Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic characterization of tailing dam using fully coupled dynamic analysis with different boundary conditions — a case study

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The seismic response analysis of a tailing dam is studied using a fully coupled effective stress approach in conjunction with an advanced multi yield surface plastic constitutive model for tailing material. Strain controlled static and cyclic triaxial tests were carried out to obtain the constitutive model for the tailing material. The tailing materials were collected from the Rampura Agucha tailing dam (Rajasthan State, India). A 2D nonlinear finite element (FE) model was then developed using different boundary conditions from the tailing embankment constructed using the downstream and upstream method of rising using OpenSees software. In first case, the model boundary was fixed in both the X and Y directions, and in the second case, viscous dashpots were introduced for both side and horizontal boundaries. The model was validated with experimental results on tailing material. Analyses were carried out considering five different earthquake motions, which were applied at the base. Comparisons of the different boundary conditions in terms of displacement flow vectors, pore pressure and stress-strain curves during shaking are presented. From the analysis, it was observed that the viscous boundary condition replicates the actual field conditions more accurately than the fixed boundary condition. In addition, it was found that the tailing embankment constructed by the downstream and upstream method of rising is not susceptible to liquefaction and lateral spreading for earthquake motions, even for a magnitude > 5.5.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM (1992), Standard Test Method for Load Controlled Cyclic Triaxial Strength of Soil, ASTM, D5311-92, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (1996), Standard Test Methods for the Determination of the Modulus and Damping Properties of Soils Using the Cyclic Triaxial Test Apparatus, ASTM, D3999-91, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu D, Madhulatha B and Dey A (2019), “A Time-Domain Nonlinear Effective-Stress Non-Masing Approach of Ground Response Analysis of Guwahati City, India,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 18(1): 61–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-019-0490-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biot MA (1941), “General Theory of Three-Dimensional Consolidation,” J. Appl. Phys, 12(2): 155–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Indian Standards (1980a), Test for Soils for Determination of Water Content-Dry Density Relation Using Light Weight Compaction (Reaffirmed 2011), IS: 2720 (Part VII), New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Indian Standards (1980b), Tests for Soils for Determination of Specific Gravity (Reaffirmed 2002), IS: 2720 (Part III), New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Indian Standards (1981), Determination of Shear Strength Parameters of Soil from Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test with Measurement of Pore Water Pressure (Reaffirmed 2002), IS: 2720 (Part XII), New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Indian Standards (1985), Tests for Soils for Grain Size Analysis (Reaffirmed 2006), IS: 2720 (Part IV), New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • COSMOS (2010a), (Consortium of Organizations for Strong Motion Observation Systems.

  • COSMOS (2010b), Strong-Motion Virtual Data Center: Update to the Cosmos Converter Tool, 2010. (http://www.cosmos-eq.org/VDC/index.html)

  • Chung FK and Krinitzsky EL (1977), “Duration, Spectral Content, and Predominant Period of Strong Motion Earthquake Records from Western United States,” Miscellaneous Paper 5-73-1, US. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dakoulas P (2012), “Nonlinear Seismic Response of Tall Concrete-Faced Rockfill Dams in Narrow Canyons,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 34(1): 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgamal AW, Parra E, Yang Z and Adalier K (2002), “Numerical Analysis of Embankment Foundation Liquefaction Countermeasures,” J. Earthquake Eng, 6(4): 447–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elia G, Amorosi A, Chan AHC and Kavvadas MJ (2011), “Numerical Prediction of the Dynamic Behavior of Two Earth Dams in Italy Using a Fully Coupled Nonlinear Approach,” Int. J. Geomech, 11(6): 504–518. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazetas G (1987), “Seismic Response of Earth Dams: Some Recent Developments,” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng, 6(1): 3–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM, Lysmer J, Hwang R and Seed HB (1973), “QUAD-4: A Computer Program for Evaluating the Seismic Response of Soil Structures by Variable Damping Finite Element Procedures,” Report No. EERC 73-16, Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM and Boulanger RW (2010), “SPT-Based Liquefaction Triggering Procedures,” Rep. No.UCD/CGM-10/0, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • IS 1893 (part 1) 2002, Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Indian Standard Code, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Wang Y and Cao Z (2014), “Probabilistic Slope Stability Analysis by Risk Aggregation,” Engineering Geology, 176: 57–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lysmer J and Kuhlemeyer RL (1969), “Finite Dynamic Model for Infinite Media,” J. Eng. Mech. Div, 95(4): 859–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newmark NM (1959), “A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics,” J. Eng. Mech. Div, ASCE, 85: 67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newmark NM (1965), “Effect of Earthquake on Dams and Embankments,” Géotechnique, 15(2): 139–160. OpenSees (Computer Software), Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piyush M, Xu D, Suryakant B and Subhamoy B (2021), “A Shake Table Investigation of Dynamic Behavior of Pile Supported Bridges in Liquefiable Soil Deposits,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 20(1): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prevost JH (1978), “Plasticity Theory for Soil Stress-Strain Behaviour,” J. Eng. Mech Div, 104(5): 1177–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rampello S, Cascone E and Grosso N (2009), “Valuation of the Seismic Response of a Homogeneous Earth Dam,” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng, 29(5): 782–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rico M, Benito G and Díez-Herrero A (2008a), “Floods from Tailings Dam Failures,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, 154: 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rico M, Benito G, Salgueiro AR, Díez-Herrero A and Pereira HG (2008b), “Reported Tailings Dam Failures,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, 152: 846–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanku K, Aniruddha S and Kousik D (2021), “Behavior of Braced Wall Embedded in Saturated Liquefiable Sand Under Seismic Loading,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 20(2): 361–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel PB, Lysmer J and Seed HB (1972), “SHAKE: A Computer Program for Earthquake Response Analysis of Horizontally Layered Sites,” Rep. No. EERC 72-12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center (EERC), Berkeley, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB and Idriss IM (1982), Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes, Engineering Monograph, Earthquake Engineering and Research Institute (EERI), Oakland, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitharam TG and Hegde AM (2016), “Stability Analysis of Rock-Fill Tailing Dam: An Indian Case Study,” International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 11(4): 332–342. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2016.1221574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitharam TG and Hegde AM (2019), “A Case Study of Probabilistic Seismic Slope Stability Analysis of Rock Fill Tailing Dam,” International Journal of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, 10(1): 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Jingyue, Ge Xinsheng, Sun Jingyuan, Liu Yasheng, Shang Zhuo, Wang Zhiqiang and Tian Maoguo (2023), “Dynamic Response Analysis of Liquefiable Ground Due to Sinusoidal Waves of Different Frequencies of Shield Construction,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 22(3): 637–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Elgamal A and Parra E (2003), “A Computational Model for Cyclic Mobility and Associated Shear Deformation,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng, 129(12): 1119–1127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:12(1119)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz OC, Chan AHC, Pastor M, Schrefler BA and Shiomi T (1999), Computational Geomechanics (with Special Reference to Earthquake Engineering), John Wiley & Sons Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thanikella Vijayasri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vijayasri, T. Dynamic characterization of tailing dam using fully coupled dynamic analysis with different boundary conditions — a case study. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 22, 995–1013 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-023-2218-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-023-2218-4

Keywords

Navigation