial: Omega-3 fatty acids: new studies, new data, new questions. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2021;24(2):109–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000000726.
Godo S, Takahashi J, Yasuda S, Shimokawa H. Role of inflammation in coronary epicardial and microvascular dysfunction. Eur Cardiol. 2021;16:e13. https://doi.org/10.15420/ecr.2020.47.
Ertuglu LA, Mutchler AP, Yu J, Kirabo A. Inflammation and oxidative stress in salt sensitive hypertension; the role of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Front Physiol. 2022;13:1096296. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.1096296.
Mori TA, Dunstan DW, Burke V, Croft KD, Rivera JH, Beilin LJ, et al. Effect of dietary fish and exercise training on urinary F2-isoprostane excretion in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients. Metabolism. 1999;48(11):1402–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0026-0495(99)90150-6.
Giordano E, Visioli F. Long-chain omega 3 fatty acids: molecular bases of potential antioxidant actions. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2014;90(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plefa.2013.11.002.
Smith WL. Cyclooxygenases, peroxide tone and the allure of fish oil. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005;17(2):174–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2005.02.005.
Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Vellas B, Rizzoli R, Kressig RW, da Silva JAP, Blauth M, et al. Effect of vitamin D supplementation, omega-3 fatty acid supplementation, or a strength-training exercise program on clinical outcomes in older adults: the DO-HEALTH randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;324(18):1855–68. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.16909.
Zhang X, Ritonja JA, Zhou N, Chen BE, Li X. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids intake and blood pressure: a dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(11):e025071. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.025071.
Guo XF, Li KL, Li JM, Li D. Effects of EPA and DHA on blood pressure and inflammatory factors: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(20):3380–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1492901.
Mori TA, Watts GF, Burke V, Hilme E, Puddey IB, Beilin LJ. Differential effects of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid on vascular reactivity of the forearm microcirculation in hyperlipidemic, overweight men. Circulation. 2000;102(1524–4539 (Electronic)):1264–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.11.1264.
Pieters DJ, Zock PL, Fuchs D, Mensink RP. Effect of alpha-linolenic acid on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure in untreated high-normal and stage I hypertensive subjects. Br J Nutr. 2019;121(2):155–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114518003094.
Ursoniu S, Sahebkar A, Andrica F, Serban C, Banach M, et al. Lipid and Blood Pressure Meta-analysis Collaboration. Effects of flaxseed supplements on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trial. Clin Nutr. 2016;35(3):615–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2015.05.012.
Hashimoto M, Tanabe Y, Hossain S, Matsuzaki K, Ohno M, Kato S, et al. Intake of alpha-linolenic acid-rich perilla frutescens leaf powder decreases home blood pressure and serum oxidized low-density lipoprotein in Japanese adults. Molecules. 2020;25(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25092099.
Domenech M, Serra-Mir M, Roth I, Freitas-Simoes T, Valls-Pedret C, Cofan M, et al. Effect of a walnut diet on office and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure in elderly individuals. Hypertension. 2019;73(5):1049–57. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12766.
Gabbs M, Leng S, Devassy JG, Monirujjaman M, Aukema HM. Advances in Our understanding of oxylipins derived from dietary PUFAs. Adv Nutr. 2015;6(5):513–40. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.114.007732.
Naghshi S, Aune D, Beyene J, Mobarak S, Asadi M, Sadeghi O. Dietary intake and biomarkers of alpha linolenic acid and risk of all cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ. 2021;375:n2213. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2213.
Sala-Vila A, Fleming J, Kris-Etherton P, Ros E. Impact of alpha-linolenic acid, the vegetable omega-3 fatty acid, on cardiovascular disease and cognition. Adv Nutr. 2022;13(5):1584–602. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmac016.
Whelan J, Fritsche K. Linoleic acid. Adv Nutr. 2013;4(3):311–2. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.113.003772.
Calder PC, Bosco N, Bourdet-Sicard R, Capuron L, Delzenne N, Dore J, et al. Health relevance of the modification of low grade inflammation in ageing (inflammageing) and the role of nutrition. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;40:95–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2017.09.001.
Fritsche KL. Too much linoleic acid promotes inflammation-doesn’t it? Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2008;79(3–5):173–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plefa.2008.09.019.
Mutanen M, Kleemola P, Valsta LM, Mensink RP, Rasanen L. Lack of effect on blood pressure by polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fat diets. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1992;46(1):1–6.
Mensink RP, Janssen MC, Katan MB. Effect on blood pressure of two diets differing in total fat but not in saturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids in healthy volunteers. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988;47(6):976–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/47.6.976.
Zock PL, Blijlevens RA, de Vries JH, Katan MB. Effects of stearic acid and trans fatty acids versus linoleic acid on blood pressure in normotensive women and men. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1993;47(6):437–44.
Aro A, Pietinen P, Valsta LM, Salminen I, Turpeinen AM, Virtanen M, et al. Lack of effect on blood pressure by low fat diets with different fatty acid compositions. J Hum Hypertens. 1998;12(6):383–9.
Miura K, Stamler J, Nakagawa H, Elliott P, Ueshima H, Chan Q, et al. Relationship of dietary linoleic acid to blood pressure. The International Study of Macro-Micronutrients and Blood Pressure Study [corrected]. Hypertension. 2008;52(2):408–14. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.112383.
Wang L, Manson JE, Forman JP, Gaziano JM, Buring JE, Sesso HD. Dietary fatty acids and the risk of hypertension in middle-aged and older women. Hypertension. 2010;56(4):598–604. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.154187.
Hooper L, Al-Khudairy L, Abdelhamid AS, Rees K, Brainard JS, Brown TJ, et al. Omega-6 fats for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;11:CD011094. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011094.pub4.
Harris WS, Mozaffarian D, Rimm E, Kris-Etherton P, Rudel LL, Appel LJ, et al. Omega-6 fatty acids and risk for cardiovascular disease: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Nutrition Subcommittee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation. 2009;119(6):902–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191627.
Farvid MS, Ding M, Pan A, Sun Q, Chiuve SE, Steffen LM, et al. Dietary linoleic acid and risk of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Circulation. 2014;130(18):1568–78. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010236.
One health framework. https://www.cdc.gov/onehealth/basics/index.html. Accessed 3 May 2023
Casas R, Ribó-Coll M, Ros E, Fitó M, Lamuela-Raventos RM, Salas-Salvadó J, et al. Change to a healthy diet in people over 70 years old: the PREDIMED experience. Eur J Nutr. 2022;61(3):1429–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-021-02741-7.
Maifeld A, Bartolomaeus H, Löber U, Avery EG, Steckhan N, Markó L, et al. Fasting alters the gut microbiome reducing blood pressure and body weight in metabolic syndrome patients. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1970. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22097-0.
Zhu R, Fogelholm M, Poppitt SD, Silvestre MP, Møller G, Huttunen-Lenz M, et al. Adherence to a plant-based diet and consumption of specific plant foods-associations with 3-year weight-loss maintenance and cardiometabolic risk factors: a secondary analysis of the PREVIEW intervention study. Nutrients. 2021;13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13113916.
Turner-McGrievy GM, Wilson MJ, Carswell J, Okpara N, Aydin H, Bailey S, et al. A 12-week randomized intervention comparing the healthy US, Mediterranean, and vegetarian dietary patterns of the US dietary guidelines for changes in body weight, hemoglobin A1c, blood pressure, and dietary quality among African American adults. J Nutr. 2023;153(2):579–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2022.11.020.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Padova within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tomé-Carneiro, J., Visioli, F. Plant-Based Diets Reduce Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review of Recent Evidence. Curr Hypertens Rep 25, 127–150 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-023-01243-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-023-01243-7