Skip to main content
Log in

Redistribution of C in a Martensite/Austenite Assembly Resulting from Q&P Processing: Computational Modeling Supported by Experiments

  • Communication
  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Advancement of the Q&P process—a suitable means for austenite stabilization—requires modeling techniques that accurately predict the C redistribution process. In the current work, thermokinetic modeling of the C redistribution is performed, including an approach to describe the discrepancy in the C chemical potential within martensite resulting from the presence of defects. Good agreement between model and experiment is obtained, thus contributing to the fundamental understanding of the physical metallurgy involved in the Q&P process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. L. Liu, B. He, and M.X. Huang: Adv. Eng. Mater., 2018, vol. 20, p. 1701083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Speer, D.K. Matlock, B.C. De Cooman, and J.G. Schroth: Acta Mater., 2003, vol. 51, pp. 2611–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Hillert and J. Ågren: Scr. Mater., 2005, vol. 52, pp. 87–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T.D. Bigg, D. V Edmonds, and E.S. Eardley: J. Alloys Compd., 2013, vol. 577, pp. S695–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. E. De Moor, C. Föjer, J. Penning, A.J. Clarke, and J.G. Speer: Phys. Rev. B, 2010, vol. 82, pp. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Gouné, F. Danoix, S. Allain, and O. Bouaziz: Scr. Mater., 2013, vol. 68, pp. 1004–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Toji, H. Matsuda, M. Herbig, P.P. Choi, and D. Raabe: Acta Mater., 2014, vol. 65, pp. 215–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A.K. Behera and G.B. Olson: Scr. Mater., 2018, vol. 147, pp. 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. E.J. Seo, L. Cho, and B.C. De Cooman: Acta Mater., 2016, vol. 107, pp. 354–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A.S. Nishikawa, M.J. Santofimia, J. Sietsma, and H. Goldenstein: Acta Mater., 2018, vol. 142, pp. 142–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Wang, H. Geng, B. Zhu, Z. Wang, and Y. Zhang: Materials, 2018, vol. 11, p. 2302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Takahama, M.J. Santofimia, M.G. Mecozzi, L. Zhao, and J. Sietsma: Acta Mater., 2012, vol. 60, pp. 2916–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M.G. Mecozzi, J. Eiken, M.J. Santofimia, and J. Sietsma: Comput. Mater. Sci., 2016, vol. 112, pp. 245–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P.G. Kubendran-Amos, E. Schoof, N. Streichan, D. Schneider, and B. Nestler: Comput. Mater. Sci., 2019, vol. 159, pp. 281–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Ruhl and M. Cohen: Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, 1969, vol. 245, p. 241.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Reisinger, G. Ressel, S. Eck, and S. Marsoner: Micron, 2017, vol. 99, pp. 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Oschgan: Diploma thesis, Vienna University of Technology, 2010.

  18. S. Gaudez, J. Teixeira, B.Y.P. Allain, M. Soler, and F. Danoix: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2018, vol. 49, pp. 2568–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. D. Kalish and E.M. Roberts: Metall. Trans., 1971, vol. 2, pp. 2783–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A.W. Cochardt, G. Schoek, and H. Wiedersich: Acta Metall., 1955, vol. 3, pp. 533–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Svoboda, Y. V Shan, E. Kozeschnik, and F.D. Fischer: Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2013, vol. 21, p. 065012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. B. Kim, E. Boucard, T. Sourmail, D. San Martín, N. Gey, and P.E.J. Rivera-Diaz-del-Castillo: Acta Mater., 2014, vol. 68, pp. 169–78.

  23. T. Klein, M. Lukas, M. Galler, and G. Ressel: IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2018, vol. 461, p. 012039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. T. Klein, M. Lukas, P. Haslberger, B. Friessnegger, M. Galler, and G. Ressel: JOM, 2019, vol. 71, pp. 1357-65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. A.J. Clarke, M.K. Miller, R.D. Field, D.R. Coughlin, P.J. Gibbs, K.D. Clarke, D.J. Alexander, K.A. Powers, P.A. Papin, and G. Krauss: Acta Mater., 2014, vol. 77, pp. 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. F. HajyAkbary, J. Sietsma, G. Miyamoto, T. Furuhara, and M.J. Santofimia: Acta Mater., 2016, vol. 104, pp. 72–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. D. V Edmonds, K. He, F.C. Rizzo, B.C. De Cooman, D.K. Matlock, and J.G. Speer: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, vol. 438–440, pp. 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. P. Liu, B. Zhu, Y. Wang, and Y. Zhang: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2016, vol. 47, pp. 4325–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. K.R. Kinsman and H.I. Aaronson: in Climax Molybdenum Co., Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1967, pp. 33–38.

  30. S.A. Mujahid and H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia: Acta Metall. Mater., 1992, vol. 40, pp. 389–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. M. Hillert, L. Höglund, and J. Ågren: Acta Metall. Mater., 1993, vol. 41, pp. 1951–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Fruitful discussions and continuous support with the MatCalc calculations by Y.V. Shan and Prof. Dr. E. Kozeschnik (TU Wien) are greatly appreciated. The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support under the scope of the COMET program within the K2 Center “Integrated Computational Material, Process and Product Engineering (IC-MPPE)” (Project No. 859480). This program is supported by the Austrian Federal Ministries for Transport, Innovation and Technology (BMVIT) and for Digital and Economic Affairs (BMDW), represented by the Austrian research funding association (FFG), and the federal states of Styria, Upper Austria and Tyrol.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina Lukas.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Manuscript submitted February 25, 2019.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klein, T., Lukas, M., Sartory, B. et al. Redistribution of C in a Martensite/Austenite Assembly Resulting from Q&P Processing: Computational Modeling Supported by Experiments. Metall Mater Trans A 50, 4006–4011 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-019-05358-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-019-05358-y

Navigation