Abstract
The COACTIV video study is part of the COACTIV research program in which secondary mathematics teachers whose students participated in PISA 03/04 were examined, with respect to their professional knowledge, motivational orientations, beliefs, and self-regulation. In the video study, 284 German secondary mathematics teachers were asked to specify how they would continue lessons shown in three short video clips that all ended at “educationally crucial” points. From the teachers’ written responses, which were coded by two independent evaluators according to five dimensions of high-quality teaching, their “situated reaction competency” (SRC) was inferred. Results relating to differences in school type (e.g., teachers from the German academic track performing better) and the relationship of SRC to other teacher characteristics (e.g., SRC was positively related to constructivist beliefs), as well as its impact on specific aspects of instructional quality, indicated the validity of the instrument.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Baumert, J., Klieme, E., Neubrand, J., Prenzel, M., Schiefele, U., Schneider, W., et al. (Hrsg.). (2001). PISA 2000: Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers’ professional competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers, mathematics teacher education, 8 (pp. 25–48). New York: Springer.
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Dubberke, T., Jordan, A., et al. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. doi:10.3102/0002831209345157.
Biza, I., Nardi, E., & Zachariades, T. (2007). Using tasks to explore teacher knowledge in situation-specific contexts. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4–6), 301–309.
Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J. E., & Shavelson, R. J. (2015a). Beyond dichotomies. Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(1), 3–13. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000194.
Blömeke, S., Hoth, J., Döhrmann, M., Busse, A., Kaiser, G., & König, J. (2015b). Teacher change during induction: Development of beginning primary teachers’ knowledge, beliefs and performance. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 287–308.
Blömeke, S., & Kaiser, G. (2014). Theoretical framework, study design and main results of TEDS-M. In S. Blömeke, F.-J. Hsieh, G. Kaiser, & W. H. Schmidt (Eds.), International perspectives on teacher knowledge, beliefs and opportunities to learn (pp. 19–48). Dordrecht: Springer.
Blömeke, S., König, J., Busse, A., Suhl, U., Benthien, J., Döhrmann, M., & Kaiser, G. (2014). Von der Lehrerausbildung in den Beruf—Fachbezogenes Wissen als Voraussetzung für Wahrnehmung, Interpretation und Handeln im Unterricht. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 17(3), 509–542.
Blum, W. (2011). Can modelling be taught and learnt? Some answers from empirical research. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (ICTMA14) (pp. 15–30). New York: Springer.
Borko, H., Koellner, K., Jacobs, J., & Seago, N. (2011). Using video representations of teaching in practice-based professional development programs. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(1), 175–187.
Brophy, J. (Ed.). (2004). Using Video in Teacher Education. Oxford: Emerald.
Buchholtz, N., Kaiser, G., & Blömeke, S. (2014). Die Erhebung mathematikdidaktischen Wissens—Konzeptualisierung einer komplexen Domäne. Journal für Mathematikdidaktik, 35(1), 101–128.
Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13–20.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.
Collins, A. M., Greeno, J. G., & Resnick, L. B. (2004). Educational learning theory. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 6, pp. 4276–4279). Oxford: Elsevier.
Cortina, K. S., & Thames, M. H. (2013). Teacher Education in Germany. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers, Mathematics Teacher Education (Vol. 8, pp. 49–62). New York: Springer.
Depaepe, F., Verschaffel, L., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Pedagogical content knowledge: A systematic review of the way in which the concept has pervaded mathematics educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 12–25.
Döhrmann, M., Kaiser, G., & Blömeke, S. (2012). The conceptualisation of mathematics competencies in the international teacher education study TEDS-M. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(3), 325–340.
Doyle, W. (2006). Ecological approaches to classroom management. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice and contemporary issues (pp. 97–125). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406.
Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2007). Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification and model types. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(3), 509–529.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage.
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606–633. doi:10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100.
Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5–26. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.53.1.5.
Hashweh, M. Z. (2005). Teacher pedagogical constructions: A reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(3), 273–292.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. London: Routledge.
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givven, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15.
Kaiser, G., Busse, A., Hoth, J., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2015). About the complexities of video-based assessments: Theoretical and methodological approaches to overcoming shortcomings of research on teachers’ competence. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 369–387. doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9616-7.
Kaiser, G., & Sriraman, B. (2006). A global survey of international perspectives on modelling in mathematics education. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 38(3), 302–310.
Kersting, N., Givvin, K., Thompson, B., Santagata, R., & Stigler, J. (2012). Measuring usable knowledge teachers’ analyses of mathematics classroom videos predict teaching quality and student learning. American Educational Research Journal, 49(3), 568–589.
Kleinknecht, M., & Schneider, J. (2013). What do teachers think and how do they feel when they analyze videos of themselves teaching and of other teachers teaching? Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 13–23.
Knievel, I., Lindmeier, A. M., & Heinze, A. (2015). Beyond knowledge: Measuring primary teachers’ subject-specific competences in and for teaching mathematics with items based on video vignettes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 309–329.
König, J., Blömeke, S., Klein, P., Suhl, U., Busse, A., & Kaiser, G. (2014). Is teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge a premise for noticing and interpreting classroom situations? A video-based assessment approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 76–88.
Krauss, S., Baumert, J., & Blum, W. (2008a). Secondary mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge: Validation of the COACTIV constructs. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(5), 873–892.
Krauss, S., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Neubrand, M., Baumert, J., Kunter, M., et al. (2013). Mathematics teachers’ domain-specific professional knowledge: Conceptualization and test construction in COACTIV. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers, mathematics teacher education, 8 (pp. 147–174). New York: Springer.
Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., et al. (2008b). Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 716–725. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.716.
Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., & Neubrand, M. (Eds.). (2013a). Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers. Results from the COACTIV project. New York: Springer.
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013b). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820. doi:10.1037/a0032583.
Kunter, M., & Voss, T. (2013). The model of instructional quality in COACTIV: A multicriteria analysis. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers, mathematics teacher education, 8 (pp. 97–124). New York: Springer.
Kuntze, S. (2006). Video technology in the assessment of an in-service teacher learning program. ZDM, 38(5), 413–421.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
Lindmeier, A. (2011). Modeling and measuring knowledge and competencies of teachers: A threefold domain-specific structure model for mathematics. Münster: Waxmann.
Lindmeier, A. (2013). Video-vignettenbasierte standardisierte Erhebung von Lehrerkognitionen. In U. Riegel & K. Macha (Eds.), Videobasierte Kompetenzforschung in den Fachdidaktiken (pp. 45–62). Münster: Waxmann.
Mason, J. (2008). PCK and beyond. In P. Sullivan & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 1, pp. 301–322)., Knowledge and beliefs in mathematics teaching and teaching development Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist, 59, 14–19.
Meyer, H. (1989). Plädoyer für Methodenvielfalt. Pädagogik, 1, 8–15.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2008). Mplus (Version 5.1). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
OECD. (2003). PISA 2003 assessment framework—mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. Paris: OECD.
Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345–375. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345.
Petrou, M., & Goulding, M. (2011). Conceptualising teachers’ mathematical knowledge in teaching. In T. Rowland & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 9–25). Dordrecht: Springer.
Prenzel, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Lehmann, R., Leutner, D., Neubrand, M., et al. (Eds.). (2004). PISA 2003. Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland—Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs. Münster: Waxmann.
Rowland, T., & Ruthven, K. (2011). Introduction: Mathematical knowledge in teaching. In T. Rowland & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 1–5). Dordrecht: Springer.
Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in preservice teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(2), 123–140.
Schmeisser, C., Krauss, S., Bruckmaier, G., Ufer, S., & Blum, W. (2013). Transmissive and constructivist beliefs of in-service mathematics teachers and of beginning university students. In Y. Li & J. N. Moschkovich (Eds.), Proficiency and beliefs in learning and teaching mathematics. Learning from Alan Schoenfeld and Günter Törner. Mathematics teaching and learning, 3 (pp. 51–68). Rotterdam: Sense.
Seidel, T., & Prenzel, M. (2007). Wie Lehrpersonen Unterricht wahrnehmen und einschätzen—Erfassung pädagogisch-psychologischer Kompetenzen bei Lehrpersonen mit Hilfe von Videosequenzen. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, Sonderheft, 8, 201–216.
Seidel, T., & Stürmer, K. (2014). Modeling and measuring the structure of professional vision in pre-service teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 739–771. doi:10.3102/0002831214531321.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational researcher, 27(2), 4–13.
Sherin, M., Jacobs, V., & Philipp, R. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes. New York: Routledge.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.
Smith, J. P, I. I. I., Disessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163.
Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1995). A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(6), 9–17.
Stürmer, K., & Seidel, T. (2015). Assessing professional vision in teacher candidates—approaches to validate the observer extended research tool. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(1), 54–63. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000200.
van der Vleuten, C. (1996). The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 1, 41–67.
van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2010). The influence of video clubs on teachers’ thinking and practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(2), 155–176.
Vosniadou, S., & Verschaffel, L. (2004). Extending the conceptual change approach to mathematics learning and teaching. Special Issue of Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 445–451.
Voss, T., Kleickmann, T., Kunter, M., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Mathematics’ teachers beliefs. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers—results from the COACTIV project. Mathematics teacher education, 8 (pp. 249–272). New York: Springer.
Wagenschein, M. (1991). Verstehen lehren. Genetisch—sokratisch—exemplarisch. Weinheim: Beltz.
Acknowledgments
We thank Steffen Knoll for his support in screening the TIMSS video material.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bruckmaier, G., Krauss, S., Blum, W. et al. Measuring mathematics teachers’ professional competence by using video clips (COACTIV video). ZDM Mathematics Education 48, 111–124 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0772-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0772-1