Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A budget impact analysis of natalizumab use in Ireland

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Multiple sclerosis is the commonest cause of disability in young Irish adults. Natalizumab reduces disability progression in those patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis who are suitable for it. First line disease modifying therapies are given in the community and are paid for by the hi-tech drug scheme. Natalizumab is given in hospital and is paid for from the hospital’s budget. Access to natalizumab has been problematic in some Irish hospitals. A budget impact analysis was performed to look at the overall cost to the Health Service Executive of giving natalizumab.

Methods

A budget impact analysis was performed from the perspective of the Health Service Executive comparing the use of natalizumab with first line disease modifying therapies for 2009–2011.

Results

The study showed that currently, the use of natalizumab is likely to be cost saving to the Health Service Executive overall, because some of the costs for natalizumab are borne by private insurers, whereas, all of the costs of disease modifying therapies are borne by the Health Service Executive.

Conclusions

Although the use of natalizumab is cost saving, current funding arrangements in the Health Service Executive do not allow for the transfer of money saved from drugs paid for in the hi-tech scheme, to hospitals who are supplying alternative treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Health Atlas Ireland is a collaboration of Population Health, HSE (Health Intelligence and HPSC), the School of Public Health and Population Sciences UCD and Dept of Geography, NUI, Maynooth providing access to “health mapping” across a sector through integrating geographical information systems, health datasets and statistical techniques. Funded by the Health Research Board and HPSC, it uses geocoded data from the Census, HIPE, mortality, infectious disease notifications, cancer registration, prescribing, disability and environmental data.

References

  1. McGuigan C, McCarthy A, Quigley C, Bannan L, Hawkins S, Hutchinson M (2004) Latitudinal variation in the prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Ireland, an effect of genetic diversity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75(4):572–576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McDonnell G, Hawkins S (1998) An epidemiologic study of multiple sclerosis in Northern Ireland. Neurology 50(2):423–428

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McGuigan C, Dunne C, Crowley J, Hagan R, Rooney G, Lawlor E et al (2005) Population frequency of HLA haplotypes contributes to the prevalence difference of multiple sclerosis in Ireland. J. Neurol 252(10):1245–1248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Central Statistics Office, Cork (2008) Regional population projections 2011–2026

  5. Gray OM, McDonnell GV, Hawkins SA (2008) Factors in the rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis in the north-east of Ireland. Mult Scler 14(7):880–886

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mauskopf J, Sullivan S, Annemans L, Caro J, Mullins C, Nuijten M et al (2007) Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR task force on good research practices-budget impact analysis. Value Health 10(5):336–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Orlewska E, Mierzejewski P (2004) Proposal of Polish guidelines for conducting financial analysis and their comparison to existing guidance on budget impact in other countries. Value Health 7(1):1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oturia A, Koch-Henriksen N, Petersen T, Jensen P, Sellebjerg F, Sorensen P (2009) Efficacy of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis patients with high disease activity: a Danish nationwide study. Eur J Neurol 16:420–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Putzki N, Kollia K, Woods S, Igwe E, Diener H, Limmroth V (2009) Natalizumab is effective as second line therapy in the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 16:424–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Health Service Executive, Dublin (2007) Report on neurology and neurophysiology services. (Unpublished)

  11. National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, Dublin (2007) Economic evaluation of natalizumab (Tysabri) for the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis that is rapidly evolving and severe or sub-optimally treated

  12. Tappenden P, McCabe C, Chilcott J, Simpson E, Nixon R, Madan J et al (2009) Cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies in the management of multiple sclerosis for the medicare population. Value Health 12(5):657–665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Dee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dee, A., Hutchinson, M. & De La Harpe, D. A budget impact analysis of natalizumab use in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci 181, 199–204 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-011-0773-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-011-0773-6

Keywords

Navigation