Invasive plant species generally reduce the abundance and diversity of local plant species, which may translate into alterations at higher tropic levels, such as arthropods. Due to the diverse functional roles of arthropods in the ecosystems, it is critical to understand how arthropod communities are affected by plant invasions. Here, we investigated the impact of the invasive ornamental herb Lupinus polyphyllus (Lindl.) on arthropod communities during its main flowering period in southwestern Finland over two years. The total number of arthropods was about 46% smaller at the invaded sites than at the uninvaded sites in both study years, and this difference was mainly due to a lower abundance of beetles, Diptera, Lepidoptera, and ants. However, the number of bumblebees (particularly Bombus lucorum) was about twice as high at invaded sites compared with uninvaded sites, even though bumblebee richness did not differ between sites. There was no statistically significant difference between invaded and uninvaded sites in the abundances of the other arthropod groups considered (Hymenoptera (excluding bumblebees and ants), Hemiptera, and Arachnida). In addition, L. polyphyllus affected the relative abundance of four arthropod groups, with the order Lepidoptera being less common at invaded sites than at uninvaded sites, while the opposite was true for bumblebees, Hemiptera, and Arachnida. Overall, these results demonstrate that the negative impact of L. polyphyllus on biodiversity goes beyond its own trophic level, suggesting that this species has the potential to alter the abundance of different arthropod groups and, consequently, the structure of arthropod communities at a large scale.
Arthropods Insects Invasive species Species abundance Species richness
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We are grateful to Evans Effah and Oluwatobi Badejo for identifying the arthropod groups, and to two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments and suggestions. This study was financially supported by the Emil Aaltonen Foundation and the Academy of Finland (#285746 to SR).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Fenesi A, Vágási CI, Beldean M, Földesi R, Kolcsár L-P, Shapiro JT, Török E, Kovács-Hostyánszki A (2015) Solidago canadensis impacts on native plant and pollinator communities in different-aged old fields. Basic Appl Ecol 16:335–346. doi:10.1007/s10530-015-0954-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fremstad E (2010) NOBANIS—invasive alien species fact sheet—Lupinus polyphyllus.—From: online database of the European Network on Invasive Alien Species—NOBANIS www.nobanis.org. Accessed Nov 24th 2016
Haddad NM, Tilman D, Haarstad J, Ritchie M, Knops JMH (2001) Contrasting effects of plant species richness and composition on insect communities: a field experiment. Am Nat 158:17–35. doi:10.1086/320866CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Herron-Sweet CR, Lehnhoff EA, Burkle LA, Littlefield JL, Mangold JM (2016) Temporal- and density-dependent impacts of an invasive plant on pollinators and pollination services to a native plant. Ecosphere 7:Article e01233. doi:10.1002/ecs2.1233
Hodkinson ID, Jackson JK (2005) Terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates as bioindicators for environmental monitoring, with particular reference to mountain ecosystems. Environ Manag 35:649–666. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0211-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobsson A, Padrón B, Ågren J (2015) Distance-dependent effects of the invasive Lupinus polyphyllus on pollination and reproductive success of two native herbs. Basic Appl Ecol 16:120–127. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2014.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losey JE, Vaughan M (2006) The economic value of ecological services provided by insects. Bioscience 56:311–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters JA, Emery SM (2015) The showy invasive plant Ranunculus ficaria facilitates pollinator activity, pollen deposition, but not always seed production of two native spring ephemeral plants. Biol Invasions 17:2329–2337. doi:10.1007/s10530-015-0878-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier CI, Reid BL, Sandoval O (2013) Effects of the invasive plant Lupinus polyphyllus on vertical accretion of fine sediment and nutrient availability in bars of the gravel-bed Paloma river. Limnologica 43:381–387. doi:10.1016/j.limno.2013.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Russo L, Nichol C, Shea K (2016) Pollinator floral provisioning by a plant invader: quantifying beneficial effects of detrimental species. Divers Distrib 22:189–198. doi:10.1111/ddi.12397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schirmel J, Bundschuh M, Entling MH, Kowarik I, Buchholz S (2016) Impacts of invasive plants on resident animals across ecosystems, taxa, and feeding types: a global assessment. Glob Change Biol 22:594–603. doi:10.1111/gcb.13093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner RA, Varia S, Eschen R, Wood S, Murphy ST, Gange AC (2013) Impacts of an invasive non-native annual weed, Impatiens glandulifera, on above- and below-ground invertebrate communities in the United Kingdom. PlosOne 8:e67271. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiedeken EJ, Egan PA, Stevenson PC, Wright GA, Brown MJF, Power EF, Farrell I, Matthews SM, Stout JC (2016) Nectar chemistry modulates the impact of an invasive plant on native pollinators. Funct Ecol 30:885–893. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M, Hulme PE, Jarošik V, Maron JL, Pergl J, Schaffner U, Sun Y, Pyšek P (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 14:702–708. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar