Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Value of ultrasonographic evaluation for soft-tissue lesions: focus on incidentally detected lesions on CT/MRI

  • Review
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soft-tissue lesions of the musculoskeletal system are commonly encountered in clinical practice and often manifest as palpable lesions. Moreover, the increasing use of cross-sectional imaging such as CT or MRI has resulted in the incidental detection of many soft-tissue lesions. Ultrasonography remains the primary imaging investigation for soft-tissue lesions. It has been shown to be helpful in depicting processes involving the soft-tissue lesions on cross-sectional imaging. This article describes the ultrasonographic findings of the most frequently incidentally detected benign and malignant soft-tissue lesions on cross-sectional imaging and suggests the characteristics of such diseases, focusing on the ultrasonographic features that allow accurate diagnosis. Familiarity with the clinical setting and the appearance of soft-tissue lesions on both ultrasonography and cross-sectional imaging can lead to accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of the condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carra BJ, Bui-Mansfield LT, O’Brien SD, Chen DC. Sonography of musculoskeletal soft-tissue masses: techniques, pearls, and pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(6):1281–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DiDomenico P, Middleton W. Sonographic evaluation of palpable superficial masses. Radiol Clin North Am. 2014;52(6):1295–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pierucci A, Teixeira P, Zimmermann V, et al. Tumours and pseudotumours of the soft tissue in adults: perspectives and current role of sonography. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013;94(3):238–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Widmann G, Riedl A, Schoepf D, Glodny B, Peer S, Gruber H. State-of-the-art HR-US imaging findings of the most frequent musculoskeletal soft-tissue tumors. Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38(7):637–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hwang S, Adler RS. Sonographic evaluation of the musculoskeletal soft tissue masses. Ultrasound Q. 2005;21(4):259–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD. Radiologic evaluation of soft-tissue masses: a current perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175(3):575–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van Rijswijk CS, Geirnaerdt MJ, Hogendoorn PC, et al. Soft-tissue tumors: value of static and dynamic gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging in prediction of malignancy. Radiology. 2004;233(2):493–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin J, Jacobson JA, Fessell DP, Weadock WJ, Hayes CW. An illustrated tutorial of musculoskeletal sonography: part 4, musculoskeletal masses, sonographically guided interventions, and miscellaneous topics. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175(6):1711–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee MH, Kim NR, Ryu JA. Cyst-like solid tumors of the musculoskeletal system: an analysis of ultrasound findings. Skeletal Radiol. 2010;39(10):981–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Machado P, Segal S, Lyshchik A, Forsberg F. A novel microvascular flow technique: initial results in thyroids. Ultrasound Q. 2016;32(1):67–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee DH, Lee JY, Han JK. Superb microvascular imaging technology for ultrasound examinations: initial experiences for hepatic tumors. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(11):2090–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhan J, Diao XH, Jin JM, Chen L, Chen Y. Superb microvascular imaging—a new vascular detecting ultrasonographic technique for avascular breast masses: a preliminary study. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(5):915–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koyama N, Hata J, Sato T, Tomiyama Y, Hino K. Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with superb microvascular imaging in hepatitis C virus-associated chronic liver diseases. Hepatol Res. 2017;47(6):593–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Piscaglia F, Bolondi L, Italian Society for Ultrasound in M, Biology Study Group on Ultrasound Contrast A. The safety of Sonovue in abdominal applications: retrospective analysis of 23188 investigations. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006;32(9):1369–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nolsoe CP, Lorentzen T. International guidelines for contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: ultrasound imaging in the new millennium. Ultrasonography. 2016;35(2):89–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim SJ, Park HJ, Lee SY. Usefulness of strain elastography of the musculoskeletal system. Ultrasonography. 2016;35(2):104–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Drakonaki EE, Allen GM, Wilson DJ. Ultrasound elastography for musculoskeletal applications. Br J Radiol. 1019;2012(85):1435–45.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chung HW, Cho KH. Ultrasonography of soft tissue “oops lesions”. Ultrasonography. 2015;34(3):217–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Loizides A, Peer S, Plaikner M, Djurdjevic T, Gruber H. Perfusion pattern of musculoskeletal masses using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a helpful tool for characterisation? Eur Radiol. 2012;22(8):1803–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Inampudi P, Jacobson JA, Fessell DP, et al. Soft-tissue lipomas: accuracy of sonography in diagnosis with pathologic correlation. Radiology. 2004;233(3):763–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wagner JM, Lee KS, Rosas H, Kliewer MA. Accuracy of sonographic diagnosis of superficial masses. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32(8):1443–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Murphey MD, Carroll JF, Flemming DJ, Pope TL, Gannon FH, Kransdorf MJ. From the archives of the AFIP: benign musculoskeletal lipomatous lesions. Radiographics. 2004;24(5):1433–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lalitha P, Reddy M, Reddy KJ. Musculoskeletal applications of elastography: a pictorial essay of our initial experience. Korean J Radiol. 2011;12(3):365–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee JC, Thomas JM, Phillips S, Fisher C, Moskovic E. Aggressive fibromatosis: MRI features with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(1):247–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vandevenne JE, De Schepper AM, De Beuckeleer L, et al. New concepts in understanding evolution of desmoid tumors: MR imaging of 30 lesions. Eur Radiol. 1997;7(7):1013–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Teo HE, Peh WC, Shek TW. Case 84: desmoid tumor of the abdominal wall. Radiology. 2005;236(1):81–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nozaki T, Matsusako M, Mimura H, et al. Imaging of vascular tumors with an emphasis on ISSVA classification. Jpn J Radiol. 2013;31(12):775–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Olsen KI, Stacy GS, Montag A. Soft-tissue cavernous hemangioma. Radiographics. 2004;24(3):849–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Blacksin MF, Ha DH, Hameed M, Aisner S. Superficial soft-tissue masses of the extremities. Radiographics. 2006;26(5):1289–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kollipara R, Odhav A, Rentas KE, Rivard DC, Lowe LH, Dinneen L. Vascular anomalies in pediatric patients: updated classification, imaging, and therapy. Radiol Clin North Am. 2013;51(4):659–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim HY, Kang CH, Kim JH, Lee SH, Park SY, Cho SW. Intramuscular and subcutaneous sparganosis: sonographic findings. J Clin Ultrasound. 2008;36(9):570–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cho JH, Lee KB, Yong TS, et al. Subcutaneous and musculoskeletal sparganosis: imaging characteristics and pathologic correlation. Skeletal Radiol. 2000;29(7):402–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang CC, Ko SF, Huang HY, et al. Epidermal cysts in the superficial soft tissue: sonographic features with an emphasis on the pseudotestis pattern. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(1):11–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee HS, Joo KB, Song HT, et al. Relationship between sonographic and pathologic findings in epidermal inclusion cysts. J Clin Ultrasound. 2001;29(7):374–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Park HJ, Lee SY, Lee SM, Kim WT, Lee S, Ahn KS. Strain elastography features of epidermoid tumours in superficial soft tissue: differences from other benign soft-tissue tumours and malignant tumours. Br J Radiol. 1050;2015(88):20140797.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Loyer EM, DuBrow RA, David CL, Coan JD, Eftekhari F. Imaging of superficial soft-tissue infections: sonographic findings in cases of cellulitis and abscess. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166(1):149–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chung WJ, Chung HW, Shin MJ, et al. MRI to differentiate benign from malignant soft-tissue tumours of the extremities: a simplified systematic imaging approach using depth, size and heterogeneity of signal intensity. Br J Radiol. 1018;2012(85):e831–6.

    Google Scholar 

  38. De Schepper AM, Ramon FA, Degryse HR. Statistical analysis of MRI parameters predicting malignancy in 141 soft tissue masses. Rofo. 1992;156(6):587–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Galant J, Marti-Bonmati L, Soler R, et al. Grading of subcutaneous soft tissue tumors by means of their relationship with the superficial fascia on MR imaging. Skeletal Radiol. 1998;27(12):657–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bodner G, Schocke MF, Rachbauer F, et al. Differentiation of malignant and benign musculoskeletal tumors: combined color and power Doppler US and spectral wave analysis. Radiology. 2002;223(2):410–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Murphey MD. World Health Organization classification of bone and soft tissue tumors: modifications and implications for radiologists. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2007;11(3):201–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Son E, Park J, Jeon H, Cho S. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) in axilla. Yonsei Med J. 2004;45(4):736–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Beaman FD, Kransdorf MJ, Andrews TR, Murphey MD, Arcara LK, Keeling JH. Superficial soft-tissue masses: analysis, diagnosis, and differential considerations. Radiographics. 2007;27(2):509–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pretorius ES, Fishman EK. Helical CT of skeletal muscle metastases from primary carcinomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174(2):401–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rubens DJ, Fultz PJ, Gottlieb RH, Rubin SJ. Effective ultrasonographically guided intervention for diagnosis of musculoskeletal lesions. J Ultrasound Med. 1997;16(12):831–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung Bin Park.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, S.B., Kang, B.S. Value of ultrasonographic evaluation for soft-tissue lesions: focus on incidentally detected lesions on CT/MRI. Jpn J Radiol 35, 485–494 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-017-0657-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-017-0657-4

Keywords

Navigation