Abstract
The stress corrosion cracking (SCC) behavior of the AA2219 aluminum alloy in the single-pass (SP) and multipass (MP) welded conditions was examined and compared with that of the base metal (BM) in 3.5 wt pct NaCl solution using a slow-strain-rate technique (SSRT). The reduction in ductility was used as a parameter to evaluate the SCC susceptibility of both the BM and welded joints. The results showed that the ductility ratio (ε NaCl/(ε air) was 0.97 and 0.96, respectively, for the BM and MP welded joint, and the same was marginally reduced to 0.9 for the SP welded joint. The fractographic examination of the failed samples revealed a typical ductile cracking morphology for all the base and welded joints, indicating the good environmental cracking resistance of this alloy under all welded conditions. To understand the decrease in the ductility of the SP welded joint, preexposure SSRT followed by microstructural observations were made, which showed that the decrease in ductility ratio of the SP welded joint was caused by the electrochemical pitting that assisted the nucleation of cracks in the form of corrosion induced mechanical cracking rather than true SCC failure of the alloy. The microstructural examination and polarization tests demonstrated a clear grain boundary (GB) sensitization of the PMZ, resulting in severe galvanic corrosion of the SP weld joint, which initiated the necessary conditions for the localized corrosion and cracking along the PMZ. The absence of PMZ and a refined fusion zone (FZ) structure because of the lesser heat input and postweld heating effect improved the galvanic corrosion resistance of the MP welded joint greatly, and thus, failure occurred along the FZ.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D.O. Sprowls and R.H. Brown: Proc. Conf. on Fundamental Aspects of Stress Corrosion Cracking, NACE, Houston, TX, 1967, pp. 478–86.
M.O. Speidel: Metall. Trans. A, 1975, vol. 6A, pp. 633–52.
J.R. Simmons, L. Johnson, A. Daech, and R. Merschel: Mater. Perf., 1982, pp. 14–18.
C.H. Crane and W.G. Smith: Weld. Res. Suppl., 1961, pp. 33s–40s.
K. Srinivasa Rao, G. Madhusudhan Reddy, and K. Prasad Rao: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, vol. 403, pp. 69–76.
C. Huang and S. Kou: Weld. Res. Suppl., 2001, pp. 46s–53s.
C. Huang and S. Kou: Weld. Res. Suppl., 2003, pp. 184s–94s.
C. Huang and S. Kou: Weld. Res. Suppl., 2000, pp. 113s–19s.
C. Huang and S. Kou: Weld. Res. Suppl., 2001, pp. 9s–17s.
A. Venugopal, K. Sreekumar, and V.S. Raja: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2010, vol. 41A, pp. 3151–60.
K. Srinivasa Rao and K. Prasad Rao: Mater. Sci. Tech., 2005, vol. 21 pp. 1199–1207.
K. Prasad Rao, G.D. Janaki Ram, and B.E. Stucker: Mater. Design, 2010, vol. 31, pp. 1576–80.
J. Hartman, R.J. Beil, and G.T. Hahn: Weld. Res. Suppl., 1987, pp. 73s–83s.
C.S. Paglia and R.G. Buchheit: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, vol. 429, pp. 107–14.
T. Ram Gopal, P.I. Gouma, and G.S. Frankel: Corrosion, 2002, vol.58, pp. 687–97.
N. Birbilis, M.K. Cavanaugh, and R.G. Buchheit: Corros. Sci., 2006, vol. 48, pp. 4202–14.
G.O. Llevbare and J.R. Scully: Corrosion, 2001, vol. 57, pp. 134–52.
W. Hu and E.I. Meletis: Mater. Sci. Forum, 2000, vols. 331–337, p. 1683–88.
P. Bala Srinivasan, K.S. Arorab, W. Dietzela, S. Pandeyb, and M.K. Schaper: J. Alloy. Compd., 2009, vol. 492, pp. 631–37.
Acknowledgments
The authors (A.V. and S.K.) are grateful to Dr. P.P. Sinha, Deputy Director (MME) VSSC for his interest and encouragement shown in this work. They also thank Director, VSSC for his permission to publish this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Manuscript submitted November 25, 2011.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Venugopal, A., Sreekumar, K. & Raja, V.S. Stress Corrosion Cracking Behavior of Multipass TIG-Welded AA2219 Aluminum Alloy in 3.5 wt pct NaCl Solution. Metall Mater Trans A 43, 3135–3148 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-012-1117-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-012-1117-5