Skip to main content
Log in

An experimental comparison of water based alumina and silica nanofluids heat transfer in laminar flow regime

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experimental investigations were carried out to determine the convective heat transfer performance and pressure drop of Al2O3/water and SiO2/water nanofluids flowing through a circular tube. Measurements show that the addition of small amounts of nano-sized Al2O3 particles to the base fluid increases heat transfer coefficients considerably, while the result for the silica nanofluids contradicts with the alumina nanofluids and this leads to some interesting results. In the case of alumina nanofluids, an average increase of 16% in convective heat transfer coefficient is observed with an average penalty of 28% in pressure drop. Moreover, flow resistance increases significantly compared to the base fluid even at very low concentrations of nanofluids. Finally, measured heat transfer coefficients are compared with predicted ones from the correlation of Shah under the same conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WEBB T L, KIM N H. Principles of enhanced heat transfer [M]. New York: Taylor and Francis, 2005: 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. CHOI S U S, EASTMAN J A. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles [C]// ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition. San Francisco, 1995: 99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  3. DING Y, ALIAS H, WEN D, WILLIAMS R A. Heat transfer of aqueous suspensions of carbon nanotubes CNT nanofluids [J]. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2006, 49(11): 240–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. HE Y, JIN Y, CHEN H, DING Y, CANG D, LU H. Heat transfer and flow behaviour of aqueous suspensions of TiO2 nanoparticles (nanofluids) flowing upward through a vertical pipe [J]. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2007, 50(11): 2272–2281.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. CHEN H, YANG W, HE Y, DING Y, ZHANG L, TAN C, LAPKIN A A, BAVYKIN D V. Heat transfer and flow behaviour of aqueous suspensions of titanate nanotubes (nanofluids) [J]. Powder Technol, 2008, 183(1): 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. PAK B, CHO Y. Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron metallic oxide particles [J]. Exp Heat Transfer, 1998, 11(2): 151–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. XUAN Y, LI Q. Investigation on convective heat transfer and flow features of nanofluids [J]. J Heat Transfer, 2003, 125: 151–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. YANG Y, ZHANG Z G, GRULKE E A, ANDERSON W B, WU G. Heat transfer properties of nanoparticle-in-fluid dispersions (nanofluids) in laminar flow [J]. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2005, 48(6): 1107–1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. WEN D, DING Y. Experimental investigation into convective heat transfer of nanofluids at the entrance region under laminar flow conditions [J]. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2004, 47(24): 5181–5188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. KULKARNI D P, NAMBURU P K, BARGAR H E, DAS D K. Convective heat transfer and fluid dynamic characteristics of SiO2 ethylene glycol/water nanofluid [J]. Heat Transfer Engineering, 2008, 29(12): 1027–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. WANG X Q, MUJUMDAR A S. Heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids: A review[J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2007, 46(1): 1–19.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. YU W, CHOI S U S. The role of interfational layers in the enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluids: A renovated Maxwell model [J]. Journal on Nanoparticle Research, 2003, 5: 167–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. BECKWITH T G, MARANGONI R D, LIENHARD J H. Mechanical measurements [M]. 5th ed. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1990: 282–285.

    Google Scholar 

  14. SHAH R K. Thermal entry length solutions for the circular tube and parallel plates [C]// Proceedings of 3rd National Heat and Mass Transfer Conference. Bombay, 1975: 11–75.

    Google Scholar 

  15. CELATA G P, CUMO M, ZUMMO G. Thermal-hydraulic characteristics of single-phase flow in capillary pipes [J]. Exp Thermal Fluids Sci, 2004, 28(2): 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. GUO Z Y, LI Z X. Size effect on single-phase channel flow and heat transfer at microscale [J]. Int J Heat Fluid Flow, 2003, 24(3): 284–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. HWANG Y J, AHN Y C, SHIN H S, LEE C G, KIM G T, PARK H S, LEE J K. Investigation on characteristics of thermal conductivity enhancement of nanofluids [J]. Current Applied Physics, 2006, 6(6): 1068–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. VARNIK F, RAABE D. Scaling effects in microscale fluid flows at rough solid surfaces[J]. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 2006, 14(5): 857–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kalbasi Mansour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmad, A., Mansour, K. & Masoud, D. An experimental comparison of water based alumina and silica nanofluids heat transfer in laminar flow regime. J. Cent. South Univ. 20, 3582–3588 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1884-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1884-1

Key words

Navigation