Abstract
While curricular change often begins with a new textbook, its eventual enactment in the hands of individual teachers depends on their orientation towards the curriculum and its representation in the textbook. Studying this teacher-textbook relationship is crucial for understanding how curricular reform intended by textbook designers is likely to be implemented in individual classrooms. We have been studying this by means of didactic tagging—a methodology where teachers assign metadata to textbook tasks. Categories of metadata include both descriptive aspects of tasks and aspects of their envisioned enactment. Prior research has focused on characteristics of the textbook that emerge as patterns in metadata that persist across multiple taggers. In the current study we turn our attention to individual differences across taggers. Four teachers tagged tasks that comprise an entire pre-calculus high school textbook. Analysis generated non-trivial findings regarding each tagger’s interaction with the textbook, in the form of individual patterns in the tagged metadata. These patterns allowed us to put forth tentative “profiles” of each of the four teachers’ interactions with the textbook. We propose this as a method for investigating and assessing teachers’ didactic orientations, and for predicting aspects of their enactment of textbook curricula, while avoiding time-consuming and intrusive observation of classroom teaching.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–14.
Brown, M. (2009). Toward a theory of curriculum design and use: Understanding the teacher–tool relationship. In J. Remillard, B. Herbel-Eisenman, & G. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–37). Routledge.
Cai, J., Wang, T., & Ding, M. (2014). How do exemplary Chinese and US Mathematics teachers view instructional coherence? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85, 265–280.
Cooper, J., Olsher, S., & Yerushalmy, M. (2020a). Didactic metadata informing teachers’ selection of learning resources—Boundary-crossing in professional development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23, 363–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09428-1
Cooper. J., Olsher, S., & Yerushalmy, M. (2020b). Empirical Reconstruction of Learning Progressions Based on Teachers’ Tagging of Didactic Metadata. The Journal of Mathematics Behavior. Advance online publication. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732312320300973
Drake, C., & Sherin, M. G. (2006). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36, 153–187.
Even, R., & Kvatinsky, T. (2010). What mathematics do teachers with contrasting teaching approaches address in probability lessons? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74, 207–222.
Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (2013). Collective work with resources: An essential dimension for teacher documentation. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(7), 1003–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0527-1
Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2007). From intended curriculum to written curriculum: Examining the “voice” of a mathematics textbook. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(4), 344–369.
Hooper, M., Mullis, I. V., & Ma, M. O. (2015). TIMSS 2015 context questionnaire framework. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College. Retrieved from https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/downloads/T15_FW_Chap3.pdf
Jaworski, B. (2009). Development of teaching through research into teachers’ use of mathematics curriculum materials and relationships between teachers and curriculum. In J. Remillard, B. Herbel-Eisenman, & G. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 338–346). Routledge.
McClain, K., Zhao, Q., Visnovska, J., & Bowen, E. (2009). Understanding the role of the institutional context in the relationship between teachers and text. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 56–69). Routledge.
Olsher, S. (2019). The narrative of sets of curricular resources as described by teachers. In S. Rezat, L. Fan, M. Hattermann, J. Schumacher, & H. Wuschke (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Mathematics Textbook Research and Development (pp. 287–292). Paderborn.
Olsher, S., & Cooper, J. (2020). Expressing the voice of the textbook—Insights gained from tagging didactic metadata. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10124-3
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2018). PISA for development technical report, chapter 15: Proficiency scale construction. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-for-development/pisafordevelopment2018technicalreport/PISA-D%20TR%20Chapter%2015%20-%20Proficiency%20Scale%20Construction%20-%20final.pdf
Pepin, B. (2018). Enhancing teacher learning with curriculum resources—a commentary paper. In L. Fan, L. Trouche, S. Rezat, C. Qi, & J. Visnovska (Eds.), Research on mathematics textbooks and teachers’ resources: advances and issues, ICME - 13 monographs (pp. 359–374). Springer.
Pepin, B., Gueudet, B., Yerushalmy, M., Trouche, L., & Chazan, D. I. (2016). E-textbooks in/for teaching and learning mathematics: A potentially transformative educational technology. In L. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of Research in Mathematics Education (3rd ed., pp. 636–661). Taylor & Francis.
Reinke, L. T., Remillard, J. T., & Kim, O. K. (2020). Examining design transparency in elementary mathematics curriculum materials. In J. Remillard & O. K. Kim (Eds.), Elementary mathematics curriculum materials (pp. 227–256). Springer.
Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers’ learning? Two fourth-grade teachers’ use of a new mathematics text. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 331–350.
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75, 211–246.
Remillard, J. T. (2016). Keeping an eye on the teacher in the digital curriculum race. In M. Bates & Z. Usiskin (Eds.), Digital curricula in School Mathematics (pp. 195–204). Information Age Publishing.
Remillard, J. T., & Heck, D. J. (2014). Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(5), 705–718.
Remillard, J., & Kim, O. K. (2020). Elementary mathematics curriculum materials: Designs for student learning and teacher enactment. Springer Nature.
Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Valverde, G., Houang, R. T., & Wiley, D. E. (1997). Many visions, many aims: A cross-national investigation of curricular intentions in school mathematics. Kluwer.
Schwartz, J. L., Kenney, J., Ilias, S., Kelly, K., Sienkiewicz, T., Sivan, Y., Steinbok, V., & Yerushalmy, M. (1995). BA - Assessing mathematical understanding and skills effectively (AMUSE). Retrieved from Balanced Assessment: http://hgse.balancedassessment.org/amuse.html.
Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. Teachers College Press.
Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319–369). Information Age Publishing.
Tarr, J. E., Chavez, O., Reys, R. E., & Reys, B. J. (2006). From the written to the enacted curricula: The intermediary role of middle school mathematics teachers in shaping students’ opportunity to learn. School Science and Mathematics, 106, 191–201.
Trouche, L., Rocha, K., Gueudet, G., & Pepin, B. (2020). Transition to digital resources as a critical process in teachers’ trajectories: the case of Anna’s documentation work. ZDM Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01164-8
Trouche, L., Gueudet, G., & Pepin, B. (2020). Documentational approach to didactics. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77487-9_100011-1
Yerushalmy, M. (2005). Function of interactive visual representations in interactive mathematical textbooks. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical learning, 10(3), 217–249.
Yerushalmy, M. (2006). Slower algebra students meet faster tools: Solving algebra word problems with graphing software. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education., 37(5), 356–387.
Yerushalmy, M., & Chazan, D. (2008). Technology and curriculum design: The ordering of discontinuities in school algebra. In L. English (Ed.), Second Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 806–837). Taylor Francis.
Yerushalmy, M., Gilead, S., Bohr-Hed, M., Toledano-Katay, D., Maman, H., & Naoman, M. (1996). Analysis. Tel Aviv, Israel. (In Hebrew).
Acknowledgements
The work reported herein was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Grant Number 12946-3. The authors wish to thank Dr. M. Adil Yalçın from Keshif LLC for his generous contribution to the development of the representation tools.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Olsher, S., Cooper, J. Aspects of the teacher-textbook relationship: What can we learn about teachers when they tag didactic metadata?. ZDM Mathematics Education 53, 1347–1358 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01251-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01251-4