Abstract
There is a strong bias concerning the regions of the globe where research on biological invasions is conducted, with notably lower representation of developing countries. However, in developing countries, effective management strategies to control invasions could be more beneficial in conserving global biodiversity since these countries tend to have larger, highly diverse natural habitats. Lower levels of development are seen as an obstacle to tackling biological invasions, but little thought is given to the advantages of developing countries in dealing with invasive species. We analyzed differences between developed and developing countries regarding the problem of invasive species and their historical and current patterns of international trade, disturbance levels and land use, research and monitoring, control and mitigation, and social awareness. Developed nations have some advantages, especially in levels of social awareness and means for controlling and studying exotics, but developing nations also enjoy important advantages given their lower levels of international trade and the availability of low-cost labor. Also, there is evidence that the process of economic development, which results in more efficient ways to transform landscapes and increases international trade, is strongly associated with increasing rates of biological invasion. Differences in data quality and availability between developed and developing countries make comparative analyses of biological invasions a difficult task. Thus, these differences creates a challenge in forming global strategies to deal with invasions. There have been calls for creating international plans to deal with invasive species, but we believe that it is important first to acknowledge the challenges and understand both the advantages and disadvantages of developing countries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balmford A, Bruner A, Cooper P, Costanza R, Farber S, Green RE, Jenkins M, Jefferiss P, Jessamy V, Madden J, Munro K, Myers N, Naeem S, Paavola J, Rayment M, Rosendo S, Roughgarden J, Trumper K, Turner RK (2002) Ecology—economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297:950–953
Bertolino S, Genovesi P (2003) Spread and attempted eradication of the grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) in Italy, and consequences for the red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in Eurasia. Biol Conserv 109:351–358
Brandon A, Spyreas G, Molano-Flores B, Carroll C, Ellis J (2003) Can volunteers provide reliable data for forest vegetation surveys? Nat Areas J 23:254–261
Chidiak M, Moreyra A, Greco C (2003) Captura de carbono y desarrollo forestal sustentable en la Patagonia Argentina: Sinergias y Desafíos. CENIT-CEPAL-UDESA, Buenos Aires
Cohen A, Carlton J (1998) Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science 279:555–558
Dalmazzone S (2000) Economic factors affecting the vulnerability to biological invasions. Pages 17–30. The economics of biological invasions. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Delaney DG, Sperling CD, Adams CS, Leung B (2008) Marine invasive species: validation of citizen science and implications for national monitoring networks. Biol Invasions 10:117–128
Ellis EC, Ramankutty N (2008) Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world. Front Ecol Environ 6:439–447
Fazey I, Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2005) Who does all the research in conservation biology? Biodivers Conserv 14:917–934
Fearnside PM (2005) Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: history, rates, and consequences. Conserv Biol 19:680–688
Gash J (2002) Deforestation, tropical: global problems. Pages 265-271. In: Douglas I (ed) Encyclopedia of global change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Genovesi P (2005) Eradications of invasive alien species in Europe: a review. Biol Invasions 7:127–133
Inderjit, Callaway RM, Kaushik. S (2006) Time for international policies on biological invasions. Front Ecol Environ 4:67–68
Jeanrenaud S (2001) Communities and forest management in Western Europe. IUCN, Gland
JICA (2005) Japan-Chile partnership programme expands the horizon of JICA’s activities in Latin America. Network Magazine 27:http://www.jica.go.jp/english/publications/reports/network/vol27/vol_27_25.html
Jiménez A, Pauchard A, Cavieres LA, Marticorena A, Bustamante RO (2008) Do climatically similar regions contain similar alien floras? A comparison between the mediterranean areas of central Chile and California. J Biogeogr 35:614–624
Koenig R (2008) Critical time for African rainforests. Science 320:1439–1441
Laurance WF (2004) The perils of payoff: corruption as a threat to global biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol 19:399–401
Lawton JH (2007) Ecology, politics and policy. J Appl Ecol 44:465–474
Leslie LL, Velez CE, Bonar SA (2004) Utilizing volunteers on fisheries projects: benefits, challenges, and management techniques. Fisheries 29:10–14
Levine JM, D’Antonio CM (2003) Forecasting biological invasions with increasing international trade. Conserv Biol 17:322–326
Lin W, Zhou G, Cheng X, Xu R (2007) Fast economic development accelerates biological invasions in China. PLoS ONE 2:e1208
Mack RN (2003) Global plant dispersal, naturalization and invasion: pathways, modes and circumstances. In: Ruiz G, Carlton J (eds) Global Pathways of Biotic invasions. Island Press, Washington, pp 3–30
Magadlela D, Mdzeke N (2004) Social benefits in the working for water programme as a public works initiative. S Afr J Sci 100:94–96
Matthews S, Brand K (2004) Tropical Asia invaded: the growing danger of invasive alien species. Global invasive species programme
Matthews S, Brand K (2005) South America invaded: the growing danger of invasive alien species. Global Invasive Species Programme
May RM (1997) The scientific wealth of nations. Science 275:793–796
May RM (1998) The scientific investments of nations. Science 281:49–51
Meyerson LA, Mooney HA (2007) Invasive alien species in an era of globalization. Front Ecol Environ 5:199–208
Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858
Padilla DK, Williams SL (2004) Beyond ballast water: aquarium and ornamental trades as sources of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 2:131–138
Pauchard A, Alaback PB (2004) Influence of elevation, land use, and landscape context on patterns of alien plant invasions along roadsides in protected areas of south-central Chile. Conserv Biol 18:238–248
Perrings C, Williamson M, Barbier EB, Delfino D, Dalmazzone S, Shogren, Simmons P, Watkinson A (2002) Biological invasion risks and the public good: an economic perspective. Conserv Ecol 6
Perry D, Perry G (2008) Improving interactions between animal rights groups and conservation biologists. Conserv Biol 22:27–35
Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52:273–288
Plessis MAd, Primack RB (2001) Academia as a nursery ground for conservation biology. Conserv Biol 15:1477–1478
Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Chytrý M, Kropá Z, Tichý L, Wild J (2005) Alien plants in temperate weed communities: prehistoric and recent invaders occupy different habitats. Ecology 86:772–785
Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Pergil J, Jarosik V, Sixtova Z, Weber E (2008) Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 23:237–244
Richardson DM, van Wilgen BW, Nunez MA (2008) Alien conifer invasions in South America: short fuse burning? Biol Invasions 10:573–577
Seglen PO (1997) Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 314:498–502
Simberloff D (2003) Eradication-preventing invasions at the outset. Weed Sci 51:247–253
Simberloff D, Von Holle B (1999) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invasions 1:21–32
Smith J, Obidzinski K, Subarudi S, Suramenggala I (2003a) Illegal logging, collusive corruption and fragmented governments in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Int For Rev 5:293–302
Smith RJ, Muir RDJ, Walpole MJ, Balmford A, Leader-Williams N (2003b) Governance and the loss of biodiversity. Nature 426:67–70
Taylor BW, Irwin RE (2004) Linking economic activities to the distribution of exotic plants. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101:17725–17730
United Nations (2006) Standard country or area codes for statistical use. United Nations publication, New York
Victor DG (2000) Risk management and the world trading system: regulating international trade distortions caused by national sanitary and phytosanitary policies. Incorporating science, economics and sociology in developing sanitary and phytosanitary Standards in international trade: Proceedings of a Conference. National Academy Press, Washington
Vilà M, Pujadas J (2001) Land-use and socio-economic correlates of plant invasions in European and North African countries. Biol Conserv 100:397–401
Westphal M, Browne M, MacKinnon K, Noble I (2008) The link between international trade and the global distribution of invasive alien species. Biol Invasions 10:391–398
Williams M (2002) Deforestation in historic times. In: Douglas I (ed) Encyclopedia of global change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 259–264
Williamson M (2006) Explaining and predicting the success of invading species at different stages of invasion. Biol Invasions 8:1561–1568
Acknowledgments
Lara Souza, Emmi Felker-Quinn and Dan Simberloff for helpful comments on the manuscript. A. Pauchard is funded by ICM P05–002, PFB-23 of Conicyt-Chile, and Fondecyt 1070488.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nuñez, M.A., Pauchard, A. Biological invasions in developing and developed countries: does one model fit all?. Biol Invasions 12, 707–714 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9517-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9517-1