Skip to main content
Log in

Accessing the influence of strategic marketing research on generating impact: moderating roles of models, journals, and estimation approaches

  • Methodological Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the literature debates the sophistication and contributions of statistical/econometric models to strategic findings, there is a lack of understanding of how different model types contribute to the impact of strategic marketing research. We collected data from 485 studies published in top-tier marketing journals over the last 50 years to assess the influence of core strategy areas, and the moderating roles of models, journals, and estimation approaches on the impact of strategic marketing research, measured in terms of citations of the articles. Using descriptive and regression analyses, we find that strategy research focusing on the “customer” and “other areas” had a relatively greater impact, whereas “sales” had a relatively lesser impact on citations than the “4Ps strategy area.” Linear regression, multivariate analysis, and structural equation models had a significantly higher impact on citations than other models. We also find that linear models and SEM positively and analytical models negatively moderate the relationship between strategy research focusing on “customer” and citations. Further, linear, analytical models and multivariate analyses negatively moderate the relationship between “sales” and citations. While strategy-focused journals positively moderate the relationship between strategic research focusing on “other area” and citations, it has a negative impact on the relationship between strategic research focusing on “sales” and citations. Relationship between strategy research focusing on “customer” and “other areas” and citations respectively is positively moderated by the estimation approach. Our study provides a perspective to the “rigor vs. relevance” debate in strategic marketing research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.decisionanalyst.com/whitepapers/choicemodelanalytics/.

  2. The list of articles can be provided upon request.

  3. As of November 11, 2016.

  4. We arrive at this conclusion based on two criteria: (1) after considering comments from the Editors of different journals in conferences/doctoral consortia and (2) after carefully evaluating the articles published in these journals.

References

  • Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California Management Review, 38(3), 102–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 27–41.

  • Aaker, D. A., Kumar, V., Leone, R. P., & Day, G. S. (2016). Marketing Research. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achrol, R. S. (2012). Slotting allowances: a time series analysis of aggregate effects over three decades. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(5), 673–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achrol, R. S., & Stern, L. W. (1988). Environmental determinants of decision-making uncertainty in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(1), 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, J., & Kamakura, W. A. (1995). The economic worth of celebrity endorsers: an event study analysis. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguirregabiria, V., & Suzuki, J. (2014). Identification and counterfactuals in dynamic models of market entry and exit. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 12(3), 267–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babakus, E., Cravens, D. W., Grant, K., Ingram, T. N., & LaForge, R. W. (1996). Investigating the relationships among sales, management control, sales territory design, salesperson performance, and sales organization effectiveness. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(4), 345–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P. (1978). Salesforce performance and satisfaction as a function of individual difference, interpersonal, and situational factors. Journal of Marketing Research, 15(4), 517–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: a review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, L. L. (1995). Relationship Marketing of Services—Growing Interest, emerging perspectives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 236–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogner, W. C., & Bansal, P. (2007). Knowledge management as the basis of sustained high performance. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 165–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borin, N., Farris, P. W., & Freeland, J. R. (1994). A model for determining retail product category assortment and shelf space allocation. Decision Sciences, 25(3), 359–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradlow, E. T., Bronnenberg, B., Russell, G. J., Arora, N., Bell, D. R., Duvvuri, S. D., Ter Hofstede, F., Sismeiro, C., Thomadsen, R., & Yang, S. (2005). Spatial models in marketing. Marketing Letters, 16(3–4), 267–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucklin, R. E., Gupta, S., & Siddarth, S. (1998). Determining segmentation in sales response across consumer purchase behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(2), 189–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bult, J. R. (1993). Semiparametric versus parametric classification models: an application to direct marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(3), 380–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil, S. T., & Zou, S. (1994). Marketing strategy-performance relationship: an investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (1998). Organizing for radical product innovation: the overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(4), 474–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (2000). The Incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Ganesan, S., & Liu, Y. (2009). Does a Firm’s product-recall strategy affect its financial value? An examination of strategic alternatives during product-harm crises. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 214–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Wang, Q., & Xie, J. (2011). Online social interactions: a natural experiment on word of mouth versus observational learning. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(2), 238–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ching, A. T., Erdem, T., & Keane, M. P. (2013). Invited paper-learning models: an assessment of progress, challenges, and new developments. Marketing Science, 32(6), 913–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chintagunta, P.K., & Dong, X. (2006). Hazard/survival models in marketing. The Handbook of Marketing Research: Uses, Misuses, and Future Advances, 441.

  • Chintagunta, P. K., & Haldar, S. (1998). Investigating purchase timing behavior in two related product categories. Journal of Marketing Research, 43-53.

  • Chintagunta, P. K., Jain, D. C., & Vilcassim, N. J. (1991). Investigating heterogeneity in brand preferences in logit models for panel data. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(4), 417–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chintagunta, P., Dubé, J.-P., & Goh, K. Y. (2005). Beyond the endogeneity bias: the effect of unmeasured brand characteristics on household-level brand choice models. Management Science, 51(5), 832–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chintagunta, P., Erdem, T., Rossi, P. E., & Wedel, M. (2006). Structural modeling in marketing: review and assessment. Marketing Science, 25(6), 604–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, D. J., Steenburgh, T., & Sudhir, K. (2013). Do bonuses enhance sales productivity? A dynamic structural analysis of bonus-based compensation plans. Marketing Science, 33(2), 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corey R. (1991). Marketing strategy-an overview. In Dolan R (Ed.), Strategic Marketing Management. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA. p 60-89.

  • Cravens, D. W., & Piercy, N. (2006). Strategic Marketing. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cravens, D. W., Ingram, T. N., LaForge, R. W., & Young, C. E. (1993). Behavior-based and outcome-based salesforce control systems. Journal of Marketing, 57(4), 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, G., Wong, M. L., & Lui, H.-K. (2006). Machine learning for direct marketing response models: Bayesian networks with evolutionary programming. Management Science, 52(4), 597–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1095–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, G.S. (1999). Market Driven Strategy: Process for Creating Value: With a New Information: free.

  • De Vries, L., Gensler, S., & Leeflang, P. S. H. (2012). Popularity of brand posts on brand Fan pages: an investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, P. S. (2001). Quality segmentation in spatial markets: when does cannibalization affect product line design? Marketing Science, 20(3), 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockner, E., & Jørgensen, S. (1988). Optimal advertising policies for diffusion models of new product innovation in monopolistic situations. Management Science, 34(1), 119–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donkers, B., Verhoef, P. C., & de Jong, M. G. (2007). Modeling clv: a test of competing models in the insurance industry. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 5(2), 163–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou, W., & Ghose, S. (2006). A dynamic nonlinear model of online retail competition using cusp catastrophe theory. Journal of Business Research, 59(7), 838–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou, W., Lim, K. H., Su, C., Zhou, N., & Cui, N. (2010). Brand positioning strategy using search engine marketing. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 261–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreze, Xavier, Stephen J Hoch, and Mary E Purk (1995), Shelf management and space elasticity, Journal of Retailing, 70 (4), 301–326.

  • Eliashberg, J., & Chatterjee, R. (1985). Analytical models of competition with implications for marketing: issues, findings, and outlook. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(3), 237–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmar (2009). 2009 Mahajan Award for Lifetime Contributions to Marketing Strategy Research. http://ama-academics.communityzero.com/elmar?go = t990773.

  • Erdem, T. (1996). A dynamic analysis of market structure based on panel data. Marketing Science, 15(4), 359–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdem, T., & Keane, M. P. (1996). Decision-making under uncertainty: capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Science, 15(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdem, T., & Swait, J. (2004). Brand credibility, brand consideration, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, E., Lee, J., Palmatier, R., & Guo, C. (2016a). Understanding the effects of plural marketing structures on alliance performance. Journal of Marketing: Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, E., Lee, J., Palmatier, R., & Han, S. (2016b). If it takes a village to Foster innovation, success depends on the neighbors: the effects of global and ego networks on new product launches. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(3), 319–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farias, V. F., Jagabathula, S., & Shah, D. (2013). A nonparametric approach to modeling choice with limited data. Management Science, 59(2), 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, R. P., Brown, S. W., & Bitner, M. J. (1993). Tracking the evolution of the services marketing literature. Journal of Retailing, 69(1), 61–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germann, F., Ebbes, P., & Grewal, R. (2015). The chief marketing officer matters! Journal of Marketing, 79(3), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokhale, S. S., & Trivedi, K. S. (1998). Analytical modeling. Encyclopedia of Distributed Systems.

  • Gönül, F., & Srinivasan, K. (1996). Estimating the impact of consumer expectations of coupons on purchase behavior: a dynamic structural model. Marketing Science, 15(3), 262–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1990). Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E., Frank, R. E., & Robinson, P. J. (1967). Cluster analysis in test market selection. Management Science, 13(8), B-387–B-400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. H., Barclay, D. W., & Ryans, A. B. (1995). Entry strategy and long-term performance: conceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 59(4), 1-16.

  • Grinstein, A. (2008). The effect of market orientation and its components on innovation consequences: a meta-analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(2), 166–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. (1988). Impact of sales promotions on when, what, and how much to buy. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(4), 342–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamill, J. (1997). The internet and international marketing. International Marketing Review, 14(5), 300–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanssens, D. M., Parsons, L. J., & Schultz, R. L. (2003). Market response models: econometric and time series analysis. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashi, I., & Stojčić, N. (2013). The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi-stage model: evidence from the community innovation survey 4. Research Policy, 42(2), 353–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, A. (2004). Towards value-based pricing—an integrative framework for decision making. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(8), 765–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, A. (2008). Customer value-based pricing strategies: why companies resist. Journal of Business Strategy, 29(4), 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D. L., & Fodor, M. (2010). Can you measure the Roi of your social media marketing? MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(1), 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, M. B. (2016). Is “strategy” a dirty word? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(5), 557–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C. (2014). Analysis of panel data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1995). The comparative advantage theory of competition. Journal of Marketing, 59(2), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, R., Ansari, A., & Gupta, S. (2007). A model of consumer learning for service quality and usage. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(4), 529–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, R., & Aaker, D. A. (1987). The strategic role of product quality. Journal of Marketing, 51(4), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, D. C., & Vilcassim, N. J. (1991). Investigating household purchase timing decisions: a conditional hazard function approach. Marketing Science, 10(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jank, W., & Kannan, P. K. (2005). Understanding geographical Markets of Online Firms Using Spatial Models of customer choice. Marketing Science, 24(4), 623–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 53-70.

  • Jedidi, K., Jagpal, H. S., & DeSarbo, W. S. (1997). Finite-mixture structural equation models for response-based segmentation and unobserved heterogeneity. Marketing Science, 16(1), 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. L. (1999). Strategic integration in industrial distribution channels: managing the Interfirm relationship as a strategic asset. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(1), 4–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadiyali, V., Chintagunta, P., & Vilcassim, N. (2000). Manufacturer-retailer channel interactions and implications for channel power: an empirical investigation of pricing in a local market. Marketing Science, 19(2), 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamakura, W. A., & Russell, G. J. (1993). Measuring brand value with scanner data. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10(1), 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamakura, W., Mela, C. F., Ansari, A., Bodapati, A., Fader, P., Iyengar, R., Naik, P., Neslin, S., Sun, B., & Verhoef, P. C. (2005). Choice models and customer relationship management. Marketing Letters, 16(3–4), 279–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L., & Aaker, D. A. (1992). The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions. Journal of marketing research, 29(1), 35-50.

  • Kerin, R. A., Rajan Varadarajan, P., & Peterson, R. A. (1992). First-mover advantage: a synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. Journal of Marketing, 56(4), 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koller, D., & Friedman, N. (2009). Probabilistic graphical models: principles and techniques. Cambridge: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V (2013), Profitable customer engagement: concept, Metrics and Strategies: SAGE Publications: India.

  • Kumar, V. (2015). Marketing research: a global outlook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., & Krishnan, T. V. (2002). Multinational diffusion models: an alternative framework. Marketing Science, 21(3), 318–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., & Pansari, A. (2016). Competitive advantage through engagement. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(4), 497–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Venkatesan, R., Bohling, T., & Beckmann, D. (2008). Practice prize report—the power of clv: managing customer lifetime value at Ibm. Marketing Science, 27(4), 585–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Bhaskaran, V., Mirchandani, R., & Shah, M. (2013). Practice prize winner-creating a measurable social media marketing strategy: increasing the value and Roi of intangibles and tangibles for hokey pokey. Marketing Science, 32(2), 194–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Sunder, S., & Leone, R. P. (2014a). Measuring and managing a Salesperson’s future value to the firm. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(5), 591–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Umashankar, N., Kim, K. H., & Bhagwat, Y. (2014b). Assessing the influence of economic and customer experience factors on service purchase behaviors. Marketing Science, 33(5), 673–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Zhang, X., & Luo, A. (2014c). Modeling customer opt-in and opt-out in a permission-based marketing context. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(4), 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Sharma, A., Donthu, N., & Rountree, C. (2015a). Implementing integrated marketing science modeling at a non-profit organization: balancing multiple business objectives at Georgia aquarium. Marketing Science, 34(6), 804–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Sunder, S., & Sharma, A. (2015b). Leveraging distribution to maximize firm performance in emerging markets. Journal of Retailing, 91(4), 627–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuruganti, S., & Basu, H. (2015). Business analytics: applications to consumer marketing. New York: McGraw Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R., & Staelin, R. (1984). An approach for developing an optimal discount pricing policy. Management Science, 30(12), 1524–1539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, D. R., McAlister, L., & Staelin, R. (2011). Sophistication in research in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M., Singh, V., & Fay, S. (2006). An empirical study of the impact of nonlinear shipping and handling fees on purchase incidence and expenditure decisions. Marketing Science, 25(1), 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R.F., & Vargo, S.L. (2014). The service-dominant logic of marketing: dialog, debate, and directions. Routledge.

  • Manchanda, P., Dubé, J.-P., Goh, K. Y., & Chintagunta, P. K. (2006). The effect of banner advertising on internet purchasing. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manchanda, P., Xie, Y., & Youn, N. (2008). The role of targeted communication and contagion in product adoption. Marketing Science, 27(6), 961–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlister, L. (2016). Rigor versus method imperialism. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(5), 565–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlister, L., Srinivasan, R., & Kim, M. C. (2007). Advertising, Research and Development, and systematic risk of the firm. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadyen, M. A., & Cannella, A. A. (2004). Social capital and knowledge creation: diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 735–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merlo, O., & Auh, S. (2009). The effects of entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation, and marketing subunit influence on firm performance. Marketing Letters, 20(3), 295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizik, N., & Jacobson, R. (2008). The financial value impact of perceptual brand attributes. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(1), 15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Calantone, R. (1994). Determinants of new product performance: a review and meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(5), 397–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, C. (2016). Celebrating Marketing’s dirty word. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(5), 562–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, N. A., Kaleka, A., & Katsikeas, C. S. (2004). Antecedents of export venture performance: a theoretical model and empirical assessment. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 90–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naik, P. A., & Peters, K. (2009). A hierarchical marketing communications model of online and offline media synergies. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(4), 288–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naik, P. A., Raman, K., & Winer, R. S. (2005). Planning marketing-mix strategies in the presence of interaction effects. Marketing Science, 24(1), 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair, H. (2007). Intertemporal price discrimination with forward-looking consumers: application to the us market for console video-games. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 5(3), 239–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath, P., & Mahajan, V. (2011). Marketing in the C-suite: a study of chief marketing officer power in firms’ top management teams. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 60–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natter, M., Ozimec, A.-M., & Kim, J.-Y. (2015). Eco: Entega’s profitable new customer acquisition on online price comparison sites. Marketing Science, 34(6), 789–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neelamegham, R., & Chintagunta, P. (1999). A Bayesian model to forecast new product performance in domestic and international markets. Marketing Science, 18(2), 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neslin, S. A., & Shoemaker, R. W. (1983). Using a natural experiment to estimate price elasticity: the 1974 sugar shortage and the ready-to-eat cereal market. Journal of Marketing, 47(1), 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Cass, A., & Sok, P. (2013). Exploring innovation driven value creation in B2b service firms: the roles of the manager, employees, and customers in value creation. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1074–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmatier, R. W., Scheer, L. K., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2007). Customer loyalty to whom? Managing the benefits and risks of salesperson-owned loyalty. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y.-H., & Fader, P. S. (2004). Modeling browsing behavior at multiple websites. Marketing Science, 23(3), 280–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkhe, A. (1993). Strategic alliance structuring: a game theoretic and transaction cost examination of Interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 794–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, J. A., Kushwaha, T., & Kumar, V. (2015). Marketing communication strategies and consumer financial decision making: the role of National Culture. Journal of Marketing, 79(1), 44–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punj, G., & Stewart, D. W. (1983). Cluster analysis in marketing research: review and suggestions for application. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(2), 134–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putsis, J., William, P., & Bayus, B. L. (2001). An empirical analysis of firms’ product line decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), 110–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, R. C., & Bass, F. M. (1985). Competition, strategy, and price dynamics: a theoretical and empirical investigation. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(3), 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reibstein, D. J., Day, G., & Wind, J. (2009). Guest editorial: is marketing academia losing its way? Journal of Marketing, 73(4), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinartz, W. J., & Kumar, V. (2000). On the profitability of long-life customers in a Noncontractual setting: an empirical investigation and implications for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risselada, H., Verhoef, P. C., & Bijmolt, T. H. A. (2014). Dynamic effects of social influence and direct marketing on the adoption of high-technology products. Journal of Marketing, 78(2), 52–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. E., & Allenby, G. M. (2003). Bayesian statistics and marketing. Marketing Science, 22(3), 304–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, D. (2014). Understanding digital marketing: marketing strategies for engaging the digital generation. London: Kogan Page Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, P., Skiera, B., & Van den Bulte, C. (2011). Referral programs and customer value. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: a field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankar, V., & Balasubramanian, S. (2009). Mobile marketing: a synthesis and prognosis. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(2), 118–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankar, V., Azar, P., & Fuller, M. (2008). Practice prize paper-bran* Eqt: a Multicategory brand equity model and its application at Allstate. Marketing Science, 27(4), 567–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, B., & Sharp, A. (1997). Loyalty programs and their impact on repeat-purchase loyalty patterns. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 14(5), 473–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, S., Misra, S., & Horsky, D. (2012). Disentangling preferences and learning in brand choice models. Marketing Science, 31(1), 115–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B. L., & Ruth, J. A. (1998). Is a company known by the company it keeps? Assessing the spillover effects of brand alliances on consumer brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skiera, B., & Albers, S. (1998). Costa: contribution optimizing sales territory alignment. Marketing Science, 17(3), 196–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S. F., & Olson, E. M. (2000). Strategy type and performance: the influence of sales force management. Strategic Management Journal, 21(8), 813–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S. F., & Olson, E. M. (2001). Marketing’s contribution to the implementation of business strategy: an empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 22(11), 1055–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, G. K. (2006). Nonlinear regression. Encyclopedia of Environmetrics.

  • Sood, A., & Tellis, G. J. (2005). Technological evolution and radical innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 152–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, S., Rutz, O. J., & Pauwels, K. (2015). Paths to and off purchase: quantifying the impact of traditional marketing and online consumer activity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1–14.

  • Sudhir, K. (2001). Competitive pricing behavior in the auto market: a structural analysis. Marketing Science, 20(1), 42–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, V., & Moorman, C. (2009). Marketing alliances, firm networks, and firm value creation. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 52–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, D. M., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Rajan Varadarajan, P. (1993). Standardization versus adaptation of international marketing strategy: an empirical investigation. Journal of Marketing, 57(4), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivedi, K. S. (1982). Probability and statistics with reliability. Queuing and Computer Science Applications. Prentice Hall, 1982.

  • Van Heerde, H. J., Gupta, S., & Wittink, D. R. (2003). Is 75% of the sales promotion bump due to brand switching? No, only 33% is. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(4), 481–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, R. (2010). Strategic marketing and marketing strategy: domain, definition, fundamental issues and foundational premises. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(2), 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, P. R., & Clark, T. (1994). Delineating the scope of corporate, business, and marketing strategy. Journal of Business Research, 31(2–3), 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, P. R., & Yadav, M. S. (2002). Marketing strategy and the internet: an organizing framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 296–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesan, R., & Kumar, V. (2004). A customer lifetime value framework for customer selection and resource allocation strategy. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 106–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesan, R., Krishnan, T. V., & Kumar, V. (2004). Evolutionary estimation of macro-level diffusion models using genetic algorithms: an alternative to nonlinear least squares. Marketing Science, 23(3), 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilcassim, N. J., & Jain, D. C. (1991). Modeling purchase-timing and brand-switching behavior incorporating explanatory variables and unobserved heterogeneity. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(1), 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vohra, N. D. (2007). Quantitative Techniques in Management. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, D. W., Giese, J. L., & Johnson, J. L. (2004). Customer retailer loyalty in the context of Multiple Channel strategies. Journal of Retailing, 80(4), 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitz, B. A., & Bradford, K. D. (1999). Personal selling and sales management: a relationship marketing perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(2), 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, G., & Bharadwaj, S. (2013). Asymmetric roles of advertising and marketing capability in financial returns to news: turning bad into good and good into great. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(6), 706–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, B., Donthu, N., & Lee, S. (2000). An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). Problems and strategies in services marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(2), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., Zhao, Y., & Helsen, K. (2011). Consumer learning in a turbulent market environment: modeling consumer choice dynamics after a product-harm crisis. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 48(2), 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., Yang, S., Narayan, V., & Zhao, Y. (2013). Modeling consumer learning from online product reviews. Marketing Science, 32(1), 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Editor, Associate Editor, and the three anonymous Reviewers for their valuable comments on the earlier version of the manuscript. We also thank Rajan Varadarajan, Vithala Rao, A. Parasuraman, Jagdish Sheth, Bharath Rajan, Ericka Robinson and the participants of the 5th AIM-AMA Sheth Foundation Doctoral Consortium, WE School, Mumbai, India for their valuable feedback on this article. Finally, we thank Renu for copyediting the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V Kumar.

Additional information

Shrihari Sridhar served as Area Editor for this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, V., Sharma, A. & Gupta, S. Accessing the influence of strategic marketing research on generating impact: moderating roles of models, journals, and estimation approaches. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 45, 164–185 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0518-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0518-9

Keywords

Navigation