Skip to main content
Log in

Implicit learning of non-linguistic and linguistic regularities in children with dyslexia

  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the hallmarks of dyslexia is the failure to automatise written patterns despite repeated exposure to print. Although many explanations have been proposed to explain this problem, researchers have recently begun to explore the possibility that an underlying implicit learning deficit may play a role in dyslexia. This hypothesis has been investigated through non-linguistic tasks exploring implicit learning in a general domain. In this study, we examined the abilities of children with dyslexia to implicitly acquire positional regularities embedded in both non-linguistic and linguistic stimuli. In experiment 1, 42 children (21 with dyslexia and 21 typically developing) were exposed to rule-governed shape sequences; whereas in experiment 2, a new group of 42 children were exposed to rule-governed letter strings. Implicit learning was assessed in both experiments via a forced-choice task. Experiments 1 and 2 showed a similar pattern of results. ANOVA analyses revealed no significant differences between the dyslexic and the typically developing group, indicating that children with dyslexia are not impaired in the acquisition of simple positional regularities, regardless of the nature of the stimuli. However, within group t-tests suggested that children from the dyslexic group could not transfer the underlying positional rules to novel instances as efficiently as typically developing children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Shapes were sequentially added as a previous pilot study with a sample of TD third graders showed that participants could only learn the visual regularities when each shape was added to the display one-at-a-time (instead of presenting all four shapes at once).

References

  • Arciuli, J., & Simpson, I. C. (2012). Statistical learning is related to reading ability in children and adults. Cognitive Science, 36(2), 286–304. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01200.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defior, S., Fonseca, L., Gottheil, B., Aldrey, A., Jiménez-Fernández, G., Pujals, M., … Serrano, F. (2006). LEE. Test de Lectura y Escritura en Español. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

  • Du, W., & Kelly, S. W. (2013). Implicit sequence learning in dyslexia: a within-sequence comparison of first- and higher-order information. Annals of Dyslexia, 63(2), 154–170. doi:10.1007/s11881-012-0077-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2001). Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes. Psychological Science, 12(6), 499–504. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folia, V., Uddén, J., Forkstam, C., Ingvar, M., Hagoort, P., & Petersson, K. M. (2008). Implicit learning and dyslexia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1145(1), 132–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabay, Y., Schiff, R., & Vakil, E. (2012). Dissociation between the procedural learning of letter names and motor sequences in developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 50(10), 2435–2441. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.06.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gombert, J. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning to read: implication as for subtypes of dyslexia. Current Psychology Letters, 10(1), 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goschke, T. (1998). Implicit learning of perceptual and motor sequences: Evidence for independent learning systems. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 401–444). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Grabe, W. (2010). Fluency in reading—thirty-five years later. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. H., Jr., Howard, D. V., Japikse, K. C., & Eden, G. F. (2006). Dyslexics are impaired on implicit higher-order sequence learning, but not on implicit spatial context learning. Neuropsychologia, 44(7), 1131–1144. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ise, E., Arnoldi, C. J., Bartling, J., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2012). Implicit learning in children with spelling disability: evidence from artificial grammar learning. Journal of Neural Transmission, 119(9), 999–1010. doi:10.1007/s00702-012-0830-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Fernández, G., Vaquero, J. M. M., Jiménez, L., & Defior, S. (2011). Dyslexic children show deficits in implicit sequence learning, but not in explicit sequence learning or contextual cueing. Annals of Dyslexia, 61(1), 85–110. doi:10.1007/s11881-010-0048-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S. W., Griffiths, S., & Frith, U. (2002). Evidence for implicit sequence learning in dyslexia. Dyslexia, 8(1), 43–52. doi:10.1002/dys.208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lum, J. A. G., Ullman, M. T., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2013). Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(10), 3460–3476. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menghini, D., Finzi, A., Benassi, M., Bolzani, R., Facoetti, A., Giovagnoli, S., … Vicari, S. (2010). Different underlying neurocognitive deficits in developmental dyslexia: a comparative study. Neuropsychologia, 48(4), 863–872. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.11.003.

  • Nigro, L., Jiménez-Fernández, G., Simpson, I. C., & Defior, S. (2015). Implicit learning of written regularities and its relationship to literacy acquisition in a shallow orthography. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44(5), 571–585. doi:10.1007/s10936-014-9303-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 1–32. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacton, S., Fayol, M., & Perruchet, P. (2005). Children’s implicit learning of graphotactic and morphological regularities. Child Development, 76(2), 324–339. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00848_a.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacton, S., Perruchet, P., Fayol, M., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Implicit learning out of the lab: the case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3), 401–426. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlidou, E. V., Kelly, M. L., & Williams, J. M. (2010). Do children with developmental dyslexia have impairments in implicit learning? Dyslexia, 16(2), 143–161. doi:10.1002/dys.400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlidou, E. V., & Williams, J. M. (2014). Implicit learning and reading: Insights from typical children and children with developmental dyslexia using the artificial grammar learning (AGL) paradigm. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(7), 1457–1472. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.03.040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlidou, E. V., Williams, J. M., & Kelly, L. M. (2009). Artificial grammar learning in primary school children with and without developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 59(1), 55–77. doi:10.1007/s11881-009-0023-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pothos, E. M. (2007). Theories of artificial grammar learning. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 227–244. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pothos, E. M., & Kirk, J. (2004). Investigating learning deficits associated with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 10(1), 61–76. doi:10.1002/dys.266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1996). Raven matrices progresivas, escalas color (CPM), general (SPM), superior (APM): Manual. Madrid: Tea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: an essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roodenrys, S., & Dunn, N. (2008). Unimpaired implicit learning in children with developmental dyslexia. Dyslexia, 14(1), 1–15. doi:10.1002/dys.340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rüsseler, J., Gerth, I., & Münte, T. F. (2006). Implicit learning is intact in adult developmental dyslexic readers: evidence from the serial reaction time task and artificial grammar learning. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28(5), 808–827. doi:10.1080/13803390591001007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime 2.0 software. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M. J., & Stackhouse, J. (Eds.). (2006). Dyslexia, speech and language: a practitioner’s handbook (2nd ed.). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, A. J., Lu, Z. L., & Manis, F. R. (2004). Slower implicit categorical learning in adult poor readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 54(2), 281–303. doi:10.1007/s11881-004-0014-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoodley, C. J., Harrison, E. P. D., & Stein, J. F. (2006). Implicit motor learning deficits in dyslexic adults. Neuropsychologia, 44(5), 795–798. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoodley, C. J., Ray, N. J., Jack, A., & Stein, J. F. (2008). Implicit learning in control, dyslexic, and garden-variety poor readers. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1145(1), 173–183. doi:10.1196/annals.1416.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicari, S., Marotta, L., Menghini, D., Molinari, M., & Petrosini, L. (2003). Implicit learning deficit in children with developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 41(1), 108–114. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00082-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been partially supported by PITN-215961-ELDEL project of the FP7 Marie Curie programme and HUM-820 research group of the Junta de Andalucía.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciana Nigro.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 3 Abstract shapes used in experiment 1 and letters used in experiment 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nigro, L., Jiménez-Fernández, G., Simpson, I.C. et al. Implicit learning of non-linguistic and linguistic regularities in children with dyslexia. Ann. of Dyslexia 66, 202–218 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-015-0116-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-015-0116-9

Keywords

Navigation