Skip to main content
Log in

Slower implicit categorical learning in adult poor readers

  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between reading and explicit and implicit categorical learning by comparing university students with poor reading to students with normal reading abilities on two categorical learning tasks. One categorical learning task involved sorting simple geometric shapes into two groups according to a unidimensional rule. The sorting rule was easily stated by the participants, consistent with explicit learning, and all participants attained criterion levels of performance. The second task involved the integration of features on different dimensions with a more complex rule that could not be described by participants, even though most could attain criterion levels of performance consistent with implicit learning. Poor readers performed as well as those without reading problems in explicit learning but not in implicit learning. Implicit learning was correlated with word reading, phonological decoding, and orthographic skill, independent of verbal ability. We consider the role of implicit learning in reading, and how a deficit could impair phonological and orthographic representation and processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, U., & Waldron, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105, 442–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, F. G., & Ell, S. W. (2001). The neurobiology of human category learning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 204–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (1993). Relations between prototype, exemplar, and decision bound models of categorization. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 37, 372–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, J. R., Perfetti, C. A., & MacWhinney, B. (1999). Quick, automatic, and general activation of orthographic and phonological representations in young readers. Developmental Psychology, 35, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, M., Demetre, J., Hamill, S., Robson, K., Shepherd, H., & Cody, G. (2002). Executive functioning in adults and children with developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2144–2155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, M. (1990). Word-recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 26, 439–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, G. F., Vanmeter, J., Rumsey, J., Maisog, J., Woods, R., & Zeffiro, T. (1996). Abnormal processing of visual motion in dyslexia revealed by functional brain imaging. Nature, 382, 66–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (1990). Development of the ability to read words. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (vol. 2, pp. 383–417). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exner, C., Koschack, J., & Irle, E. (2002). The differential role of premotor frontal cortex and basal ganglia in motor sequence learning: Evidence from focal basal ganglia lesions. Learning and Memory, 9, 376–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, J., Syrdal-Lasky, A., Millay, K., & Knox, C. (1981). Performance of dyslexic children on speech perception tests. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32, 401–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottardo, A., Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1996). The relationships between phonological sensitivity, syntactic processing, and verbal working memory in the reading performance of third-grade children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 563–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harm, M., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harm, M., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S. W., Griffiths, S., & Frith, U. (2002). Evidence for implicit sequence learning in dyslexia. Dyslexia, 8, 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keri, S. (2003). The cognitive neuroscience of category learning. Brain Research Reviews, 43, 85–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowlton, B. J., Mangels, J. A., & Squire, L. R. (1996). A neostriatal habit learning system in humans. Science, 273, 1399–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1993). The learning of categories: Parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge. Science, 262, 1747–1749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowlton, B. J., Squire, L. R., Paulsen, J. S., Swerdlow, N. R., Swenson, M., & Butters, N. (1996). Dissociations within nondeclarative memory in Huntington’s disease. Neuropsychology, 10, 538–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, W. T., & Filoteo, J. V. (2001). Striatal contributions to category learning: Quantitative modeling of simple linear and complex non-linear rule learning in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 710–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manis, F. R., & Keating, P. (in press). Speech perception in dyslexic children with and without language impairments. In H. W. Catts & A. G. Kamhi (Eds.), The connections between language and reading disabilities. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., Doi, L. M., McBride-Chang, C., & Petersen, A. (1996). On the bases of two subtypes of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 58, 157–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manis, F. R., Sperling, A. J., & Lu, Z. L. (2004, June). Visual processing deficits in dyslexia in high noise displays. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Amsterdam.

  • Mather, N., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001a). Examiner’s manual. Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, N., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001b). Examiner’s manual. Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson, R. I., Fawcett, A. J., & Dean, P. (2001). Developmental dyslexia: The cerebellar deficit hypothesis. Trends in Neuroscience, 9, 508–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 115, 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. K., Wise, B. W., Conners, F., Rack, J., & Fulker, D. (1989). Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 339–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulesu, E., Démonet, J.-F., Fazio, F., McCrory, E., Chanoine, V., Brunswick, N., Cappa, S. F., Cossu, G., Habib, M., Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2001). Dyslexia: Cultural diversity and biological unity. Science, 291, 2165–2167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, B. F., & Lefly, D. L. (2001). Early reading development in children at family risk for dyslexia. Child Development, 72, 816–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. (Oxford Psychology Series No. 19). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serniclaes, W., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Carré, R., & Démonet, J.-F. (2001). Perceptual discrimination of speech sounds in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 384–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, A. J. (2004). Perceptual integration and noise exclusion in the etiology of developmental dyslexia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

  • Sperling, A. J., Lu, Z. L., & Manis, F. R. (2003, April). Magnocellular processing in reading: A study using phantom contour paradigm and first-order motion. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, San Francisco, CA.

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression based test of the phonological-core variable difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffler, D. J. (2001). Implicit cognition and spelling development. Developmental Review, 21, 168–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, D., & Goswami, U. (1997). Phonological awareness deficits in developmental dyslexia and the phonological representations hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 18–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talcott, J. B., Hansen, P. C., Assoku, E. L., & Stein, J. F. (2000). Visual motion sensitivity in dyslexia: Evidence for temporal and energy integration deficits. Neuropsychologia 38, 935–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicari, S., Marotta, L., Menghini, D., Molinari, M., & Petrosini, L. (2003). Implicit learning deficit in children with developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 41, 108–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werker, J., & Tees, R. (1987). Speech perception in severely disabled and average reading children. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 48–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willcutt, E. G., Pennington, B. F., Boada, R., Ogline, J. S., Tunick, R. A., Chhabildas, N. A., & Olson, R. K. (2001). A comparison of the cognitive deficits in reading disability and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (2000). The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 668–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H., Oltman, P., Raskin, E., & Karps, S. (1971). A manual for the group-embedded figures test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, P. H., Michel, G. F., Ovrut, M., & Drake, C. (1990). Rate and timing precision of motor coordination in developmental dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 26, 349–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne J. Sperling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sperling, A.J., Lu, ZL. & Manis, F.R. Slower implicit categorical learning in adult poor readers. Ann. of Dyslexia 54, 281–303 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-004-0014-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-004-0014-z

Keywords

Navigation