Skip to main content
Log in

Anatomic study of the lymph nodes of the mesorectum

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Lymph node involvement is the most important prognostic factor when staging patients with colorectal cancer. The probability of detecting metastasis grows with the number of nodes examined. However, the number of nodes found in surgical specimens varies substantially. We have therefore determined the number and distribution of lymph nodes in the mesorectum by cadaveric dissection. METHODS: Twenty formalin-fixed cadaveric pelvises were dissected (13 males). The search for lymph nodes was performed in a systematic way, from the division of the superior rectal artery following the smallest visible branches to the level of the anorectal ring. RESULTS: A total of 168 lymph nodes were found in 20 mesorectal blocks, with a mean (standard deviation) number per specimen of 8.4 (4.45). Lymph node size ranged from 2 to 10 mm. Distribution of lymph nodes in mesorectum was as follows: 120 nodes (71.4 percent) were found around the branches of the superior rectal artery proximal to the peritoneal reflection, and 48 nodes (28.6 percent) were found distal to the peritoneal reflection. Fourteen specimens (70 percent) had lymph nodes at the division of the superior rectal artery. CONCLUSIONS: The mean number of lymph nodes found in the mesorectum distal to the superior rectal artery division was 8.4. Most of these lymph nodes were proximal to the peritoneal reflection. The range found in the number of lymph nodes per case should be considered for use in the formulation of guidelines in anatomicopathologic studies of surgical specimens obtained after mesorectal excision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1993;341:457–60.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Enker WE, Thaler HT, Cranor ML, Polyak T. Total mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg 1995;181:335–46.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heald RJ. Total mesorectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer: a Scandinavian consensus. Br J Surg 1995;82:1297–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hill GL, Rafique M. Extrafascial excision of the rectum for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85:809–12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carlsen E, Schlichting E, Guldvog I, Johonson E, Heald RJ. Effect of the introduction of total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85:526–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Soreide O, Norstein J, eds. Rectal cancer surgery. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldstein NS, Sanford W, Coffey M, Layfield L. Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma: trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;106:209–16.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Andreola S, Leo E, Belli F,et al. Manual dissection of adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum specimens for detection of lymph node metastases smaller than 5 mm. Cancer 1996;77:607–12.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Scott KW, Grace RH. Detection of lymph nodes metastases in colorectal carcinoma before and after fat clearance. Br J Surg 1989;76:1165–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hyder JW, Talbott TM, Maycroft TC. A critical review of chemical lymph-node clearance and staging of colon and rectal cancer at Ferguson hospital, 1977 to 1982. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:923–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cawthorn SJ, Parums DV, Gibbs NM,et al. Extent of mesorectal spread and involvement of lateral resection margin as prognostic factors after surgery for rectal cancer. Lancet 1990;335:1055–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Herrera L, Villarreal JR. Incidence of metastases from rectal adenocarcinoma in small lymph nodes detected by a clearing technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:783–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hida J, Mori N, Kubo R,et al. Metastases from carcinoma of the colon and rectum detected in small lymph nodes by the clearing method. J Am Coll Surg 1994;178:223–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hida J, Masayuky Y, Muruyama T,et al. Lymph nodes metastases detected in the mesorectum distal to carcinoma of the rectum by the clearing method: justification of the total mesorectal excision. J Am Coll Surg 1997;184:584–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Enker WE, Philipsen SJ, Heilweil ML,et al. En block pelvic lymphadenectomy and sphincter preservation in the surgical management of rectal cancer. Ann Surg 1986;203:426–33.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sheffield JP, Talbot IC. ACP broadsheet 132: gross examination of the large intestine, September 1992. J Clin Pathol 1992;45:751–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ratto C, Sofo L, Ippoliti M,et al. Accurate lymph-node detection in colorectal specimens resected for cancer is of prognostic significance. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:143–58.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rouvière H. Anatomie des lymphatiques de l'homme. Paris: Masson et Cie, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wheeler JM, Warren BF, Jones AC, Mortensen NJ. Preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: implications for surgeons, pathologists and radiologists. Br J Surg 1999;86:1108–20.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Heald RJ, Moran BJ. Embryology and anatomy of the rectum. Semin Surg Oncol 1998;15:66–71.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hida J, Yasutomi M, Tokoro T, Kubo R. Examination of nodal metastases by a clearing method supports pelvic plexus preservation in rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:510–4.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jass JR, Miller K, Northover JM. Fat clearance method versus manual dissection of lymph nodes in specimens of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 1986;1:155–6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gilchrist R, David V. Lymphatic spread of carcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg 1938;108:621–38.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Grinnell RS. The lymphatic and venous spread of carcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg 1942;116:200–16.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sauer Y, Bacon HE. A new approach for excision of carcinoma of the lower portion of the rectum and anal canal. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1952;95:229–42.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hernanz F, Revuelta S, Redondo C, Madrazo C, Castillo J, Gomez-Fleitas M. Colorectal adenocarcinoma: quality of the assessment of lymph node metastases. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:373–7.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Maurel J, Launoy G, Grosclaude P,et al. Lymph node harvest reporting in patients with carcinoma of the large bowel: a French population-based study. Cancer 1998;82:1482–6.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma. 1st English ed. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  29. American Joint Committee on Cancer. Manual for staging of cancer. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1992:75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hermanek P, Sobin LH (International Union Against Cancer [UICC]), eds. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 4th ed (2nd revision). Berlin: Springer, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hermanek P. What can the pathologist tell the surgeon about rectal cancer resection? In: Scholefield JH. Challenges in colorectal cancer. London: Blackwell Science Ltd, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Poster presentation at the XVI Congreso Latinoamericano de Coloproctología, Santiago, Chile, October 28 to 30, 1999.

About this article

Cite this article

Canessa, C.E., Badía, F., Fierro, S. et al. Anatomic study of the lymph nodes of the mesorectum. Dis Colon Rectum 44, 1333–1336 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234794

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234794

Key words

Navigation