Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrating history and philosophy in mathematics education at university level through problem-oriented project work

  • Original article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Through the last three decades several hundred problem-oriented student-directed projects concerning meta-aspects of mathematics and science have been performed in the 2-year interdisciplinary introductory science programme at Roskilde University. Three selected reports from this cohort of project reports are used to investigate and present empirical evidence for learning potentials of integrating history and philosophy in mathematics education. The three projects are: (1) a history project about the use of mathematics in biology that exhibits different epistemic cultures in mathematics and biology. (2) An educational project about the difficulties of learning mathematics that connects to the philosophy of mathematics. (3) A history of mathematics project that connects to the sociology of multiple discoveries. It is analyzed and discussed in what sense students gain first hand experiences with and learn about meta-aspects of mathematics and their mathematical foundation through the problem-oriented student-directed project work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For literature on using history in mathematics education, see, e.g. Fauvel (1991a, 1991b), Fauvel & van Maanen (2000) and Katz (2000). For discussions about difficulties of incorporating history of mathematics in mathematics teaching, see Fried (2001, 2007).

  2. The practise of this student-directed problem-oriented project-organised study programme is introduced and discussed in the paper by Blomhøj and Kjeldsen (2009) in this issue of ZDM.

  3. The problem-oriented project work also constitutes half of the study time in the master’s programmes. Its significance for the master’s education in mathematics is treated by Niss (2001).

  4. Each project work is assessed through an oral examination that takes its point of departure within the project report. The students’ performance is individually evaluated by an external examinator, who has been chosen from the national list of mathematics examinators that are used at mathematics examinations at all universities in Denmark.

  5. Our translation and paraphrasing.

  6. The following paraphrase from the students’ project report also appears in the paper by Kjeldsen (2007).

  7. The students’ wording is a bit unclear here, r′ and r′ + Δr′ denotes the radius of the circles that form the cylinders.

References

  • Andersen, S. H., Hybholt, T. K., & Pedersen, T. F. (2002). Why is mathematics difficult? (in Danish). Report, 3rd semester, Nat-Bas, Roskilde University.

  • Andersen, L. D., Jørgensen, D. R., Larsen, L. F., & Pedersen, M. L. (2003). Rashevsky’s pride and prejudice (in Danish). Report, 3rd semester, Nat-Bas, Roskilde University.

  • Bevilacqua, F., Giannetto, E., & Matthews, M. R. (2001). Science education and culture: The contribution of history and philosophy of science. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomhøj, M., & Kjeldsen, T.H. (2009). Project organised science studies at university level: Exemplarity and interdisciplinarity. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education (this issue).

  • Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1962). On some works of Kantorovich, Koopmans and others. Management Science, 8, 246–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, T., & Vinner, S. (1989). Images and definitions for the concept of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 356–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evgenia, A. (2007). Linear programming—a multiple discovery? Report, 3rd semester, Basic Studies in Natural Sciences, Roskilde University.

  • Fauvel, J. (Ed.). (1991a). Special issue on history in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics—An International Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(2).

  • Fauvel, J. (1991b). Using history in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics—An International Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(2), 3–6.

  • Fauvel, J., & van Maanen, J. (Eds.). (2000). History in mathematics education—The ICMI study. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floutrup, S., & Jensen, J.H. (Eds.). (2006). Studievejledningen 2006–2007 (The study guide 2006–2007, in Danish). Studienævnet for det naturvidenskabelige basisstudium, House 13.1, Roskilde University.

  • Fried, M. N. (2001). Can mathematics education and history of mathematics coexist? Science & Education, 10, 391–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried, M. N. (2007). Didactics and history of mathematics: Knowledge and self-knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankvist, T. U. (2007). Empirical research in the field of using history in mathematics education. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 12, 83–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankvist, T.U. (forthcoming). A categorization of the ‘whys’ and ‘hows’ of using history in mathematics education.

  • Katz, V. (Ed.). (2000). Using history to teach mathematics—An international perspective. Vol. 51. MAA notes. Washington: The Mathematical Association of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjeldsen, T. H. (2007). Meta aspects of science in problem based project work—experiences from Roskilde University. Proceedings for the ninth international history, philosophy & science teaching conference, The International History & Philosophy of Science Teaching Group.

  • Klassen, S. (2006). A theoretical framework for contextual science teaching. Interchange, 37(1–2), 31–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantorovich, L. (1960). Mathematical methods of organizing and planning production. Management Science, 6, 366–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T. (1960). A note about Kantorovich’s paper “Mathematical methods of organizing and planning production”. Management Science, 6, 363–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (2003). Is history of science stuck in the past? Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 3, 521–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. T. & Janzen Roth, E. (2005). Can students think like Archimedes? An instructional design experiment to incorporate history of science in student learning. International history and philosophy of science and science teaching eighth congress. Leeds, England

  • Mason, R. T. & Janzen Roth, E. (2007). Why π? An instructional design experiment to incorporate history of science in student learning. Proceedings for the ninth international history, philosophy & science teaching conference, The International History & Philosophy of Science Teaching Group.

  • Matthews, M. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1973). Singletons and multiples in science. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), The sociology of science, theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 343–382). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, D. (2007). We now interrupt the story: Mediating student learning using historical studies. Proceedings for the ninth international history, philosophy & science teaching conference, The International History & Philosophy of Science Teaching Group.

  • Meyling, H. (1997). How to change students’ conceptions of the epistemology of science. Science & Education, 6(4), 397–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monk, M., & Osborne, J. (1997). Placing the history and philosophy of science on the curriculum: A model for the development of pedagogy. Science & Education, 81(4), 405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niss, M. (2001). University mathematics based on problem-oriented student projects: 25 years of experiences with the Roskilde model. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: An ICMI study (pp. 405–422). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niss, M. (2002). Reflection over science and the dissemination of science (in Danish). Internal note written by the house-coordinating supervisor in House 14.2 fall semester 2002 that elaborates the theme for the project work done in the third semester of the Introductory Science Programme at Roskilde University, Denmark.

  • Niss, M., & Jensen, T. H. (Eds.). (2002). Kompetencer og matematiklæring–Idéer og inspiration til udvikling af matematikundervisning i Danmark. Uddannelsesstyrelsens temahæfteserie 18. Copenhagen: The Danish Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niss, M., & Jensen, T. H. (Eds.). (2005). Competencies and mathematical learning—Ideas and inspiration for the development of mathematics teaching and learning in Denmark. English translation of parts I–VI of Niss and Jensen (2002). Tekster fra IMFUFA. Roskilde University: IMFUFA (to be ordered from http://imfufa@ruc.dk).

  • Patinkin, D. (1983). Multiple discoveries and the central message. The American Journal of Sociology, 89, 306–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashevsky, N. (1934). Physico-mathematical aspects of cellular multiplication and development. Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology, II (pp. 188–198). Long Island, New York: Cold Spring Harbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach, L. E., & Wandersee, J. H. (1993). Short story science. Science Teacher, 60(6), 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinner, A. (1995). Contextual settings, science stories, and large context problems: Toward a more humanistic science education. Science Education, 79(5), 555–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinner, A., & Williams, H. (1998). History and philosophy of science in the science curriculum. In K. G. Tobin & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1027–1045). Boston, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular references to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wandersee, J. H. (1990). On the value and use of history of science in teaching today’s science; Constructing historical vignettes. In D. Herget (Ed.), More history and philosophy of science in science teaching. FL: Florida State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank three anonymous referees for critique, helpful comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tinne Hoff Kjeldsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kjeldsen, T.H., Blomhøj, M. Integrating history and philosophy in mathematics education at university level through problem-oriented project work. ZDM Mathematics Education 41, 87–103 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0101-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0101-4

Keywords

Navigation