Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics of night soil and leaf co-composting using aerobic static method

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main purpose of this work is to investigate the characteristics of night soil and leaf co-composting using aerobic static composting method. Three influencing factors, including proportion of night soil and leaf, aeration rate and aeration pattern, were investigated through the evolution of the principal physicochemical properties, i.e., temperature, oxygen consumption rate, organic matters, moisture content, carbon, nitrogen, carbon-to-nitrogen ratio and Germination index (GI). It was found that the 3:1 (w:w) mixture of night soil and leaf was capable of achieving the highest composting temperature, longest retention time of high temperature (55°C), and fastest organic matter degradation. The 0.14 m3·min−1·m−3 aeration rate was most beneficial to composting, and the mixture of night soil and leaf maintained the highest temperature for the longest duration and achieved the highest CO2 content and GI. The continuous aeration pattern during composting was superior to an intermittent aeration pattern, since the latter delayed the composting process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lu Y, Wu X, Guo J. Characteristics of municipal solid waste and sewage sludge co-composting. Waste Management (New York), 2009, 29(3): 1152–1157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tremier A, de Guardia A, Massiani C, Paul E, Martel J L. A respirometric method for characterising the organic composition and biodegradation kinetics and the temperature influence on the biodegradation kinetics, for a mixture of sludge and bulking agent to be co-composted. Bioresource Technology, 2005, 96(2): 169–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Banegas V, Moreno J L, Moreno J I, García C, León G, Hernández T. Composting anaerobic and aerobic sewage sludges using two proportions of sawdust. Waste Management (New York), 2007, 27(10): 1317–1327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. de Guardia A, Petiot C, Rogeau D, Druilhe C. Influence of aeration rate on nitrogen dynamics during composting. Waste Management (New York), 2008, 28(3): 575–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong JW C, Mak K F, Chan NW, Lam A, Fang M, Zhou L X, Wu Q T, Liao X D. Co-composting of soybean residues and leaves in Hong Kong. Bioresource Technology, 2001, 76(2): 99–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ekinci K, Keener HM, Akbolat D. Effects of feedstock, airflow rate, and recirculation ratio on performance of composting systems with air recirculation. Bioresource Technology, 2006, 97(7): 922–932

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liang Y, Leonard J J, Feddes J J R, McGill WB. Influence of carbon and buffer amendment on ammonia volatilization in composting. Bioresource Technology, 2006, 97(5): 748–761

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Meunchang S, Panichsakpatana S, Weaver R W. Co-composting of filter cake and bagasse; by-products from a sugar mill. Bioresource Technology, 2005, 96(4): 437–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Li X J, Zhang R H, Pang Y Z. Characteristics of dairy manure composting with rice straw. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(2): 359–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zubillaga M S, Lavado R S. Stability indexes of sewage sludge compost obtained with different proportions of a bulking agent. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2003, 34(3–4): 581–591

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Eftoda G, Mc Cartney D. Determining the critical bulking agent requirement for municipal biosolids composting. Compost Science & Utilization, 2004, 12(3): 208–218

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rasapoor M, Nasrabadi T, Kamali M, Hoveidi H. The effects of aeration rate on generated compost quality, using aerated static pile method. Waste Management (New York), 2009, 29(2): 570–573

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Themelis N J, Kim Y H. Material and energy balances in a large-scale aerobic bioconversion cell. Waste Management Research, 2002, 20(3): 234–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ekinci K, Keener H M, Elwell D L, Michel F C. Effects of aeration strategies on the composting process: Part I, Experimental studies. Transactions of the ASAE, 2004, 47(5): 1697–1708

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hong J H, Keener H M, Elwell D L. Preliminary study of the effect of continuous and intermittent aeration on composting hog manure amended with sawdust. Compost Science & Utilization, 1998, 6(3): 74–88

    Google Scholar 

  16. Elwell D L, Borger D C, Blaho D V, Fahrni J K, Keener H M, Willett L B. Changes in concentrations of malodorous compounds during controlled aeration composting. Compost Science & Utilization, 2004, 12(2): 102–107

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ko H J, Kim K Y, Kim H T, Kim C N, Umeda M. Evaluation of maturity parameters and heavy metal contents in composts made from animal manure. Waste Management (New York), 2008, 28(5): 813–820

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. de Bertoldi M, Ferranti M P, L’Hermite P, Zucconi F. Compost: Production, Quality and Use, Elsevier Applied Science. London: Elsevier, 1986, 852

  19. Bertran E, Sort X, Soliva M, Trillas I. Composting winery waste: Sludges and grape stalks. Bioresource Technology, 2004, 95(2): 203–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tiquia S M, Tam N F Y. Elimination of phytotoxicity during co-composting of spent pig-manure sawdust litter and pig sludge. Bioresource Technology, 1998, 65(1–2): 43–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Imbeah M. Composting piggery waste: a review. Bioresource Technology, 1998, 63(3): 197–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stentiford E I. Composting control: Principles and practice. In: de Bertoldi M, Sequi P, Lemmes B, Papi T, eds. The Science of Composting, Part 1. Glasgow: Blackie, 1996, 56–59

    Google Scholar 

  23. USEPA. Control of pathogens in municipal wastewater sludge for land application. In: Center for Environmental Research Information. Environmental Regulations and Technology EPA/625/10-89/006. Cincinnati, OH 45268, 1989, 71

  24. Golueke C G, Diaz L F. Historical review: Composting and its role in municipal waste management. In: de Bertoldi M, Sequi P, Lemmes B, Papi T, eds. The Science of Composting, Part 1. Glasgow: Blackie, 1996, 3–14

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tchobanoglous G, Theisen H, Vigil S. Integrated Solid Waste Management: Engineering Principles and Management Issues. New York: McGraw-Hill Science Engineering, 1993, 686–687

    Google Scholar 

  26. Choi W, Chang S. Nitrogen dynamics in co-composted drilling wastes: Effects of compost quality and 15N fertilization. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2005, 37(12): 2297–2305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Morel J L, Colin F, Germon J C, Godin P, Juste C. Methods for the evaluation of the maturity of municipal refuse compost. In: Gasser J K R, ed. Composting of Agricultural and Other Wastes. London: Elsevier, 1985, 56–72

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ministry of Urban and Rural Construction and Environmental Protection. Control Standards for Pollutants in Sludge from Agricultural Use, GB4284-84. Beijing, 1984 (in Chinese)

  29. State Bureau of Environmental Protection. Control Standards for Urban Wastes for Agricultural Use, GB8172-87. Beijing, 1987 (in Chinese)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongtao Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, X., Wang, D., Lu, W. et al. Characteristics of night soil and leaf co-composting using aerobic static method. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 6, 421–427 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-011-0380-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-011-0380-9

Keywords

Navigation