Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tensile, Creep, and Fatigue Behaviors of 3D-Printed Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) is a widely used thermoplastics in 3D printing. However, there is a lack of thorough investigation of the mechanical properties of 3D-printed ABS components, including orientation-dependent tensile strength and creep fatigue properties. In this work, a systematic characterization is conducted on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed ABS components. Specifically, the effect of printing orientation on the tensile and creep properties is investigated. The results show that, in tensile tests, the 0° printing orientation has the highest Young’s modulus of 1.81 GPa, and ultimate strength of 224 MPa. In the creep test, the 90° printing orientation has the lowest k value of 0.2 in the plastics creep model, suggesting 90° is the most creep resistant direction. In the fatigue test, the average cycle number under load of 30 N is 3796 cycles. The average cycle number decreases to 128 cycles when the load is 60 N. Using the Paris law, with an estimated crack size of 0.75 mm, and stress intensity factor is varied from 352 to 700 \(N\sqrt m\), the derived fatigue crack growth rate is 0.0341 mm/cycle. This study provides important mechanical property data that is useful for applying 3D-printed ABS in engineering applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acrylonitrile_butadiene_styrene. Accessed August 31, 2017.

  2. 3D Printer Materials Guide. https://3dprinting.com/materials/. Accessed August 31, 2017.

  3. P. Kumar, I. Ahuja, and R. Singh, Application of Fusion Deposition Modelling for Rapid Investment Casting—A Review, International Journal of Materials Engineering Innovation, 2012, 3(3–4), p 204–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A.K. Sood, R.K. Ohdar, and S.S. Mahapatra, Experimental Investigation and Empirical Modelling of FDM Process for Compressive Strength Improvement, Journal of Advanced Research, 2012, 3(1), p 81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cai, L., et al., Effect of Printing Orientation on Strength of 3D Printed ABS Plastics. In TMS 2016: 145th Annual Meeting & Exhibition: Supplemental Proceedings. 2016, Wiley, pp. 199–204.

  6. Brindley, P., et al., Preliminary Investigation into the Mechanical Properties of Stratasys Polycarbonate and M30 ABS Materials. 2008, Loughborough University.

  7. Hossain, M.S., et al. Improving Tensile Mechanical Properties of FDM-Manufactured Specimens Via Modifying Build Parameters. in International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium: An Additive Manufacturing Conference. Austin, TX. 2013.

  8. J.P. Moore and C.B. Williams, Fatigue Properties of Parts Printed by PolyJet Material Jetting, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2015, 21(6), p 675–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. ASTM D638-14, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

  10. Stratasys, CatalystEx. 2015, Stratasys.

  11. B.M. Tymrak, M. Kreiger, and J.M. Pearce, Mechanical Properties of Components Fabricated With Open-Source 3-D Printers Under Realistic Environmental Conditions, Materials & Design, 2014, 58, p 242–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bagsik, A., V. Schöppner, and E. Klemp, FDM Part Quality Manufactured with Ultem*9085 in Polymeric Materials. 2010.

  13. N.E. Dowling, Mechanical Behavior of Materials, 4th ed., Pearson, London, 2012

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

J. Z. acknowledges the support from the Walmart Foundation (Project title: Optimal Plastic Injection Molding Tooling Design and Production through Advanced Additive Manufacturing). Linlin Cai is supported by the CTEE (Commitment to Engineering Excellence Research Fund) research program and MURI (Multidisciplinary Undergraduate Research Institute) program at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. Kate Schlarman is supported by NSF (Award Number: EEC 1406995).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Zhang.

Additional information

This article is an invited paper selected from presentations at “Recent Development in Additive Manufacturing: Process and Equipment Development and Applications,” held during MS&T’16, October 23–27, 2016, in Salt Lake City, UT, and has been expanded from the original presentation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Cai, L., Golub, M. et al. Tensile, Creep, and Fatigue Behaviors of 3D-Printed Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 27, 57–62 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-017-2961-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-017-2961-7

Keywords

Navigation