Skip to main content
Log in

Early Relaparoscopy for Management of Suspected Postoperative Complications

  • original article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

Diagnosis of complications after laparoscopic surgery is difficult and sometimes late.

Methods

We compared the outcome of patients who had early (<48 h) relaparoscopy for suspected postoperative complication to those where relaparoscopy was delayed (>48 h).

Results

During the study period, 7726 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery on our service. Of these, 57 (0.7%) patients had relaparoscopy for suspected complication. The primary operations were elective in 48 patients and emergent in nine. Thirty-seven patients had early, 20 had delayed, secondary operations. The most common indication in the early group was excessive pain (46%) followed by peritoneal signs in 35%. In the delayed group, the most common indication was signs of systemic inflammatory response syndrome in 30% and peritoneal signs in 25%. Relaparoscopy was negative in 16 (28%) patients with no difference between groups. The identified complication was treated laparoscopically in 37(65%) patients, and the rest were converted. The patients in the delayed group had a significantly longer hospital stay (p < 0.003) and had a higher rate of complications (p < 0.05). They also had a higher mortality rate (10% vs. 2.7%), but the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

A policy of early relaparoscopy in patients with suspected complications enables timely management of identified complications with expedient resolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schrenk P, Woisetschlager R, Rieger R, Wayand W. Mechanism, management, and prevention of laparoscopic bowel injuries. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;43:572–574.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schafer M, Lauper M, Krahenbuhl L. Trocar and Veress needle injuries during laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 2001;15:275–280.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vilos GA. Laparoscopic bowel injuries: forty litigated gynaecological cases in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2002;24:224–230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee CM, Stewart L, Way LW. Postcholecystectomy abdominal bile collections. Arch Surg 2000;135:538–542. discussion 42–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferriman A. Laparoscopic surgery: two thirds of injuries initially missed. Bmj 2000;321:784.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shamiyeh A, Wayand W. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2004;389:164–171.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Papasavas PK, Caushaj PF, McCormick JT, Quinlin RF, Hayetian FD, Maurer J et al. Laparoscopic management of complications following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc 2003;17:610–614.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Perrone JM, Soper NJ, Eagon JC, Klingensmith ME, Aft RL, Frisella MM et al. Perioperative outcomes and complications of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surgery 2005;138:708–715. discussion 15–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dexter SP, Miller GV, Davides D, Martin IG, Sue Ling HM, Sagar PM et al. Relaparoscopy for the detection and treatment of complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2000;179:316–319.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dixon M, Carrillo EH. Iliac vascular injuries during elective laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 1999;13:1230–1233.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mayol J, Garcia-Aguilar J, Ortiz-Oshiro E, De-Diego Carmona JA, Fernandez-Represa JA. Risks of the minimal access approach for laparoscopic surgery: multivariate analysis of morbidity related to umbilical trocar insertion. World J Surg 1997;21:529–533.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. van der Voort M, Heijnsdijk EA, Gouma DJ. Bowel injury as a complication of laparoscopy. Br J Surg 2004;91:1253–1258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hackert T, Kienle P, Weitz J, Werner J, Szabo G, Hagl S et al. Accuracy of diagnostic laparoscopy for early diagnosis of abdominal complications after cardiac surgery. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1671–1674.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wills VL, Jorgensen JO, Hunt DR. Role of relaparoscopy in the management of minor bile leakage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2000;87:176–180.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosin D, Zmora O, Khaikin M, Bar Zakai B, Ayalon A, Shabtai M. Laparoscopic management of surgical complications after a recent laparotomy. Surg Endosc 2004;18:994–996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris Kirshtein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirshtein, B., Roy-Shapira, A., Domchik, S. et al. Early Relaparoscopy for Management of Suspected Postoperative Complications. J Gastrointest Surg 12, 1257–1262 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0515-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0515-x

Keywords

Navigation