Abstract
Human activities that define the Anthropocene can lead to multi-faceted (social, ecological, economic) problems, such as biological invasions. Yet, interdisciplinary collaborations focused on understanding their causes and finding solutions remain relatively scarce. Telecoupling lens helps to conceptualize the biological invasions process (transport–introduction–establishment–invasion) across distal coupled human–nature systems. Using invasive non-native plants as an example, we explain how their invasion can alter either one or both of the sending (native) and receiving (invaded) systems. This occurs through multi-directional flows (e.g., species, knowledge), mediated by numerous dynamic agents (e.g., policymakers, immigrants, gardeners, scientists) that act at different temporal and geographic scales. Importantly, adopting the telecoupling perspective, we can incorporate policy and management into the invasion process by defining information flows and institutions as influential factors of the invasion process. Despite its substantial potential to improve our understanding of invasive species, the integration of the telecoupling perspective with traditional invasion frameworks remains largely unexplored.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Adams LB, Alter TR, Parkes MW et al (2019) Political economics, collective action and wicked socio-ecological problems: a practice story from the field. Gatew Int J Commun Res Engagem 12:6496. https://doi.org/10.5130/ijcre.v12i1.6496
Allen J, Gosden C, White JP (1989) Human Pleistocene adaptations in the tropical island Pacific: recent evidence from New Ireland, a Greater Australian outlier. Antiquity 63:548–561. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00076547
Bardsley D, Edwards-Jones G (2006) Stakeholders’ perceptions of the impacts of invasive exotic plant species in the Mediterranean region. GeoJournal 65:199–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-005-2755-6
Bell M, Charles-Edwards E, Kupiszewska D, Kupiszewski M, Stillwell J, Zhu Y (2014) Internal migration data around the world: assessing contemporary practice. Popul Space Place 21:17–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1848
Bertelsmeier C, Ollier S (2021) Bridgehead effects distort global flows of alien species. Divers Distrib 27:2180–2189. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13388
Binggeli P (2001) The human dimensions of invasive woody plants. In: McNeely JA (ed) The great Reshuffling: human dimensions of alien invasive species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, pp 145–159
Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošík V, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26:333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023
Boltovskoy D, Guiaşu R, Burlakova L, Karatayev A, Schlaepfer MA, Correa N (2022) Misleading estimates of economic impacts of biological invasions: including the costs but not the benefits. Ambio 51:1786–1799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01707-1
Boucher C, Stirton CH (1980) Port Jackson. In: Stirton CH (ed) Plant invaders: beautiful but dangerous. Department of Nature and Environmental Conservation of the Cape Provincial Administration, Cape Town, pp 60–30
Bravo-Vargas V, García RA, Pizarro JC, Pauchard A (2019) Do people care about pine invasions? Visitor perceptions and willingness to pay for pine control in a protected area. J Environ Manag 229:57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.018
Bruce K, Cameron G, Harcombe P, Jubinsky G (1997) Introduction, impact on native habitats, and management of a woody invader, the Chinese tallow tree, Sapium sebiferum (L.) Roxb. Nat Areas J 17(3):255–260
Busso CA, Bentivegna DJ, Fernández OA (2013) A review on invasive plants in Rangelands of Argentina. Interciencia 38(2):95–103
Cadotte MW, Yasui SLE, Livingstone S, MacIvor JS (2017) Are urban systems beneficial, detrimental, or indifferent for biological invasion? Biol Invasions 19:3489–3503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1586-y
Carruthers J, Robin L, Hattingh JP, Kull CA, Rangan H, van Wilgenl BW (2011) A native at home and abroad: the history, politics, ethics and aesthetics of acacias. Divers Distrib 17:810–821. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00779.x
Carter NH, Viña A, Hull V, McConnell WJ, Axinn W, Ghimire D, Liu J (2014) Coupled human and natural systems approach to wildlife research and conservation. Ecol Soc 19:art43
Cassey P, Delean S, Lockwood JL, Sadowski JS, Blackburn TM (2018) Dissecting the null model for biological invasions: a meta-analysis of the propagule pressure effect. PLoS Biol 16:e2005987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005987
Castro-Díez P, Vaz AS, Silva JS et al (2019) Global effects of non-native tree species on multiple ecosystem services. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 94:1477–1501. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12511
Catford JA, Jansson R, Nilsson C (2009) Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Divers Distrib 15:22–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00521.x
Cook GD, Dias L (2006) It was no accident: deliberate plant introductions by Australian government agencies during the 20th century. Austral J Bot 54:601–625. https://doi.org/10.1071/bt05157
Courchamp F, Fournier A, Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Bonnaud E, Jeschke JM, Russell JC (2017) Invasion biology: specific problems and possible Solutions. Trends Ecol Evol 32:13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.11.001
Cronk QCB, Fuller JL (2001) Invaders: the threat to natural ecosystems. Earthscan, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315071831
Crowley SL, Hinchliffe S, McDonald RA (2017) Conflict in invasive species management. Front Ecol Environ 15:133–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1471
Di Febbraro M, Menchetti M, Russo D, Aloise G, Roscioni F, Preatoni DG, Loy A, Martinoli A, Bertolino S, Mori E (2019) Integrating climate and land-use change scenarios in modelling the future spread of invasive squirrels in Italy. Divers Distrib 25:644–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12890
Dickie IA, Bennett BM, Burrows LE, Nuñez MA, Peltzer DA, Porté A, Richardson DM, Rejmánek M, Rundel PW, van Wilgen BW (2014) Conflicting values: ecosystem services and invasive tree management. Biol Invasions 16:705–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0609-6
Dray FA, Bennett BC, Center TD (2006) Invasion History of Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S.T. Blake in Florida. Castanea 71:210–225. https://doi.org/10.2179/05-27.1
Driscoll DA, Catford JA, Barney JN, Hulme PE, Martin ITG, Pauchard A, Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Riley S, Visser V (2014) New pasture plants intensify invasive species risk. Proc Nat Acad Sci 111:16622–16627. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1409347111
Essl F, Dullinger S, Rabitsch W et al (2011) Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:203–207. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011728108
Essl F, Dullinger S, Rabitsch W, Hulme PE, Pyšek P, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM (2015) Historical legacies accumulate to shape future biodiversity in an era of rapid global change. Divers Distrib 21:534–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12312
Essl F, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM et al (2017) Scientific and normative foundations for the valuation of alien-species impacts: thirteen core principles. Bioscience 67:166–178. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw160
Estévez RA, Anderson CB, Pizarro JC, Burgman MA (2015) Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management. Conserv Biol 29(1):19–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12359
Fernandez RD, Ceballos SJ, Aragón R et al (2020) A global review of Ligustrum lucidum (Oleaceae) invasion. Bot Rev 86:93–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-020-09228-w
Forseth IN, Innis AF (2004) Kudzu (Pueraria montana): history, physiology, and ecology combine to make a major ecosystem threat. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23:401–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680490505150
Franco Gavonel M, Adger WN, Safra de Campos R, Boyd E, Carr ER, Fábos A, Fransen S, Jolivet D, Zickgraf C, Codjoe SNA, Abu M, Siddiqui T (2021) The migration-sustainability paradox: transformations in mobile worlds. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 49:98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.03.013
Friis C, Nielsen JØ (2014) Exploring the potential of the telecoupling framework for understanding land change. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, IRI THESys
Game ET, Meijaard E, Sheil D, McDonald-Madden E (2014) Conservation in a wicked complex world; challenges and solutions. Conserv Lett 7:271–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12050
García-Díaz P, Cassey P, Norbury G et al (2021) Management policies for invasive alien species: addressing the impacts rather than the species. Bioscience 71:174–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa139
García-Díaz P, Montti L, Powell PA et al (2022) Identifying priorities, targets, and actions for the long-term social and ecological management of invasive non-native species. Environ Manag 69:140–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01541-3
García Lerena M, Doumecq M, Stampella P, Pochettino M (2018) Las raíces del paisaje: los árboles en la construcción de las estancias de la región pampeana argentina. In: Ciencias y Medio ambiente. 56 Congreso Internacional de las Américas (Eds) Universidad de Salamanca. https://doi.org/10.14201/0aq0251_4
Gasparri NI, Waroux Y (2015) The coupling of South American soybean and cattle production frontiers: new challenges for conservation policy and land change science. Conserv Lett 8:290–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12121
Gavier-Pizarro GI, Radeloff VC, Stewart SI, Huebner CD, Keuler NS (2010) Housing is positively associated with invasive exotic plant species richness in New England, USA. Ecol Appl 20(7):1913–1925
GISD, Global Invasive Species Database (2020a) Species profile: Caulerpa taxifolia. Downloaded from http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=115. Accessed on 04 July 2020
GISD, Global Invasive Species Database (2020b) Species profile: Pinus. Downloaded from http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=890. Accessed on 24 Sept 2020
González MV, Montti L, Jiménez YG, Aráoz E (2024) Linking migration flows with the prevalence of exotic plant species in the Andes. Mt Res Dev 44(1):R1–R9. https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.2023.00017
Grau HR (2018) Biología & globalización: especies que vinieron para quedarse, en los ecosistemas del norte argentino. Edicones del Subtrópico, Fundación ProYungas, Yerba Buena, Tucumán, Argentina. p 68 (ISBN 978–987-28168-8-9-1)
Hanley N, Roberts M (2019) The economic benefits of invasive species management. People Nat 1:124–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.31
Heger T, Pahl AT, Botta-Dukát Z et al (2013) Conceptual frameworks and methods for advancing invasion ecology. Ambio 42:527–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0379-x
Hulme PE (2005) Nursery crime: agriculture as victim and perpetrator in the spread of invasive species. Crop science and technology. British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, pp 733–740
Hulme PE (2011) Addressing the threat to biodiversity from botanic gardens. Trends Ecol Evol 26:168–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.005
Hulme PE (2020) Plant invasions in New Zealand: global lessons in prevention, eradication and control. Biol Invasions 22:1539–1562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-020-02224-6
Hulme PE, Bacher S, Kenis M, Klotz S, Kühn I, Minchin D, NentwigW OS, Panov P, Pergl P, Pyšek P, Roques A, Sol D, Solarz W, Vilà M (2008) Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy. J Appl Ecol 45:403–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01442.x
Hulme PE, Brundu G, Carboni M et al (2018) Integrating invasive species policies across ornamental horticulture supply chains to prevent plant invasions. J Appl Ecol 55:92–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12953
Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) (2019) Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the IPBES -Advanced Unedited Version-. URL: https://www.ipbes.net/system/tdf/spm_global_unedited_advance.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=35245. Accessed 18 Jun 2019
Jimenez YG, Ceballos SJ, Aráoz E, Blundo C, Carilla J, Malizia A, Grau HR (2022) Spatial, temporal and ecological patterns of peri-urban forest transitions. An example from subtropical Argentina. Front for Global Chang 5:7619
Kowarik I (2003) Human agency in biological invasions: secondary releases foster naturalisation and population expansion of alien plant species. Biol Invasions 5:293–312. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BINV.0000005574.15074.66
Kowarik I (2005) Urban ornamentals escaped from cultivation. In: Gressel J (ed) Crop ferality and volunteerism. CRC Press, pp 97–121
Krug RM, Roura N, Richardson D (2010) Clearing of invasive alien plants under different budget scenarios: using a simulation model to test efficiency. Biol Invasions 12:4099–4112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9827-3
Kueffer C, Hirsch Hadorn G (2008) How to achieve effectiveness in problem-oriented landscape research: the example of research on biotic invasions. Living Rev Landsc Res 2:49. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrlr-2008-2
Kueffer C, Kull CA (2017) Non-native species and the aesthetics of nature. In: Vilà M, Hulme PE (eds) Impact of biological invasions on ecosystem services. Springer, Cham, pp 311–324
Latombe G, Pyšek P, Jeschke JM et al (2017) A vision for global monitoring of biological invasions. Biol Cons 213:295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.013
Lehan N, Murphy J, Thorburn L, Bradley B (2013) Accidental introductions are an important source of invasive plants in the continental United States. Am J Bot 100(7):1287–1293. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1300061
Lewis SL, Maslin MA (2015) Defining the Anthropocene. Nature 519:171–180. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14258
Linders TEW, Schaffner U, Eschen R, Abebe A, Choge SK, Nigatu L, Mbaabu PR, Shiferaw H, Allan E (2019) Direct and indirect effects of invasive species: biodiversity loss is a major mechanism by which an invasive tree affects ecosystem functioning. J Ecol 107:2660–2672. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13268
Liu J, Hull V, Batistella M et al (2013) Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05873-180226
Liu J, Dou Y, Batistella M et al (2018) Spillover systems in a telecoupled Anthropocene: typology, methods, and governance for global sustainability. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 33:58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.04.009
Lombaert E, Guillemaud T, Cornuet J-M, Malausa T, Facon B, Estoup A (2010) Bridgehead effect in the worldwide invasion of the biocontrol harlequin ladybird. PLoS ONE 5:e9743. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009743
Mack RN (2001) Motivation and consequences of the human dispersal plants. In: McNeely JA (ed) The great Reshuffling: Human Dimensions of Alien Invasive Species. pp 23–34
Mack RN, Lonsdale WM (2001) Humans as global plant dispersers: getting more than we bargained for: current introductions of species for aesthetic purposes present the largest single challenge for predicting which plant immigrants will become future pests. Bioscience 51:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0095:HAGPDG]2.0.CO;2
Marambe B, Bambaradeniya C, Pushpakumara D, Gamini, Pallewatta N (2001) Human dimensions of invasive alien species in Sri Lanka. IUCN, Cambridge, pp 135–142
Mason NWH, Palmer DJ, Vetrova V, Brabyn L, Paul T, Willemse P, Peltzer DA (2017) Accentuating the positive while eliminating the negative of alien tree invasions: a multiple ecosystem services approach to prioritising control efforts. Biol Invasions 19:1181–1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1307-y
Maundu P, Kibet S, Morimoto Y, Imbumi M, Adeka R (2009) Impact of Prosopis juliflora on Kenya’s semi-arid and arid ecosystems and local livelihoods. Biodiversity 10:33–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2009.9712842
Mbaabu PR, Ng W-T, Schaffner U, Gichaba M, Olago D, Choge S, Oriaso S, Eckert S (2019) Spatial Evolution of Prosopis invasion and its effects on LULC and livelihoods in Baringo, Kenya. Remote Sens 11:1217. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11101217
McGeoch MA, Genovesi P, Bellingham PJ, Costello MJ, McGrannachan C, Sheppard A (2016) Prioritizing species, pathways, and sites to achieve conservation targets for biological invasion. Biol Invasions 18:299–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-1013-1
McIntosh CR, Finnoff DC, Settle C, Shogren JF (2009) Economic valuation and invasive species. In: Keller RP, Lodge DM, Lewis MA, Shogren JF (eds) Bioeconomics invasive species: integrating ecology, economics, policy, and management. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 151–179
Montti L, Piriz Carillo VR, Gutierrez Angonese J, Gasparri NI, Grau HR (2017) The role of bioclimatic features, landscape configuration and historical land use in the invasion of an Asian tree in subtropical Argentina. Landscape Ecol 32:2167–2185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0563-2
Morgan V, Sytsma M (2010) Alaska spartina prevention, detection and response plan. Center for lakes and reservoirs publications and presentations. URL: http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/centerforlakes_pub/5.
Nuñez M, Medley K (2011) Pine invasions: Climate predicts invasion success; something else predicts failure. Divers Distrib 17:703–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00772.x
Nuñez MA, Pauchard A (2010) Biological invasions in developing and developed countries: does one model fit all? Biol Invasions 12:707–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9517-1
Parodi LR (1926) Las malezas de los cultivos en el partido de Pergamino. Rev Fac Agron Vet UBA 5:75–188
Pemberton RW, Liu H (2009) Marketing time predicts naturalization of horticultural plants. Ecology 90:69–80. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1516.1
Peña E, Hidalgo M, Langdon B, Pauchard A (2008) Patterns of spread of Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. invasion in a natural reserve in southern South America. For Ecol Manag 256:1049–1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.020
Petitpierre B, Kueffer C, Broennimann O et al (2012) Climatic niche shifts are rare among terrestrial plant invaders. Science 335:1344–1348. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215933
Phillips C, Marden M, Lambie S, Watson A, Ross C, Fraser S (2012) Observations of below-ground characteristics of young redwood trees (Sequoia sempervirens) from two sites in New Zealand – implications for erosion control. Plant Soil 363:33–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-0
Procheş Ş, Wilson J, Richardson D, Rejmanek M (2011) Native and naturalized range size in Pinus: relative importance of biogeography, introduction effort and species traits. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:513–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00703.x
Pyšek P, Hulme PE, Simberloff D et al (2020) Scientists’ warning on invasive alien species. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 95:1511–1534. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12627
Reichard SH, White P (2001) Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States: most invasive plants have been introduced for horticultural use by nurseries, botanical gardens, and individuals. Bioscience 51:103–113. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0103:HAAPOI]2.0.CO;2
Rejmánek M, Richardson DM (2011) Eucalypts. In: Rejmánek M, Simberloff D (eds) Encyclopedia of biological invasions. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 203–209
Richardson DM (1998) Forestry trees as invasive aliens. Conserv Biol 12:18–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.96392.x
Richardson DM, Pyšek P (2012) Naturalization of introduced plants: ecological drivers of biogeographical patterns. New Phytol 196:383–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04292.x
Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib 6:93–107. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00083.x
Roberts M, Cresswell W, Hanley N (2018) Prioritising invasive species control actions: evaluating effectiveness, costs, willingness to pay and social acceptance. Ecol Econ 152:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.027
Robertson PA, Mill A, Novoa A et al (2020) A proposed unified framework to describe the management of biological invasions. Biol Invasions 22:2633–2645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-020-02298-2
Robertson PA, Mill AC, Adriaens T, Moore N, Vanderhoeven S, Essl F, Booy O (2021) Risk management assessment improves the cost-effectiveness of invasive species prioritisation. Biology 10:1320. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10121320
Rotherham ID, Lambert RA (2012) Invasive and introduced plants and animals: human perceptions, attitudes and approaches to management. Routledge, Earthscan, p 394
Rout ME, Chrzanowski TH, Smith WK, Gough L (2013) Ecological impacts of the invasive grass Sorghum halepense on native tallgrass prairie. Biol Invasions 15:327–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0289-7
Schwartz MW, Thorne JH, Viers JH (2006) Biotic homogenization of the California flora in urban and urbanizing regions. Biol Cons 127:282–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.05.017
Seebens H, Blackburn TM, Dyer EE et al (2018) Global rise in emerging alien species results from increased accessibility of new source pools. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115:E2264–E2273. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719429115
Seebens H, Clarke DA, Groom Q, Wilson JRU, García-Berthou E, Kühn I, Roigé M, Pagad S, Essl F, Vicente J, Winter M, McGeoch M (2020) A workflow for standardising and integrating alien species distribution data. NeoBiota 59:39–59. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.59.53578
Seto KC, Reenberg A, Boone CG et al (2012) Urban land teleconnections and sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 109(20):7687–7692. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117622109
Shackleton RT, Le Maitre DC, Pasiecznik NM, Richardson DM (2014) Prosopis: a global assessment of the biogeography, benefits, impacts and management of one of the world’s worst woody invasive plant taxa. AoB Plants 6:027. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plu027
Shackleton RT, Larson BMH, Novoa A et al (2019a) The human and social dimensions of invasion science and management. J Environ Manag 229:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.041
Shackleton RT, Richardson DM, Shackleton CM et al (2019b) Explaining people’s perceptions of invasive alien species: a conceptual framework. J Environ Manag 229:10–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.045
Shackleton RT, Adriaens T, Brundu G et al (2019c) Stakeholder engagement in the study and management of invasive alien species. J Environ Manag 229:88–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.044
Sheremet O, Healey JR, Quine CP, Hanley N (2017) Public preferences and willingness to pay for forest disease control in the UK. J Agric Econ 68:781–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12210
Simberloff D, Nuñez MA, Ledgard NJ et al (2010) Spread and impact of introduced conifers in South America: lessons from other southern hemisphere regions. Austral Ecol 35:489–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.02058.x
Speziale KL, Lambertucci SA, Carrete M, Tella JL (2012) Dealing with non-native species: what makes the difference in South America? Biol Invasions 14:1609–1621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0162-0
Stokes KE, Neill KP, Montgomery WI, Dick JTA, Maggs CA, McDonald RA (2006) The importance of stakeholder engagement in invasive species management: a cross-jurisdictional perspective in Ireland. Biodivers Conserv 15:2829–2852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-3137-6
Stone LM, Byrne M, Virtue JG (2008) An environmental weed risk assessment model for Australian forage improvement programs. Aust J Exp Agric 48:568–574. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07117
Sukopp H (1972) Wandel von flora und vegetation in Mitteleuropa unter dem Einfluss des Menschen. Ber Landwirtsch 50:112–139
Tassin J, Kull CA (2015) Facing the broader dimensions of biological invasions. Land Use Policy 42:165–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.014
Thomas CD (2017) Inheritors of the Earth: how nature is thriving in an age of extinction. Hachette, New York, p 300
Udo N, Darrot C, Atlan A (2019) From useful to invasive, the status of gorse on Reunion Island. J Environ Manag 229:166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.036
van Kleunen M, Essl F, Pergl J et al (2018) The changing role of ornamental horticulture in alien plant invasions: Horticulture and plant invasions. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 93:1421–1437. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12402
Vaz AS, Kueffer C, Kull CA et al (2017a) Integrating ecosystem services and disservices: insights from plant invasions. Ecosyst Serv 23:94–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.017
Vaz AS, Kueffer C, Kull CA et al (2017b) The progress of interdisciplinarity in invasion science. Ambio 46:428–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0897-7
Vickery R (1995) A dictionary of plant lore. Oxford University Press, NY
Wakie TT, Laituri M, Evangelista PH (2016) Assessing the distribution and impacts of Prosopis juliflora through participatory approaches. Appl Geogr 66:132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.11.017
Wang CJ, Wan JZ, Qu H, Zhang ZX (2017) Climatic niche shift of aquatic plant invaders between native and invasive ranges: a test using 10 species across different biomes on a global scale. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 41:27. https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2017019
Wijesundera S (1999) Pathways of introduction of invasive alien species into Sri Lanka. In: Proceedings of First National Workshop on Invasive Alien Species. Ministry of Forestry and Environment, Sri Lanka
Woods M, Moriarty PV (2001) Strangers in a Strange Land: the problem of exotic species. Environ Values 10:163–191. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327101129340796
Wright JA, DiNicola A, Gaitan E (2000) Latin American forest plantations: opportunities for carbon sequestration, economic development, and financial returns. J for 98:20–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/98.9.20
Xu JS, Chikashige T, Meguro S, Kawachi S (1991) Effective utilization of stillingia or Chinese tallow-tree (Sapium sebiferum) fruits. Mokuzai Gakkaishi. J Japan Wood Res Soc 37:494–498
Yang H, Lupi F, Zhang J, Chen X, Liu J (2018) Feedback of telecoupling: the case of a payments for ecosystem services program. Ecol Soc 23(2):45
Zenni RD, Dickie IA, Wingfield MJ et al (2016) Evolutionary dynamics of tree invasions: complementing the unified framework for biological invasions. AoB Plants. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plw085
Zimmermann H, Brandt P, Fischer J et al (2014) The human release hypothesis for biological invasions: human activity as a determinant of the abundance of invasive plant species. F1000Res 3:109. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3740.1
Acknowledgements
The ideas presented here have been developed thanks to frequent opinions exchanged within Garcia-Diaz P, Powell P, Nuñez M, le Polaine de Waroux Y and Fernandez R. Their valuables comments that great improve the first versions of the manuscripts.
Funding
Despite the salary of authors was finding by CONICET no funding was used to developed this idea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LM led the manuscript. LM, NIG and HRG contributed to the study conception and design, commented on all previous versions of the manuscript, read, edited, and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Not conflict was declared.
Additional information
Handled by Rajarshi DasGupta, Natural Resource and Ecosystems, Japan.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Montti, L., Gasparri, N.I. & Grau, H.R. Telecoupling lens for integrating ecological and human dimensions of the biological invasion problem. Sustain Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01476-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01476-8