Abstract
The classroom culture of Korean schools has recently been changing as the population of linguistically and culturally diverse students increases. Students with multicultural backgrounds as well as Korea-born students returning from long residences in foreign countries have difficulties adjusting to Korean public schools due to a lack of Korean language proficiency and knowledge of Korean school culture. This study defines these students as Korean language learners (KLLs) and investigates both teacher and student perspectives on effective mathematics education for them. Cummins’ Quadrant model and the sheltered instruction observation protocol model, which were developed and used for English language learners (ELLs), are the frameworks used. The study explores various pedagogies for language learners and discusses the effectiveness and feasibility of ELL education models in a Korean school context based on the survey results of Korean elementary teachers and interviews of KLLs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barton, M. L., Heidema, C., & Jordan, D. (2002). Teaching reading in mathematics and science. Educational Leadership, 60(3), 24–28.
Boakes, N. (2009). Origami instruction in the middle school mathematics classroom: its impact on spatial visualization and geometry knowledge of students. Research in Middle Level Education, 32(7), 1–12.
Bruner, J. S. (1975). Language as an instrument of thought. London: Heinemann.
Cho, Y. M., & Lee, O. Y. (2010). An analysis of the results of a mathematics diagnostic test taken by multicultural Koreans in their first or second year of elementary school. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 20(2), 103–119.
Cho, Y. D., Yoon, H. W., & Park, S. C. (2006). A study on education in multicultural families. Seoul: Korean Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development.
Chval, K. B., & Chavez, O. (2011). Designing math lessons for English language learners. Mathematics Teaching in The Middle School, 17(5), 261–265.
Chval, K. B., Pinnow, R. J., & Thomas, A. (2014). Learning how to focus on language while teaching mathematics to English language learners: a case study of Courtney. Mathematics Education Research Journal. doi:10.1007/s13394-013-0101-8.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Cummins, J. (1979). Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 19, 121–129.
Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: issues in assessment and pedagogy. San Diego: College Hill.
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy bilingual children in the crossfire. Tonawanda. New York: Multilingual Matters Ltd. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=80547.
Dale, T., & Cuevas, G. (1987). Integrating language and mathematics learning. In J. Crandall (Ed.), ESL through content area instruction: mathematics, science, and social studies (pp. 9–54). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Echevarria, J., Powers, K., & Short, D. (2006). School reform and standards-based education: a model for English language learners. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 195–208.
Echevarria, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D. (2004). Making content comprehensible for English learners : the SIOP model. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Echevarria, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D. (2010). The SIOP model for teaching mathematics to english learners. Boston: Pearson.
Edelsky, C., Hudelson, S., Flores, B., Barkin, F., Altweger, B., & Jilbert, K. (1983). Semilingualissm and language deficit. Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 1–22.
Forman, E. (1996). Learning mathematic as participation in classroom practice: implications of sociocultural theory for educational reform. In L. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 115–130). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Freeman, B., & Crawford, L. (2008). Creating a Middle School mathematics curriculum for english-language learners. Remedial and Special Education, 29(1), 9–19. doi:10.1177/0741932507309717.
Furner, J. (2009). Mayan mathematics: connecting history and culture in the classroom. Teaching For Excellence and Equity in Mathematics, 1(1), 28–33.
Garrison, L., & Mora, J. (2005). Adapting mathematics instruction for English-language learners: the language-concept connection. In L. Ortiz-Franco, N. Hernandez, & Y. De La Cruz (Eds.), Changing the faces of mathematics: perspectives on latinos (pp. 35–47). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Gee, J. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: theory and method. New York: Routledge.
Gellert, A. (2014). Students discussing mathematics in small-group interactions: opportunities for discursive negotiation processes focused on contentious mathematical issues. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(6). doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0594-y.
Gibbons, P. (1998). Classroom talk and the learning of new registers in a second language. Language and Education, 12(2), 99–108.
Gutstein, E., Lipman, P., Hernandez, P., & de los Reyes, R. (1997). Culturally relevant mathematics teaching in a Mexican American context. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(6), 709–737.
Hansson, Å. (2012). The meaning of mathematics instruction in multilingual classrooms: analyzing the importance of responsibility for learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(1), 103–125. doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9385-y.
Hong, W. P. (2010). Multicultural education in Korea: its development, remaining issues, and global implications. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11, 387–395.
Jang, Y. Y., & Choi-Koh, S. S. (2009). A case study on the instructional dimensions in teaching mathematics to the elementary school students from multi-cultural backgrounds. Journal of Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series A: The Mathematical Education, 48(4), 419–442.
Jang, D. H., & Hwang, M. H. (2009). Emerging multiculturalism in Korea: Competing discourses of inclusion and exclusion. Presented at the International Studies Association Annual Convention, New York.
Johansson, M., Lange, T., Meaney, T., Riesbeck, E., & Wernberg, A. (2014). Young children’s multimodal mathematical explanations. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(6). doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0614-y.
Kim, S., & Kim, L. R. (2012). The Need for Multicultural Education in South Korea. In D. Urias (Ed.), The Immigration & Education Nexus (Vol. 12, pp. 243–251). SensePublishers, Dordrecht. doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-820-9_15.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lim, C. S., & Presmeg, N. (2011). Teaching mathematics in two languages: a teaching dilemma of Malaysia Chinese primary schools. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 137–161.
McLaughlin, M., & Talbert, J. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology. (2011). Report of Korean students in abroad. http://www.mest.go.kr/web/268/ko/board/view.do?bbsId=35&boardSeq=22423.
Mo, K. W., & Hwang, H. W. (2007). Social studies teachers’ perception of multicultural education and its implications on teacher education programs. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 24(2), 199–219.
Moschkovich, J. (2007). Bilingual mathematics learners: how views of language, bilingual learners, and mathematical communication affect instruction. In N. S. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics. New York and London: Teachers College Press.
Nasir, N. (2002). Identity, goals, and learning: mathematics in cultural practice. Mathematical Learning: Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2&3), 213–248.
National Center for Multicultural Education. (2012). Dropout rate of multicultural students. http://www.nime.or.kr/Front/scientist/cboardView.asp?no=2013&cate=%C5%EB%B0%E8.%B9%FD%B7%C9&cate2=&cate3=.
Pearn, C. (2007). Using paper folding, fraction walls, and number lines to develop understanding of fractions for students from years 5-8. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 63(4), 31–36.
Seol, D. H., Kim, Y. T., Kim, H. M., Yoon, H. S., Lee, H. K., & Yim, K. (2005). Foreign wives’ life in Korea: Focusing on the policy of welfare and health. Gwacheon: Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare.
Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education. (2013). Returning student information. http://return.sen.go.kr.
Setati, M. (1998). Code-switching in a senior primary class of second-language mathematics learners. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18(1), 34–40.
Setati, M., & Adler, J. (2000). Between languages and discourses: language practices in primary multilingual mathematics classrooms in South Africa. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43, 243–269.
Song, R. J., Moon, J. E., & Ju, M. K. (2010). Principles and methods of multicultural mathematics teacher education. Journal of Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(4), 639–665.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Vincent, C. (1996). Singing to a star: The school meanings of second generation Salvadorean students. Fairfax: George Mason University.
Vogt, M., & Echevarria, J. (2008). 99 ideas and activities for teaching English learners with the SIOP model. Boston: Pearson Allyn and Bacon.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole (Ed.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
Won, H.-M. (2008). Policy report: seventy percent of the students from minority families not enrolled in high schools. Seoul: Korean National Assembly.
Yoon, Y. N. (2010). A Study on the current status of “Korean for learning” of multicultural students in elementary school and support methodology for it. Seoul: Seoul National University of Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A: A Sample SIOP Mathematics Lesson (adapted from Echevarria et al. 2010)
Lesson: Describing characteristics of two-dimensional shapes
Expectation: recognize, name, build, draw, compare, and sort two-dimensional shapes
Key Vocabulary: square, triangle, rhombus, trapezoid, hexagon, characteristic
Higher Order Thinking Question: Why is it important to know what shapes surround us?
General Frames: I noticed … Something that is the same is … Something that is different is …
Specific Frames: One characteristic of a ________ is ________________.
Connections to prior knowledge/provide background information | |
Teacher will display a rhombus, trapezoid, and hexagon. Students are asked to show 1 finger if they do not know the names of the shapes, two fingers if they know the name of at least one shape, and three fingers if they know the names of all three shapes Teacher will ask students where else they see shapes in or outside of the classroom. Students will answer in small groups and then share with the whole group | |
Content objectives | Meaningful activities |
Students will demonstrate knowledge of the characteristics of two-dimensional geometric shapes by defining what a square, triangle, rhombus, trapezoid, and hexagon are on a 4-Corner Vocabulary Chart | Teacher will distribute pattern block sets to each of the groups. The set consists of a square, triangle, rhombus, trapezoid, and hexagon The teacher will ask students to take a few minutes in their groups to talk about the different shapes and answer the following questions: What do you notice? How are they same? How are they different? Students will share in their groups and answer using the general frames above I noticed … Something that is the same/different is … Teacher will then display each on the overhead and name each shape, explicitly identifying them as geometric shapes As the teacher displays and names each shape, students will share out their ideas of what they noticed about each shape in their groups Teacher will explicitly teach the word characteristic and explain to students that what they are sharing are the characteristics of each of the shapes Students will then be assigned one shape that they will use to complete a 4-Corner Vocabulary Chart for their group Students divide their piece of chart paper into four squares Students will create their chart, including an illustration, a definition, a sentence and the word itself Students will present their completed chart to the group Teacher will post charts on a math word wall in the room so that children can have them for reference |
Language objectives | |
Students will demonstrate comprehension of the characteristic of two-dimensional geometric shapes by writing and explaining the characteristics of a square, triangle, rhombus, trapezoid, and hexagon using the frame. One characteristic of a ________ is ________________ | Teacher will provide students a sheet that has each shape drawn and labeled Teacher will model and guide students in practicing how to appropriately use the specific frame Below each shape, students will individually complete the specific frame One characteristic of a ________ is ________________ Teacher will remind students to refer to the 4-Corner Vocabulary Charts that they completed to help them complete their frames In pairs, students will share their completed frames |
Wrap-up | |
Rate your learning. Teacher will ask students to think about how well they’ve learned the different shapes. Student will show one finger if they feel they haven’t learned; two fingers if they feel good about their learning but would like more information on shapes; and three fingers if they feel they have learned everything they need to about geometric shapes |
Appendix B: 4-Corner Vocabulary Chart
See Fig. 2.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
I, J.Y., Chang, H. Teaching mathematics for Korean language learners based on ELL education models. ZDM Mathematics Education 46, 939–951 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0631-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0631-x