Skip to main content
Log in

Study on adhesively-bonded surface of tapered double cantilever specimen made of aluminum foam affected with shear force

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aluminum foam is widely used in diverse areas to minimize the weight and maximize the absorption of shock energy in lightweight structures and various bio-materials. It presents a number of advantages, such as low density, incombustibility, non-rigidity, excellent energy absorptivity, sound absorptivity and low heat conductivity. The aluminum foam with an air cell structure was placed under the TDCB Mode II tensile load by using Landmark equipment manufactured by MTS to examine the shear failure behavior. The angle of the tapered adhesively-bonded surfaces of specimens was designated as a variable, and three models were developed with the inclined angles differing from one another at 6°, 8° and 10°. The specimens with the inclined angles of 6°, 8° and 10° have the maximum reaction forces of 168 N, 194 N when the forced displacements are 6, 5 and 4.2 mm respectively. There are three specimens with the inclined angles of 10°, 8° and 6° in the order of maximum reaction force. As the analysis result, the maximum equivalent stresses of 0.813 MPa and 0.895 MPa happened when the forced displacements of 6 mm and 5 mm proceeded at the models of 6° and 8°, respectively. A simulation was carried out on the basis of finite element method and the experimental design. The results of the experiment and the simulation analysis are shown not different from each other significantly. Thus, only a simulation could be confirmed to be performed in substitution of an experiment, which is costly and time-consuming in order to determine the shearing properties of materials made of aluminum foam with artificial data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. PAUL A, RAMAMURTY U. Strain rate sensitivity of a closed-cell aluminium foam [J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2000, 281(1/2): 1-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. COOPER V, LVANKOVIC A, KARAC A, MCAULIFFE D, MURPHY N. Effects of bond gap thickness on the fracture of nano-toughened epoxy adhesive joints [J]. Polymer, 2012, 53(24): 5540-5553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. LEE H H, MAJD H, ORREGO S, MAJD B, ROMBERG E, MUTLUAY M M, AROLA D. Degradation in the fatigue strength of dentin by cutting, etching and adhesive bonding [J]. Dental Materials, 2014, 30: 1061-1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. British Standard, BS 7991. Determination of the mode I adhesive fracture energy GIC of structure adhesives using the double cantilever beam (DBC) and tapered double cantilver beam (TDCB) specimens [S]. 2001.

  5. KIM S S, HAN M S, CHO J U, CHO C D. Study on the fatigue experiment of TDCB aluminium foam Specimen bonded with adhesive [J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2013, 14(10): 1791-1795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. OHNO N, OKUMURA D, NIIKAWA T. Long-wave buckling of elastic square honeycombs subject to in-plane biaxial compression [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2004, 46(11): 1697-1713.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. SANCAKTAR E, KARMARKAR U. Mechanical behavior of interlocking multi-stepped double scarf adhesive joints including void and disbond effects [J]. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, 2014, 53: 44-56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. BLACKMAN B R K, DEAR J P, KINLOCH A J, MACGILIVRAY H, WANG Y, WILLIAMS J G, YAYLA P. The failure of fibre composites and adhesively bonded fibre composites under high rates of test part III mixed-mode I/II and mode II loadings [J]. Journal of Materials Science, 1996, 31(17): 4467-4477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. SHOKRIEH M M, HEIDARI- RARANI M, RAHIMI S. Influence of curved delamination front on toughness of multidirectional DCB specimens [J]. Composite Structures, 2012, 94(4): 1359-1365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. BANG S O, KOOK J H, KIM S H, CHO J U. Simulation analysis on the compression property of sandwich composite [J]. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 2012, 13(2): 478-484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. MARZI S, BIEL A, STIGH U. On experimental methods to investigate the effect of layer thickness on the fracture behaviour of adhesively bonded joints [J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2011, 31(8): 840-850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. VOLKERSEN O. Aireraft insurance [M]. Berlin, Germany: Oldenbourg R. 1938: 41-47. (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  13. LOLAND O, REISSNER E. The stresses in cement joints [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1944, 11: 17-27.

    Google Scholar 

  14. ADAMSA R D. Failure strength tests and their limitations [M]// American Society of Meals Adhesives Handbook, New York: ASM International, 1990: 325-335.

    Google Scholar 

  15. HART-SMITH L J. Further developments in the design and analysis of adhesive bonded structural joints [J]. ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1981, 749: 3-31.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ZHANG Yu-jun, YANG Chao-shuai. FEM analyses for influences of stress-chemical solution on THM coupling in dual-porosity rock mass [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(4): 1138-1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. MARTINY PH, LANI F, KINLOCH A J, PARDOEN T. A maximum stress at a distance criterion for the prediction of crack propagation in adhesively-bonded joints [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2013, 97: 105-135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. ZAIN N M, AHMAD S H, ALI E S. Effect of surface treatments on the durability of green polyurethane adhesive bonded aluminium alloy [J]. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, 2014, 55: 43-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. HUANG Yin, BU Ying-ge, ZHOU Jian-guo, SHI Hui-ji, XIE Hui-min, FENG Xue. Fatigue crack growth and propagation along the adhesive interface between fiber-reinforced composites [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanic, 2013, 110: 290-299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. SUN Jian, ZHANG Lun. Vehicle actuation based short-term traffic flow prediction model for signalized intersections [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(1): 287-298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. KANERVA M, SAARELA O. The peel ply surface treatment for adhesive bonding of composites: A review [J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2013, 43: 60-69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. KIM J G, HWANG Y J, YOON S H, LEE D G. Improvement of the fracture toughness of adhesively bonded stainless steel joints with aramid fibers at cryogenic temperatures [J]. Composite Structure, 2012, 94(9): 2982-2989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. CHO J U, HONG S J, LEE S K, CHO C D. Impact fracture behavior at the material of aluminum foam [J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2012, 539: 250-258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-ung Cho.

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(2011-0006548) supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Hp., Cho, Ju. Study on adhesively-bonded surface of tapered double cantilever specimen made of aluminum foam affected with shear force. J. Cent. South Univ. 22, 4521–4527 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-3001-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-3001-0

Key words

Navigation