This article elaborates a theoretical, methodological, and analytical approach intended to highlight the materiality and reciprocity of noticing in mathematics classrooms. Drawing from highly resonant concepts from materialism and Indigenous Knowledges—two perspectives that researchers rarely bring into dialogue—this alternative approach explores the reciprocal, material, and more-than-human nature of noticing. By focusing on the role of movement in noticing, the approach discusses the indivisibility of sensing and making sense as students and teachers mobilize mathematical concepts. Applying this approach in a non-traditional analysis of two classroom episodes, the paper provides a discussion centered on what noticing looks like when humans are decentered, concepts are mobilized, and sensing meets making sense.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abrahamson, D., & Sánchez-García, R. (2016). Learning is moving in new ways: The ecological dynamics of mathematics education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25, 203–239.
Alsawaie, O. N., & Alghazo, I. M. (2010). The effect of video-based approach on prospective teachers’ ability to analyze mathematics teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(3), 223–241.
Argüelles, J. (1987). The Mayan factor: Path beyond technology. Santa Fe: Bear & Company.
Bakhtin, M. (1990). Author and hero in aesthetic activity (V. Liapunov, trans.). In M. Holquist & V. Liapunov (Eds.), Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays (pp. 4–256). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Ball, D. L. (1992). Magical hopes: Manipulatives and the reform of math education. American Educator, 16(2), 14–18.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Towards an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Barad, K. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: Dis/continuities, spacetime enfoldings, and justice-to-come. Derrida Today, 3(2), 240–268.
Barad, K. (2012). On touching: The inhuman that therefore I am. Differences: A Journal of Cultural Feminist Studies, 23(3), 206–223.
Barnhardt, R., & Kawagley, A. O. (2008). Indigenous Knowledge systems and Alaskan Native ways of knowing. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 36(1), 8–23.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham: Duke University Press.
Bodén, L., Lenz Taguchi, H., Moberg, E., & Taylor C. A. (2019). Relational materialism. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.789.
Boylan, M. (2017). Towards a mathematics education for ecological selves: Pedagogies for relational knowing and being. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 32, 1–15.
Cajete, G. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Santa Fe: Clear Light Publishers.
Châtelet, G. (2000). Figuring space: Philosophy, mathematics and physics (trans. Robert Shore and Muriel Zagha). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Choy, B. H. (2015). Snapshots of mathematics teacher noticing during task design. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28, 421–440.
Colebrook, C. (2016). ‘A grandiose time of coexistence’: Stratigraphy of the Anthropocene. Deleuze Studies, 10(4), 440–454.
Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2003). Understanding learning systems: Mathematics education and complexity science. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 137–167.
de Araujo, Z., Amador, J., Estepa, A., Weston, T., Aming-Attai, R., & Kosko, K. W. (2015). Animating preservice teachers’ noticing. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 17(2), 25–44.
de Freitas, E. (2016). Material encounters and media events: What kind of mathematics can a body do? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91, 185–202.
de Freitas, E. (2017). Karen Barad’s quantum ontology and posthuman ethics: Rethinking the concept of relationality. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 741–748.
de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglement in the classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2018). The quantum mind: Alternative ways of reasoning with uncertainty. Canadian Journal f Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 18(3), 271–283.
Deleuze, G. (1995). Difference and repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.
Dominguez, H. (2019). Theorizing reciprocal noticing with non-dominant students in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1), 75–89.
Eagleton, T. (1990). The significance of theory. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
Estapa, A., Pinnow, R. J., & Chval, K. B. (2016). Supporting novice teachers as they learn to teach English language learners. The New Educator, 12(1), 85–104.
Ferguson, A. A. (2000). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of black masculinity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Fernandes, A. (2012). Mathematics preservice teachers learning about English language learners through task-based interviews and noticing. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 1(1), 10–22.
Fernández, C., Llinares, S., & Valls, J. (2012). Learning to notice students’ mathematical thinking through on-line discussions. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(6), 747–759.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.
Grosz, E. (2005). Time travels: Feminism, nature, power. Durham: Duke University Press.
Guattari, F. (1992). Chaosmose. Paris: Galilée.
Gutiérrez, R. (2017). Living mathematx: Towards a vision for the future. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 32, 1–34.
Hand, V. (2012). Seeing culture and power in mathematical learning: Toward a model of equitable instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80, 233–247.
Hatcher, A., Bartlett, C., Marshall, A., & Marshall, M. (2009). Two-eyed seeing in the classroom environment: Concepts, approaches, and challenges. Canadian Journal of Science, mathematics and technology education, 9(3), 141–153.
Hoban, G. F. (2002). Teacher learning for educational change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.
Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. London: Routledge.
Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 169–202.
Jilk, L. M. (2016). Supporting teacher noticing of students’ mathematical strengths. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 4(2), 188–199.
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
Little Bear, L. (2000). Jagged worldviews colliding. In M. Battiste (Ed.), Reclaiming indigenous voice and vision (pp. 77–85). Vancouver: UBC Press.
Lobato, J., Hohensee, C., & Rhodehamel, B. (2013). Students’ mathematical noticing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(5), 809–850.
Louie, N. L. (2018). Culture and ideology in mathematics teacher noticing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97, 55–69.
Manning, E. (2007). Politics of touch: Sense, movement, sovereignty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Marshall, Y., & Alberti, B. (2014). A matter of difference: Karen Barad, ontology and archaeological bodies. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 24(1), 19–36.
Martin, K. A. (1998). Becoming a gendered body: Practices of preschools. American Sociological Review, 63, 494–511.
Martínez Parédez, D. (1964). Hunab Ku: Síntesis del pensamiento filosófico Maya. Distrito Federal, México, Editorial Orión.
Mason, J. (1998). Enabling teachers to be real teachers: Necessary levels of awareness and structure of attention. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(3), 243–267.
Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London: Routledge Falmer.
Mason, J. (2009). Teaching as disciplined enquiry. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 2005–2223.
Mason, J. (2017). Probing beneath the surface of experience. In E. O. Schack, M. H. Fisher, & J. A. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 1–17). Cham: Springer.
McDuffie, A. R., Foote, M. Q., Bolson, C., Turner, E., Aguirre, J. A., Bartell, T. G., et al. (2014). Using video analysis to support prospective K-8 teachers’ noticing of students’ multiple mathematical knowledge bases. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17, 245–270.
McLaren, P. (1986). Schooling as a ritual performance: Towards a political economy of educational symbols and gestures. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Mikulan, P., & Sinclair, N. (2017). Thinking mathematics pedagogy stratigraphically in the Anthropocene. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 32, 1–13.
Mikulan, P., & Sinclair, N. (2019). Stratigraphy as a method for studying the different modes of existence arising in the mathematical classroom. ZDM, 51, 239–249.
Moyer, P. (2001). Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipulatives to teach mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47, 175–197.
Mt. Pleasant, J. . (2016). Food yields and nutrient analysis of the Three Sisters: A Haudenosaunee cropping system. Ethnobiology Letters, 7(1), 87–98.
Neal, L. I., McCray, A. D., Webb-Johnson, G., & Bridgest, S. T. (2003). The effects of African American movement styles on teachers’ perceptions and reactions. Journal of Special Education, 37(1), 49–57.
Pais, A. (2012). A critical approach to equity. In O. Skovsmose & B. Greer (Eds.), Opening the cage: Critique of mathematics education (pp. 49–91). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Palmer, A. (2011). “How many sums can I do”? Performative strategies and diffractive thinking as methodological tools for rethinking mathematical subjectivity. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 1(1), 3–18.
Peirce, C. S. (1992). Reasoning and the logic of things. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Piaget, J. (1928). Judgment and reasoning in the child. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Radford, L. (2008). Connecting theories in mathematics education: Challenges and possibilities. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 317–327.
Radford, L. (2009). Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(3), 111–126.
Rancière, J. (2004). The politics of aesthetics: The distribution of the sensible. New York: Continuum.
Roth, W. M. (2011). Geometry as objective science in elementary school classrooms: Mathematics in the flesh. New York: Routledge.
Roth, W. M. (2015). Excess of graphical thinking: Movement, mathematics and flow. For the Learning of Mathematics, 35(1), 2–7.
Roth, W. M. (2016). Growing-making mathematics: A dynamic perspective on people, materials, and movement in classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93, 87–103.
Santagata, R., & Guarino, J. (2011). Using video to teach future teachers to learn from teaching. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43, 133–145.
Schack, E. O., Fisher, M. H., Thomas, J. N., Eisenhardt, S., Tassell, J., & Yoder, M. (2013). Prospective elementary school teachers’ professional noticing of children’s early numeracy. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16, 379–397.
Serres, M. (2011). Variations on the body (trans. Randolph Burks). Minneapolis: Univocal.
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2011). The primacy of movement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. (2011). Situating the study of teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 3–13). New York: Routledge.
Skovsmose, O. (2005). Travelling through education: Uncertainty, mathematics, responsibility. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Skovsmose, O., & Greer, B. (2012). Opening the cage? Critical agency in the face of uncertainty. In O. Skovsmose & B. Greer (Eds.), Opening the cage: Critique of mathematics education (pp. 369–386). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Valsiner, J. (1987). Culture and the development of children’s action: A theory of human development. New York: Wiley.
van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 134–151). New York: Routledge.
van Es, E. A., Hand, V., & Mercado, J. (2017). Making visible the relationship between teachers’ noticing for equity and equitable teaching practice. In E. O. Schack, M. Fisher, & J. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 251–270). Cham: Springer.
Wager, A. A. (2014). Noticing children’s participation: Insights into teacher positionality toward equitable mathematics pedagogy. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(3), 312–350.
Walkoe, J. (2015). Exploring teacher noticing of student algebraic thinking in a video club. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18, 523–550.
Whitehead, A. N. (1959). The aims of education. Daedalus, 88(1), 192–205.
Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality. New York: The Free Press.
This article is based on research supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant no. 1253822. Any findings, claims, or recommendations included in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Dominguez, H. Students and teachers mobilizing mathematical concepts through reciprocal noticing. ZDM Mathematics Education (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01209-y