Abstract
This article provides a commentary to the eight papers of this issue of ZDM entitled “Researching the enacted mathematics curriculum.” It is structured around three main questions concerning (1) the layers of the curriculum addressed in the eight papers; (2) an identification of the main theoretical framework used, and an appreciation of this as compared to another European framework; and (3) challenges for future research on the enacted mathematics curriculum. The author outlines her views derived from a particular European perspective.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualising resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 205–224. doi:10.1023/A:1009903206236.
Brousseau, G. (1997). The theory of didactical situations. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Chevallard, Y. (2006). Steps towards a new epistemology in mathematics education. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th Conference of European researchers in mathematics education (pp. 21–30). Barcelona: FUNDEMI-IQS.
Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119–142.
Confrey, J., Maloney, A. P., & Corley, A. K. (2014). Learning trajectories: a framework for connecting standards with curriculum. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(5) (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0598-7.
Goodlad, J. I., Klein, F., & Tye, K. A. (1979). The domains of curriculum and their study. In J. I. Goodlad (Ed.), Curriculum inquiry: the story of curriculum practice (pp. 43–76). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gueudet, G., Buteau, C., Mesa, V., & Misfeldt, M. (2014). Instrumental and documentational approaches: from technology use to documentational systems in university mathematics education. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 139–155.
Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (2013). Collective work with resources: an essential dimension for teacher documentation. ZDM-The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 45(7), 1003–1016. doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0527-1.
Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2012). Teachers’ work with resources: documentational geneses and professional geneses. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to ‘lived’ resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hunsader, P. D., Thompson, D. R., Zorin, B., Mohn, A. L., Zakrzewski, J., Karadeniz, I., et al. (2014). Assessments accompanying published textbooks: the extent to which mathematical processes are evident. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(5) (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0570-6.
Huntley, M. A., & Terrell, M. (2014). One-step and multi-step linear equations: a content analysis of five textbook series. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(5) (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0627-6
Otten, S., & Soria, V. M. (2014). Relationships between students’ learning and their participation during enactment of middle school algebra tasks. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(5) (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0572-4.
Pepin, B., & Gueudet, G. (2014). Curricular resources and textbooks. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2013a). Investigating textbooks as crucial interfaces between culture, policy and teacher curricular practice: two contrasted case studies in France and Norway. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6), 685–698.
Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2013b). Re-sourcing teachers’ work and interactions: a collective perspective on resources, their use and transformations. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(7), 929–944. doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0534-2.
Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., Yerushalmy, M., Trouche, L., & Chazan, D. (2015). E-textbooks in/for teaching and learning mathematics: a potentially transformative educational technology. In L. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of research in mathematics education (3rd ed.). Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis.
Remillard, J. T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: a framework for examining teachers’ curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 100(4), 315–341.
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
Remillard, J. T., Harris, B., & Agodini, R. (2014). The influence of curriculum material design on opportunities for student learning. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(5) (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0585-z.
Remillard, J. T., and Heck, D. J. (2014). Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(5) (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0600-4.
Schmidt, W. H., Jorde, D., Cogan, L., Barrier, E., Ganzalo, I., Moser, U., et al. (1996). Characterising pedagogical flow: An investigation of mathematics and science teaching in six countries. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Sears, R., & Chávez, O. (2014). Opportunities to engage with proof: the nature of proof tasks in two geometry textbooks and its influence on enacted lessons. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(5) (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0596-9.
Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: an analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488.
Stein, M. K., Remillard, J. T., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319–369). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Thompson, D. R., & Senk, S. L. (2014). The same geometry textbook does not mean the same classroom enactment. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(5) (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0622-y.
Thompson, D. R., Senk, S. L., & Johnson, G. J. (2012). Opportunities to learn reasoning and proof in high school mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(3), 253–295.
Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Huang, R. T. (2002). According to the book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the worlds of textbooks. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
van den Akker, J. (2003). Curriculum perspectives: an introduction. In J. van den Akker, W. Kuiper, & U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 1–10). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Vergnaud, G. (1982). Cognitive and developmental psychology and research in mathematics education: some theoretical and methodological issues. For the Learning of Mathematics, 3(2), 31–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pepin, B. Re-sourcing curriculum materials: in search of appropriate frameworks for researching the enacted mathematics curriculum. ZDM Mathematics Education 46, 837–842 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0628-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0628-5