Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Examination of the double-deficit hypothesis with adolescents and young adults with dyslexia

  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The double-deficit hypothesis (DDH) of the developmental dyslexias (Wolf and Bowers, Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415–438, 1999) was investigated with 149 adolescents and young adults (age range = 16 to 24 years) with dyslexia. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that a two-factor model with separate naming speed (NS) and phonological awareness (PA) constructs was superior to a one-factor model, supporting the assumption within the DDH that NS is a source of reading dysfunction separable from PA. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses resulted in findings that were only partially supportive of the DDH. NS was predictive of word reading, spelling, and reading fluency beyond PA and verbal intellectual ability, but not pseudoword reading and timed and untimed reading comprehension. Examination of DDH subtypes did not support the core assumption of the DDH that the double-deficit subtype would have more impaired reading skills than both of the single-deficit subtypes. The NS deficit subtype was found to be more prevalent than the double-deficit and PA deficit subtypes within the subgroup of dyslexics with impairment in reading fluency. Overall results provided mixed support for the DDH and pointed to the need for the inclusion of additional abilities within theories of the underlying mechanisms disrupted in dyslexia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, P. T., Holloway, C. A., Youngdahl, P. L., & Dykman, R. A. (2001). The double-deficit theory of reading disability does not fit all. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 152–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments, 42 U.S.C. §12101 et seq. (2008).

  • Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101–336, 104 Stat. 328 (1990).

  • Araujo, S., Pacheco, A., Faisca, L., Petersson, K. M., & Reis, A. (2010). Visual rapid naming and phonological abilities: different subtypes in dyslexic children. International Journal of Psychology, 45, 443–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badian, N. A. (1997). Dyslexia and the double-deficit hypothesis. Annals of Dyslexia, 47, 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Thomson, J., Wagner, R., Swanson, H. L., & Raskind, W. (2006). Modeling phonological core deficits within a working memory architecture in children and adults with developmental dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 165–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. I., Fishco, V. V., & Hannah, G. (1993a). Nelson-Denny reading test. Chicago, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. I., Fishco, V. V., & Hannah, G. (1993b). Nelson-Denny reading test technical report forms G & H. Chicago, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueggermann, A. E., Kamphaus, R. W., & Dombrowski, S. C. (2008). An impairment model of learning disability diagnosis. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39, 424–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canivez, G. L. (2013). Psychometric versus actuarial interpretation of intelligence and related aptitude batteries. In D. H. Saklofske, C. R. Reynolds, & V. L. Schwean (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of child psychological assessment (pp. 84–112). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cirino, P. T., Israelian, M. K., Morris, M. K., & Morris, R. D. (2005). Evaluation of the double-deficit hypothesis in college students referred for learning difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coady, J. A. (2013). Rapid naming by children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 604–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, D. L., DeFries, J. C., & Olson, R. K. (2001). Are RAN- and phonological-awareness deficits additive in children with reading disabilities? Dyslexia, 7, 125–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2001). Converging evidence for the concept of orthographic processing. Reading and Writing, 14, 549–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, L. E., & Denckla, M. B. (2001). The relationship of rapid serial naming and word reading in normally developing readers: an explanatory model. Reading and Writing, 14, 673–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denckla, M. B., & Cutting, L. E. (1999). History and significance of rapid automatized naming. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dombrowski, S. C., Kamphaus, R. W., & Reynolds, C. R. (2004). After the demise of the discrepancy: proposed learning disabilities diagnostic criteria. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 364–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007a). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007b). Peabody picture vocabulary test, fourth edition manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escribano, C. L. (2007). Evaluation of the double-deficit hypothesis subtype classification of readers in Spanish. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou, G. K., Parrilla, R., Kirby, J. R., & Stephenson, K. (2008). Rapid naming components and their relationship with phonological awareness, orthographic knowledge, speed of processing, and different reading outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 325–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammill, D. D., Mather, N., Allen, E. A., & Roberts, R. (2002). Using semantics, grammar, phonology, and rapid naming tasks to predict word identification. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez, J. E., Hernandez-Valle, I., Rodriguez, C., Guzman, R., Diaz, A., & Ortiz, R. (2008). The double-deficit hypothesis in Spanish developmental dyslexia. Topics in Language Disorders, 28, 46–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamphaus, R. W. (2005). Clinical assessment of child and adolescent intelligence (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzir, T., Kim, Y., Wolf, M., Morris, R., & Lovett, M. W. (2008). The varieties of pathways to dysfluent reading: comparing subtypes of children with dyslexia at letter, word, and connected text levels of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, J. R., Georgiou, G. K., Martinussen, R., & Parrila, R. (2010). Naming speed and reading: from prediction to instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 341–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R. K., & Pfeiffer, S. L. (2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 453–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loehlin, J. C. (2004). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis (4th ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manis, F. R., Doi, L. M., & Bhadha, B. (2000). Naming speed, phonological awareness, and orthographic knowledge in second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 325–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCardle, P., Scarborough, H. S., & Catts, H. W. (2001). Predicting, explaining, and preventing children’s reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 230–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFall, R. M. (2005). Theory and utility: key themes in evidence-based assessment. Psychological Assessment, 17, 312–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, K. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). Woodcock–Johnson III technical manual. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. J., Miller, S. R., Bloom, J. S., Jones, L., Lindstrom, W., & Hynd, G. W. (2006). Testing the double-deficit hypothesis in an adult sample. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 83–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. M., Lindstrom, J. H., Lindstrom, W., & Denis, D. (2012). The structure of phonological processing and its relationship to basic reading. Exceptionality, 20, 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, E. S., & Wolf, M. (2012). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 427–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, B. A., Wolf, M., & Lovett, M. W. (2012). A taxometric investigation of developmental dyslexia subtypes. Dyslexia, 18, 16–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, B. F., Cardoso-Martins, C., Green, P. A., & Lefly, D. L. (2001). Comparing the phonological and double-deficit hypotheses for developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 14, 707–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, D., Stainthorp, R., Stuart, M., Garwood, H., & Quinlan, P. (2007). An experimental comparison between rival theories of rapid automatized naming performance and its relationship to reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 98, 46–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., & Olson, R. K. (1992). The nonword deficit in developmental dyslexia: a review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 28–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rucklidge, J. J., & Tannock, R. (2002). Neuropsychological profiles of adolescents with ADHD: effects of reading difficulties and gender. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 988–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatschneider, C., Carlson, C. D., Francis, D. J., Foorman, B. R., & Fletcher, J. M. (2002). Relationships of rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness in early reading development: implications for the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semrud-Clikeman, M., Guy, K., Griffin, J. D., & Hynd, G. W. (2000). Rapid naming deficits in children and adolescents with reading disabilities and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Brain and Language, 74, 70–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden variety poor reader: the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunseth, K., & Bowers, P. G. (2002). Rapid naming and phonemic awareness: contributions to reading, spelling, and orthographic knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 401–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., & Hsieh, C. (2009). Reading disabilities in adults: a selective meta-analysis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1362–1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., & Siegel, L. (2001). Learning disabilities as a working memory deficit. Issues in Education, 7, 107–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., Trainin, G., Necoechea, D. M., & Hammill, D. D. (2003). Rapid naming, phonological awareness, and reading: a meta-analysis of the correlation evidence. Review of Educational Research, 73, 407–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannock, R., Martinussen, R., & Frijters, J. (2000). Naming speed performance and stimulant effects indicate effortful, semantic processing deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K. (2002). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaessen, G. P., & Blomert, L. (2009). Naming problems do not reflect a second independent core deficit in dyslexia: double deficits explored. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 202–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what we have learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vukovic, R. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2006). The double-deficit hypothesis: a comprehensive analysis of evidence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vukovic, R. K., Wilson, A. M., & Nash, K. K. (2004). Naming speed deficits in adults with reading disabilities: a test of the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 440–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Garza, N., & Levine, P. (2005). After high school: A first look at the postschool experiences of youth with learning disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study – 2. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/2005-04/nlts2_report_2005_04_complete.pdf.

  • Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999a). Comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999b). Comprehensive test of phonological processing examiner’s manual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willcutt, E. G., Pennington, B. F., Olson, R. K., & DeFries, J. C. (2007). Understanding comorbidity: a twin study of reading disability and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. American Journal of Medical Genetics (Neuropsychiatric Genetics), 144, 709–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (2000). The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 668–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., O’Rourke, A. G., Gidney, C., Lovett, M., Cirino, P., & Morris, R. (2002). The second deficit: an investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 15, 43–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001a). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement normative update. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001b). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities normative update. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Regents’ Center for Learning Disorders, University of Georgia, 337 Milledge Hall, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    Jason M. Nelson

Authors
  1. Jason M. Nelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason M. Nelson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nelson, J.M. Examination of the double-deficit hypothesis with adolescents and young adults with dyslexia. Ann. of Dyslexia 65, 159–177 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-015-0105-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-015-0105-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation