Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Hospital volume and outcomes of cardiothoracic surgery in Japan: 2005–2009 national survey

  • National Survey
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To elucidate the relationship between hospital volume and cardiothoracic surgical outcomes in Japan using the annual survey data, obtained between 2005 and 2009, collected by the Committee for Scientific Affairs of the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery.

Methods

The relationship between hospital volume and 30-day mortality was analyzed using a logistic regression model. The empirical Bayes (EB) method was also used to stabilize any large variation resulting from a small sample size. Hospitals, whose lower limit of the EB mortality 95 % confidence interval was above the mean EB mortality of all hospitals, were defined as those with “inferior outcomes”. The surgical procedures analyzed were coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG: elective + emergency), elective CABG, emergency CABG, single-valve surgery, surgery for acute type A dissection, open heart surgery for newborns, open heart surgery for infants, surgery for lung cancer, and surgery for esophageal cancer.

Results

There were large variations in 30-day mortality for all procedures, particularly in the lower-volume hospitals. There was a significant but weak inverse correlation between the hospital volume and the 30-day mortality rate for elective CABG, emergency CABG, single valve surgery, surgery for acute type A dissection, and lung cancer surgery. There was no correlation between hospital volume and the 30-day morality for open heart surgery for newborns and infants, and esophageal cancer surgery. After EB method adjustment, there was no hospital with inferior outcomes for conventional operations such as elective CABG, single-valve surgery and lung cancer surgery. The ratio of hospitals with inferior outcomes in more complex procedures was 1.8 % for open heart surgery for newborns, 0.8 % for open heart surgery for infants, and 0.2 % for esophageal cancer surgery.

Conclusion

There is a weak or no inverse correlation between the hospital volume and the mortality in cardiothoracic surgery in Japan. Most of the low-volume hospitals are not associated with inferior outcomes. The performance of the lower-volume hospitals should be carefully scrutinized using risk adjustment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized—empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. New Engl J Med. 1979;301:1364–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dudley RA, Johansen KL, Brand R, Rennie DJ, Milstein A. Selective referral to high-volume hospitals—estimating potentially avoidable deaths. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;283:1159–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. New Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shahian DM, Normand SLT. The volume-outcome relationship: from luft to leapfrog. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:1048–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nishida H, Yoshida E. Suggestions from non-pandering governmental health care policy groups: across the board 30 % cut of surgeon’s fee according to number of operation—pandering fool and disguised healthcare cost-cutting policy under fiscal crisis. Cardiovasc Med Surg. 2005;7:417–29.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kazui T, Osada H, Fujita H. An attempt to analyze the relation between hospital surgical volume and clinical outcome. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;55:483–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Osada H, Yamakoshi E. Hospital volume and surgical outcomes of lung cancer in Japan. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;55:360–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Clayton D, Kaldor J. Empirical Bayes estimates of age-standardized relative risks for use in disease mapping. Biometrics. 1987;43:671–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ueda Y, Osada H, Osugi H. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2005. Annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;55:377–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ueda Y, Fujii Y, Udagawa H. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2006: annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;56:365–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ueda Y, Fujii Y, Kuwano H. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2007. Annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;57:488–513.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sakata R, Fujii Y, Kuwano H. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2008: annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;58:356–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sakata R, Fujii Y, Kuwano H. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2009. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;59:636–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data-analysis using generalized linear-models. Biometrika. 1986;73:13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shahian DM, O’Brien SM, Filardo G, Ferraris VA, Haan CK, Rich JB, Normand SL, DeLong ER, Shewan CM, Dokholyan RS, Peterson ED, Edwards FH, Anderson RP. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1—coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:S2–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. STS national database executive summaries. 2011.

  17. O’Brien SM, Shahian DM, Filardo G, Ferraris VA, Haan CK, Rich JB, Normand S-LT, DeLong ER, Shewan CM, Dokholyan RS. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2—isolated valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:S23–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. New Engl J Med. 2011;364:2128–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hughes GC, Zhao Y, Rankin JS, Scarborough JE, O’Brien S, Bavaria JE, Wolfe WG, Gaca JG, Gammie JS, Shahian DM, Smith PK. Effects of institutional volumes on operative outcomes for aortic root replacement in North America. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012.

  20. Shahian DM, O’Brien SM, Normand SL, Peterson ED, Edwards FH. Association of hospital coronary artery bypass volume with processes of care, mortality, morbidity, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons composite quality score. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:273–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Peterson ED, Coombs LP, DeLong ER, Haan CK, Ferguson TB. Procedural volume as a marker of quality for CABG surgery. J Am Med Assoc. 2004;291:195–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shahian DM, Normand SLT. Low-volume coronary artery bypass surgery: measuring and optimizing performance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:1202–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gammie JS, O’Brien SM, Griffith BP, Ferguson TB, Peterson ED. Influence of hospital procedural volume on care process and mortality for patients undergoing elective surgery for mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2007;115:881–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kurlansky PA, Argenziano M, Dunton R, Lancey R, Nast E, Stewart A, Williams T, Zapolanski A, Chang H, Tingley J, Smith CR. Quality, not volume, determines outcome of coronary artery bypass surgery in a university-based community hospital network. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143(287–293):e281.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ms. Etsuko Yamakoshi (Statcom Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) for statistical analyses of the present study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara, Sakyo, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan

    Ryuzo Sakata

  2. Department of Surgical Science (Surgery I), Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan

    Hiroyuki Kuwano

  3. Department of General Thoracic, Breast and Endocrinological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan

    Hiroyasu Yokomise

Authors
  1. Ryuzo Sakata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hiroyuki Kuwano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hiroyasu Yokomise
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryuzo Sakata.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sakata, R., Kuwano, H. & Yokomise, H. Hospital volume and outcomes of cardiothoracic surgery in Japan: 2005–2009 national survey. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 60, 625–638 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-012-0128-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-012-0128-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation