Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictors of Primary Care Management of Depression in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Primary care providers (PCPs) vary in skills to effectively treat depression. Key features of evidence-based collaborative care models (CCMs) include the availability of depression care managers (DCMs) and mental health specialists (MHSs) in primary care. Little is known, however, about the relationships between PCP characteristics, CCM features, and PCP depression care.

OBJECTIVE

To assess relationships between various CCM features, PCP characteristics, and PCP depression management.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of a provider survey.

PARTICIPANTS

180 PCPs in eight VA sites nationwide.

MAIN MEASURES

Independent variables included scales measuring comfort and difficulty with depression care; collaboration with a MHS; self-reported depression caseload; availability of a collocated MHS, and co-management with a DCM or MHS. Covariates included provider type and gender. For outcomes, we assessed PCP self-reported performance of key depression management behaviors in primary care in the past 6 months.

KEY RESULTS

Response rate was 52 % overall, with 47 % attending physicians, 34 % residents, and 19 % nurse practitioners and physician assistants. Half (52 %) reported greater than eight veterans with depression in their panels and a MHS collocated in primary care (50 %). Seven of the eight clinics had a DCM. In multivariable analysis, significant predictors for PCP depression management included comfort, difficulty, co-management with MHSs and numbers of veterans with depression in their panels.

CONCLUSIONS

PCPs who felt greater ease and comfort in managing depression, co-managed with MHSs, and reported higher depression caseloads, were more likely to report performing depression management behaviors. Neither a collocated MHS, collaborating with a MHS, nor co-managing with a DCM independently predicted PCP depression management. Because the success of collaborative care for depression depends on the ability and willingness of PCPs to engage in managing depression themselves, along with other providers, more research is necessary to understand how to engage PCPs in depression management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Kessler R, Chiu W, Demler O, Walters E. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of twelve-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):617–627.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Singleton N, Bumpstead R, O’Brien M, Lee A, Meltzer H. Office of National Statistics: Psychiatric Morbidity Among Adults Living in Private Households, 2000. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yano E, Chaney E, Campbell D, et al. Yield of practice-based depression screenings in VA primary care settings. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(3):331–338.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Young AS, Klap R, Sherbourne CD, Wells KB. The quality of care for depressive and anxiety disorders in the United States. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58(1):55–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang P, Lane M, Olfson M, Pincus H, Wells K, Kessler R. Twelve-Month Use of Mental health services in the United States. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:629–640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Katz SJ, Kessler RC, Lin E, Wells KB. Medication management of depression in the United States and Ontario. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(2):77–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin EH, Von Korff M, Katon W, et al. The role of the primary care physician in patients’ adherence to antidepressant therapy. Med Care. 1995;33(1):67–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Henke R, McGuire T, Zaslavsky A, Ford D, Meredity L, Arbelaez J. Clinician- and organization-level factors in the adoption of evidence-based care for depression in primary care. Health Care Manag Rev. 2008;33(4):289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pincus HA, Pechura CM, Elinson L, Pettit AR. Depression in primary care: linking clinical and systems strategies. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2001;23(6):311–318.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Baik SY, Bowers BJ, Oakley LD, Susman JL. The recognition of depression: the primary care clinician’s perspective. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(1):31–37.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fickel J, Parker L, Yano E, Kirchner J. Primary care-mental health collaboration: an example of assessing usual practice and potential barriers. J Interprofessional Care. 2007;21(2):207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Henke RM, Chou AF, Chanin JC, Zides AB, Scholle SH. Physician attitude toward depression care interventions: implications for implementation of quality improvement initiatives. Implement Sci. 2008;3:40.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Anthony JS, Baik SY, Bowers BJ, Tidjani B, Jacobson CJ, Susman J. Conditions that influence a primary care clinician’s decision to refer patients for depression care. Rehabil Nurs. 2010;35(3):113–122.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Benzer JK, Beehler S, Miller C, et al. Grounded theory of barriers and facilitators to mandated implementation of mental health care in the primary care setting. Depress Res Treat. 2012;2012:597157.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thielke S, Vannoy S, Unutzer J. Integrating mental health and primary care. Prim Care Clin Off Pract. 2007;34:571–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Watts B, Shiner B, Pomerantz A, Stender P, Weeks W. Outcomes of a quality improvement project integrating mental health into primary care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16:378–381.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Collins C, Hewson DL, Munger R, Wade T. Evolving Models of Behavioral Health Integration in Primary Care. New York, NY: Milbank Memorial Fund; 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Pomerantz A, Shiner B, Watts B, et al. The white river model of colocated collaborative care. Fam Syst Health. 2010;28(2):114–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Butler M, Kane RL, McAlpine D, et al. Integration of Mental Health/Substance Abuse and Primary Care No. 173. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Katon W, Von Korff M, Lin E, et al. Collaborative management to achieve treatment guidelines: impact on depression in primmary care. JAMA. 1995;273:1026–1031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Unutzer J, Katon W, Callahan C, et al. Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288(22):2836–2845.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wagner E, Austin B, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schafer J, Bonomi A. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff. 2001;20(6):64–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith JL, Williams JW Jr, Owen RR, Rubenstein LV, Chaney E. Developing a national dissemination plan for collaborative care for depression: QUERI Series. Implement Sci. 2008;3:59.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Katon W, Von Korff M, Lin E, et al. Stepped collaborative care for primary care patients with persistent symptoms of depression: a randomized trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(12):1109–1115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gilbody S, Bower P, Fletcher J, Richards D, Sutton AJ. Collaborative care for depression. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:2314–2321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bower P, Gilbody S, Richards D, Fletcher J, Sutton A. Collaborative care for depression in primary care. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;189:484–493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Unutzer J, Katon WJ, Fan MY, et al. Long-term cost effects of collaborative care for late-life depression. Am J Manag Care. 2008;14(2):95–100.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jacob V, Chattopadhyay SK, Sipe TA, Thota AB, Byard GJ, Chapman DP. Economics of collaborative care for management of depressive disorders: a community guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(5):539–549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoon J, Rose DE, Canelo I, et al. Medical home features of VHA primary care clinics and avoidable hospitalizations. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(9):1188–1194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chaney EF, Rubenstein LV, Liu CF, et al. Implementing collaborative care for depression treatment in primary care: a cluster randomized evaluation of a quality improvement practice redesign. Implement Sci. 2011;6:121.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nutting P, Gallagher K, Riley K, et al. Care management for depression in primary care practice: findings from the RESPECT-depression trial. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6:30–37.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nutting PA, Gallagher KM, Riley K, White S, Dietrich AJ, Dickinson WP. Implementing a depression improvement intervention in five health care organizations: experience from the RESPECT-Depression trial. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2007;34(2):127–137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Solberg LI, Fischer LR, Wei F, et al. A CQI intervention to change the care of depression: a controlled study. Eff Clin Pract. 2001;4(6):239–249.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rimer BK, Glanz K. Theory at a Glance: A Guide for Health Promotion Practice (2nd ed). National Cancer Institute. US Dept of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health; 2005.

  36. Depression Guideline Panel. Depression in Primary Care: detection and Diagnosis (Volume 1: Detection and Diagnosis). Rockville, (MD): Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR); 1993.

  37. Depression Guideline Panel. Depression in Primary Care (Volume 2: Treatment of Major Depression). Rockville, (MD): Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR); 1993.

  38. Rubenstein L, Chaney E, Ober S, et al. Using evidence-based quality improvement methods for translating depression collaborative care research into practice. Fam Syst Health. 2010;28:91–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yano E, Fleming B, Canelo, et al. National Survey Results for the Primary Care Director Module of the VHA Clinical Practice Organizational Survey. Sepulveda, CA: VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Collaborative care for depression in the primary care setting: a primer on VA’s Translating Initiatives for Depression into Effective Solutions (TIDES) Project. In: VA Health Services Research and Development Service, Office of Research and Development, Dept of Veterans Affairs, ed. Washington, DC 2008.

  41. Veterans Health Administration. Corporate Data Warehouse.

  42. Area Resource File (ARF). Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Bureau of Health Professions; 2008.

  43. Department of Veterans Affairs. Office of Academic Affiliations. http://www.va.gov/oaa/. Accessed Jan 29, 2014.

  44. Williams JW Jr, Rost K, Dietrich AJ, Ciotti MC, Zyzanski SJ, Cornell J. Primary care physicians’ approach to depressive disorders. Effects of physician specialty and practice structure. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8(1):58–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Meredith LS, Jackson-Triche M, Duan N, Rubenstein LV, Camp P, Wells KB. Quality improvement for depression enhances long-term treatment knowledge for primary care clinicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(12):868–877.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Seelig MD, Yano EM, Asch SM, Lin E, Gelberg L, Rubenstein LV. From marriage of convenience to partnership: what will it take for mental health and primary care providers to collaborate for depression care? Technical Monograph #06HFP0001. VA HSR&D Center of Excellence for the Study of Health Care Provider Behavior; 2006.

  47. Gittell JH, Seidner R, Wimbush J. A relational model of how high-performance work systems work. Organ Sci. 2010;21(2):490–506.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gittell JH, Fairfield KM, Bierbaum B, et al. Impact of relational coordination on quality of care, postoperative pain and functioning, and length of stay: a nine-hospital study of surgical patients. Med Care. 2000;38(8):807–819.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. McDonald K, Sundaram V, Bravata D, et al. Care Coordination. Technical Review 9 (Prepared by the Stanford University-UCSF Evidence-based Practice Center under contract 290020017). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Foy R, Hempel S, Rubenstein L, et al. Meta-analysis: the effect of interactive communication between collaborating primary care physicians and specialists. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(4):247–258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kline R. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Groves R, Fowler F Jr, Couper M, Lepkowski J, Singer E, Tourangeau R. Survey Methodology. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Little RJ, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Gelenberg AJ. A review of the current guidelines for depression treatment. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71(7):e15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gelenberg AJ, Freeman M, Markowitz J, et al. Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Major Depressive Disorder. 3rd ed. American Psychiatric Association; 2010. http://psychiatryonline.org/pdfaccess.ashx?ResourceID=243261&PDFSource=6. Accessed Feb 20, 2014.

  56. Dwight-Johnson M, Sherbourne CD, Liao D, Wells KB. Treatment preferences among depressed primary care patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(8):527–534.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Prins MA, Verhaak PF, Bensing JM, van der Meer K. Health beliefs and perceived need for mental health care of anxiety and depression–the patients’ perspective explored. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008;28(6):1038–1058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Gum AM, Arean PA, Hunkeler E, et al. Depression treatment preferences in older primary care patients. Gerontologist. 2006;46(1):14–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Bower P, Knowles S, Coventry PA, Rowland N. Counselling for mental health and psychosocial problems in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (9):CD001025. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001025.pub3.

  60. Harkness EF, Bower PJ. On-site mental health workers delivering psychological therapy and psychosocial interventions to patients in primary care: effects on the professional practice of primary care providers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (1):CD000532. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000532.pub2.

  61. Nutting PA, Gallagher K, Riley K, et al. Care management for depression in primary care practice: findings from the RESPECT-Depression trial. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(1):30–37.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kellerman SE, Herold J. Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(1):61–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Chaudoir SR, Dugan AG, Barr CH. Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):22.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Rollman BL, Hanusa BH, Gilbert T, Lowe HJ, Kapoor WN, Schulberg HC. The electronic medical record. A randomized trial of its impact on primary care physicians’ initial management of major depression [corrected]. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(2):189–197.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Fihn SD, McDonell MB, Diehr P, et al. Effects of sustained audit/feedback on self-reported health status of primary care patients. Am J Med. 2004;116(4):241–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Simon GE, VonKorff M, Rutter C, Wagner E. Randomised trial of monitoring, feedback, and management of care by telephone to improve treatment of depression in primary care. BMJ. 2000;320(7234):550–554.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Callahan CM, Hendrie HC, Dittus RS, Brater DC, Hui SL, Tierney WM. Improving treatment of late life depression in primary care: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42(8):839–846.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Contributors include Michelle Seelig, MD, MSHS, Jeff Spina, MD in survey development, and Martin Lee, PhD, and Michael Mitchell, PhD, for statistical consultation. We would like to thank Jack Needleman, PhD, for reviewing earlier drafts of this manuscript.

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs, or the US government, or other affiliated institutions.

Funders

The ReTIDES project “Expanding and Testing VA Collaborative Care Models for Depression” was supported by VA HSR&D (Project #MNT 03-215, PIs Lisa Rubenstein, MD MSHS, and Edmund Chaney, PhD) and VA Mental Health Quality Enhancement Research Initiative. Funding support for preparation of this paper was provided by VA Office of Academic Affiliations, through the Health Services Research Fellowship Training Program (TMP 65-020). Dr. Yano’s time was funded by the VA HSR&D Service through a Senior Research Career Scientist Award (Project # RCS 05-195).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evelyn T. Chang MD, MSHS.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Appendix Table 1

(PDF 30 kb)

Appendix Table 2

(PDF 21 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, E.T., Magnabosco, J.L., Chaney, E. et al. Predictors of Primary Care Management of Depression in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. J GEN INTERN MED 29, 1017–1025 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-2807-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-2807-z

KEY WORDS

Navigation