Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Functional and physicochemical properties of cookies enriched with edible insect (Tenebrio molitor and Zophobas atratus) powders

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The high nutritional value of edible insects attracted attention of the food industry for enhancing nutritional characteristics especially protein content of food products. In this study, enrichment of edible insect (Tenebrio molitor and Zophobas atratus) powders into cookie formulations at 0–30% substitution level of wheat flour was tested for their effect on functional and physicochemical properties of cookies. As the substitution level of insect powders increased, the nutritional values, the darkness, redness and yellowness, and the hardness of cookies significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased, whereas the dough hardness and adhesiveness and the mean scores for all sensory attributes and overall acceptability of cookies decreased. All the cookie samples containing insect powders were microbiologically stable and safe. The cookies enriched with both insect powders up to 20% substitution level were found to be sensorially acceptable. Overall, these results demonstrate a potential application of insect powders to improve nutritional values of cookies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. Akhtar, M.B. Isman, in Proteins in Food Processing, 2nd edn., ed. by R.Y. Yada (Woodhead Publishing, UK, 2018), pp. 263–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100722-8.00011-5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. L. Kouřimská, A. Adámková, NFS J. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nfs.2016.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Menozzi, G. Sogari, M. Veneziani, E. Simoni, C. Mora, Food Qual. Prefer. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Q. Yang, S. Liu, J. Sun, L. Yu, C. Zhang, J. Bi, J. Insect Sci. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieu001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. EFSA Scientific Committee, EFSA J. (2015). https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Osimani, V. Milanović, F. Cardinali, A. Roncolini, C. Garofalo, F. Clementi, Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2018.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Zielińska, M. Karaś, B. Baraniak, LWT Food Sci. Technol. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.01.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. B.A. Rumpold, O.K. Schlüter, Mol. Nutr. Food Res. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201200735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Bawa, S. Songsermpong, C. Kaewtapee, W. Chanput, J. Food Process. Preserv. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.14601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. L.M. de Oliveira, A.J. da Silva Lucas, C.L. Cadaval, M.S. Mellado, Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2017.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. C.M. González, R. Garzón, C.M. Rosell, Insects as ingredients for bakery goods. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2018.03.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Haber, M. Mishyna, J.J.I. Martinez, O. Benjamin, LWT Food Sci. Technol. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Roncolini, V. Milanović, F. Cardinali, A. Osimani, C. Garofalo, R. Sabbatini, PLoS ONE (2019). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211747

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. J.P. Ryu, J.T. Shin, J. Kim, Y.W. Kim, Entomol. Res. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-5967.12203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A.O. Akande, O.S. Jolayemi, V.A. Adelugba, S.T. Akande, J. Asia Pac. Entomol. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2020.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Delicato, J.J. Schouteten, K. Dewettinck, X. Gellynck, D.A. Tzompa-Sosa, Food Qual. Prefer. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Y.F. Cheng, R. Bhat, Food Biosci. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2016.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S. van Broekhoven, D.G.A.B. Oonincx, A. van Huis, J.J.A. van Loon, J. Insect Physiol. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2014.12.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. AACC International, Approved methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists, 10th edn. (St. Paul, Minnesota, 2000)

  20. A. Chauhan, D.C. Saxena, S. Singh, LWT Food Sci. Technol. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.03.115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. AOAC International, Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 20th edn. (Rockville, Maryland, 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. A.L. Merrill, B.K. Watt, Energy Value of Foods: Basis and Derivation. Agriculture Handbook No. 74 (ARS United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  23. G.E. Inglett, D. Chen, S.X. Liu, LWT Food Sci. Technol. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.03.056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. W.H. Andrews, Trends Food Sci. Technol. (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-2244(96)10017-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. S.P. Cauvain, L.S. Young, Bakery Food Manufacture and Quality: Water Control and Effects, 2nd edn. (Wiley, Oxford, 2008), pp. 263–284

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. M. Kurniadi, Y. Khasanah, A. Kusumaningrum, M. Angwar, D. Rachmawanti, N.H.R. Parnanto, L.D. Pratiwi, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/251/1/012034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. R. Jan, D.C. Saxena, S. Singh, J. Food Meas. Charact. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-017-9484-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. S. Chevallier, P. Colonna, A. Buléon, G. Della Valle, J. Agric. Food Chem. (2000). https://doi.org/10.1021/jf990435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. P. Vasanthakumari, R. Jaganmohan, J. Food Process. Preserv. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.13824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. R. Jan, D.C. Saxena, S. Singh, LWT Food Sci. Technol. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. R.C. Hoseney, D. E. Rogers, in The Science of Cookie and Cracker Production. ed. by H. Faridi (Champman & Hall, New York, 1994), pp. 203–225

    Google Scholar 

  32. K.H. McWatters, J.B. Ouedraogo, A.V.A. Resurreccion, Y.-C. Hung, R.D. Phillips, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2621.2003.00716.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. J. Park, I. Choi, Y. Kim, LWT Food Sci. Technol. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.03.110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. H.C. Klunder, J. Wolkers-Rooijackers, J.M. Korpela, M.J.R. Nout, Food Control (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.02.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Department of Medical Sciences Thailand, Revised guidelines for the assessment of microbiological quality of processed foods. http://dmsclibrary.moph.go.th/ebooks/files/micro-ISBN60.pdf, 2017. Accessed 14 May 2019

  36. H. Khouryieh, F. Aramouni, J. Sci. Food Agric. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. P. Kittisuban, P. Ritthiruangdej, M. Suphantharika, LWT Food Sci. Technol. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.02.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support from Center of Excellence on Biodiversity, Chulalongkorn University is acknowledged. This research is also partially supported by Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JS: Investigation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft. SK: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing—review and editing. MS: Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manop Suphantharika.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sriprablom, J., Kitthawee, S. & Suphantharika, M. Functional and physicochemical properties of cookies enriched with edible insect (Tenebrio molitor and Zophobas atratus) powders. Food Measure 16, 2181–2190 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-022-01324-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-022-01324-2

Keywords

Navigation