Skip to main content
Log in

Collective work with resources: an essential dimension for teacher documentation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we study the collective dimensions of teachers’ work in their ordinary daily practice. We argue that teachers’ ordinary work comprises many collaborative aspects, and that the interactions with colleagues, often through resources, are crucial for teacher professional development. Using a theoretical framework based on teacher documentation work, we focused on interactions between teachers and resources to study two teachers’ work: one teacher in France and one teacher in Norway. For both teachers we identified collective dimensions in their work with resources. Contrasting these two cases enabled us to identify particular features, but also possible invariants, of teachers’ work with resources. Our results indicate that collective dimensions are always present in teachers’ work, but that true communities of practice, which could be considered as an achievement of collective teachers’ work, are scarce. We discuss the conditions for the emergence of such communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Each pupil gets his/her individual ‘arbeidsplan’: this provides work (e.g., exercises) to be done over a period of time, typically over 1 or 2 weeks.

  2. http://www.primas-project.eu.

  3. ‘Hélice’ means Helix, and pupil learning is assumed to develop along a didactic progression of a spiral: each topic is introduced and then deepened in subsequent revisiting of the topic area.

References

  • Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualising resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 205–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: what is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(6–8), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borba, M. C., & Llinares, S. (2012). Online mathematics teacher education: overview of an emergent field of research. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44, 697–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesné, J., Coulange, L., Grapin, N., & Le Yaouanq, M. (2009). Hélice 6ème. Paris: Hatier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevallard, Y. (2006). Steps towards a new epistemology in mathematics education. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education CERME 4 (pp. 21–30). Barcelona: FUNDEMI IQS-Universitat Ramon Llull. http://www.mathematik.uni-dortmund.de/~erme/CERME4/index.php. Accessed 26 July 2013.

  • Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diekema, A. R., & Whitney Olsen, M. (2012). The notion of relevance in teacher information behavior. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: a Japanese approach to improving mathematics learning and teaching. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuglestad, A. B. (2007). Developing tasks and teaching with ICT in mathematics in an inquiry community. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education CERME 5 (pp. 1409–1418). Larnaca, Cyprus: University of Cyprus. http://www.mathematik.uni-dortmund.de/~erme/CERME5b. Accessed 26 July 2013.

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goos, M. (2012). Socio-cultural perspectives in research on and with mathematics teachers: a zone theory approach. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(4), 521–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (Eds.). (2012). From textbooks to ‘lived’ resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2009). Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. (2008). Building and sustaining inquiry communities in mathematics teaching development. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), Participants in mathematics teachers education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks (pp. 309–330). Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krainer, K., & Wood, T. (Eds.). (2008). Participants in mathematics teachers education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks (Vol. 3). Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyngved, R., Pepin, B., & Sikko, S. A. (2012). Inquiry based learning (IBL) environments: working with teachers on and mathematics and science tasks. In F. Rønning, R. Diesen, H. Hoveid, & I. Pareliussen (Eds.), FOU Praksis 2011 (pp. 275–286). Trondheim: Tapir AkademiskForlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabra, H., & Trouche, L. (2011). Collective design of an online math textbook: when individual and collective documentation works meet. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland, & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education CERME 7 (pp. 2356–2366). University of Rzesów. http://www.mathematik.uni-dortmund.de/~erme/doc/cerme7/CERME7.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2013.

  • Vergnaud, G. (1998). Toward a cognitive theory of practice. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity (pp. 227–241). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, G. (1995). The art of judgement: The study of policy making. London: Sage Centenary Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Gueudet.

Appendix: Questionnaire and interview

Appendix: Questionnaire and interview

We present here the questionnaire and interview questions used with Vera. The written questionnaire was completed before the interview. The first part of the interview (questions in italics) complements the questionnaire, drawing on the written answers.

1.1 Questionnaire and first part of the interview

1. What is your background: studies, and positions from the beginning of your career? Why did you change school?

2. What opportunities have you had to work with other teachers? What are the consequences (for your resources, for your professional practice, for your ideas about mathematics and their teaching…)? Can you describe the ‘real team work’ at the vocational school? What experiences?

  • 2.1 Professional development. When? On which themes? With what consequences? Why did you choose this training?

  • 2.2 Professional associations. Which? When? With what consequences?

  • 2.3 With teachers in your school. When? About which subjects? What form of collective work? With what consequences?

3. The following questions concern the resources of your teaching (ICT, textbooks, websites…) What are, or have been, the most-used resources? What criteria for their choice? What use of these resources?

  • 3.1 When you started your career

  • 3.2 Five years ago

  • 3.3 Now

3.4 What might be your resources in 2020?

3.5 About ICT resources, can you describe the environment in your school in terms of computer room, interactive white board, and colleagues interested by this equipment?

4. About the textbook Hélice which you now use to prepare your lessons in grade 6

  • 4.1 When did you start using it, and why?

  • 4.2. How do you use it to prepare your courses?

  • 4.3. How do you combine it with other resources (precisely which resources)?

5. About the use of Sésamath resources

  • 5.1 When did you start using Sésamath resources, and why? Did this use change your work, in-class and out-of-class? Do your colleagues appreciate the Sésamath resources? Does it change the work of the pupils?

  • 5.2 How do you combine the two textbooks, Sésamath and Hélice?

  • 5.3 Do you take part in the Sésamath association activity?

  • 5.4 Do you share Sésamath resources with colleagues?

1.2 Second part of the interview

Imagine that you go on leave for 1 year. I come to replace you, and try to act your way (as similar as you as possible). What should I do, to prepare the courses, to work with the pupils?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gueudet, G., Pepin, B. & Trouche, L. Collective work with resources: an essential dimension for teacher documentation. ZDM Mathematics Education 45, 1003–1016 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0527-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0527-1

Keywords

Navigation