Abstract
Upward and downward directional solidification of hypoeutectic Al-Si alloys were numerically simulated inside a cylindrical container. Undercooling of the liquidus temperature prior to the solidification event was introduced in the numerical model. The finite-volume method was used to solve the energy, concentration, momentum, and continuity equations. Temperature and liquid concentrations inside the mushy zone were coupled with local equilibrium assumptions. An energy equation was applied to determine the liquid fraction inside the mushy zone while considering the temperature undercooling at the solidifying dendrite/liquid interface. Momentum and continuity equations were coupled by the SIMPLE algorithm. Flow velocity distribution at various times, G, R, λ 1, and solidification time at mushy zone/liquid interface during solidification were predicted. The effect of shrinkage during solidification on these solidification parameters was quantified. Transient temperature distribution, solidification time for the mushy zone/liquid interface, and λ 1 were validated by laboratory experiments. It was found that better agreement could be achieved when the fluid flow due to solidification shrinkage was considered. Considering shrinkage in upward solidification was found to only have a marginal effect on solidification parameters, such as G, R, and λ 1; whereas, in the downward solidification, fluid flow due to shrinkage had a significant effect on these solidification parameters. Considering shrinkage during downward solidification resulted in a smaller R, stronger fluid flow, and increased solidification time at the mushy zone/liquid interface. Further, the flow pattern was significantly altered when solidification shrinkage was considered in the simulation. The effect of shrinkage on G and λ 1 strongly depended on the instantaneous location of the mushy zone/liquid interface in the computational domain. The numerical results could be validated by experimental data only when both the undercooling of the liquidus temperature prior to solidification and fluid flow in the liquid caused by the effect of shrinkage during solidification were included in the model.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- c ps :
-
specific heat of solid as a function of temperature (J Kg−1 C−1)[1]
- c pl :
-
specific heat of liquid (J Kg−1 C−1)[1]
- C L :
-
liquid concentration (wt pct)
- C o :
-
average alloy composition (wt pct)
- C S :
-
solid concentration (wt pct)
- D :
-
coefficient of solute diffusion in the liquid (6.25 × 10−9 (m2 s−1))[2]
- G :
-
transient temperature gradient in liquid at the mushy zone/liquid interface (°C mm−1)
- k :
-
average partition coefficient of the Al-Si binary hypoeutectic alloy (0.116)[3]
- K s :
-
thermal conductivity of solid as a function of temperature (W m−1 C−1)[1]
- K l :
-
thermal conductivity of liquid (W m−1 C−1)[1]
- L :
-
latent heat of fusion (J Kg−1)[3]
- m :
-
the slope of the liquidus line in the Al-Si binary hypoeutectic alloy phase diagram (−6.675 (K wt pct−1))[3]
- p :
-
pressure (Pa)
- R :
-
transient velocity of the mushy zone/liquid interface (mm s−1)
- t :
-
time (s)
- T :
-
temperature (°C)
- T liq :
-
liquidus temperature (°C)[3]
- T ini :
-
initial temperature of liquid (°C)
- T m :
-
melting temperature of pure aluminum (660 °C)[3]
- T eut :
-
eutectic temperature (578.6 °C)[3]
- \( \dot{T} \) :
-
instantaneous tip cooling rate = G·R (°C s−1)
- ΔT :
-
undercooling of T liq (°C)
- u r :
-
velocity in r direction (mm s−1)
- u y :
-
velocity in y direction (mm s−1)
- U :
-
magnitude of the flow velocity in the liquid at the mushy zone/liquid interface (mm s−1); \( U = \sqrt {\left( {u_{r}^{2} + u_{y}^{2} } \right)} \)
- β :
-
contraction ratio \( \left[ {\beta = {\frac{{\rho_{s} - \rho_{l} }}{{\rho_{l} }}}} \right] \)(volumetric shrinkage during solidification)[1]
- β C :
-
solute expansion coefficient (4.26 × 10−4 (wt pct−1))[1]
- β T :
-
thermal expansion coefficient (–1.39 × 10−4 (K−1))[1]
- Γ:
-
Gibbs–Thomson coefficient (1.97 × 10−7 (K m−1))[4]
- ϕ :
-
liquid fraction
- ρ l :
-
liquid density (Kg m−3)[1]
- ρ s :
-
solid density (Kg m−3)[1]
- μ :
-
dynamic viscosity 1.3 × 10−3 (Pa s)[1]
- λ 01 :
-
primary arm spacing if no fluid flow effect is considered (μm)
- λ 1 :
-
primary arm spacing (μm)
References
JMatPro, Sente Software Ltd., Ver. 4.1, Guildford, United Kingdom, 2007.
D.P. Sekulic, P.K. Galenko, M.D. Krivilyov, L. Walker, and F. Gao: Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 2005, vol. 48, pp. 2385–96.
Factsage, Computherm LLC., Madison, Ver. 5.5, WI, 2007.
M. Gunduz and J.D. Hunt: Acta Metall., 1985, vol. 33, pp. 1651–72.
W.D. Bennon and F.P. Incropera: Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer., 1987, vol. 30, pp. 2161–70.
S.D. Felicelli, J.C. Heinrich, and D.R. Poirier: Metall. Trans. B, 1991, vol. 22B, pp. 847–59.
V.R. Voller and C. Prakash: Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 1987, vol. 30, pp. 1709–19.
H. Wang, S. Shankar, and M.S. Hamed: 5th Int. Conf. on Computational Heat and Mass Transfer, Canmore, AB, Canada, 2007, pp. 345–51.
W.D. Bennon and F.P. Incropera: Numer. Heat Transfer, 1988, vol. 13, pp. 277–96.
S.D. Felicelli, J.C. Heinrich, and D.R. Poirier: Numer. Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals, 1993, vol. 23, pp. 461–81.
J.C. Heinrich and D.R. Poirier: Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2004, vol. 12, pp. 881–99.
E. McBride, J.C. Heinrich, and D.R. Poirier: Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 1999, vol. 31, pp. 787–800.
D. XU and Q. LI: Numer. Heat Transfer, Part A, 1991, vol. 20, pp. 203–21.
K.C. Chiang and H.L. Tsai: Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 1992, vol. 35, pp. 1763–70.
K.C. Chiang and H.L. Tsai: Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 1992, vol. 35, pp. 1771–78.
M.J.M. Krane and F.P. Incropera: Metall. Trans. A, 1995, vol. 26A, pp. 2329–39.
S. Steinbach and L. Ratke: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, vols. 413–414, pp. 200–04.
T. Magnusson and L. Arnberg: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2001, vol. 32A, pp. 2605–13.
M.C. Schneider and C. Beckermann: Metall. Trans. A, 1995, vol. 26A, pp. 2373–88.
M.C. Schneider and C. Beckermann: Summary of a Method for Numerically Simulating the Columnar Dendritic Solidification of Binary Alloys, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 1993.
M.D. Peres, C.A. Siqueira, and A. Garcia: J. Alloys Compd., 2004, vol. 381, pp. 168–81.
J.E. Spinelli, M.D. Peres, and A. Garcia: J. Alloys Compd., 2005, vol. 403, pp. 228–38.
M.C. Flemings: Solidification Processing, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, NY, 1974.
M.H. Burden and J.D. Hunt: J. Cryst. Growth, 1974, vol. 22, pp. 99–108.
M.H. Burden and J.D. Hunt: J. Cryst. Growth, 1974, vol. 22, pp. 109–16.
P.C. Carman: Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 1937, vol. 15, pp. 150–56.
P.C. Carman: I. J. Soc. Chem. Indus., 1938, vol. 57, pp. 225–34.
S. Asai and I. Muchi: Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn., 1978, vol. 18, pp. 290–98.
D. Bouchard and J.S. Kirkaldy: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 1997, vol. 28B, pp. 651–63.
P. Lehmann, R. Moreaub, D. Camela, and R. Bolcatob: J. Cryst. Growth, 1998, vol. 183, pp. 690–704.
H. Wang: Ph.D. Thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 2009.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Manuscript submitted July 8, 2010.
Appendix
Appendix
Thermophysical Material Properties
Properties | Al-3 Wt pct Si | Al-5 Wt pct Si | Al-7 Wt pct Si |
---|---|---|---|
K s | 228.08 − 0.061055 × T | 226.01 – 0.077488 × T | 223.93 – 0.093920 × T |
K l | 85.476 | 84.568 | 83.661 |
C ps | 887.23 + 0.50227 × T | 883.54 + 0.50227 × T | 879.85 + 0.50227 × T |
C pl | 1168.9 | 1163.7 | 1158.6 |
ρ s | 2627.9 | 2621.6 | 2614.5 |
ρ l | 2415.0 | 2422.8 | 2430.6 |
L | 4.05 × 105 | 4.25 × 105 | 4.45 × 105 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, H., Hamed, M.S. & Shankar, S. Effect of Shrinkage on Primary Dendrite Arm Spacing during Binary Al-Si Alloy Solidification. Metall Mater Trans A 42, 2331–2345 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-011-0611-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-011-0611-5