Skip to main content
Log in

Interventions and diversity, equity, and inclusion: Two current directions in research on the teaching and learning of calculus

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
ZDM – Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Calculus continues to be an important topic of discussion among mathematics education researchers given how it often acts as a gatekeeper for students in STEM. In their extensive 2017 review of calculus literature, Larsen and colleagues identified two main areas of applied research that had largely been neglected: research related (1) to efforts to improve calculus teaching and learning and (2) to equity and social justice. In this review we investigate how scholars have answered this call by reviewing recent literature related to these two themes. First we identified some promising intervention studies that investigated changes at the course level (e.g., calculus courses intended for engineering students) and at the level of specific calculus topics (e.g. using digital tools to help students understand the Fundamental Theorem). Second, we identified several studies on diversity, equity, and inclusion. We found that some studies in this collection still approached this research through traditional methods (e.g., so called achievement gaps) but we also identified promising new directions for research in which scholars utilize critical theories and provide counter-narratives that highlight the strengths of calculus students from historically marginalized groups. We conclude our review by discussing future directions we hope to see in the field that we argue will strengthen current work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

We mark with ** papers from the review with annotated bibliographies and with * the rest of the papers included in the review

  • Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **Adiredja, A. P. (2019). Anti-deficit narratives: Engaging the politics of research on mathematical sense making. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 50(4), 401–435. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.50.4.0401. This paper presents a call for more scholars to take an anti-deficit perspective to cognitive research on students’ sense-making. The author introduced counter-narratives as a way to counteract deficit master-narratives that can be especially harmful to students from marginalized groups. To illustrate his point, the author presented a counter-narrative of a Latina student making sense of the formal definition of function limit.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Adiredja, A. P. (2021). The pancake story and the epsilon-delta definition. Primus, 31(6), 662–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2019.1669231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adiredja, A. P., & Andrews-Larson, C. (2017). Taking the sociopolitical turn in postsecondary mathematics education research. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 3(3), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-017-0054-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Alessio, F., Demeio, L., & Telloni, A. I. (2022). Promoting a meaningful learning of double integrals through routes of digital tasks. Teaching Mathematics and Computer Science, 20(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.5485/TMCS.2022.0539

  • *Arnold, E. G., Burroughs, E. A., & Deshler, J. M. (2020). Investigating classroom implementation of research-based interventions for reducing stereotype threat in calculus. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 43(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2019.1575352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Bakri, S. R. A., Liew, C. Y., Chen, C. K., Tuh, M. H., & Ling, S. C. (2021). Bridging the gap between the derivatives and graph sketching in calculus: An innovative game-based learning approach. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(4), 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **Battey, D., Amman, K., Leyva, L. A., Hyland, N., & McMichael, E. W. (2022). Racialized and gendered labor in students’ responses to precalculus and calculus instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 53(2), 94–113. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0170. This study investigated the type of labor, and associated coping mechanisms, women, Black, and Latino/a calculus students described in response to instructional events they perceive as racialized or gendered. Results indicated that students engaged in both cognitive and emotional labor in response to these events and mitigated their participation in class in order to cope with that labor. The authors described implications of the students’ coping mechanisms.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biancani, S., & McFarland, D. A. (2013). Social networks research in higher education. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 28, pp. 151–215). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5836-0_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • **Bos, R., Doorman, M., & Piroi, M. (2020). Emergent models in a reinvention activity for learning the slope of a curve. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 59, 100773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100773. This paper reports on an instructional design study that is supported by the theory of Realistic Mathematics Education and focused on the concept of slope of a curve. Within an a-didactical context students begin the process of reinventing the concept and the authors analyzed their mathematical activity to connect it to various approaches identified in their a priori analysis. They identified a number of informal approaches that could be productively developed during a subsequent institutionalization phase directed by a teacher.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bressoud, D. M., Carlson, M. P., Mesa, V., & Rasmussen, C. (2013). The calculus student: insights from the Mathematical Association of America national study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(5), 685–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J. (2017). Compendium for research in mathematics education. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celedón-Pattichis, S., Borden, L. L., Pape, S. J., Clements, D. H., Peters, S. A., Males, J. R., Chapman, O., & Leonard, J. (2018). Asset-based approaches to equitable mathematics education research and practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(4), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.4.0373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetina-Vázquez, M., Cabañas-Sánchez, G., & Sosa-Moguel, L. (2019). Collective mathematical progress in an introductory calculus course during the treatment of the quadratic function. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 7(2), 155–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • **Champion, J., & Mesa, V. (2018). Pathways to calculus in U.S. high schools. Primus, 28(6), 508–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2017.1315473. This study investigated the different pathways students take to get to calculus in high school. As part of this investigation, the authors explored correlations between pathways and multiple variables. The results of this study found that self-efficacy, students’ ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and 9th grade course placement were strongly associated with calculus completion among high school students.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, J. P. (2012). From STEM to stern: A review and test of stereotype threat interventions on women’s math performance and motivation [Thesis, Montana State University-Bozeman, College of Letters and Science]. https://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/1062. Accessed 4 Apr 2023.

  • Crespo, S., Herbst, P., Lichtenstein, E. K., Matthews, P. G., & Chazan, D. (2022). Challenges to and opportunities for sustaining an equity focus in mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 53(2), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2021-0215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, A., Fawcett, K., Szűcs, D., & Dowker, A. (2012). Gender differences in mathematics anxiety and the relation to mathematics performance while controlling for test anxiety. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 8(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Ellis, B., Larsen, S., Voigt, M., & Vroom, K. (2021). Where calculus and engineering converge: An analysis of curricular change in calculus for engineers. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 7(2), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-020-00130-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • González-Martín, A. S., Nardi, E., & Biza, I. (2018). From resource to document: Scaffolding content and organising student learning in teachers’ documentation work on the teaching of series. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98(3), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9813-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guay, R. (1977). Purdue spatial visualization tests. Purdue Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, R. (2009). Framing equity: Helping students “play the game” and “change the game.” Teaching for Excellence and Equity in Mathematics, 1(1), 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, R. (2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37–68. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0037

  • Hauk, S., Toney, A. F., Brown, A., & Salguero, K. (2021). Activities for enacting equity in mathematics education research. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 7(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-020-00122-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Henderson, R., Hewagallage, D., Follmer, J., Michaluk, L., Deshler, J., Fuller, E., & Stewart, J. (2022). Mediating role of personality in the relation of gender to self-efficacy in physics and mathematics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(1), 010143. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, D. S., & Lee, J. K. (2022). Contrasting cases of college calculus instructors: Their preferences and potential pedagogy in teaching derivative graphs. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2120838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inzlicht, M., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11(5), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaremus, F., Gore, J., Prieto-Rodriguez, E., & Fray, L. (2020). Girls are still being ‘counted out’: Teacher expectations of high-level mathematics students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09986-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Jett, C. C. (2021). The qualms and quarrels with online undergraduate mathematics: The experiences of African American male STEM majors. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 13(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2020.1827663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, N. M., Frank, T. J., & Elliott, T. Y. (2021). A call for a critical-historical framework in addressing the mathematical experiences of black teachers and students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 52(4), 476–490. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Kouropatov, A., & Ovodenko, R. (2022). An explorative digital tool as a pathway to meaning: The case of the inflection point. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 41(2), 142–166. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrac007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Lagrange, J.-B., & Laval, D. (2023). Connecting algorithmics to mathematics learning: A design study of the intermediate value theorem and the bisection algorithm. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 112(2), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10192-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, S., Marrongelle, K., Bressoud, D., & Graham, K. (2017). Understanding the concepts of calculus: Frameworks and roadmaps emerging from educational research. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 526–550). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S. C., Huttenlocher, J., Taylor, A., & Langrock, A. (1999). Early sex differences in spatial skill. Developmental Psychology, 35(4), 940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Lewis, D. (2020). Gender effects on re-assessment attempts in a standards-based grading implementation. Primus, 30(5), 539–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2019.1616636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Leyva, L. A., McNeill, R. T., Marshall, B. L., & Guzmán, O. A. (2021a). “It seems like they purposefully try to make as many kids drop”: An analysis of logics and mechanisms of racial-gendered inequality in introductory mathematics instruction. The Journal of Higher Education, 92(5), 784–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.1879586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **Leyva, L. A., Quea, R., Weber, K., Battey, D., & López, D. (2021b). Detailing racialized and gendered mechanisms of undergraduate precalculus and calculus classroom instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 39(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1849218. This study investigated mechanisms in instruction that women, Black, and Latino/a students identify as sources of racial and gendered marginalization. Three mechanisms of inequities were found: 1) creating differential opportunities for classroom participation and instructor support, 2) limiting within-group peer support and 3) activating racialized and gendered ideas of who belongs in STEM. Based on these results, the authors cautioned that instructors’ behaviors cannot be decontextualized from the sociohistorical realities in which they occur.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Leyva, L. A., Amman, K., Wolf McMichael, E. A., Igbinosun, J., & Khan, N. (2022). Support for all? Confronting racism and patriarchy to promote equitable learning opportunities through undergraduate calculus instruction. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 8(2), 339–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-022-00177-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liakos, Y., Gerami, S., Mesa, V., Judson, T., & Ma, Y. (2022). How an inquiry-oriented textbook shaped a calculus instructor’s planning. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(1), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1961171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479–1498. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Maciejewski, W., & Star, J. R. (2016). Developing flexible procedural knowledge in undergraduate calculus. Research in Mathematics Education, 18(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2016.1148626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *McCunn, L., & Cilli-Turner, E. (2020). Spatial training and calculus ability: Investigating impacts on student performance and cognitive style. Journal of Educational Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2020.10.1.20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *McNeill, R. T., Leyva, L. A., & Marshall, B. (2022). “They’re just students. There’s no clear distinction”: A critical discourse analysis of color-evasive, gender-neutral faculty discourses in undergraduate calculus instruction. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 31(4–5), 630–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2022.2073233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Nagle, C., Tracy, T., Adams, G., & Scutella, D. (2017). The notion of motion: Covariational reasoning and the limit concept. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(4), 573–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1262469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, J., & Likwambe, B. (2018). Exploring the nature of dialogue within South African pre-service teachers’ calculus lecture rooms. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(3), 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2018.1533612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., & Rizzolo, D. (2022). Use of variables in calculus class: Focusing on Teaching Assistants’ discussion of variables. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(1), 165–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1971314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T., Johnston, E., Bolles, H., Ogilvie, C., Knaub, A., & Holme, T. (2020). Benefits to students of team-based learning in large enrollment calculus. Primus, 30(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2018.1542417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. L. (1996). Gender trials: Emotional lives in contemporary law firms. University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • *Rasmussen, C., Apkarian, N., Hagman, J. E., Johnson, E., Larsen, S., & Bressoud, D. (2019). Brief report: Characteristics of precalculus through calculus 2 programs: Insights From a national census survey. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 50(1), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.50.1.0098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinholz, D. (2017a). Co-calculus: Integrating the academic and the social. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 3(2), 521–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinholz, D. (2017b). Peer conferences in calculus: The impact of systematic training. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1077197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinholz, D. L. (2018). Three approaches to focusing peer feedback. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **Ryberg, U. (2018). Generating different lesson designs and analyzing their effects: The impact of representations when discerning aspects of the derivative. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 51, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.03.012. The authors report on a two part investigation consisting of a qualitative design study and a follow-up quantitative study to compare the relative impact of two designs. The resulting findings suggest that it may be beneficial to delay the introduction of symbols in derivative instruction as that representation seems to dominate (and limit) student activity once it is introduced.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Sadler, P., & Sonnert, G. (2018). The path to college calculus: The impact of high school mathematics coursework. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(3), 292–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2000). Purposes and methods of research in mathematics education. Notices of the AMS, 47(6), 641–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2010). Research methods in (mathematics) education. In L. English, & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 467–519). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sealey, V., Infante, N., Campbell, M. P., & Bolyard, J. (2020). The generation and use of graphical examples in calculus classrooms: The case of the mean value theorem. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 57, 100743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.100743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, E., & Hunter, A.-B. (2019). Talking about leaving revisited: Persistence, relocation, and loss in undergraduate STEM education. Springer Nature.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • *Sickle, J. V., Schuler, K. R., Holcomb, J. P., Carver, S. D., Resnick, A., Quinn, C., Jackson, D. K., Duffy, S. F., & Sridhar, N. (2020). Closing the achievement gap for underrepresented minority students in STEM: A deep look at a comprehensive intervention. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 21(2), 5–18. https://jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/2452

  • Solórzano, D. G., & Yosso, T. J. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040200800103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorby, S., Casey, B., Veurink, N., & Dulaney, A. (2013). The role of spatial training in improving spatial and calculus performance in engineering students. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • **Swidan, O. (2020). A learning trajectory for the fundamental theorem of calculus using digital tools. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(4), 542–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1593531. The author described a learning trajectory delineated by a set of nine “learning focuses” identified as 11 pairs of students engaged with a digital tool that allowed them to explore connections between the graph of a function and the graph of its accumulation function. Nine such focuses are described and situated with respect to a mathematical description of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (informed by prior research).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Swidan, O., & Fried, M. (2021). Focuses of awareness in the process of learning the fundamental theorem of calculus with digital technologies. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 62, 100847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2021.100847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • **Tremaine, R., Hagman, J. E., Voigt, M., Damas, S., & Gehrtz, J. (2022). You don’t want to come into a broken system: Perspectives for increasing diversity in STEM among undergraduate calculus program stakeholders. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 8(2), 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-022-00184-x. Drawing on critical race theories, the authors of this study investigated calculus stakeholders’ motivations for increasing diversity in STEM. The authors presented a framework of these motivations, comparing four motivation themes along both a critical and dominant axes. This framework can be used by institutions to highlight areas of strength and growth in stakeholders regarding equity.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turra, H., Carrasco, V., González, C., Sandoval, V., & Yáñez, S. (2019). Flipped classroom experiences and their impact on engineering students’ attitudes towards university-level mathematics. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1644963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Voigt, M., Apkarian, N., & Rasmussen, C. (2020). Undergraduate course variations in precalculus through Calculus 2. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(6), 858–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1636148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. R., & Leatham, K. R. (2017). Journal quality in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(4), 369–396. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.4.0369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Yang, T.-C., Fu, H.-T., Hwang, G.-J., & Yang, S. J. H. (2017). Development of an interactive mathematics learning system based on a two-tier test diagnostic and guiding strategy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2154

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean Larsen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alzaga Elizondo, T., Larsen, S. Interventions and diversity, equity, and inclusion: Two current directions in research on the teaching and learning of calculus. ZDM Mathematics Education (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01553-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01553-3

Keywords

Navigation