Skip to main content
Log in

Thermophysical Properties of Cold- and Vacuum Plasma-Sprayed Cu-Cr-X Alloys, NiAl and NiCrAlY Coatings II: Specific Heat Capacity

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Part I of the paper discussed the temperature dependencies of the electrical resistivities, thermal conductivities, thermal diffusivities and total hemispherical emissivities of several vacuum plasma-sprayed (VPS) and cold-sprayed (CS) copper alloy monolithic coatings, VPS NiAl, VPS NiCrAlY, extruded GRCop-84 and as-cast Cu-17(wt.%)Cr-5%Al. Part II discusses the temperature dependencies of the constant-pressure specific heat capacities, C P, of these coatings. The data were empirically regression-fitted with the equation:

$${\varvec{C}}_{\mathbf{P}} = {\mathbf{ AT}}^{\mathbf 4} + {\mathbf{BT}}^{\mathbf 3} + {\mathbf{CT}}^{\mathbf 2} + {\mathbf{DT}} + \varvec{E}$$

where T is the absolute temperature and A, B, C, D and E are regression constants. The temperature dependencies of the molar enthalpy, molar entropy and Gibbs molar free energy determined from experimental values of molar specific heat capacity are reported. Calculated values of C P using the Neumann–Kopp (NK) rule were in poor agreement with experimental data. Instead, a modification of the NK rule was found to predict values closer to the experimental data with an absolute deviation less than 6.5%. The specific molar heat capacities for all the alloys did not agree with the Dulong–Petit law, and C P > 3R, where R is the universal gas constant, were measured for all the alloys except NiAl for which C P < 3R at all temperatures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The term “monolithic coatings” is used in a generic manner in this paper to distinguish cold- and vacuum plasma-sprayed powders from cast or extruded alloys.

  2. It is noted that the NASA polynomial equation was a better fit to the experimental data than the other commonly used empirical equation C P = E 1 + D 1*T + C 1/T 2 [7].

  3. Although C P was used to describe the experimental data in Fig. 1, 2, 3, and 4, the term (C P)expt is used in Fig. 5, 6 and 7 specifically to distinguish the experimental data from the values calculated using Eq 2. It is noted that the experimental data shown in Fig. 5, 6 and 7 are identical to those shown in Fig. 1, 2, 3 and 4.

  4. The deviation was defined as ((C P)NK − (C P)expt)/(C P)expt). Only absolute values are reported.

  5. Since the specific heat measurements were not conducted between 0 and 295 K, the form of the Eq 3 has to be consistent with theories on low-temperature specific heat capacities. In the absence of experimental data, Eq 3 is provided to enable the estimation of design parameters of the RLV combustion chamber in the cryogenic range.

  6. It should be noted that this assumption allows the calculation of the absolute values H T , S T and G T rather than ΔH T , ΔS T , and ΔG T .

References

  1. S.V. Raj, Thermophysical Properties of Cold- and Vacuum Plasma-Sprayed Cu-Cr-X Alloys, NiAl and NiCrAlY Coatings I: Electrical and Thermal Conductivity, Thermal Diffusivity, and Total Hemispherical Emissivity, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2017. doi:10.1007/s11665-017-3012-0

  2. S.V. Raj and A. Palczer, Thermal Expansion of Vacuum Plasma Sprayed Coatings, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, A527, p 2129–2135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S.V. Raj, R. Pawlik, and W. Loewenthal, Young’s Moduli of Cold and Vacuum Plasma Sprayed Metallic Coatings, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2009, A513-514, p 59–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Karthikeyan, Development of Oxidation Resistant Coatings on GRCop-84 Substrates by Cold Spray Process, NASA CR 2007–214706, NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  5. http://www.tprl.com/tprl.html

  6. ASTM Standard E1269, Standard test method for determining specific heat capacity by differential scanning calorimetry, ASTM Annual Book of Standards, vol. 14.02 (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2004)

  7. G.N. Lewis and M. Randall, Thermodynamics, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1961, p 66

    Google Scholar 

  8. D.O. Allison, Polynomial Approximations of Thermodynamic Properties of Arbitrary Gas Mixtures Over Wide Pressure and Density Ranges, NASA TN D-6862, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.R. Andrews and O. Biblarz, Temperature Dependence of Gas Properties in Polynomial Form, NPS67-81-001, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  10. B.J. McBride, S. Gordon, and M.A. Reno, Coefficients for Calculating Thermodynamic and Transportation Properties of Species, NASA TM 4513, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Hickman, T. McKechnie, and R. Holmes, Material Properties of Vacuum Plasma Sprayed Cu-8Cr-4Nb for Liquid Rockets, 37th Joint Propulsion Conf., Salt Lake City, UT, 2001, American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics, Washington, DC

  12. Y.S. Touloukian and E.H. Buyco, Specific Heat: Metallic Elements and Alloys, Thermophysical Properties of Matter, Vol 4, IFI/Plenum, New York, 1970, p 146–152

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. W.S. Walston and R. Darolia, Effect of Alloying on Physical Properties of NiAl, High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys V, (eds. I. Baker, R. Darolia, J.D. Whittenberger, and M.H. Yoo, 1993, vol. 288, p. 237–242, MRS Symposium Proceedings, Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA

  14. L.S. Darken and R.W. Gurry, Physical Chemistry of Metals, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953

    Google Scholar 

  15. R.A. Swalin, Thermodynamics of Solids, Wiley, New York, 1962

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Valencia and P.N. Quested, Thermophysical Properties, ASM Handbook, 2008, 15, p 468–481

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Leitner, P. Vonka, D. Sedmidubsky, and P. Svoboda, Application of Neumann–Kopp Rule for the Estimation of Heat Capacity of Mixed Oxides, Thermochim. Acta, 2010, 497, p 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Brandt, L. Pawlowski, G. Neuer, and P. Fauchais, Specific Heat and Thermal Conductivity of Plasma Sprayed Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia and NiAl, NiCr, NiCrAl, NiCrAlY, NiCoCrAlY Coatings, High Temp. High Press., 1986, 18, p 65–77

    Google Scholar 

  19. S.S. Zumdahl, Introductory Chemistry, 5th ed., Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  20. N.F. Mott and H. Jones, The Theory of the Properties of Metals and Alloys, Dover, New York, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Wang, R. Lück, and B. Predel, Heat Capacities of Intermetallic Compounds in the Iron-Titanium System, Z. Metall., 1993, 84, p 230–236

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The experimental measurements were conducted by the Thermophysical Properties Research Laboratory, Inc. (TPRL), West Lafayette, IN under contract, and these contributions are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. V. Raj.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raj, S.V. Thermophysical Properties of Cold- and Vacuum Plasma-Sprayed Cu-Cr-X Alloys, NiAl and NiCrAlY Coatings II: Specific Heat Capacity. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 26, 5472–5480 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-017-3015-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-017-3015-x

Keywords

Navigation