Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 515–524 | Cite as

Relational Capacity: Broadening the Notion of Decision-Making Capacity in Paediatric Healthcare

  • Katharina M. Ruhe
  • Eva De Clercq
  • Tenzin Wangmo
  • Bernice S. Elger
Original Research

Abstract

Problems arise when applying the current procedural conceptualization of decision-making capacity to paediatric healthcare: Its emphasis on content-neutrality and rational cognition as well as its implicit assumption that capacity is an ability that resides within a person jeopardizes children’s position in decision-making. The purpose of the paper is to challenge this dominant account of capacity and provide an alternative for how capacity should be understood in paediatric care. First, the influence of developmental psychologist Jean Piaget upon the notion of capacity is discussed, followed by an examination of Vygostky’s contextualist view on children’s development, which emphasizes social interactions and learning for decision-making capacity. In drawing parallels between autonomy and capacity, substantive approaches to relational autonomy are presented that underline the importance of the content of a decision. The authors then provide a relational reconceptualization of capacity that leads the focus away from the individual to include important social others such as parents and physicians. Within this new approach, the outcome of adults’ decision-making processes is accepted as a guiding factor for a good decision for the child. If the child makes a choice that is not approved by adults, the new conceptualization emphasizes mutual exchange and engagement by both parties.

Keywords

Children Capacity Decision-making Relational autonomy Substantive 

References

  1. Alderson, P. 1992. In the genes or in the stars? Children’s competence to consent. Journal of Medical Ethics 18(3): 119–124.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. ———. 2003. Die autonomie des kindes: Über die selbstbestimmungsfähigkeit von kindern in der medizin [Children’s autonomy: On children’s capacity to make decisions in healthcare]. In Das kind als patient—Ethische konflikte zwischen kindeswohl und kindeswille [Children as patients: Ethical conflicts between the child’s welfare and the child’s wishes], ed. C. Wiesemann, A. Dörries, G. Wolfslast, and A. Simon, 28–47. Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2007. Competent children? Minors’ consent to health care treatment and research. Social Science and Medicine 65(11): 2272–2283.Google Scholar
  4. Alderson, P., and J. Montgomery. 1996. Health care choices: Making decisions with children, Vol. 2. Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
  5. Alderson, P., K. Sutcliffe, and K. Curtis. 2006. Children’s competence to consent to medical treatment. Hastings Center Report 36(6): 25–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Appelbaum, P.S. 2007. Assessment of patients’ competence to consent to treatment. New England Journal of Medicine 357(18): 1834–1840.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Banner, N.F. 2013. Can procedural and substantive elements of decision-making be reconciled in assessments of mental capacity? International Journal of Law in Context 9(01): 71–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bielby, N.F. 2013. Can procedural and substantive elements of decision-making be reconciled in assessments of mental capacity? International Journal of Law in Context 9(1): 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buchanan, A.E., and D.W. Brock. 1989. Deciding for others: The ethics of surrogate decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Brainerd, C.J. 1978. The stage question in cognitive-developmental theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1(02): 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bronfenbrenner, U. 1979. The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Chaiklin, S. 2003. The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context, ed. A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V.S. Ageyev, and S.M. Miller. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Charland, L. 2011. Decision-making capacity. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://seop.illc.uva.nl/entries/decision-capacity/. Accessed June 13, 2015.
  15. ———. 1998. Appreciation and emotion: Theoretical reflections on the MacArthur treatment competence study. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8(4): 359–376.Google Scholar
  16. Christman, J. 2003. Autonomy in moral and political philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/autonomy-moral/. Accessed June 12, 2014.
  17. ———. 2004. Relational autonomy, liberal individualism, and the social constitution of selves. Philosophical Studies 117(1): 143–164.Google Scholar
  18. Cornock, M. 2010. Hannah Jones, consent and the child in action: A legal commentary. Paediatric Nursing 22(2): 14–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dittmann, V. 2008. Urteilsfähigkeit als Voraussetzung für Aufklärung und Einwilligung. Therapeutische Umschau 65(7): 367–370.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Etchells, E., G. Sharpe, C. Elliott, and P.A. Singer. 1996. Bioethics for clinicians: 3. Capacity. Canadian Medical Association Journal 155(6): 657–661.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Freeman, M. 2005. Rethinking Gillick. International Journal of Children’s Rights 13: 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gabe, J., G. Olumide, and M. Bury. 2004. “It takes three to tango”: A framework for understanding patient partnership in paediatric clinics. Social Science & Medicine 59(5): 1071–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ganzini, L., L. Volicer, W.A. Nelson, E. Fox, and A.R. Derse. 2004. Ten myths about decision-making capacity. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 5(4): 263–267.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gilligan, C. 1982. In a different voice: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Graham, A., and R. Fitzgerald. 2010. Children’s participation in research. Some possibilities and constraints in the current Australian research environment. Journal of Sociology 46(2): 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grisso, T., and L. Vierling. 1978. Minors’ consent to treatment: A developmental perspective. Professional Psychology 9(3): 412–427.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Held, V. 1993. Feminist morality: Transforming culture, society, and politics: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 2007. Feminism and moral theory. Bioethics: An introduction to the history, methods, and practice: 158.Google Scholar
  29. Hickey, K. 2007. Minors’ rights in medical decision making. JONAS Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation 9(3): 100–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hinds, P.S., D. Drew, L.L. Oakes, et al. 2005. End-of-life care preferences of pediatric patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 23(36): 9146–9154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Holaday, B., L. Lamontagne, and J. Marciel. 1994. Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development: Implications for nurse assistance of children's learning. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing 17(1): 15–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Inhelder, B., H. Sinclair, and M. Bovet. 1974. Learning and the development of cognition. Translated by S. Wedgwood. Cambridge, MA, US: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Larcher, V., and A. Hutchinson. 2010. How should paediatricians assess Gillick competence? Archives of Disease in Childhood 95(4): 307–311.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lo, B. 1990. Assessing decision‐making capacity. Journal of Law, Medicine and Health Care 18(3): 193–201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mackenzie, C. 2008. Relational autonomy, normative authority and perfectionism. Journal of Social Philosophy 39(4): 512–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mackenzie, C., and W. Rogers. 2013. Autonomy, vulnerability and capacity: A philosophical appraisal of the Mental Capacity Act. International Journal of Law in Context 9(01): 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mackenzie, C., and N. Stoljar. 2000. Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on automony, agency, and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Marti, E. 1996. Mechanisms of internalisation and externalization of knowledge in Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s theories. In Piaget - Vygostky, The social genesis of thought, ed. A. Tryphon and J. Vonèche. East Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  39. Melton, G.B. 1983. Children’s competence to consent. In Children’s competence to consent, ed. G.B. Melton, G.P. Koocher, and M.J. Saks, 1–18. United States: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mercurio, M.R. 2007. An adolescent’s refusal of medical treatment: Implications of the Abraham Cheerix case. Pediatrics 120(6): 1357–1358.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller, P.H. 1993. Theorien der entwicklungspsychologie [Theories in Developmental Psychology]. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  42. Miller, R. 2011. Vygotsky in perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morrison, K.L., J.K. Morrison, and S. Holdridge-Crane. 1979. The child’s right to give informed consent to psychiatric treatment. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology 8(1): 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Murray, F. 1983. Learning and development through social interaction and conflict: A challenge to social learning theory. Piaget and the foundations of knowledge: 231–247.Google Scholar
  45. Peter, C. 2008. Die Einwilligung von minderjährigen in medizinische eingriffe [Minors‘ consent in medical interventions]. Schweizerische Ärztezeitung 89(36): 1539–1540.Google Scholar
  46. Peter, E., and J. Liaschenko. 2013. Moral distress reexamined: A feminist interpretation of nurses’ identities, relationships, and responsibilites. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10(3): 337–345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Piaget, J. 1972. Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development 15(1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rogoff, B., C. Mosier, J. Mistry, and A. Göncü. 1993. Toddlers’ guided participation with their caregivers in cultural activity. In Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development, ed. E.A. Forman, N. Minick, and C.A. Stone, 175–179. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Ruhe, K.M., T. Wangmo, D.O. Badarau, B.S. Elger, and F. Niggli. 2014. Decision-making capacity of children and adolescents—Suggestions for advancing the concept’s implementation in pediatric healthcare. European Journal of Pediatrics 174(6): 1–8.Google Scholar
  50. Sametz, L. 1979. Children, law and child development: The child developmentalist’s role in the legal system. Juvenile and Family Court Journal 30(3): 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Siegel, L.S. 1993. Amazing new discovery: Piaget was wrong! Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne 34(3): 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Siegel, L.S., and B. Hodkin. 1982. The garden path to the understanding of cognitive development: Has Piaget led us into the poison ivy? In Jean Piaget: Consensus and controversy, ed. S. Modgil and C. Modgil, 239–245. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  53. Sjöstrand, M., S. Eriksson, N. Juth, and G. Helgesson. 2013. Paternalism in the name of autonomy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38(6): 710–724.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Stier, S. 1978. Children’s rights and society's duties. Journal of Social Issues 34(2): 46–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stoljar, N. 2013. Feminist perspectives on autonomy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-autonomy/. Accessed December 6, 2014.
  56. Tryphon, A., and J. Vonèche. 2013. Piaget Vygotsky: The social genesis of thought. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  57. Vygotsky, L.S. 1978a. Interaction between learning and development. In Readings on the development of children, ed. M. Gauvain and M. Cole, 34–41. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  58. ———. 1978b. Internalization of higher psychological functions. In Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, ed. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman, 52–57. Cambridge, Massachussets: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  59. ———. 1986. Thought and language. Cambridge: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  60. Whitty-Rogers, J., M. Alex, C. MacDonald, D.P. Gallant, and W. Austin. 2009. Working with children in end-of-life decision making. Nursing Ethics 16(6): 743–758.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katharina M. Ruhe
    • 1
  • Eva De Clercq
    • 1
  • Tenzin Wangmo
    • 1
  • Bernice S. Elger
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Biomedical EthicsUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations