Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Current Trends in the Management of Low Rectal Tumors: Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision

  • Surgery and Surgical Innovations in Colorectal Cancer (S Huerta, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Colorectal Cancer Reports

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The access of the low rectum is a surgical challenge and, in case of cancer, the outcome of the patient depends on the quality of the surgery. The transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) is a surgical technique with a combined abdominal and perineal approach. We review the literature for technical aspect of taTME as well as comparisons with other techniques.

Recent Findings

Comparison with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision and taTME was summarized in a meta-analysis which showed better oncological results with lower circumferential margin involvement and better completeness of the mesorectum.

Summary

TaTME is a safe approach. All steps of the intervention are well described and should be followed as numerous pitfalls exist. When compared with laparoscopic or robotic TME, the taTME showed to be safe with similar oncological results. Patients known to be difficult, male, obese, with a narrow pelvis, should be considered for the taTME approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration. Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol. 2017; 3(4):524–548. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688.

  2. • Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1986;1(8496):1479–82. First description from Prof. Heald of the importance of Total Mesorectum excision.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van Gijn W, Marijnen C, Nagtegaal ID, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:575–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nagtegaal ID, van Kriekan JH. The role of pathologists in the quality control of diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer—an overview. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38(7):964–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. •• Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, et al. Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(7):1729–34. This paper introduces the importance of surgical quality for local recurrence.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nagtegaal D, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg EK, et al. Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carci- noma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26(3):350–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hompes R, Ris F, Cunningham C, Mortensen NJ, Cahill RA. Transanal glove port is a safe and cost-effective alternative for transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br J Surg. 2012;99(10):1429–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8865.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(9):220–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guarner-Argente C, Beltrán M, Martínez-Pallí G, Navarro-Ripoll R, Martínez-Zamora MÀ, Córdova H, et al. Infection during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery peritoneoscopy: a randomized comparative study in a survival porcine model. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18(6):741–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2011.08.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, et al. NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1205–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0965.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heald RJ. A new solution to some old problems: transanal TME. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17(3):257–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-0984-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferko A, Malý O, Örhalmi J, Dolejš J. CT/MRI pelvimetry as a useful tool when selecting patients with rectal cancer for transanal total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(3):1164–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4324-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. •• Adamina M, Buchs NC, Penna M, et al. St. Gallen consensus on safe implementation of transanal total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(3):1091–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5990-2. International experts consensus which set the basis, indications of taTME and how to implement this technique safely.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. •• Atallah S, Albert M, Monson JR. Critical concepts and important anatomic landmarks encountered during transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME): toward the mastery of a new operation for rectal cancer surgery. Tech Coloproctol. 2016;20(7):483–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1475-x. Excellent review of all the critical steps of the taTME and how to avoid pitfalls.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Buchs NC, Kraus R, Mortensen NJ, et al. Endoscopically assisted extralevator abdominoperineal excision. Color Dis. 2015;17:277–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Penna M, Knol JJ, Tuynman JB, Tekkis PP, Mortensen NJ, Hompes R. Four anastomotic techniques following transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Tech Coloproctol. 2016;20:185–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1414-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bracey E, Knol J, Buchs N, et al. Technique for a stapled anastomosis following transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17(10):O208–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Buchs NC, Hompes R. Stereotactic navigation and augmented reality for transanal total mesorectal excision? Color Dis. 2015;17:825–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Larach S. Image-guided real-time navigation for transanal total mesorectal excision: a pilot study. Tech Coloproctol. 2015;19(11):679–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1329-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mizrahi I, de Lacy FB, Abu-Gazala M, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer with indocyanine green fluorescence angiography. Tech Coloproctol. 2018;22:785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1869-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ratcliffe F, Hogan AM, Hompes R. CO2 embolus: an important complication of TaTME surgery. Tech Coloproctol. 2017;21:61–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1565-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Goto S, Hasegawa S, Hida K. Multicenter analysis of impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term oncologic outcomes after curative resection of colon cancer. Surgery. 2017;162(2):317–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.03.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Phitayakorn R, Delaney CP, Reynolds HL, Champagne BJ, Heriot AG, Neary P, et al. Standardized algorithms for management of anastomotic leaks and related abdominal and pelvic abscesses after colorectal surgery. World J Surg. 2008;32(6):1147–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9468-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, Wynn G, Austin R, Warusavitarne J, et al. Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic failure in 1594 patients treated by transanal total mesorectal excision: results from the international TaTME registry. Ann Surg. 2018:1. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002653.

  25. Blok RD, Stam R, Westerduin E, Borstlap WAA, Hompes R, Bemelman WA, et al. Impact of an institutional change from routine to highly selective diversion of a low anastomosis after TME for rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(8):1220–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.03.033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Buchs NC, Kraus R, Mortensen NJ, Cunningham C, George B, Jones O, et al. Endoscopically assisted extralevator abdominoperineal excision. Color Dis. 2015;17(12):O277–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Letarte F, Raval M, Karimuddin A, Phang PT, Brown CJ. Salvage TME following TEM: a possible indication for TaTME. Tech Coloproctol. 2018;22(5):355–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1784-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. de Lacy FB, van Laarhoven JJEM, Pena R, Arroyave MC, Bravo R, Cuatrecasas M, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision: pathological results of 186 patients with mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(5):2442–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5944-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision: international registry results of the first 720 cases. Ann Surg. 2017;266(1):111–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hüscher CG, Tierno SM, Romeo V, et al. Technologies, technical steps, and early postoperative results of transanal TME. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016;25(5):247–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2016.1206024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Burke JP, Martin-Perez B, Khan A, Nassif G, de Beche-Adams T, Larach SW, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: early outcomes in 50 consecutive patients. Color Dis. 2016;18(6):570–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13263.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Buchs NC, Wynn G, Austin R, et al. A two-centre experience of transanal total mesorectal excision. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18:1154–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lacy AM, Tasende MM, Delgado S, Fernandez-Hevia M, Jimenez M, de Lacy B, et al. Transanal Total Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: outcomes after 140 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(2):415–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.03.046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Veltcamp Helbach M, Deijen CL, Velthuis S, Bonjer HJ, Tuynman JB, Sietses C. Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma: short-term outcomes and experience after 80 cases. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(2):464–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4221-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MHGM, de Lange-de Klerk ESM, et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1324–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Marks JH, Myers EA, Zeger EL, Denittis AS, Gummadi M, Marks GJ. Long-term outcomes by a transanal approach to total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(12):5248–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5597-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang X, Gao Y, Dai X, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid-to-low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6527.

  38. Detering R, Roodbeen SX, van Oostendorp SE, Dekker J-WT, Sietses C, Bemelman WA, et al. Dutch colorectal cancer audit group. Three-year nationwide experience with transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in the Netherlands: a propensity score-matched comparison with conventional laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. J Am Coll Surg. 2019;228(3):235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.016.

  39. Veltcamp Helbach M, Koedam TWA, Knol JJ, Velthuis S, Bonjer HJ, Tuynman JB, et al. Quality of life after rectal cancer surgery: differences between laparoscopic and transanal total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(1):79–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6276-z.

  40. Bjoern MX, Nielsen S, Perdawood SK. Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: a comparison of functional outcomes after transanal and laparoscopic approaches. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-4057-6.

  41. Deijen C, Velthuis S, Tsai A, et al. COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:3210–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lelong B, de Chaisemartin C, Meillat H, et al. A multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy, morbidity and functional outcome of endoscopic transanal proctectomy versus laparoscopic proctectomy for low-lying rectal cancer (ETAP-GRECCAR 11 TRIAL): rationale and design. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):253. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3200-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Law WL, Foo DCC. Comparison of early experience of robotic and transanal total mesorectal excision using propensity score matching. Surg Endosc. 2018;33:757–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6340-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Perez D, Melling N, Biebl M, Reeh M, Baukloh JK, Miro J, et al. Robotic low anterior resection versus transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a comparison of 115 cases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(2):237–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2017.11.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kuo LJ, Ngu JC, Tong YS, Chen CC. Combined robotic transanal total mesorectal excision (R-taTME) and single-site plus one-port (R-SSPO) technique for ultra-low rectal surgery-initial experience with a new operation approach. Int J Color Dis. 2017;32:249–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Coffey JC, Dillon MF, O'Driscoll JS, et al. Transanal total mesocolic excision (taTME) as part of ileoanal pouch formation in ulcerative colitis--first report of a case. Int J Color Dis. 2016;31(3):735–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2236-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Xian-rui Wu X, Wei L, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision as a surgical procedure for diffuse cavernous hemangioma of the rectum: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;39:164–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Leo CA, Samaranayake S, Perry-Woodford ZL, Vitone L, Faiz O, Hodgkinson JD, et al. Initial experience of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis by transanal total mesorectal rectal excision and single-incision abdominal laparoscopic surgery. Color Dis. 2016;18(12):1162–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13359.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Penna M, Whiteford M, Hompes R, Sylla P. Developing and assessing a cadaveric training model for transanal total mesorectal excision: initial experience in the UK and USA. Color Dis. 2017;19(5):476–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Koedam TWA, Veltcamp Helbach M, van de Ven PM, Kruyt PM, van Heek NT, Bonjer HJ, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: evaluation of the learning curve. Tech Coloproctol. 2018;22(4):279–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1771-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Francis N, Penna M, Mackenzie H, et al. Consensus on structured training curriculum for transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Surg Endosc. 2017;31(7):2711–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5562-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mickael Chevallay.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Surgery and Surgical Innovations in Colorectal Cancer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chevallay, M., Meyer, J., Wassmer, CH. et al. Current Trends in the Management of Low Rectal Tumors: Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep 15, 90–97 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11888-019-00434-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11888-019-00434-2

Keywords

Navigation