Abstract
The stress corrosion cracking (SCC) behavior of AA2219 aluminum alloy in the as-welded (AW) and repair-welded (RW) conditions was examined and compared with that of the base metal (BM) in 3.5 wt pct NaCl solution using the slow strain rate technique (SSRT). The reduction in ductility was used as a parameter to evaluate the SCC susceptibility of both BM and welded joints. The results show that the ductility ratio (ε NaCl/(ε air)) of the BM was close to one (0.97) and reduced to 0.9 for the AW joint. This value further reduced to 0.77 after carrying out one repair welding operation. However, the RW specimen exhibited higher ductility than the single-weld specimens even in 3.5 wt pct NaCl solution. SSRT results obtained using pre-exposed samples followed by post-test metallographic observations clearly showed localized pitting corrosion along the partially melted zone (PMZ), signifying that the reduction in ductility ratio of both the AW and RW joints was more due to mechanical overload failure, caused by the localized corrosion and a consequent reduction in specimen thickness, than due to SCC. Also, the RW joint exhibited higher ductility than the AW joint both in air and the environment, although SCC index (SI) for the former is lower than that of the latter. Fractographic examination of the failed samples, in general, revealed a typical ductile cracking morphology for all the base and welded joints, indicating the good environmental cracking resistance of this alloy. Microstructural examination and polarization tests further demonstrate grain boundary melting along the PMZ, and that provided the necessary electrochemical condition for the preferential cracking on that zone of the weldment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D.O. Sprowls and R.H. Brown: Proc. Conf. on “Fundamental Aspects of Stress Corrosion Cracking,” OH, Sept. 11–15, NACE, Houston, TX, 1967, pp. 478–86.
M.O. Speidel: Metall. Trans. A, 1975, vol. 6A, pp. 633–51.
J.R. Simmons, L. Johnson, A. Daech, and R. Merschel: Mater. Perf., 1982, June, pp. 14–18.
C.H. Crane and W.G. Smith: Weld. Res. Suppl., 1961, Jan., pp. 33s–40s.
M.O. Speidel and M.V. Hyatt: Adv. Corros. Sci. Technol., 1970, pp. 230–44.
B.C. Meyer, H. Doyen, D. Emanoski, G. Empus, T. Hirsch, and P. Mayr: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2000, vol. 31A, pp. 1453–59.
C. Huang and S. Kou: Weld. Res. Suppl., 2000, May, pp. 113s–20s.
C. Huang and S. Kou: Weld. Res. Suppl., 2001, Feb., pp. 46s–53s.
J. Hartman, R.J. Beil, and G.T. Hahn: Weld. Res. Suppl., 1987, Mar., pp. 73s–83s.
S. Kou: Welding Metallurgy, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1987, pp. 239–47.
C. Huang and S. Kou: Weld. Res. Suppl., 2001, Jan., pp. 9s–17s.
T. Ram Gopal, P.I. Gouma, and G.S. Frankel: Corrosion, 2002, vol. 58, pp. 687–97.
N. Birbilis, M.K. Cavanaugh, and R.G. Buchheit: Corros. Sci., 2006, vol. 48, pp. 4202–14.
G.O. Llevbare and J.R. Scully: Corrosion, 2001, vol. 57, pp. 134–52.
S.R. Koteswara Rao, G. Madhusudhan Reddy, K.Srinivasa Rao, M. Kamaraj, and K. Prasad Rao: Mater. Charact., 2005, vol. 55, pp. 345–54.
C.S. Paglia and R.G. Buchheit: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, vol. 429, pp. 107–14.
W. Hu and E.I. Meletis: Mater. Sci. Forum, 2000, vols. 331–337, pp. 1683–88.
C.S. Paglia and R.G. Buchheit: Scripta Mater., 2008, vol. 58, pp. 383–87.
Acknowledgments
The authors AV and SK are grateful to Dr. P.P. Sinha, Deputy Director, MME, VSSC, and Mr. M.C. Mittal, Former Group Director, MMG, VSSC, for their interest and encouragement shown in this work. They also thank Mr. M.J. Nair, Brahmos Industries, and Mr. Chenniappan, formerly DGM, MEE, VSSC, for their generous help on welding and sample fabrication, respectively.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Manuscript submitted November 11, 2009.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Venugopal, A., Sreekumar, K. & Raja, V. Effect of Repair Welding on Electrochemical Corrosion and Stress Corrosion Cracking Behavior of TIG Welded AA2219 Aluminum Alloy in 3.5 Wt Pct NaCl Solution. Metall Mater Trans A 41, 3151–3160 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-010-0377-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-010-0377-1