Abstract
Purpose
Due to increasing numbers of patients with dementia, more physicians who do not specialize in brain nuclear medicine are being asked to interpret SPECT images of cerebral blood flow. We conducted a multicenter study to determine whether a computer-assisted diagnostic system Z-score summation analysis method (ZSAM) using three-dimensional stereotactic surface projections (3D-SSP) can differentiate Alzheimer’s disease (AD)/dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and non-AD/DLB in institutions using various types of gamma cameras.
Method
We determined the normal thresholds of Z-sum (summed Z-score) within a template region of interest for each single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) device and then compared them with the Z-sums of patients and calculated the accuracy of the differential diagnosis by ZSAM. We compared the diagnostic accuracy between ZSAM and visual assessment.
Patients
We enrolled 202 patients with AD (mean age, 76.8 years), 40 with DLB (mean age 76.3 years) and 36 with non-AD/DLB (progressive supranuclear palsy, n = 10; frontotemporal dementia, n = 20; slowly progressive aphasia, n = 2 and one each with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, corticobasal degeneration, multiple system atrophy and Parkinson’s disease) who underwent N-isopropyl-p-[123I] iodoamphetamine cerebral blood flow SPECT imaging at each participating institution.
Results
The ZSAM sensitivity to differentiate between AD/DLB and non-AD/DLB in all patients, as well as those with mini-mental state examination scores of ≥24 and 20–23 points were 88.0, 78.0 and 88.4 %, respectively, with specificity of 50.0, 44.4 and 60.0 %, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy rates were 83.1, 72.9 and 84.2 %, respectively. The areas under receiver operating characteristics curves for visual inspection by four expert raters were 0.74–0.84, 0.66–0.85 and 0.81–0.93, respectively, in the same patient groups. The diagnostic accuracy rates were 70.9–89.2 %, 50.9–84.8 % and 76.2–93.1 %, respectively.
Conclusion
The diagnostic accuracy of ZSAM to differentiate AD/DLB from other types of dementia or degenerative diseases regardless of severity was equal to that of visual assessment by expert raters even across several institutions. These findings suggested that ZSAM could serve as a supplementary tool to help expert evaluators who differentially diagnose dementia from SPECT images by visual assessment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Reiman EM, Jagust WJ. Brain imaging in the study of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage. 2012;61:505–16.
Herholz K. Perfusion SPECT and FDG-PET. Int Psychogeriatr. 2011;23(Suppl 2):S25–31.
Ishii K, Kanda T, Uemura T, Miyamoto N, Yoshikawa T, Shimada K, et al. Computer-assisted diagnostic system for neurodegenerative dementia using brain SPECT and 3D-SSP. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:831–40.
Minoshima S, Frey KA, Koeppe RA, Foster NL, Kuhl DE. A diagnostic approach in Alzheimer’s disease using three-dimensional stereotactic surface projections of fluorine-18-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1238–48.
McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan E. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology. 1984;34:939–44.
McKeith IG, Dickson DW, Lowe J, Emre M, O’Brien JT, Feldman H, et al. Consortium on DLB. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: third report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology. 2005;65:1863–72.
Onishi H, Matsutomo N, Kai Y, Kangai Y, Amijima H, Yamaguchi T. Evaluation of a novel normal database with matched SPECT systems and optimal pre-filter parameters for 3D-SSP. Ann Nucl Med. 2012;26:16–25.
Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, Passant U, Stuss D, Black S. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 1998;51(1):546–54.
Litvan I, Agid Y, Calne D, Campbell G, Dubois B, Duvoisin RC, et al. Clinical research criteria for the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele–Richardson–Olszewski syndrome): report of the NINDSSPSP international workshop. Neurology. 1996;47:1–9.
Ishikawa M, Hashimoto M, Kuwana N, Mori E, Miyake H, Wachi A, et al. Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2008;48(Suppl):S1–23.
Lang AE, Riley DE, Bergeron C. Cortical-basal ganglionic degeneration. In: Calne DB, editor. Neurodegenerative disease. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1994. p. 877–94.
Gilman S, Wenning GK, Low PA, Brooks DJ, Mathias CJ, Trojanowski JQ, et al. Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. Neurology. 2008;71:670–6.
Calne DB, Snow BJ, Lee C. Criteria for diagnosing Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol. 1992;32 (Suppl):S125–7.
Ishii K, Yamaji S, Kitagaki H, Imamura T, Hirono N, Mori E. Regional cerebral blood flow difference between dementia with Lewy bodies and AD. Neurology. 1999;53:413–6.
Minoshima S, Giordani B, Berent S, Frey KA, Foster NL, Kuhl DE. Metabolic reduction in the posterior cingulate cortex in very early Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol. 1997;42:85–94.
Sakamoto S, Ishii K, Sasaki M, Hosaka K, Mori T, Matsui M, et al. Differences in cerebral metabolic impairment between early and late onset types of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Sci. 2002;200:27–32.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Mr. Kiyotaka Watanabe and Mr. Shuya Miki (Nihon Medi-Physics, Tokyo, Japan) for providing and improving the iNEUROSTAT++ program, which uses the 3D-SSP program and was dedicated to this Z-score summation analysis method.
Conflict of interest
Kazunari Ishii received lecture fees from Nihon Medi-Physics. Kengo Ito, Atsushi Nakanishi, Shin Kitamura, and Akira Terashima declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Ishii, K., Ito, K., Nakanishi, A. et al. Computer-assisted system for diagnosing degenerative dementia using cerebral blood flow SPECT and 3D-SSP: a multicenter study. Jpn J Radiol 32, 383–390 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-014-0329-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-014-0329-6