Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability and optimal replacement policy for a generalized mixed shock model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TEST Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A generalized mixed shock model, which mixes two run shock models, is developed and analyzed. According to the model, the system subject to both internal degradation and external shocks fails upon the occurrence of \(k_1\) consecutive shocks whose magnitude is between predefined critical values of \(d_1\) and \(d_2\) such that \(d_1<d_2\), or \(k_2\) consecutive shocks whose magnitude is above \(d_2\). The system’s reliability, mean time to failure, and mean residual lifetime are all calculated under the assumption that the lifetime of the system due to internal wear and external shock arrival times follows a phase-type distribution. The best policy for replacement is also discussed. There are also graphical representations and numerical examples for the proposed model, in which both lifetime distribution of internal degradation and the interarrival periods between external shocks follow the Erlang distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Assaf D, Levikson B (1982) Closure of phase type distributions under operations arising in reliability theory. Ann Probab 10(1):265–269

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Auto My Garage, Inc Tire. My garage auto & tire. http://mygarageairdrie.ca/timing-belts/, 2019 (accessed January 7), (2023)

  • Bozbulut AR, Eryilmaz S (2020) Generalized extreme shock models and their applications. Commun Stat Simul Comput 49(1):110–120

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cha JH, Finkelstein M (2011) On new classes of extreme shock models and some generalizations. J Appl Probab 48(1):258–270

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chin-Diew L, Min X, Barlow RE (2006) Stochastic ageing and dependence for reliability. Springer-Verlag

  • Cirillo P, Husler J (2011) Extreme shock models: an alternative perspective. Stat Prob Lett 81(1):25–30

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cui LR, Wu B (2019) Extended phase-type models for multistate competing risk systems. Reliabil Eng Syst Saf 181:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eryilmaz S (2017) Computing optimal replacement time and mean residual life in reliability shock models. Comput Indus Eng 103:40–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eryilmaz S, Devrim Y (2019) Reliability and optimal replacement policy for a k-out-of-n system subject to shocks. Reliabil Eng Syst Saf 188:393–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eryilmaz S, Tekin M (2019) Reliability evaluation of a system under a mixed shock model. J Comput Appl Math 352:255–261

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gut A, Hüsler J (1999) Extreme shock models. Extremes 2(3):295–307

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • He QM (2006) Fundamentals of matrix-analytic methods. Springer, New York

  • Huang XZ, Jin SJ, He XF, He D (2019) Reliability analysis of coherent systems subject to internal failures and external shocks. Reliabil Eng Syst Saf 181:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li XY, Li YF, Huang HZ, Zio E (2018) Reliability assessment of phased-mission systems under random shocks. Reliabil Eng Syst Safety 180:352–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallor F, Omey E (2001) Shocks, runs and random sums. J Appl Probab 38(2):438–448

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Montoro-Cazorla D, Rafael PO, Carmen Segovia M (2007) Survival probabilities for shock and wear models governed by phase-type distributions. Qual Technol Quantitat Manag 4(1):85–94

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Montoro-Cazorla D, Perez-Ocon R, Segovia MC (2009) Shock and wear models under policy n using phase-type distributions. Appl Math Model 33(1):543–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuts Marcel F, Meier Kathleen S (1981) On the use of phase type distributions in reliability modelling of systems with two components. Operat Res Spektrum 2(4):227–234

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ozkut M, Eryilmaz S (2019) Reliability analysis under marshall-olkin run shock model. J Comput Appl Math 349:52–59

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Ocon R, Segovia MD (2009) Shock models under a markovian arrival process. Math Comput Model 50(5–6):879–884

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Segovia MC, Labeau PE (2013) Reliability of a multi-state system subject to shocks using phase-type distributions. Appl Math Model 37(7):4883–4904

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shanthikumar JG, Sumita U (1983) General shock-models associated with correlated renewal sequences. J Appl Probab 20(3):600–614

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tabriz AA, Khorshidvand B, Ayough A (2016) Modelling age based replacement decisions considering shocks and failure rate. Int J Qual Reliabil Manag 33(1):107–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarezadeh S, Asadi M (2019) Coherent systems subject to multiple shocks with applications to preventative maintenance. Reliabil Eng Syst Saf 185:124–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Cai K, Wang XY, Song YB (2018) Optimal replacement policies for a shock model with a change point. Comput Indus Eng 118:383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the editor and anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions, which have contributed to the improvement of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Ozkut.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Proof of (13): Since continuous phase-type random variable R has representation \(PH_c(\varvec{\alpha },\textbf{A})\) and from (1), we have

$$\begin{aligned} P(R>t)=\varvec{\alpha }\exp (\textbf{A}t)\textbf{e}'=\varvec{\alpha }\left( \sum _{n=0}^\infty \frac{t^n}{n!}\textbf{A}^n\right) \textbf{e}' \end{aligned}$$

and

$$\begin{aligned} E(min(R,t))&=\int _0^\infty P(min(R,t)>u)du \\&=\int _0^t P(R>u)du \\&=\int _0^t \varvec{\alpha }\left( \sum _{n=0}^\infty \frac{u^n}{n!}\textbf{A}^n\right) \textbf{e}' du \\&=\varvec{\alpha }\left( \textbf{A}^{-1}\sum _{n=0}^\infty \frac{t^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}\textbf{A}^{n+1}\right) \textbf{e}' \\&=\varvec{\alpha }\left( \textbf{A}^{-1}\sum _{n=-1}^\infty \frac{t^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}\textbf{A}^{n+1}-\textbf{I}\right) \textbf{e}' \\&=\varvec{\alpha }\left( \textbf{A}^{-1}(\exp (\textbf{A}t)-\textbf{I}) \right) \textbf{e}' \\&=\varvec{\alpha }\textbf{A}^{-1}\exp (\textbf{A}t)\textbf{e}' -\varvec{\alpha }\textbf{A}^{-1}\textbf{e}'. \end{aligned}$$

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozkut, M. Reliability and optimal replacement policy for a generalized mixed shock model. TEST 32, 1038–1054 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-023-00864-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-023-00864-z

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation