Skip to main content
Log in

Screening for Prediabetes and Diabetes in a National Network of Federally Qualified Health Centers: An Observational Study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In 2021, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended screening for prediabetes and diabetes among adults aged 35–70 years with overweight or obesity. Studying dysglycemia screening in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) that serve vulnerable patient populations is needed to understand health equity implications of this recommendation.

Objective

To investigate screening practices among FQHC patients who would be eligible according to the 2021 USPSTF recommendation.

Design

Retrospective cohort study analyzing electronic health records from a national network of 282 FQHC sites.

Participants

We included 183,329 patients without prior evidence of prediabetes or diabetes, who had ≥ 1 office visit from 2018–2020.

Main Measures

Screening eligibility was based on age and measured body mass index (BMI). The primary outcome, screening completion, was ascertained using hemoglobin A1c or fasting plasma glucose results from 2018–2020.

Key Results

Among 89,543 patients who would be eligible according to the 2021 USPSTF recommendation, 53,263 (59.5%) were screened. Those who completed screening had higher BMI values than patients who did not (33.0 ± 6.7 kg/m2 vs. 31.9 ± 6.2 kg/m2, p < 0.001). Adults aged 50–64 years had greater odds of screening completion relative to younger patients (OR 1.13, 95% CI: 1.10–1.17). Patients from racial and ethnic minority groups, as well as those without health insurance, were more likely to complete screening than White patients and insured patients, respectively. Clinical risk factors for diabetes were also associated with dysglycemia screening. Among patients who completed screening, 23,588 (44.3%) had values consistent with prediabetes or diabetes.

Conclusions

Over half of FQHC patients who would be eligible according to the 2021 USPSTF recommendation were screened. Screening completion was higher among middle-aged patients, those with greater BMI values, as well as vulnerable groups with a high risk of developing diabetes. Future research should examine adoption of the 2021 USPSTF screening recommendation and its impact on health equity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Those interested in accessing the study data should contact the corresponding author.

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report, Estimates of Diabetes and Its Burden in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Updated January 18, 2022. Accessed April 8, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/index.html

  2. Menke A, Casagrande S, Geiss L, Cowie CC. Prevalence of and Trends in Diabetes Among Adults in the United States, 1988-2012. JAMA. 2015;314(10):1021-1029. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Preston SH, Choi D, Elo IT, Stokes A. Effect of Diabetes on Life Expectancy in the United States by Race and Ethnicity. Biodemography Soc Biol. 2018;64(2):139-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/19485565.2018.1542291

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Egede LE, Gebregziabher M, Hunt KJ, et al. Regional, geographic, and racial/ethnic variation in glycemic control in a national sample of veterans with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(4):938-43. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-1504

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Walker RJ, Strom Williams J, Egede LE. Influence of Race, Ethnicity and Social Determinants of Health on Diabetes Outcomes. Am J Med Sci. 2016;351(4):366-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2016.01.008

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Spanakis EK, Golden SH. Race/ethnic difference in diabetes and diabetic complications. Curr Diab Rep. 2013;13(6):814-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-013-0421-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, et al. Screening for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2021;326(8):736-743. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.12531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Siu AL. Screening for Abnormal Blood Glucose and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(11):861-8. https://doi.org/10.7326/m15-2345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. O'Brien MJ, Zhang Y, Bailey SC, et al. Screening for Prediabetes and Diabetes: Clinical Performance and Implications for Health Equity. Am J Prev Med. in press;

  10. Bullard KM, Ali MK, Imperatore G, et al. Receipt of Glucose Testing and Performance of Two US Diabetes Screening Guidelines, 2007-2012. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0125249. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kiefer MM, Silverman JB, Young BA, Nelson KM. National patterns in diabetes screening: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2012. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(5):612-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3147-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Casagrande SS, Cowie CC, Genuth SM. Self-reported prevalence of diabetes screening in the U.S., 2005-2010. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(6):780-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.039

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kelley AT, Nocon RS, O'Brien MJ. Diabetes Management in Community Health Centers: a Review of Policies and Programs. Curr Diab Rep. Feb 6 2020;20(2):8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-020-1289-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. National Association of Community Health Centers. Community Health Center Chart Book. http://www.nachc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Chartbook_FINAL_6.20.18.pdf

  15. O'Brien MJ, Lee JY, Carnethon MR, et al. Detecting Dysglycemia Using the 2015 United States Preventive Services Task Force Screening Criteria: A Cohort Analysis of Community Health Center Patients. PLoS Med. 2016;13(7):e1002074. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002074

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Obinwa U, Pérez A, Lingvay I, Meneghini L, Halm EA, Bowen ME. Multilevel Variation in Diabetes Screening Within an Integrated Health System. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(5):1016-1024. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-1622

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hsu WC, Araneta MR, Kanaya AM, Chiang JL, Fujimoto W. BMI cut points to identify at-risk Asian Americans for type 2 diabetes screening. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(1):150-8. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-2391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Girdhar S, Sharma S, Chaudhary A, Bansal P, Satija M. An Epidemiological Study of Overweight and Obesity Among Women in an Urban Area of North India. Indian J Community Med. 2016;41(2):154-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218.173492

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Defining Adult Overweight & Obesity. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Accessed Feb 7, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpao/index.html

  20. ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR, et al. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023. Diabetes Care. 2023;46(Suppl 1):S19-s40. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc23-S002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282(15):1458-65. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.15.1458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Evron JM, Herman WH, McEwen LN. Changes in Screening Practices for Prediabetes and Diabetes Since the Recommendation for Hemoglobin A(1c) Testing. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(4):576-584. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-1726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl 1):S13-s28.https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-S002

  24. Thomas TW, Golin C, Samuel-Hodge CD, Kirkman MS, Golden SD, Lightfoot AF. Race and gender differences in abnormal blood glucose screening and clinician response to prediabetes: A mixed-methods assessment. Prev Med. 2021;148:106587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106587

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Banerjee ES, Shaak K, Burgess N, Johnson M, Careyva B. Factors Associated with Clinician Adherence to USPSTF Diabetes Screening Recommendations. J Prim Care Community Health. 2021;12:21501327211016579. https://doi.org/10.1177/21501327211016579

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR, et al. 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023. Diabetes Care. 2023;46(Suppl 1):S140-s157. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc23-S009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Knowler W, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler S, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(6):393-403. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa012512.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Valdez R. Detecting undiagnosed type 2 diabetes: family history as a risk factor and screening tool. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3(4):722-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/193229680900300417

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Lizneva D, Suturina L, Walker W, Brakta S, Gavrilova-Jordan L, Azziz R. Criteria, prevalence, and phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(1):6-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.05.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jonas DE, Crotty K, Yun JDY, et al. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Evidence Syntheses, formerly Systematic Evidence Reviews. Screening for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Evidence Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2021.

  31. Bauchner H, Fontanarosa PB, Golub RM. JAMA Welcomes the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2016;315(4):351-2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.18448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shealy KM, Wu J, Waites J, Taylor NA, Blair Sarbacker G. Patterns of Diabetes Screening and Prediabetes Treatment during Office Visits in the US. J Am Board Fam Med. 2019;32(2):209-217. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2019.02.180259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. National Association of Community Health Centers. Community Health Center Chartbook. Community Health Center Chart Book. Accessed September 19, 2022. http://www.nachc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Chartbook_FINAL_6.20.18.pdf

  34. Albu JB, Sohler N, Li R, et al. An Interrupted Time Series Analysis to Determine the Effect of an Electronic Health Record-Based Intervention on Appropriate Screening for Type 2 Diabetes in Urban Primary Care Clinics in New York City. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(8):1058-1064. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-2133

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Iyengar JJ, Fisher MEK, Ziegler JE, et al. Increasing Diabetes Screening in a Primary Care Setting. Clin Diabetes. 2022;40(1):87-91. https://doi.org/10.2337/cd21-0039

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements:

We gratefully acknowledge the FQHCs who contributed data to the current study, and their leadership for agreeing to make the data available for analysis.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30-DK092949).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew J. O’Brien MD, MSc.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

Matthew J. O’Brien: No financial conflicts of interest to report.

Stacy C. Bailey: Dr. Bailey reports receiving research grants from the following organizations that were paid to Northwestern University: NIH, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Merck, Gilead, and the Retirement Research Foundation for Aging. Dr. Bailey reports receiving personal consulting fees from Lundbeck, Pfizer, Sanofi, Luto UK, and the University of Westminster. Dr. Bailey reports receiving personal fees for participation on a scientific advisory board at Gilead and support for travel from NIH and Gilead. None of these potential financial conflicts of interest are related to the current work.

Dyanna L. Gregory: No financial conflicts of interest to report.

Andrew L. Owen: No financial conflicts of interest to report.

Sadiya S. Khan: No financial conflicts of interest to report.

Ronald T. Ackermann: Dr. Ackermann reports receiving personal consulting fees from UnitedHealth Group unrelated to the current work.

Amro Hassan: No financial conflicts of interest to report.

Nivedita Mohanty: No financial conflicts of interest to report.

Michael Bowen: No financial conflicts of interest to report.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 36 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Brien, M.J., Bailey, S.C., Gregory, D.L. et al. Screening for Prediabetes and Diabetes in a National Network of Federally Qualified Health Centers: An Observational Study. J GEN INTERN MED 38, 3541–3548 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08402-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08402-1

KEY WORDS

Navigation