Skip to main content
Log in

Co-composting of green leaves and kitchen waste: characterization of organic amendments, microbial activity and analysis of defence enzymes in plants

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Co-composting of green leaves and kitchen waste at low initial carbon–nitrogen (C/N) ratios was carried out to improve the available nutrients. Composting was performed in a pile for a period of 42 days, and physico-chemical factors, including, moisture content, pH, electrical conductivity, total Kjeldahal nitrogen, total carbon, and germination index were investigated. The pH of the compost increased exponentially up to 21 days of treatment and it was found to be as its maximum at day 42 (7.69 ± 0.09). EC was observed at 3.1 ± 0.23 mS/cm after day 1 of treatment and it increased to 5.61 ± 0.48 mS/cm after 14 days of composting. EC decreased after 28 days of the composting process and was stable after 35 days. After 7 days of composting process, organic matter was 74.3 ± 2.8% and decreased as 54 ± 3.1% within 21 days. The total organic carbon content was determined as 39.2 ± 1.8% at day 1 and the stable organic carbon level was determined to be 24.1 ± 0.9% after 42 days. The total Kjeldahl nitrogen content of the compost was determined as 1.1% before initiating the composting process. After the third and fourth weeks, the total Kjeldahl nitrogen increased gradually (1.7 ± 0.2%) and it was 1.9 ± 0.15% in the compost after 28 days. The C/N ratio decreased after 1 week (31) and decreased to 15.7 after 28 days of composting. The C/N ratio was 12.1 after 42 days of composting showing maturity. The microbial population was observed during the composting process, and it varied significantly (p < 0.05). In 1 and 2 weeks of compost, the germination index was 42.3 ± 2.8% and 48.3 ± 2.6%, respectively, and it improved to 100% after 42 days of mature compost indicating suitability in soil amendment (p < 0.05). The organic nutrients improved soil microbial activity in the greenhouse. The organic amendments improved the health of the whole plant and improved the yield of green gram (p < 0.05). The applied organic nutrients improved peroxidase, phenylalanine ammonia lyase, and polyphenol oxidase activity in Vigna radiata seeds (p < 0.05).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Azim K (2017) Composting parameters and compost quality: A literature review. Org Agric 8:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-017-0180-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barthod J, Rumpel C, Dignac MF (2018) Composting with additives to improve organic amendments A review. Agron Sustain Dev 38:17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0491-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fan H, Liao J, Abass OK, Liu L, Huang X, Wei L, Li J, Xie W, Liu C (2019) Effects of compost characteristics on nutrient retention and simultaneous pollutant immobilization and degradation during co-composting process. Bioresour Technol 275:61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Calabi-Floody M, Medina J, Suazo J, Ordiqueo M, Aponte H, Mora MD, Rumpel C (2019) Optimization of wheat straw co-composting for carrier material development. Waste Manage 98:37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.07.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen YT (2016) A Cost Analysis of FoodWaste Composting in Taiwan. Sustainability 8:1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reyes-Torres M, Oviedo-Ocaña ER, Dominguez I, Komilis D, Sánchez A (2018) A systematic review on the composting of green waste: Feedstock quality and optimization strategies. Waste Manage 77:486–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Adhikari BK, Barrington S, Martinez J, King S (2008) Characterization of food waste and bulking agents for composting. Waste Manage 28:795–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.08.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bandara NJ, Hettiaratchi JP, Wirasinghe SC, Pilapiiya S (2007) Relation of waste generation and composition to socio-economic factors: a case study. Environ Monit Assess 135:31–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9705-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gouveia N, Prado RR (2009) Health risks in areas close to urban solid waste landfill sites. Rev de Saude Publica 44:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102010005000029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Waqas M, Nizami AS, Aburiazaiza AS, Barakat MA, Rashid IM, Ismail IMI (2018) Optimizing the process of food waste compost and valorizing its applications: A case study of Saudi Arabia. J Cleaner Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ouda OKM, Raza SA, Nizami AS, Rehan M, Al-Waked R, Korres NE (2016) Waste to energy potential: A case study of Saudi Arabia. Renew 61:328–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.005

  12. Al-Dhabi NA, Esmail GA, Valan Arasu M (2020) Co-fermentation of food waste and municipal sludge from the Saudi Arabian environment to improve lactic acid production by Lactobacillus rhamnosus AW3 isolated from date processing waste. Sustainability 12:6899. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nizami AS, Ouda OKM, Rehan M, El-Maghraby AMO, Gardy J, Hassanpour A, Kumar S, Ismail IMI (2016) The potential of Saudi Arabian natural zeolites in energy recovery technologies. Energy 108:162–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mashat BH (2014) Effective microorganisms (EM) technology as a pathway to improve municipal solid waste of Makkah city (Saudi Arabia) and as foul odor eliminator. The Clute Institute International Academic Conference Munich, Germany (2014)

  15. Awasthi MK, Pandey AK, Bundela PS, Wong JW, Li R, Zhang Z (2016) Cocomposting of gelatin industry sludge combined with organic fraction of municipal solid waste and poultry waste employing zeolite mixed with enriched nitrifying bacterial consortium. Bioresour Technol 213:181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Avimelech Y, Cohen A, Shkedy D (1993) Can we expect a consistent efficiency of municipal waste compost application? Compost Sci Utiln 1:5–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.1993.10757897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang GF, Wu QT, Wong JWC, Nagar BB (2006) Transformation of organic matter during co-composting of pig manure with sawdust. Bioresour Technol 97:1834–1842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.08.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Dhabi NA, Esmail GA, Mohammed Ghilan AK, Valan Arasu M (2019) Composting of vegetable waste using microbial consortium and biocontrol efficacy of Streptomyces Sp. Al-Dhabi 30 isolated from the Saudi Arabian environment for sustainable agriculture. Sustainability 11:6845. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li Q, Wang XC, Zhang HH, Shi HL, Hu T, Ngo HH (2013) Characteristics of nitrogen transformation and microbial community in an aerobic composting reactor under two typical temperatures. Bioresour Technol 137:270–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Iqbal MK, Nadeem A, Sherazi F, Khan RA (2015) Optimization of processparameters for kitchen waste composting by response surface methodology. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:1759–1768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0543-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bernal MP, Alburquerque A, Moral R (2009) Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment, A review. Bioresour Technol 100:5444–5453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hueso S, García C, Hernandez T (2012) Severe drought conditions modify the microbial community structure, size and activity in amended and unamended soils. Soil Biol Biochem 50:167–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.03.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Estevez-Schwarz I, Seoane-Labandeira S, Nunez-Delgado A, Lopez-Mosquera ME (2012) Production and characterization of compost made from garden and other waste. Pol J Environ Stud 21:855–864

    Google Scholar 

  24. Day M, Shaw K (2000) Biological, chemical and physical processes of composting. In: Stofella PJ, Kahn BA (eds) Compost utilization in horticultural cropping systems. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton USA, pp 17–50

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gondek K, Kopec M, Mierzwa M, Tabak M, Chmiel M (2014) Chemical and biological properties of composts produced from organic waste. J Elementol 148:377–390. https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2014.19.2.670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dominguez M, Nunez RP, Pineiro J, Barral MT (2019) Physicochemical and biochemical properties of an acid soil under potato culture amended with municipal solid waste compost. Int J Recycl Organic Waste Agric 8:171–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-019-0246-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tiquia SM, Wan HC, Tam NF (2002) Microbial population dynamics and enzyme activities during composting. Compost Sci Util 10(2):150–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2002.10702075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. CoelhoL RM, Dionísio L (2013) Variation in microbial population during composting of agro-industrial waste. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:4179–4186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4202-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang C, Guo X, Deng H, Dong D, Tu Q, Wu W (2014) New insights into the structure and dynamics of actinomycetal community during manure composting. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:3327–3337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5424-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schulz H, Glaser B (2012) Effects of biochar compared to organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil quality and plant growth in a greenhouse experiment. J Plant Nut Soil Sci 175(3):410–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201100143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Borowik A, Wyszkowska J, Wyszkowski M (2017) Resistance of aerobic microorganisms and soil enzyme response to soil contamination with Ekodiesel Ultra fuel. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:24346–24363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0076-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Franke-Whittle IH, Confalonieri A, Insam H, Schlegelmilch M, Körner I (2014) Changes in the microbial communities during co-composting of digestates. Waste Manage 34:632–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang M, Hanna M, Li J, Butcher S, Dai H, Xiao W (2019) Creation of a hyperpermeable yeast strain to genotoxic agents through combined inactivation of PDR and CWP genes. Toxicol Sci 113:401–411. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfp267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu Z, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Chen D, Zhang YQ (2011) Drosophila Acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4 regulates axonal transport of synaptic vesicles and is required for synaptic development and transmission. J Neurosci 31(6):2052–2063. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3278-10.2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Makan A, Assobhei O, Mountadar M (2013) Effect of initial moisture content on the in-vessel composting under air pressure of organic fraction of municipal solid waste in Morocco. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng 10:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1735-2746-10-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang J, Chen G, Sun H, Zhou S, Zou G (2016) Straw biochar hastens organic matter degradation and produces nutrient-rich compost. Bioresour Technol 200:876–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bustamante MA, Paredes C, Marhuenda-Egea FC, Pferez-Espinosa A, Bernal MP, Moral R (2008) Co-composting of distillery wastes with animal manures:carbon and nitrogen transformations in the evaluation of compost stability. Chemosphere 72:551–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.03.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chaher NEH, Chakchouk M, Engler N, Nassour A, Nelles M, Hamdi M (2020) Optimization of food waste and biochar in-vessel co-composting. Sustainability 12:1356. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pant AP, Radovich TJK, Hue NV, Paull RE (2012) Biochemical properties of compost tea associated with compost quality and effects on pak choi growth. Sci Hortic 148:138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.09.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hosseini SM, Abdul Aziz H (2013) Evaluation of thermochemical pretreatment and continuous thermophilic condition in rice straw composting process enhancement. Bioresour Technol 133:240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gao M, Li B, Yu A, Liang F, Yang L, Sun Y (2010) The effect of aeration rate on forcedaeration composting of chicken manure and sawdust. Bioresour Technol 101:1899–1903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhao XL, Li BQ, Ni JP, Xie DT (2016) Effect of four crop straws on transformation of organic matter during sewage sludge composting. J Integr Agr 15:232–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60954-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tran QMM, Mimoto H, Nakasaki K (2015) Inoculation of lactic acid bacterium accelerates organic matter degradation during composting. Int Biodeter Biodegr 104:377–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Xi J, Liu Y, Liu H, Chen H, Emborg ME, Zhang SC (2012) Specification of midbrain dopamine neurons from primate pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells 30:1655–1663. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Karatas I, Ozturk L, Demir Y, Unlukara A, Kurunc A, Duzdemir O (2014) Alterations in antioxidant enzyme activities and proline content in pea leaves under long-term drought stress. Toxicol Indust Health 30:693–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233712462471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Getahun T, Nigusie A, Entele T, Van Gerven T, Van der Bruggen B (2012) Effect of turning frequencies on composting biodegradable municipal solid waste quality. Resour Conserv Recycl 65:79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang X, Selvam A, Wong JWC (2016) Influence of lime on struvite formation and nitrogen conservation during food waste composting. Bioresour Technol 217:227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Awasthi MK, Selvam A, Chan MT, Wong JWC (2018) Bio-degradation of oily food waste employing thermophilic bacterial strains. Bioresour Technol 248:141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ofei-Quartey MN, Appiah-Effah E, Akodwaa-Boadi K, Ampaw B, Taylor TS, Millogo ZE (2023) Enhancing the economic potential of organic waste by co-composting using ratio modelling toward a circular economy. J Mat Cyc Waste Manage 25(3):1560–1580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01633-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hargerty DJ, Pavoni JL, Heer JE (1999) Solid Waste Management. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 12–13

    Google Scholar 

  51. Mironov V, Vanteeva A, Sokolova D, Merkel A, Nikolaev Y (2021) Microbiota dynamics of mechanically separated organic fraction of municipal solid waste during composting. Microorganisms 9(9):1877. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9091877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sundberg C, Yu D, Franke-Whittle I, Kauppi S, Smars S, Insam H, Romantschuk M, Jonsson H (2013) Effects of pH and microbial composition on odour in food waste composting. Waste Manage 33:204–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ryckeboer J, Mergaert J, Vaes K, Klammer S, De Clercq D, Coosemans J, Insam H, Swings J (2010) A survey of bacteria and fungi occurring during composting and self-heating processes. Ann Microbiol 53:349–410

    Google Scholar 

  54. Rashad S, Niizuma K, Tominaga T (2020) tRNA cleavage: a new insight. Neural Regen Res 15:47–52. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.264447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Turan V (2021) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and pistachio husk biochar combination reduces Ni distribution in mungbean plant and improves plant antioxidants and soil enzymes. Physiologia Plantarum. J Fungi 173:418–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Israr D, Mustafa KS, Khan M, Shahzad N, Ahmad S (2016) Masood, Interactive effects of phosphorus and Pseudomonas putida on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) growth, nutrient uptake, antioxidant enzymes and organic acids exudation. Plant Physiol Biochem 108:304–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.07.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to the Researchers supporting project number (RSP2024R185), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TAS, SRF, and PV: methodology, formal analysis, investigation; original draft, KMA: formal analysis, data curation; validation, MSE: review, editing, project administration.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. A. Sathya.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 34 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sathya, T.A., Alarjani, K.M., Elshikh, M.S. et al. Co-composting of green leaves and kitchen waste: characterization of organic amendments, microbial activity and analysis of defence enzymes in plants. Biomass Conv. Bioref. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-024-05608-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-024-05608-z

Keywords

Navigation