Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Can Adequate Lymphadenectomy be Obtained by Laparoscopic Resection in Rectal Cancer? Results of a Case–Control Study in 200 Patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study is to compare pathological findings in rectal cancer specimens obtained by laparoscopy or laparotomy.

Materials and Methods

Bowel length, distal and circumferential margins, and number of total and positive nodes harvested were prospectively recorded in specimens obtained from 100 consecutive patients who had a laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for cancer. These data were compared with those extracted from a well-matched group of 100 patients who had an open procedure.

Results

The mean length of the specimens was 31.04 cm in the case group and 29.45 cm in the control group (not significant (NS)). All distal margins in both groups were negative. The circumferential margin was positive in four cases in the case group and nine cases in the control group (NS). The mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 13.76 nodes/patient in the case group and 12.74 nodes/patient in the control group (NS). The mean number of involved lymph nodes was 1.18 node/case in the case group and 1.96 node/case in group 2 (NS).

Conclusion

There is no difference between laparoscopic or open approaches concerning specimen's length, distal margin, circumferential margin, and total and positive lymph nodes. Laparoscopic rectal resection is not only technically feasible but it seems also oncologically safe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morino M, Parini U, Giraudo G, Salval M, Brachet, Contul R, Garrone C. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. A consecutive series of 100 patients. Ann Surg 2003;237:335-342.

  2. Agha A, Fürst A, Hierl J, Iesalnieks I, Glockzin G, Anthuber M, Jauch KW, Schlitt HJ. Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: oncological results and clinical outcome of 225 patients. Surg Endosc 2008;22:2229–2237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365:1718–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, van der Worp E, Kapiteijn E, Quirke P, van Krieken JH. Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1729–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kahn HA, Sempos CT. Statistical methods in epidemiology, 1st ed. Oxford University Press, New-York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, Couture J, Fleshman J, Guillem J, Miedema B, Ota D, Sargent D. Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:583–596.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hernanz F, Revuelta S, Redondo C, Madrazo C, Castillo J, Gomez-Fleitas M. Colorectal carcinoma: quality of the assessment of lymph node metastases. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:373–377.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldstein NS, Sanford W, Coffey M, Layfield LJ. Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed from adenocarcinoma. Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;106:209–216.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pocard M, Panis Y, Malassagne B, Nemeth J, Hautefeuille P, Valleur P. Assessing the effectiveness of mesorectal excision in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:839–845.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wong JH, Severino R, Honnebier MB, Tom P, Namiki TS. Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:2896–2900.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tepper JE, O'Connell MJ, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Compton C, Benson AB, Cummings B, Gunderson L, MacDonald JS, Mayer RJ. Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:157–163.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Prandi M, Lionetto R, Bini A, Francioni G. Prognostic evaluation of stage B colon cancer patients is improved by an adequate lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg 2002;235:458–463.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson PM, Malatjalian D, Porter GA. Adequacy of nodal harvest in colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort study. J Gastrointest Surg 2002;6:883–890.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Canessa CE, Badia F, Fierro S, Fiol V, Hayek G. Anatomic study of the lymph nodes of the mesorectum. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:1333–1336.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Seki Y, Ohue M, Sekimoto M, Takiguchi S, Takemasa I, Ikeda M, Yamamoto H, Monden M. Evaluation of the technical difficulty performing laparoscopic resection of a rectosigmoid carcinoma: visceral fat reflects technical difficulty more accurately than body mass index. Surg Endosc 2007;21:929–934.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cawthorn SJ, Gibbs NM, Marks CG. Clearance technique for the detection of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 1986;73:58–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Görög D, Nagy P, Péter A, Perner F. Influence of obesity on lymph node recovery from rectal resection specimens. Pathology Oncology Research 2003;9:180–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tekkis PP, Smith JJ, Heriot AG, Darzi AW, Thompson MR, Stamatakis JD. A national study on lymph node retrieval in resectional surgery for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:1673–1683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJH, van der Worp E, Kapiteijn E, Quirke P, van Krieken JH. Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1729–1734.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wichmann M, Muller C, Meyer G, Strauss T, Hornung H, Lau-Werner U, Angele MK, Schildberg FW. Effect of preoperative radiochemotherapy on lymph node retrieval after resection of rectal cancer. Arch Surg 2002;137:206–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rinkus K, Russell G, Levine E. Prognostic significance of nodal disease following preoperative radiation for rectal adenocarcinoma. Am Surg 2002;68:482–487.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Leibold T, Shia J, Ruo L, Minsky BD, Akhurst T, Gollub MJ, Ginsberg MS, Larson S, Riedel E, Wong WD, Guillem JG. Prognostic implications of the distribution of lymph node metastases in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:2106–2111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rullier A, Laurent C, Capdepont M, Vendrely V, Belleannée G, Bioulac-Sage P, Rullier E. Lymph nodes after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma: number, status, and impact on survival. Am J Surg Pathol 2008;32:45–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Medich D, McGinty J, Parda D, Karlovits S, Davis C, Caushaj P, Lembersky B. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery for locally advanced distal rectal adenocarcinoma: pathologic findings and clinical implications. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:1123–1128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hughes R, Glynne-Jones R, Grainger J, Richman P, Makris A, Harrison M, Ashford R, Harrison RA, Livingston JI, McDonald PJ, Meyrick Thomas J, Mitchell IC, Northover JMA, Phillips R, Wallace M, Windsor A, Novell JR. Can pathological complete response in the primary tumour following pre-operative pelvic chemoradiotherapy for T3-T4 rectal cancer predict for sterilisation of pelvic lymph nodes, a low risk of local recurrence and the appropriateness of local excision? Int J Colorectal Dis 2006;21:11–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery. The clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 1982;69:613–616.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, William NS. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumor spread and surgical excision. Lancet 1986;2:996–999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Slanetz CA, Grimson R. Effect of high and intermediate ligation on survival and recurrence rates following curative resection of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:1205–1219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hida JI, Yasutomi M, Tokoro T, Kubo R. Examination of nodal metastases by a clearing method supports pelvic plexus preservation in rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:510–514.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sprenger T, Rothe H, Homayounfar K, Beissbarth T, Ghadimi BM, Becker H, Liersch T. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy does not necessarily reduce lymph node retrieval in rectal cancer specimens – results from a prospective evaluation with extensive pathological work-up. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14:96–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schofield JB, Mounter NA, Mallett R, Haboubi NY. The importance of accurate pathological assessment of lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer. Colorectal Disease 2006;8:460–470.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital, BP 217, 38043, Grenoble cedex, France

    Samer Sara, Gilles Poncet, David Voirin, Daniel Anglade & Jean-Luc Faucheron

  2. Department of Pathology, University Hospital, BP 217, 38043, Grenoble cedex, France

    Marie-Hélène Laverriere

  3. Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Michallon Hospital, B.P. 217, 38043, Grenoble cedex, France

    Jean-Luc Faucheron

Authors
  1. Samer Sara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gilles Poncet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Voirin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marie-Hélène Laverriere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Daniel Anglade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jean-Luc Faucheron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Luc Faucheron.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sara, S., Poncet, G., Voirin, D. et al. Can Adequate Lymphadenectomy be Obtained by Laparoscopic Resection in Rectal Cancer? Results of a Case–Control Study in 200 Patients. J Gastrointest Surg 14, 1244–1247 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1228-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1228-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation