Skip to main content
Log in

Phonological and orthographic processing: Their roles in reading prediction

  • Part IV Relating Oral Language Abilities To Reading
  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ninety-six children were administered an orthographic test as preschoolers and two measures of nonphonemic phonological awareness (syllable segmentation, rhyme detection) in midkindergarten. The power of the three measures to predict reading at grades 1, 3, and 7 was examined. With earlier reading level, preschool verbal IQ and age, and verbal memory controlled, both phonological measures added significant variance to grade 1 word reading, and syllable segmentation also contributed to reading comprehension, but neither measure accounted for variance in reading at grades 3 and 7. The orthographic measure contributed significant variance to grade 1 word reading, and also to reading vocabulary and reading comprehension at grades 3 and 7, with the proportion of variance in reading comprehension increasing with grade level. When early (grade 1) and late (grade 7) poor readers were compared, late poor readers were significantly higher than early poor readers on a first grade phonological test, but significantly lower on a seventh grade orthographic measure. Evidence suggested that a late reading comprehension deficit may be due to poor orthographic processing skills in some children, but to a phonological and general verbal deficit in others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). Word recognition: The interface of educational policies and scientific research. Reading and Writing: An interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 113–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badian, N. A. (1994). Preschool prediction: Orthographic and phonological skills, and reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 44: 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badian, N. A. (1995). Predicting reading ability over the long term: The changing roles of letter-naming, phonological awareness and orthographic processing. Annals of Dyslexia, 45: 79–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badian, N. A. (1998). A validation of the role of preschool phonological and orthographic skills in the prediction of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 472–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badian, N. A. (1999). Reading disability defined as a discrepancy between listening and reading comprehension: A longitudinal study of stability, gender differences, and prevalence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 138–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badian, N. A. (2000). Do preschool orthographic skills contribute to prediction of reading? In N. A. Badian (ed.), Prediction and prevention of reading failure (pp. 31–56). Baltimore, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, E. W. (1993). Phonological awareness: What’s important and to whom? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, T. A., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (1992). The role of orthographic processing skills on five different reading tasks. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 335–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowey, J. A., & Francis, J. (1991). Phonological analysis as a function of age and exposure to reading instruction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 91–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1991). Phonological skills before and after learning to read. In S. A. Brady & D. P. Shankweiler (eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 37–53). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casalis, S., & Louis-Alexandre, M.-F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 303–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. A. (1997). Onset, rhymes, and phonemes in learning to read. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. A. (2000). Preschool phonological awareness and success in reading. In N. A. Badian (ed.), Prediction and prevention of reading failure (pp. 153–178). Baltimore, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, L. G., & Seymour, P. H. K. (2000). Phonemes and rhyme in the development of reading and metaphonology: The Dundee longitudinal study. In N. A. Badian (ed.), Prediction and prevention of reading failure (pp. 275–297). Baltimore, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (1989). The development of spelling knowledge and its role in reading acquisition and reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 356–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to decoding. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C., Borstrøm, I., & Petersen, D. K. (1998). Predicting dyslexia from kindergarten: The importance of distinctiveness of phonological representations of lexical items. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 36–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felton, R. H. (1992). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 212–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foorman, B. R. (1994). Phonological and orthographic processing: Separate but equal? In V. W. Berninger (ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge, Vol.1 (pp. 321–357). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, A. E. (1991). How early phonological development might set the stage for phoneme awareness. In S. A. Brady & D. P. Shankweiler (eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 97–117). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gipstein, M., Brady, S. A., & Fowler, A. (2000). Questioning the role of syllables and rimes in early phonological awareness. In N. A. Badian (ed.), Prediction and prevention of reading failure (pp. 179–216). Baltimore, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove, U. K.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W., & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonigan, C. J., Burgess, S., Anthony, J. L., & Barker, T. A. (1998). Development of phonological sensitivity in 2- to 5-year-old children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 294–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., & Doi, L. M. (1999). See Dick RAN: Rapid naming and the longitudinal prediction of reading subskills in first and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 129–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, V. A. (1993). Phoneme awareness and future reading ability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, V. A., & Liberman, I. Y. (1984). Phonological awareness and verbal short-term memory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 592–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M., & Taylor, S. (1997). Segmentation, not rhyming, predicts early progress in learning to read. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muter, V., & Snowling, M. (1998). Concurrent and longitudinal predictors of reading: The role of metalinguistic and short-term memory skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 320–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R., Forsberg, H., Wise, B., & Rack, J. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In G. R. Lyon (ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 243–277). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., Beck, L., Bell, L., & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 283–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psychological Corporation (1992). Stanford achievement test, 8th edition. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rack, J. P., & Olson, R. K. (1993). Phonological deficits, IQ, and individual differences in reading disability: Genetic and environmental influences. Developmental Review, 13, 269–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, D. J., Kim, J. K., & Lipa-Wade, S. (2000). Application of Frith’s developmental phase model to the process of identifying at-risk beginning readers. In N. A. Badian (ed.), Prediction and prevention of reading failure (pp. 87–103). Baltimore, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, H. S. (1998). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities: Phonological awareness and some other promising predictors. In B. K. Shapiro, P. J. Accardo, & A. J. Capute (eds.), Specific reading disability: A view of the spectrum (pp. 75–119). Timonium, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L., Jorm, A. F., MacLean, R., & Matthews, R. (1984). Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1309–1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590–604, 612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1992). Speculations on the causes and consequences of individual differences in early reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 307–342). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Cramer, B. B. (1984). Assessing phonological processes in kindergarten children: Issues of task compatibility. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Cunningham, A. E. (1991). Beyond phonological processes: Print exposure and orthographic processing. In S. A. Brady & D. P. Shankweiler (eds), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 219–235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Burgess, S., & Hecht, S. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word-reading skills in second-to-fifth-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 161–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., & Zukowski, A. (1991). Levels of phonological awareness. In S. A. Brady & D. P. Shankweiler (eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 67–83). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (1987). Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 321–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Chen, R. S. (1995). The increasingly inextricable relationship between orthographic and phonological coding in learning to read: Some reservations about current methods of operationalizing orthographic coding. In V. W. Berninger (ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge, Vol. II (pp. 47–111). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., & Barker, T. A. (1994). The development of orthographic processing ability. In V. W. Berninger (ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge, Vol. I (pp. 243–276). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hecht, S. A., Barker, T. A., Burgess, S. R., Donahue, J., & Garon, T. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 468–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1967). Preschool and primary scale of intelligence. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Badian, N.A. Phonological and orthographic processing: Their roles in reading prediction. Ann. of Dyslexia 51, 177–202 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-001-0010-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-001-0010-5

Keywords

Navigation