Advertisement

Effects of a Transitional Care Practice for a Vulnerable Population: a Pragmatic, Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial

  • David T. LissEmail author
  • Ronald T. Ackermann
  • Andrew Cooper
  • Emily A. Finch
  • Courtney Hurt
  • Nicola Lancki
  • Angela Rogers
  • Avani Sheth
  • Caroline Teter
  • Christine Schaeffer
Original Research

Abstract

Background

There is limited experimental evidence on transitional care interventions beyond 30 days post-discharge and in vulnerable populations.

Objective

Evaluate effects of a transitional care practice (TC) that comprehensively addresses patients’ medical and psychosocial needs following hospital discharge.

Design

Pragmatic, randomized comparative effectiveness trial.

Patients

Adults discharged from an initial emergency, observation, or inpatient hospital encounter with no trusted usual source of care.

Interventions

TC intervention included a scheduled post-discharge appointment at the TC practice, where a multidisciplinary team comprehensively assessed patients’ medical and psychosocial needs, addressed modifiable barriers, and subsequent linkage to a new primary care source. Routine Care involved assistance scheduling a post-discharge appointment with a primary care provider that often partnered with the hospital where the initial encounter occurred.

Main Measures

The primary outcome was a binary indicator of death or additional hospital encounters within 90 days of initial discharge. Secondary outcomes included any additional hospital encounters, and counts of hospital encounters, over 180 days.

Key Results

Four hundred ninety patients were randomized to TC intervention and 164 to Routine Care; 34.6% were uninsured, 49.7% had Medicaid, and 57.4% were homeless or lived in a high-poverty area. There was no significant difference between arms in the 90-day probability of death or additional hospital encounters (relative risk [RR] 0.89; 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74–1.13). However, TC patients had 37% and 35% lower probability of any inpatient admission over 90 days (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.43–0.91) and 180 days (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.47–0.89), respectively. Over 180 days, TC patients had 42% fewer inpatient admissions (incidence rate ratio 0.58; 95% CI 0.37–0.90).

Conclusions

Among patients randomized to a patient-centered transitional care intervention, there was no significant reduction in 90-day probability of death or additional hospital encounters. However, there were significant decreases in measures of inpatient admissions over 180 days.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03066492.

KEY WORDS

care transitions comparative effectiveness patient-centered care randomized trials vulnerable populations underserved populations hospital discharge 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients who participated in this study, along with care team members and staff at the Northwestern Medical Group Transitional Care practice. We thank the Chicago-area FQHCs that provided care to patients in both study arms and AllianceChicago for collaboration in data acquisition efforts. We also recognize the support and participation of Northwestern Memorial HealthCare and providers and staff at Northwestern Memorial Hospital. We thank Dyanna Gregory, MS, who led early work on several aspects of study randomization and analysis, and Michelle Cates and Mya Carter, who conducted follow-up phone interviews.

Funding

This research was supported by funding from Northwestern Memorial Hospital and the J.B. and M.K. Pritzker Family Foundation. Funders were not involved in reviewing or approving the manuscript for publication. REDCap is supported at Feinberg School of Medicine by the Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science (NUCATS) Institute. Research reported in this publication was supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health’s National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (#UL1TR001422).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Protocols were registered in the National Clinical Trials Registry (NCT03066492) and approved by Northwestern University’s institutional review board with a waiver of informed consent for study inclusion and collection of electronic outcome data.

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Schaeffer, Ms. Rogers, and Ms. Teter report employment as health care providers at the Northwestern Medical Group Transitional Care (TC) practice, and Ms. Hurt formerly provided social work services at the Northwestern Medical Group TC practice. All remaining authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

References

  1. 1.
    Lee KK, Yang J, Hernandez AF, Steimle AE, Go AS. Post-discharge Follow-up Characteristics Associated With 30-Day Readmission After Heart Failure Hospitalization. Med Care 2016;54(4):365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gold HT, Slover JD, Joo L, Bosco J, Iorio R, Oh C. Association of Depression With 90-Day Hospital Readmission After Total Joint Arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 2016;31(11):2385–2388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coleman EA. Falling through the cracks: challenges and opportunities for improving transitional care for persons with continuous complex care needs. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003;51(4):549–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burke RE, Guo R, Prochazka AV, Misky GJ. Identifying keys to success in reducing readmissions using the ideal transitions in care framework. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kangovi S, Barg FK, Carter T, et al. Challenges faced by patients with low socioeconomic status during the post-hospital transition. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29(2):283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kangovi S, Levy K, Barg FK, Carter T, Long JA, Grande D. Perspectives of older adults of low socioeconomic status on the post-hospital transition. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2014;25(2):746–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Englander H, Michaels L, Chan B, Kansagara D. The care transitions innovation (C-TraIn) for socioeconomically disadvantaged adults: results of a cluster randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29(11):1460–1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jack BW, Chetty VK, Anthony D, et al. A reengineered hospital discharge program to decrease rehospitalization: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2009;150(3):178–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Balaban RB, Galbraith AA, Burns ME, Vialle-Valentin CE, Larochelle MR, Ross-Degnan D. A Patient Navigator Intervention to Reduce Hospital Readmissions among High-Risk Safety-Net Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30(7):907–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kangovi S, Mitra N, Grande D, et al. Patient-centered community health worker intervention to improve posthospital outcomes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174(4):535–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Balaban RB, Zhang F, Vialle-Valentin CE, et al. Impact of a Patient Navigator Program on Hospital-Based and Outpatient Utilization Over 180 Days in a Safety-Net Health System. J Gen Intern Med 2017:1–9.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Coleman EA, Parry C, Chalmers S, Min SJ. The care transitions intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2006;166(17):1822–1828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Naylor MD, Brooten D, Campbell R, et al. Comprehensive discharge planning and home follow-up of hospitalized elders: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 1999;281(7):613–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leppin AL, Gionfriddo MR, Kessler M, et al. Preventing 30-day hospital readmissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174(7):1095–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kansagara D, Chiovaro JC, Kagen D, et al. So many options, where do we start? An overview of the care transitions literature. J Hosp Med 2016;11(3):221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kociol RD, Liang L, Hernandez AF, et al. Are we targeting the right metric for heart failure? Comparison of hospital 30-day readmission rates and total episode of care inpatient days. Am Heart J 2013;165(6):987–994 e981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chin DL, Bang H, Manickam RN, Romano PS. Rethinking Thirty-Day Hospital Readmissions: Shorter Intervals Might Be Better Indicators Of Quality Of Care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016;35(10):1867–1875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chandra A, Dalton MA, Holmes J. Large increases in spending on postacute care in Medicare point to the potential for cost savings in these settings. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32(5):864–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Likosky DS, Zhou W, Malenka DJ, Borden WB, Nallamothu BK, Skinner JS. Growth in medicare expenditures for patients with acute myocardial infarction: a comparison of 1998 through 1999 and 2008. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173(22):2055–2061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schaeffer C, Teter C, Finch EA, et al. A pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness trial of transitional care for a socioeconomically diverse population: Design, rationale and baseline characteristics. Contemp Clin Trials 2018;65:53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD, et al. A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62(5):464–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Donze J, Aujesky D, Williams D, Schnipper JL. Potentially avoidable 30-day hospital readmissions in medical patients: derivation and validation of a prediction model. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173(8):632–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hasan O, Meltzer DO, Shaykevich SA, et al. Hospital readmission in general medicine patients: a prediction model. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25(3):211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    van Walraven C, Wong J, Forster AJ. LACE+ index: extension of a validated index to predict early death or urgent readmission after hospital discharge using administrative data. Open Med 2012;6(3):e80–90.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    United States Census Bureau. American Community Survey Data Releases. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/news/data-releases.2015.html. Accessed 20 March 2019.
  26. 26.
    Bishaw A. Areas with concentrated poverty: 2006–2010. American Community Survey Briefs, Vol 9: US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, United States Census Bureau; 2011.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jiang Y, Novais AP, Viner-Brown S, Fine M. Non-emergent hospital emergency department use and neighborhood poverty in Rhode Island 2008-2012. RI Med J 2014;97(7):47–51.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Death Index. 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ndi/index.htm. Accessed 20 March 2019.
  29. 29.
    Maruish MEE. User’s manual for the SF-12v2 Health Survey (3rd ed.). Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated; 2012.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cheak-Zamora NC, Wyrwich KW, McBride TD. Reliability and validity of the SF-12v2 in the medical expenditure panel survey. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehab 2009;18(6):727–735.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, Tusler M. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res 2005;40(6 Pt 1):1918–1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Mahoney ER, Tusler M. Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res 2004;39(4 Pt 1):1005–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. 2004. https://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/survey_comp/survey_results_ques_sections.jsp?Section=AC&Year1=2004&Submit1=Search. Accessed 20 March 2019.
  34. 34.
    Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42(2):377–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol 2004;159(7):702–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rennke S, Nguyen OK, Shoeb MH, Magan Y, Wachter RM, Ranji SR. Hospital-initiated transitional care interventions as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2013;158(5 Pt 2):433–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hansen LO, Young RS, Hinami K, Leung A, Williams MV. Interventions to reduce 30-day rehospitalization: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2011;155(8):520–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • David T. Liss
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ronald T. Ackermann
    • 1
    • 2
  • Andrew Cooper
    • 1
    • 2
  • Emily A. Finch
    • 1
    • 2
  • Courtney Hurt
    • 3
  • Nicola Lancki
    • 2
  • Angela Rogers
    • 2
    • 4
  • Avani Sheth
    • 5
  • Caroline Teter
    • 2
    • 4
  • Christine Schaeffer
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Community Health, Institute for Public Health and MedicineNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoUSA
  3. 3.PCPI FoundationChicagoUSA
  4. 4.Northwestern Medical Group Transitional CareChicagoUSA
  5. 5.Department of Family and Community MedicineCook County Health and Hospitals SystemChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations