Skip to main content
Log in

Shear wave velocity (Vs) and SPT resistance (N) correlation for the Isfahan Metro, Iran

  • Research Article - Applied Geophysics
  • Published:
Acta Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some soil characteristics, such as the shear wave velocity, the shear modulus, the Poisson ratio, and the porosity, affect how clay soils behave. The soil design parameters under loading, such as soil liquefaction induced by dynamic earthquake loading, employ the shear wave velocity and shear module with modest stress. In order to understand the pore saturation, the Poisson ratio and seismic velocity ratio are also utilized. Additionally, one of the most crucial physical characteristics for assessing permeability at the base of any engineering structure, resolving consolidation issues that may arise at the foundation of an engineering structure, and influencing the deformation behavior of soils is soil porosity. Predicting the porosity of clay soils is a crucial first step in tackling engineering and environmental issues that may arise in the soil after an earthquake or not. With the use of dynamic soil metrics such as seismic velocities, shear modules, bulk modules, seismic velocity ratios, and Poisson ratios, the current work aims to estimate soil porosity. Seismic refraction was used by various studies in the past to conduct in-situ geophysical research. The lithological characteristics of the soil (such as the grain size, shape, type, compaction, consolidation, and cementation of the grains) and the physical characteristics of the soil (such as porosity, permeability, density, anisotropy, saturation level, liquid–solid transition, pressure, and temperature), as well as the elasticity characteristics of the soil (such as shear modulus (G), bulk modulus (K), Young modulus (E), Poisson ratio (μ) and Lamé constants (\(\lambda\))) all have an impact on seismic waves passing through a medium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akbarimehr D, Fakharian K (2021) Dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio of clay mixed with waste rubber using cyclic triaxial apparatus. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 140:106435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alhuay-León CG, Trejo-Noreña PC (2021) The empirical correlation between shear wave velocity (Vs) and penetration resistance for the eolian sand deposits in the city of Olmos-Peru. Dyna 88(217):247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansari A, Zahoor F, Rao KS, Jain AK (2022) Seismic hazard assessment studies based on deterministic and probabilistic approaches for the Jammu region. NW Himalayas Arab J of Geosci 15(11):1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athanasopoulos GA (1995) Empirical correlations Vso-NSPT for soils of Greece: a comparative study of reliability. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Computation Mechanics Publications. Southampton, Boston, pp 19–25.

  • Ayele A, Woldearegay K, Meten M (2023) Seismic hazard evaluation using site response analysis and amplitude parameters at Hawassa town, Main Ethiopian Rift. Arab J Geosci 16(3):212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bashir K, Debnath R, Saha R (2022) Estimation of local site effects and seismic vulnerability using geotechnical dataset at flyover site Agartala India. Acta Geophys 70(3):1003–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatrayi H, Hajizadeh F, Taghavi B (2021) Identification of subsurface structures and dynamic modulus determination based on downhole seismic surveys (case study). Geotech Geol Eng 39:5279–5289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forte G, Chioccarelli E, De Falco M, Cito P, Santo A, Iervolino I (2019) Seismic soil classification of Italy based on surface geology and shear-wave velocity measurements. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 122:79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasancebi N, Ulusay R (2007) Empirical correlations between shear wave velocity (Vs) and penetration resistance for ground shaking assessments. Bull Eng Geol Env 66:203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter JA, Benjumea B, Harris JB, Miller RD, Pullan SE, Burns RA, Good RL (2002) Surface and downhole shear wave seismic methods for thick soil site investigations. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(9–12):931–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussien MN, Karray M (2015) Shear wave velocity (Vs) as a geotechnical parameter: an overview. Can Geotech J 53(2):252–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huynh QT, Lai VQ, Boonyatee T, Keawsawasvong S (2022) Verification of soil parameters of hardening soil model with small-strain stiffness for deep excavations in medium dense sand in Ho Chi Minh City. Vietnam Innov Infrastruct Solut 7(1):15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai T, Tonoughi K (2021) Correlation of N value with S-wave velocity and shear modulus. Penetration Testing. Routledge, London, pp 67–72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • IS: 2720-Part 4. (1985). Methods of test for soils: grain size analysis.

  • Jallow A, Ou CY, Lim A (2019) Three-dimensional numerical study of long-term settlement induced in shield tunneling. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 88:221–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Satyannarayana R, Rajesh BG (2022) Correlation between SPT-N and shear wave velocity (VS) and seismic site classification for Amaravati city India. J Appl Geophys 205:104757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kushwaha SS, Kishan D, Dindorkar N (2018) Stabilization of expansive soil using eko soil enzyme for highway embankment. Mater Today: Proc 5(9):19667–19679

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lancelle, C. E., Baldwin, J. A., Lord, N., Fratta, D., Chalari, A., & Wang, H. F. (2021). Using distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) for multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW). Distributed Acoustic Sensing in Geophysics: Methods and Applications, pp 213–228.

  • Maheshwari BK, Mahajan AK, Sharma ML, Paul DK, Kaynia AM, Lindholm C (2013) Relationship between shear velocity and SPT resistance for sandy soils in the Ganga basin. Int J Geotech Eng 7(1):63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muley P, Maheshwari BK, Kirar B (2022) Liquefaction potential of sites in Roorkee Region using SPT-Based methods. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 8(2):26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto T, Kokusho T, Yoshida Y, & Kusuonoki K (1989) Comparison of surface versus subsurface wave source for P–S logging in sand layer. In Proc. 44th Ann. Conf. JSCE (Vol. 3, pp. 996–7).

  • Panjamani AP, Ingale SG (2021) Status quo of standard penetration test in India: a review of field practices and suggestions to incorporate in Is 2131. Indian Geotech J 51:421–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahimi S, Wood CM, Wotherspoon LM (2020) Influence of soil aging on SPT-Vs correlation and seismic site classification. Eng Geol 272:105653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raptakis DG, Anastasiadis SAJ, Pitilakis KD, & Lontzetidis KS (1995) Shear wave velocities and damping of Greek natural soils. In Proc. 10th European Conf. Earthquake Engg., Vienna (Vol. 477482).

  • Romero-Ruiz A, Linde N, Keller T, Or D (2018) A review of geophysical methods for soil structure characterization. Rev Geophys 56(4):672–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykora, D. W. (1983). Correlations of in situ measurements in sands of shear wave velocity (Vs), soil characteristics, and site conditions (Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin).

  • Tuttle MP, Hartleb R, Wolf L, Mayne PW (2019) Paleoliquefaction studies and the evaluation of seismic hazard. Geosciences 9(7):311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uma Maheswari R, Boominathan A, Dodagoudar GR (2010) Use of surface waves in statistical correlations of shear wave velocity (Vs) and penetration resistance of Chennai soils. Geotech Geol Eng 28:119–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author greatly appreciates the support of Isfahan Region's Metro Company which enabled the data acquisition. We appreciate the critical reading by arbitration committee and we will be acknowledging our gratitude for enlightening suggestion and insightful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farnusch Hajizadeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No government or corporate entity has provided funding to the writers of this article. The writers of this work have no competing interests.

Additional information

Edited by Prof. Jadwiga Anna Jarzyna (ASSOCIATE EDITOR) / Prof. Gabriela Fernández Viejo (CO-EDITOR-IN-CHIEF).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chatrayi, H., Hajizadeh, F. & Taghavi, B. Shear wave velocity (Vs) and SPT resistance (N) correlation for the Isfahan Metro, Iran. Acta Geophys. 72, 1749–1764 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01180-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01180-8

Keywords

Navigation