Abstract
The effects of plant invasions on plant communities are often assessed at a few sites or in a particular type of habitat, while studies in different habitat types are scarce. We investigated plant communities in the presence and absence of the invasive ornamental herb, Lupinus polyphyllus, in four habitat types: meadow, forest, road verge and wasteland, in two geographic regions by comparing vascular plant species richness, vegetation structure based on species traits, community composition and the reproductive success of native plant species at invaded and non-invaded locations. The invader was associated with declines in the number of vascular plant species in all habitat types but was unassociated with differences in plant community composition in terms of species identity or species relative cover. However, sites with large lupin invasions (≥1,000 m2) contained fewer vascular plant species, a larger proportion of clonal species and more lighter-seeded species than sites with small invasions. The reproductive output of native plants varied across habitats from declines to increases in the presence of L. polyphyllus, and depended on species status (meadow, non-meadow species) rather than species identity, with meadow species generally showing an increase in the reproductive output in the presence of the invader. Overall, our results demonstrate that lupin invasions are associated with declines in local plant species richness across habitats. Although we did not detect systematic differences in species composition between invaded and non-invaded locations, species with particular traits may still be more persistent in invaded plant communities than others.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams SN, Engelhardt KAM (2009) Diversity declines in Microstegium vimineum (Japanese stiltgrass) patches. Biol Conserv 142:1003–1010
Alvarez ME, Cushman JH (2002) Community-level consequences of a plant invasion: effects on three habitats in coastal California. Ecol Appl 12:1434–1444
Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46
Bartomeus I, Vilá M, Santamaría L (2008) Contrasting effects of invasive plants in plant-pollinator networks. Oecologia 155:761–770
Bartomeus I, Vilá M, Steffan-Dwenter I (2010) Combined effects of Impatiens glandulifera invasion and landscape structure on native plant pollination. J Ecol 98:440–450
Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ et al (2008) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135
Chittka L, Schürkens S (2001) Successful invasion of a floral market. Nature 411:653
Cousins SAO (2006) Plant species richness in midfield islets and road verges—the effect of landscape fragmentation. Biol Conserv 127:500–509
Cousins SAO, Vanhoenacker D (2011) Detection of extinction debt depends on scale and specialisation. Biol Conserv 144:782–787
Flanagan RJ, Mitchell RJ, Karron JD (2010) Increased relative abundance of an invasive competitor for pollination, Lythrym salicaria, reduces seed number in Mimulus ringens. Oecologia 164:445–454
Franco M, Silvertown J (2004) A comparative demography of plants based upon elasticites of vital rates. Ecology 85:531–538
Gaertner M, Den Breeyen A, Hui C et al (2009) Impacts of alien plant invasions on species richness in Mediterranean-type ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Progr Phys Geogr 33:319–338
Grabas GB, Laverty TM (1999) The effect of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.; Lythraceae) on the pollination and reproductive success of sympatric co-flowering wetland plants. Ecoscience 6:230–242
Haynes J, Mesler M (1984) Pollen foraging by bumblebees: foraging patterns and efficiency on Lupinus polyphyllus. Oecologia 61:249–253
Hejda M, Pyšek P (2006) What is the impact of Impatiens glandulifera on species diversity of invaded riparian vegetation? Biol Conserv 132:143–152
Jakobsson A, Padrón B, Traveset A (2009) Competition for pollinators between invasive and native plants: effects of spatial scale of investigation (note). Ècoscience 16:138–141
Lampinen R, Lahti T (2008) Kasviatlas 2007. University of Helsinki, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Botanical Museum, Helsinki. http://www.luomus.fi/kasviatlas
Maltez-Mouro S, Maestre FT, Freitas H (2010) Weak effects of the exotic invasive Carpobrotus edulis on the structure and composition of Portuguese sand-dune communities. Biol Invasions 12:2117–2130
McKinney AM, Goodell K (2010) Plant-pollinator interactions between invasive and native plant vary between sites with different flowering phenology. Plant Ecol. doi:10.1007/s11258-010-9882-y
Meffin R, Millert AL, Hulme PE et al (2010) Experimental introduction of the alien plant Hieracium lepidulum reveals no significant impact on montane plant communities in New Zealand. Div Distrib 16:804–815
Mills JE, Reinartz JA, Meyer GA et al (2009) Exotic shrub invasion in an undisturbed wetland has little community-level effects over 15-year period. Biol Invasions 11:1803–1820
Moragues E, Traveset A (2005) Effect of Carpobrotus spp. on the pollination success of native plant species of the Balearic Islands. Biol Conserv 122:611–619
Morales CL, Traveset A (2009) A meta-analysis of impacts of alien vs. native plants on pollinator visitation and reproductive success of co-flowering native plants. Ecol Lett 12:716–728
Muller-Landau HC (2010) The tolerance-fecundity trade-off and the maintenance of diversity in seed size. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2:4242–4247
Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New York, NY
Powell KI, Chase JM, Knight TMN (2011) A synthesis of plant invasion effects on biodiversity across spatial scales. Am J Bot 98:539–548
Pykälä J (2001) Maintaining biodiversity through traditional animal husbandry. Finnish Environmental Institute, Helsinki (in Finnish with English abstract)
R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Ramula S, Knight TM, Burns JH et al (2008) General guidelines for invasive plant management based on comparative demography of invasive and native plant populations. J Appl Ecol 45:1124–1133
Richardson DM, Holmes PM, Esler KJ et al (2007) Riparian vegetation: degradation, alien plant invasions, and restoration prospects. Diversity Distrib 13:126–139
Silvertown J, Franco M, Pisanty I et al (1993) Comparative plant demography—relative importance of life-cycle components to the finite rate of increase in woody and herbaceous perennials. J Ecol 81:465–476
Thiele J, Iserman M, Otte A et al (2010) Competitive displacement or biotic resistance? Disentangling relationships between community diversity and invasion success of tall herbs and shrubs. J Veg Sci 21:123–220
Valtonen A, Jantunen J, Saarinen K (2006) Flora and lepidoptera fauna adversely affected by invasive Lupinus polyphyllus along road verges. Biol Conserv 133:389–396
van Kleunen M, Weber E, Fischer M (2010) A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecol Lett 13:235–245
Vilá M, Espinar JL, Hejda M et al (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 14:702–708
Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT et al (2002) Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:125–159
Wurst S, Vender V, Rillig MC (2010) Testing for allelopathic effects in plant competition: does activated carbon disrupt plant symbioses? Plant Ecol 211:19–26
Acknowledgments
We thank the Academy of Finland for funding, Tuija Häkkilä for assistance in the field, and three anonymous reviewers for valuable comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramula, S., Pihlaja, K. Plant communities and the reproductive success of native plants after the invasion of an ornamental herb. Biol Invasions 14, 2079–2090 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0215-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0215-z