Abstract
Physical properties and color parameters were compared in goat and sheep meat blankets “mantas” obtained after salting and air-drying processes at 8–10 °C for 48 and 120 h, respectively. Animal which were used in preparation process did not meet the requirement of age and weight to be involved into the classifications of Protected Designation of Origin or Geographical Indication established by Portuguese regulations. pH, water activity (aw), water holding capacity (WHC) and texture were assessed in longissimus dorsi muscle of fresh meat samples. The processes of product fabrication consisted of six stages: ageing, deboning and obtaining of mantas, salting, stumbling, washing, air drying and vacuum packaging. Color CIELAB parameters were monitored during salting and air-drying processes at subscapularis and semimembranosus muscles. Significant differences were found between physical characteristics of fresh meats; texture and WHC were the factors most influenced by ageing. Sheep meat blankets reached values of L*, b* and C* higher than the goat but a lower value of a*.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
FAO, Statistics. Agricultural production. (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2015), http://www.fao.org/economic/ess/ess-publications/ess-yearbook/ess-yearbook2010/yearbook2010-production/en/. Accessed 22 Feb 2015
FAO, Statistics. Consumption. (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2015), http://www.fao.org/economic/ess/ess-publications/ess-yearbook/ess-yearbook2010/yearbook2010-consumption/es/. Accessed 22 Feb 2015
S. Rodrigues, A. Teixeira, Consumers’ preferences for meat of Cabrito Transmontano. Effects of sex and carcass weight. Span. J. Agric. Res. 8(4), 936–945 (2010)
H.C. Schönfeldt, R.T. Naudé, W. Bok, S.M. van Heerden, R. Smit, E. Boshoff, Flavour- and tenderness-related quality characteristics of goat and sheep meat. Meat Sci. 34(3), 363–379 (1993)
E.L. Walker, M.D. Hudson, in Species of meat animals | sheep and goats, ed. by M. Dikeman, C. Devine (Academic Press, Oxford, 2014), pp. 374–379
A. Teixeira, E. Pereira, E. Rodrigues, Goat meat quality. Effects of salting, air-drying and ageing processes. Small Rumin Res. 98(1), 55–58 (2011)
E.C. Webb, N.H. Casey, L. Simela, Goat meat quality. Small Rumin Res. 60(1–2), 153–166 (2005)
E. Hierro, L. de la Hoz, J.A. Ordóñez, Headspace volatile compounds from salted and occasionally smoked dried meats (cecinas) as affected by animal species. Food Chem. 85(4), 649–657 (2004)
T.T. Håseth, G. Thorkelsson, M.S. Sidhu, in North European Products, ed. by F. Toldrá (Blackwell, Oxford, 2008), pp. 407–413
Y.P. Gadekar, B.D. Sharma, A.K. Shinde, A.K. Verma, S.K. Mendiratta, Effect of natural antioxidants on the quality of cured, restructured goat meat product during refrigerated storage (4 ± 1 °C). Small Rumin Res. 119(1–3), 72–80 (2014)
L.H. Villalobos-Delgado, I. Caro, C. Blanco, L. Morán, N. Prieto, R. Bodas et al., Quality characteristics of a dry-cured lamb leg as affected by tumbling after dry-salting and processing time. Meat Sci. 97(1), 115–122 (2014)
NP-3441, Determinação do pH. Método de referência (IPQ, Lisbon, 2008)
AOAC, Official Methods of Analysis 15th edn. (Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, 1990)
K.O. Honikel, Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci. 49, 447–457 (1998)
CIE, Colorimetry, 2nd ed. Commission International de l’Eclairage (CIE Publications No. 152, Vienna, 1986)
G. Wu, M.M. Farouk, S. Clerens, K. Rosenvold, Effect of beef ultimate pH and large structural protein changes with aging on meat tenderness. Meat Sci. 98(4), 637–645 (2014)
A. Watanabe, C. Devine, Effect of meat ultimate pH on rate of titin and nebulin degradation. Meat Sci. 42(4), 407–413 (1996)
M.A. Paleari, V.M. Moretti, G. Beretta, T. Mentasti, C. Bersani, Cured products from different animal species. Meat Sci. 63(4), 485–489 (2003)
A.F. Oliveira, Short Communication: quality of ewe and goat meat cured product. An approach to provide value added to culled animals. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 94(3), 459–462 (2014)
L. Guerrero, P. Gou, J. Arnau, The influence of meat pH on mechanical and sensory textural properties of dry-cured ham. Meat Sci. 52(3), 267–273 (1999)
I.T. Kadim, O. Mahgoub, S. Khalaf, Effects of the transportation during hot season and electrical stimulation on meat quality characteristics of goat Longissimus dorsi muscle. Small Rumin Res. 121(1), 120–124 (2014)
A.R. Sen, A. Santra, S.A. Karim, Carcass yield, composition and meat quality attributes of sheep and goat under semiarid conditions. Meat Sci. 66(4), 757–763 (2004)
P.J. Heinze, M.C. Smith, R.T. Naudé, R.L. Boccard, Influence of breed and age on collagen content and solubility of some ovine and goat muscles. Ghent, Belgium, 24–29 August 1986
G. Monin, V. Santé-Lhoutellier, in Conversion of Muscle to Meat | Color and Texture Deviations, ed. by M. Dikeman, C. Devine (Academic Press, Oxford, 2014), pp. 339–345
D.A. Ledward, Post-slaughter influences on the formation of metyyoglobin in beef muscles. Meat Sci. 15(3), 149–171 (1985)
S.K. Devatkal, B.M. Naveena, Effect of salt, kinnow and pomegranate fruit by-product powders on color and oxidative stability of raw ground goat meat during refrigerated storage. Meat Sci. 85(2), 306–311 (2010)
J.E. Hayes, T.A. Kenny, P. Ward, J.P. Kerry, Development of a modified dry curing process for beef. Meat Sci. 77(3), 314–323 (2007)
Acknowledgments
This study was framed in the project of cooperation among Carcass and Meat Quality and Technology Laboratory of Agrarian School of Bragança, ANCRAS—Serrana Goat National Association of Breed Producers, ACOB—Bragançana Sheep National Association of Breed Producers and Bísaro Salsicharia Tradicional and financially supported by BISOVICAP.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ortega, A., Chito, D. & Teixeira, A. Comparative evaluation of physical parameters of salted goat and sheep meat blankets “mantas” from Northeastern Portugal. Food Measure 10, 670–675 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-016-9350-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-016-9350-z